When reusing a register for a new definition, the fast register allocator
used to insert a kill flag at the previous last use of that register to
inform later passes that this register is free between the redef and the
last use. However, this may be wrong when subregisters are involved.
Indeed, a partially redef would have trigger a kill of the full super
register, potentially wrongly marking all the other subregisters as
free. Given we don't track which lanes are still live, we cannot set the
kill flag in such case.
Note: This bug has been latent for about 7 years (r104056).
llvmg.org/PR33677
llvm-svn: 307428
Some platforms require an explicit specialization of std::hash
for PdbRaw_FeaturesSig. Also a test involving case sensitivity
needed to be fixed. For now that particular check just accepts
any path even if they're completely different. Long term we
should output paths in the correct case to match MSVC.
llvm-svn: 307426
Without this we would just append whatever the user
wrote on the command line, so if we're in C:\foo
and we run lld-link bar/baz.obj, we would write
C:\foo\bar/baz.obj in various places in the PDB.
MSVC linker does not do this, so we shouldn't either.
This fixes some differences in the diff test, so we
update the test as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35092
llvm-svn: 307423
A couple of things were different about our generated PDBs.
1) We were outputting the wrong Version on the PDB Stream.
The version we were setting was newer than what MSVC is setting.
It's not clear what the implications are, but we change LLD
to use PdbImplVC70, as MSVC does.
2) For the optional debug stream indices in the DBI Stream, we
were outputting 0 to mean "the stream is not present". MSVC
outputs uint16_t(-1), which is the "correct" way to specify
that a stream is not present. So we fix that as well.
3) We were setting the PDB Stream signature to 0. This is supposed
to be the result of calling time(nullptr). Although this leads
to non-deterministic builds, a better way to solve that is by
having a command line option explicitly for generating a
reproducible build, and have the default behavior of lld-link
match the default behavior of link.
To test this, I'm making use of the new and improved `pdb diff`
sub command. To make it suitable for writing tests against, I had
to modify the diff subcommand slightly to print less verbose output.
Previously it would always print | <column> | <value1> | <value2> |
which is quite verbose, and the values are fragile. All we really
want to know is "did we produce the same value as link?" So I added
command line options to print a single character representing the
result status (different, identical, equivalent), and another to
hide the value display. Note that just inspecting the diff output
used to write the test, you can see some things that are obviously
wrong. That is just reflective of the fact that this is the state
of affairs today, not that we're asserting that this is "correct".
We can use this as a starting point to discover differences, fix
them, and update the test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35086
llvm-svn: 307422
We're getting to the point that some MS tools (e.g. DIA) can recognize
our PDBs but others (e.g. link.exe) cannot. I think the way forward is
to improve our tooling to help us find differences more easily. For
example, if we can compile the same program with clang-cl and cl and
have a tool tell us all the places where the PDBs differ, this could
tell us what we're doing wrong. It's tricky though, because there are a
lot of "benign" differences in a PDB. For example, if the string table
in one PDB consists of "foo" followed by "bar" and in the other PDB it
consists of "bar" followed by "foo", this is not necessarily a critical
difference, as long as the uses of these strings also refer to the
correct location. On the other hand, if the second PDB doesn't even
contain the string "foo" at all, this is a critical difference.
diff mode has been in llvm-pdbutil for quite a while, but because of the
above challenge along with some others, it's been hard to make it
useful. I think this patch addresses that. It looks for all the same
things, but it now prints the output in tabular format (carefully
formatted and aligned into tables and fields), and it highlights
critical differences in red, non-critical differences in yellow, and
identical fields in green. This makes it easy to spot the places we
differ, and the general concept of outputting arbitrary fields in
tabular format can be extended to provide analysis into many of the
different types of information that show up in a PDB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35039
llvm-svn: 307421
Summary:
This is an addon to the change rl304488 cloning fixes. (Originally rl304226 reverted rl304228 and reapplied rl304488 https://reviews.llvm.org/D33655)
rl304488 works great when DILocalVariables that comes from the inlined function has a 'unique-ed' type, but,
in the case when the variable type is distinct we will create a second DILocalVariable in the scope of the original function that was inlined.
Consider cloning of the following function:
```
define private void @f() !dbg !5 {
%1 = alloca i32, !dbg !11
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %1, metadata !14, metadata !12), !dbg !18
ret void, !dbg !18
}
!14 = !DILocalVariable(name: "inlined", scope: !15, file: !6, line: 5, type: !17) ; came from an inlined function
!15 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "inlined", linkageName: "inlined", scope: null, file: !6, line: 8, type: !7, isLocal: true, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 9, isOptimized: false, unit: !0, variables: !16)
!16 = !{!14}
!17 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "some_struct", size: 32, align: 32)
```
Without this fix, when function 'f' is cloned, we will create another DILocalVariable for "inlined", due to its type being distinct.
```
define private void @f.1() !dbg !23 {
%1 = alloca i32, !dbg !26
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(metadata i32* %1, metadata !28, metadata !12), !dbg !30
ret void, !dbg !30
}
!14 = !DILocalVariable(name: "inlined", scope: !15, file: !6, line: 5, type: !17)
!15 = distinct !DISubprogram(name: "inlined", linkageName: "inlined", scope: null, file: !6, line: 8, type: !7, isLocal: true, isDefinition: true, scopeLine: 9, isOptimized: false, unit: !0, variables: !16)
!16 = !{!14}
!17 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "some_struct", size: 32, align: 32)
;
!28 = !DILocalVariable(name: "inlined", scope: !15, file: !6, line: 5, type: !29) ; OOPS second DILocalVariable
!29 = distinct !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "some_struct", size: 32, align: 32)
```
Now we have two DILocalVariable for "inlined" within the same scope. This result in assert in AsmPrinter/DwarfDebug.h:131: void llvm::DbgVariable::addMMIEntry(const llvm::DbgVariable &): Assertion `V.Var == Var && "conflicting variable"' failed.
(Full example: See: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33492)
In this change we prevent duplication of types so that when a metadata for DILocalVariable is cloned it will get uniqued to the same metadate node as an original variable.
Reviewers: loladiro, dblaikie, aprantl, echristo
Reviewed By: loladiro
Subscribers: EricWF, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35106
llvm-svn: 307418
Minor refactoring to use the preexisting loop exit that's already
calculated. We do not need to recompute the loop exit in ConnectProlog.
Apart from avoiding redundant computation, this is required for
supporting multiple loop exits when Prolog remainder loops are generated.
llvm-svn: 307417
r306334 fixed a bug in AArch64 dealing with wide interleaved accesses having
pointer types. The bug also exists in ARM, so this patch copies over the fix.
llvm-svn: 307409
x86 scalar select-of-constants (Cond ? C1 : C2) combining/lowering is a mess
with missing optimizations. We handle some patterns, but miss logical variants.
To clean that up, we should convert all select-of-constants to logic/math and
enhance the combining for the expected patterns from that. DAGCombiner already
has the foundation to allow the transforms, so we just need to fill in the holes
for x86 math op lowering. Selecting 0 or -1 needs extra attention to produce the
optimal code as shown here.
Attempt to verify that all of these IR forms are logically equivalent:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/plxs
Earlier steps in this series:
rL306040
rL306072
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34652
llvm-svn: 307404
Prior to this commit both of the added test cases were passing. However, in the
latter case (test7) we were doing a lot more work to arrive at the same answer
(i.e., we were using isImpliedCondMatchingOperands() to determine the
implication.).
llvm-svn: 307400
Today the safepoint IR verifier catches some unrelocated uses of base
pointers that are actually valid.
With this change, we narrow down the set of false positives.
Specifically, the verifier knows about compares to null and compares
between 2 unrelocated pointers.
Reviewed by: skatkov
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35057
llvm-svn: 307392
Summary:
This change gives a 0.89% speed on execution time, a 0.94% improvement
in benchmark scores and a 0.62% increase in binary size on a Cortex-A57.
These numbers are the geomean results on a wide range of benchmarks from
the test-suite, SPEC2000, SPEC2006 and a range of proprietary suites.
The software optimization guide for the Cortex-A57 recommends 16 byte
branch alignment.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, mcrosier, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, sbaranga
Reviewed By: kristof.beyls
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34954
llvm-svn: 307389
Summary:
This change gives a 0.34% speed on execution time, a 0.61% improvement
in benchmark scores and a 0.57% increase in binary size on a Cortex-A72.
These numbers are the geomean results on a wide range of benchmarks from
the test-suite, SPEC2000, SPEC2006 and a range of proprietary suites.
The software optimization guide for the Cortex-A72 recommends 16 byte
branch alignment.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, kristof.beyls, rengolin, sbaranga, mcrosier, javed.absar
Reviewed By: kristof.beyls
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aemerson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34961
llvm-svn: 307380
the system's version of macOS
sys::getProcessTriple returns LLVM_HOST_TRIPLE, whose system version might not
be the actual version of the system on which the compiler running. This commit
ensures that, for macOS, sys::getProcessTriple returns a triple with the
system's macOS version.
rdar://33177551
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34446
llvm-svn: 307372
We lower to a sequence consisting of:
- MOVi 0 into a register
- VCMPS to do the actual comparison and set the VFP flags
- FMSTAT to move the flags out of the VFP unit
- MOVCCi to either use the "zero register" that we have previously set
with the MOVi, or move 1 into the result register, based on the values
of the flags
As was the case with soft-float, for some predicates (one, ueq) we
actually need two comparisons instead of just one. When that happens, we
generate two VCMPS-FMSTAT-MOVCCi sequences and chain them by means of
using the result of the first MOVCCi as the "zero register" for the
second one. This is a bit overkill, since one comparison followed by
two non-flag-setting conditional moves should be enough. In any case,
the backend manages to CSE one of the comparisons away so it doesn't
matter much.
Note that unlike SelectionDAG and FastISel, we always use VCMPS, and not
VCMPES. This makes the code a lot simpler, and it also seems correct
since the LLVM Lang Ref defines simple true/false returns if the
operands are QNaN's. For SNaN's, even VCMPS throws an Invalid Operand
exception, so they won't be slipping through unnoticed.
Implementation-wise, this introduces a template so we can share the same
code that we use for handling integer comparisons, since the only
differences are in the details (exact opcodes to be used etc). Hopefully
this will be easy to extend to s64 G_FCMP.
llvm-svn: 307365
Some of our emitters were using the name of the Target to reference things that were created by others emitters using Namespace.
Apparently all targets have the same Target name as their instruction and register Namespace field?
Someone on IRC had a target that didn't do this and was getting build errors. This patch is a necessary, but maybe not sufficient fix.
llvm-svn: 307358
Based strictly on the name, this seems to have something to do
width edit & continue. The goal of this patch has nothing to do
with supporting edit and continue though. msvc link.exe writes
very basic information into this area even when *not* compiling
with support for E&C, and so the goal here is to bring lld-link
to parity. Since we cannot know what assumptions standard tools
make about the content of PDB files, we need to be as close as
possible.
This ECNames data structure is a standard PDB string hash table.
link.exe puts a single string into this hash table, which is the
full path to the PDB file on disk. It then references this string
from the module descriptor for the compiler generated `* Linker *`
module.
With this patch, lld-link will generate the exact same sequence of
bytes as MSVC link for this subsection for a given object file
input (as reported by `llvm-pdbutil bytes -ec`).
llvm-svn: 307356
Craig Topper