Remove the use of the 't' length modifier to avoid a gcc warning. Based
on usage, 32 bits of precision is good enough for printing a stack
offset for a stack trace.
't' length modifier isn't in C++03 but it *is* in C++11. Added a FIXME
to reintroduce once LLVM makes the switch to C++11.
Reviewer: gribozavr
llvm-svn: 173711
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
whether or not we want to print out backtrace information. Useful
for libraries that don't need backtrace information on a crash.
rdar://11844710
llvm-svn: 164426
This is likely only the tip of the ice berg, but this particular bug
caused any double-free on a glibc system to turn into a deadlock! It is
not generally safe to either allocate or release heap memory from within
the signal handler. The 'pop_back()' in RemoveFilesToRemove was deleting
memory and causing the deadlock. What's worse, eraseFromDisk in PathV1
has lots of allocation and deallocation paths. We even passed 'true' in
a place that would have caused the *signal handler* to try to run the
'system' system call and shell out to 'rm -rf'. That was never going to
work...
This patch switches the file removal to use a vector of strings so that
the exact text needed for the 'unlink' system call can be stored there.
It switches the loop to be a boring indexed loop, and directly calls
unlink without looking at the error. It also works quite hard to ensure
that calling 'c_str()' is safe, by ensuring that the non-signal-handling
code path that manipulates the vector always leaves it in a state where
every element has already had 'c_str()' called at least once.
I dunno exactly how overkill this is, but it fixes the
deadlock-on-double free issue, and seems likely to prevent any other
issues from sneaking up.
Sorry for not having a test case, but I *really* don't know how to test
signal handling code easily....
llvm-svn: 158580
Dan Gohman