Addresses LWG 3548 which mandates that when shared_ptr is being constructed from a unique_ptr, the unique_ptr's deleter should be moved and not copied.
Reviewed By: #libc, philnik, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119159
Changes in [P0896](https://wg21.link/p0896):
- add `disable_sized_sentinel_for`;
- add `iter_move` and `iter_swap`;
- add a `requires` clause to the `operator->`;
- add `iterator_concept`;
- check that the `Iterator` template parameter is a bidirectional
iterator;
- add constraints to all comparison operators;
- change the definitions of `iterator_category`, `value_type`,
`difference_type` and `reference` (changes to `iterator_category` were
already implemented).
Also add a few forgotten things to the `reverse_iterator` synopsis
(notably the spaceship operator).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120180
This tests the same QoI issue as the existing STL Classic test,
but for the Ranges algorithms. Also, do the same thing for all
the algorithms that take projections.
I found a few missing algorithms and added them to the existing test, too. `std::find_first_of` currently fails; I should look at why that is (and in particular, what is it doing weird that //makes// it inconsistent with the entire rest of libc++?).
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121265
We've been meaning to remove support for the legacy testing configuration
for a long time. This patch switches the default from the legacy config
to the appropriate new-style configuration based on a few hints.
We've been running with the new-style configuration for more than a year
in our CI, however it's possible that this will uncover issues with some
users that run the tests on platforms that we don't support yet with the
new-style configs. Unfortunately, there is no way to know about it other
than to land this patch and see whether anything breaks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121632
This reverts commit 406d418c0c.
Our regular bots are now using clang-13. The previous set will remain
online for a while to check reviews that haven't rebased to include
this change yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121894
In the new-style testing configurations, we were hardcoding paths to the
`include` and `lib` directories, which was incorrect but always went
unnoticed because the hardcoded values always happened to match the
actual value.
When using new-style configs with the bootstrapping build, this falls
appart -- and we never noticed this because the bootstrapping build was
still using old style configs.
This patch removes the %{install} substitution, which makes it too
tempting to hardcode installation paths, and it also switches the
bootstrapping build to actually using new-style configs like we
always intended to do.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121700
In 7fb40e1569, I changed the availability for bad_optional_access and
friends from macOS 10.14 to 10.13 after conducting an investigation on
old dylibs. It turns out that macOS 10.13 did have bad_optional_access,
however the dylib on iOS didn't match the dylib on macOS, so those
exception classes were only introduced in iOS 12.
Thanks to Aditya Kumar for noticing this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121735
It's the role of the C++ ABI library to install its own headers, not libc++.
This fixes an existing issue causing spurious CI failures where both libc++
and libc++abi would try to install <cxxabi.h> & friends in the same location,
leading to failures during the installation step.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121706
This should make CI consistent on all the compilers we support. Most of
this patch is working around various warnings emitted by GCC in our code
base, which are now being shown when we compile the tests.
After this patch, the whole test suite should be warning free on all
compilers we support and test, except for a few warnings on GCC that
we silence explicitly until we figure out the proper fix for them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120684
Back in 3a208c6894, we implemented the range-based constructor for <span>.
However, in doing so, we removed a previous non-standard constructor that
we provided before shipping <ranges>. Unfortunately, that breaks code that
was relying on a range-based constructor until we ship all of <ranges>.
This patch reintroduces the old non-conforming constructors and tests
that were removed in 3a208c6894 and uses them whenever <ranges> is
not provided (e.g. in LLVM 14). This is only a temporary workaround
until we enable <ranges> by default in C++20, which should hopefully
happen by LLVM 15.
The goal is to cherry-pick this workaround back to the LLVM 14 release
branch, since I suspect the constructor removal may otherwise cause
breakage out there, like the breakage I saw internally.
We could have avoided this situation by waiting for C++20 to be finalized
before shipping std::span. For example, we could have guarded it with
something like _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_INCOMPLETE_RANGES to prevent users from
accidentally starting to depend on it before it is stable. We did not
have these mechanisms when std::span was first implemented, though.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121626
The class `__dir_stream` is currently declared in two places: as a
top-level forward declaration in `directory_iterator.h`, and as a friend
declaration in class `directory_entry`, in `directory_entry.h`.
The former has a `_LIBCPP_HIDDEN` attribute, but the latter does not,
causing the Firefox build to complain about the visibility not matching
the previous declaration. This is because Firefox plays games with
pushing and popping visibility.
Work around this by making both `__dir_stream` declarations consistently
use `_LIBCPP_HIDDEN`.
Reviewed By: ldionne, philnik, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121639
Prior to this patch, there was no distinction between tests that check
basic assertions and tests that check full-fledged iterator debugging
assertions. Both were disabled when support for the debug mode is not
provided in the dylib, which is stronger than it needs to be.
Furthermore, all of the tests using "debug_macros.h" that contain more
than one assertion in them were broken -- any code after the first
assertion would never be executed.
This patch refactors all of our assertion-related tests to:
1. Be enabled whenever they can, i.e. basic assertions tests are run
even when the debug mode is disabled.
2. Use the superior `check_assertion.h` (previously `debug_mode_helper.h`)
instead of `debug_macros.h`, which allows multiple assertions in the
same program.
3. Coalesce some tests into the same file to make them more readable.
4. Use consistent naming for test files -- no more db{1,2,3,...,10} tests.
This is a large but mostly mechanical patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121462
It turns out that the whole header is only enabled in C++20 and above,
so these checks were redundant (and always true).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121604
All supported compilers that support C++20 now support concepts. So, remove
`_LIB_LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS` in favor of `_LIBCPP_STD_VER > 17`. Similarly in
the tests, remove `// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-no-concepts`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121528
We don't need preprocessor logic to exclude those declarations when compiling for
the Windows App Store, because that is handled by using_if_exists now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108632
Instead of carrying around #ifdefs to determine whether those functions
are available on the platform, unconditionally use the using_if_exists
attribute to import it into namespace std only when available. That was
the purpose of this attribute from the start.
This change means that trying to use libc++ with an old SDK (or on an
old platform for platforms that ship system headers in /usr/include)
will require a recent Clang that supports the using_if_exists attribute.
When using an older Clang or GCC, the underlying platform has to support
a C11 standard library.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108203
As a fly-by fix, also move it closer to where it is needed, and add a
comment explaining the existence of this weird function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121231
operator-> is not a requirement for most iterators, so remove it. To
account for this change, the `common_iterator.operator->` test needs to
be refactored quite a bit -- improve test coverage while we're at it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118400
Now that we've branched for the LLVM 14 release, our support window
moves to clang-13 and clang-14. Similarly, AppleClang 13 has been
released for some time now, so that should be the oldest compiler
we support, per our policy.
A possible follow-up would be to remove _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_CONCEPTS, since
I don't think we support any compiler that doesn't support concepts
anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118831
This reverts commit 276ca873. That commit has quite a history at this
point. It was first landed in dbc647643577, which broke std::shared_ptr<T const>
and was reverted in 9138666f5. It was then re-applied in 276ca873, with
the std::shared_ptr issue fixed, but it caused widespread breakage at
Google (which suggests it would cause similar breakage in the wild too),
so now I'm reverting again.
Instead, I will add a escape hatch that vendors can turn on to enable
the extension and perform a phased transition over one or two releases
like we sometimes do when things become non-trivial.
These tests don't seem specific to the debug mode, so it makes sense to
run them even when the debug mode is disabled. When we run with the debug
mode enabled, we'll get the out-of-bounds checking that this test seems
to be concerned with.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121241
Based on review comments in D97705 applied some code cleanups in
<charconv>. The header now uses a more recent libc++ style.
Reviewed By: Quuxplusone, #libc, philnik
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121223
LIBCXX_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS does not have any relationship to the `assert`
macro -- it only controls assertions that are internal to the library.
Playing around with `NDEBUG` only muddies the picture further than it
already is.
Also, remove a failing assertion in the benchmarks. That assertion had
never been exercised because we defined `NDEBUG` manually, and it was
failing since we introduced the ability to generate a benchmark vector
with the Quicksort adversary ordering (which is obviously not sorted).
This was split off of https://llvm.org/D121123.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121244
Those older versions used a different monetary decimal separator.
To avoid unnecessary churn to support that, just XFAIL the test
on those older versions. (Up until
df1e43c496, the whole test was XFAILed
on all versions of glibc.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120979
On Windows, constants like F::alpha and F::print are bitmasks
consisting of multiple bits (e.g. F::alpha consisting of both the
bits F::upper and F::lower). In such a case, we can't check that
all the bits from all the expected constants are set. Instead,
check that (p[i] & mask) != 0 returns the expected value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120802
This extension is a portability trap for users, since no other standard
library supports it. Furthermore, the Standard explicitly allows
implementations to reject std::allocator<cv T>, so allowing it is
really going against the current.
This was discovered in D120684: this extension required `const_cast`ing
in `__construct_range_forward`, a fishy bit of code that can be removed
if we don't support the extension anymore.
This is a re-application of dbc647643577, which was reverted in 9138666f5
because it broke std::shared_ptr<T const>. Tests have now been added and
we've made sure that std::shared_ptr<T const> wouldn't be broken in this
version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120996
As a fly-by fix, enable the complexity-changing assertions in __debug_less
only when the full debug mode is enabled, since debugging level 0 is usually
understood to only contain basic assertions that do not change the complexity
of algorithms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121129
These are some checks that make sense in libc++ IMO. The checks after `#TODO: investigate these checks` are candidates, but they can't be enabled without some cleanup.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Spies: aheejin, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120925
Asher Mancinelli