This could fail, which looked concerning. However nothing was actually
using the results of this. I assume this was intended to use the
anti-feature of analyzeBranch of removing instructions, but wasn't
actually calling it with AllowModify = true.
Fixes bug 42162.
llvm-svn: 362800
lib.exe doesn't allow creating .lib files with object files that have
differing machine types. Update llvm-lib to match.
The motivation is to make it possible to infer the machine type of a
.lib file in lld, so that it can warn when e.g. a 32-bit .lib file is
passed to a 64-bit link (PR38965).
Fixes PR38782.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62913
llvm-svn: 362798
This is a potentially large perf win for AVX1 targets because of the way we
auto-vectorize to 256-bit but then expect the backend to legalize/optimize
for the half-implemented AVX1 ISA.
On the motivating example from PR37428 (even though this patch doesn't solve
the vector shift issue):
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37428
...there's a 16% speedup when compiling with "-mavx" (perf tested on Haswell)
because we eliminate the remaining 256-bit vblendv ops.
I added comments on a couple of tests that require further work. If we have
256-bit logic ops separating the vselect and extract, we should probably narrow
everything to 128-bit, but that requires a larger pattern match.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62969
llvm-svn: 362797
Branch Target Identification (BTI) and Pointer Authentication (PAC) are
architecture features introduced in v8.5a and 8.3a respectively. The new
instructions have been added in the hint space so that binaries take
advantage of support where it exists yet still run on older hardware. The
impact of each feature is:
BTI: For executable pages that have been guarded, all indirect branches
must have a destination that is a BTI instruction of the appropriate type.
For the static linker, this means that PLT entries must have a "BTI c" as
the first instruction in the sequence. BTI is an all or nothing
property for a link unit, any indirect branch not landing on a valid
destination will cause a Branch Target Exception.
PAC: The dynamic loader encodes with PACIA the address of the destination
that the PLT entry will load from the .plt.got, placing the result in a
subset of the top-bits that are not valid virtual addresses. The PLT entry
may authenticate these top-bits using the AUTIA instruction before
branching to the destination. Use of PAC in PLT sequences is a contract
between the dynamic loader and the static linker, it is independent of
whether the relocatable objects use PAC.
BTI and PAC are independent features that can be combined. So we can have
several combinations of PLT:
- Standard with no BTI or PAC
- BTI PLT with "BTI c" as first instruction.
- PAC PLT with "AUTIA1716" before the indirect branch to X17.
- BTIPAC PLT with "BTI c" as first instruction and "AUTIA1716" before the
first indirect branch to X17.
The use of BTI and PAC in relocatable object files are encoded by feature
bits in the .note.gnu.property section in a similar way to Intel CET. There
is one AArch64 specific program property GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_AND
and two target feature bits defined:
- GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_BTI
-- All executable sections are compatible with BTI.
- GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_PAC
-- All executable sections have return address signing enabled.
Due to the properties of FEATURE_1_AND the static linker can tell when all
input relocatable objects have the BTI and PAC feature bits set. The static
linker uses this to enable the appropriate PLT sequence.
Neither -> standard PLT
GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_BTI -> BTI PLT
GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_PAC -> PAC PLT
Both properties -> BTIPAC PLT
In addition to the .note.gnu.properties there are two new command line
options:
--force-bti : Act as if all relocatable inputs had
GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_BTI and warn for every relocatable object
that does not.
--pac-plt : Act as if all relocatable inputs had
GNU_PROPERTY_AARCH64_FEATURE_1_PAC. As PAC is a contract between the loader
and static linker no warning is given if it is not present in an input.
Two processor specific dynamic tags are used to communicate that a non
standard PLT sequence is being used.
DTI_AARCH64_BTI_PLT and DTI_AARCH64_BTI_PAC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62609
llvm-svn: 362793
Summary:
Add output to `llvm::errs()` when `-ftime-trace` option is enabled,
add regression test checking this option works as expected.
Reviewers: thakis, aganea
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61914
llvm-svn: 362792
Change D60691 caused some knock-on failures that weren't caught by the
existing tests. Firstly, selecting a CPU that should have had a
restricted FPU (e.g. `-mcpu=cortex-m4`, which should have 16 d-regs
and no double precision) could give the unrestricted version, because
`ARM::getFPUFeatures` returned a list of features including subtracted
ones (here `-fp64`,`-d32`), but `ARMTargetInfo::initFeatureMap` threw
away all the ones that didn't start with `+`. Secondly, the
preprocessor macros didn't reliably match the actual compilation
settings: for example, `-mfpu=softvfp` could still set `__ARM_FP` as
if hardware FP was available, because the list of features on the cc1
command line would include things like `+vfp4`,`-vfp4d16` and clang
didn't realise that one of those cancelled out the other.
I've fixed both of these issues by rewriting `ARM::getFPUFeatures` so
that it returns a list that enables every FP-related feature
compatible with the selected FPU and disables every feature not
compatible, which is more verbose but means clang doesn't have to
understand the dependency relationships between the backend features.
Meanwhile, `ARMTargetInfo::handleTargetFeatures` is testing for all
the various forms of the FP feature names, so that it won't miss cases
where it should have set `HW_FP` to feed into feature test macros.
That in turn caused an ordering problem when handling `-mcpu=foo+bar`
together with `-mfpu=something_that_turns_off_bar`. To fix that, I've
arranged that the `+bar` suffixes on the end of `-mcpu` and `-march`
cause feature names to be put into a separate vector which is
concatenated after the output of `getFPUFeatures`.
Another side effect of all this is to fix a bug where `clang -target
armv8-eabi` by itself would fail to set `__ARM_FEATURE_FMA`, even
though `armv8` (aka Arm v8-A) implies FP-Armv8 which has FMA. That was
because `HW_FP` was being set to a value including only the `FPARMV8`
bit, but that feature test macro was testing only the `VFP4FPU` bit.
Now `HW_FP` ends up with all the bits set, so it gives the right
answer.
Changes to tests included in this patch:
* `arm-target-features.c`: I had to change basically all the expected
results. (The Cortex-M4 test in there should function as a
regression test for the accidental double-precision bug.)
* `arm-mfpu.c`, `armv8.1m.main.c`: switched to using `CHECK-DAG`
everywhere so that those tests are no longer sensitive to the order
of cc1 feature options on the command line.
* `arm-acle-6.5.c`: been updated to expect the right answer to that
FMA test.
* `Preprocessor/arm-target-features.c`: added a regression test for
the `mfpu=softvfp` issue.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, dmgreen, ostannard, samparker, JamesNagurne
Reviewed By: ostannard
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62998
llvm-svn: 362791
Summary:
This allows some integer bitwise operations to instead be performed by
hardware fp instructions. This is correct because the RISC-V spec
requires the F and D extensions to use the IEEE-754 standard
representation, and fp register loads and stores to be bit-preserving.
This is tested against the soft-float ABI, but with hardware float
extensions enabled, so that the tests also ensure the optimisation also
fires in this case.
Reviewers: asb, luismarques
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, jrtc27, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62900
llvm-svn: 362790
It was added by D46654 but is actually never used.
R_PPC64_CALL_PLT (was: R_PPC_CALL_PLT) is a static link-time constant.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62994
llvm-svn: 362788
These builtins should work with immediate or variable shift operand for
gcc compatibility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62850
llvm-svn: 362786
Summary:
- when a method is not available because of the target value kind (e.g. an &&
method on a Foo& variable), then don't offer it.
- when a method is effectively shadowed by another method from the same class
with a) an identical argument list and b) superior qualifiers, then don't
offer it.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62582
llvm-svn: 362785
Summary:
The DWARFCompileUnit is set as the "user data" of the lldb compile unit
directly in the constructor (see ParseCompileUnit).
This means that instead of going through unit indexes, we can just fetch
the DWARF unit directly from there.
Reviewers: clayborg, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: aprantl, jdoerfert, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62943
llvm-svn: 362783
Summary:
This patch fixes a bug in the assembler that permitted a type suffix on
predicate registers when not expected. For instance, the following was
previously valid:
faddv h0, p0.q, z1.h
This bug was present in all SVE instructions containing predicates with
no type suffix and no predication form qualifier, i.e. /z or /m. The
latter instructions are already caught with an appropiate error message
by the assembler, e.g.:
.text
<stdin>:1:13: error: not expecting size suffix
cmpne p1.s, p0.b/z, z2.s, 0
^
A similar issue for SVE vector registers was fixed in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59636
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62942
llvm-svn: 362780
This is https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42122.
If an object file has a size less than program header's file [offset + size]
(i.e. if we have overflow), llvm-objcopy crashes instead of reporting a
error.
The patch fixes this issue.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62898
llvm-svn: 362778
This is a refactoring follow-up for D62809
"Change how we handle implicit sections.".
It allows to simplify the code.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62912
llvm-svn: 362777
Patch which introduces a target-independent framework for generating
hardware loops at the IR level. Most of the code has been taken from
PowerPC CTRLoops and PowerPC has been ported over to use this generic
pass. The target dependent parts have been moved into
TargetTransformInfo, via isHardwareLoopProfitable, with
HardwareLoopInfo introduced to transfer information from the backend.
Three generic intrinsics have been introduced:
- void @llvm.set_loop_iterations
Takes as a single operand, the number of iterations to be executed.
- i1 @llvm.loop_decrement(anyint)
Takes the maximum number of elements processed in an iteration of
the loop body and subtracts this from the total count. Returns
false when the loop should exit.
- anyint @llvm.loop_decrement_reg(anyint, anyint)
Takes the number of elements remaining to be processed as well as
the maximum numbe of elements processed in an iteration of the loop
body. Returns the updated number of elements remaining.
llvm-svn: 362774
In r356860, the legalization logic for BSWAP was modified to ISD::ROTL,
rather than the old ISD::{SHL, SRL, OR} nodes.
This works fine on AVR for 8-bit rotations, but 16-bit rotations are
currently unimplemented - they always trigger an assertion error in the
AVRExpandPseudoInsts pass ("RORW unimplemented").
This patch instructions the legalizer to expand 16-bit rotations into
the previous SHL, SRL, OR pattern it did previously.
This fixes the 'issue-cannot-select-bswap.ll' test. Interestingly, this
test failure seems flaky - it passes successfully on the avr-build-01
buildbot, but fails locally on my Arch Linux install.
llvm-svn: 362773
When a function is excluded via comdat we shouldn't add it to the
final list of init functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62983
llvm-svn: 362769
We should keep the symbol type (STT_GNU_IFUNC) for a local ifunc because
it may result in an IRELATIVE reloc that the dynamic loader will use to
resolve the address at startup time.
There is another problem that is not fixed by this patch: a PC relative
relocation should also create a relocation with the ifunc symbol.
llvm-svn: 362767
Use the PPC vector min/max instructions for computing the corresponding
operation as these should be faster than the compare/select sequences
we currently emit.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47332
llvm-svn: 362759
to try and fix android buildbot. Also make sure that the empty dummy
test contains an output file name so the android_build.py wrapper script
doesn't check fail.
llvm-svn: 362758
most / all other Expr subclasses.
This reinstates r362551, reverted in r362597, with a fix to a bug that
caused MemberExprs to sometimes have a null FoundDecl after a round-trip
through an AST file.
llvm-svn: 362756
SIInsertSkips really doesn't understand the control flow, and makes
very stupid assumptions about the block layout. This was able to get
away with not skipping return blocks, since usually after
structurization there is only one placed at the end of the
function. Tail duplication can break this assumption.
llvm-svn: 362754
Incorrect Debug Variable Range was calculated while "COMPUTING LIVE DEBUG VARIABLES" stage.
Range for Debug Variable("i") computed according to current state of instructions
inside of basic block. But Register Allocator creates new instructions which were not taken
into account when Live Debug Variables computed. In the result DBG_VALUE instruction for
the "i" variable was put after these newly inserted instructions. This is incorrect.
Debug Value for the loop counter should be inserted before any loop instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62650
llvm-svn: 362750
Stefan Stipanovic