Much to my surprise, '-disable-llvm-optzns' which I thought was the
magical flag I wanted to get at the raw LLVM IR coming out of Clang
deosn't do that. It still runs some passes over the IR. I don't want
that, I really want the *raw* IR coming out of Clang and I strongly
suspect everyone else using it is in the same camp.
There is actually a flag that does what I want that I didn't know about
called '-disable-llvm-passes'. I suspect many others don't know about it
either. It both does what I want and is much simpler.
This removes the confusing version and makes that spelling of the flag
an alias for '-disable-llvm-passes'. I've also moved everything in Clang
to use the 'passes' spelling as it seems both more accurate (*all* LLVM
passes are disabled, not just optimizations) and much easier to remember
and spell correctly.
This is part of simplifying how Clang drives LLVM to make it cleaner to
wire up to the new pass manager.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28047
llvm-svn: 290392
There was linker problem, and it turns out that it is not always safe
to refer to vtable. If the vtable is used, then we can refer to it
without any problem, but because we don't know when it will be used or
not, we can only check if vtable is external or it is safe to to emit it
speculativly (when class it doesn't have any inline virtual functions).
It should be fixed in the future.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12385
llvm-svn: 246214
Summary:
A reference temporary should inherit the linkage of the variable it
initializes. Otherwise, we may hit cases where a reference temporary
wouldn't have the same value in all translation units.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3515
llvm-svn: 207451
implicitly instantiable, even if we don't see a body on the friend
function declaration. The body may simply have not yet been attached.
This fixes PR10666.
There may be an alternate, preferred implementation strategy, see my
FIXME. Review would definitely be appreciated Doug. =D
llvm-svn: 137934
within class templates when they are necessary to complete the type of
the member. The canonical example is code like:
template <typename T> struct S {
static const int arr[];
static const int x;
static int f();
};
template <typename T> const int S<T>::arr[] = { 1, 2, 3 };
template <typename T> const int S<T>::x = sizeof(arr) / sizeof(arr[0]);
template <typename T> int S<T>::f() { return x; }
int x = S<int>::f();
We need to instantiate S<T>::arr's definition to pick up its initializer
and complete the array type. This involves new code to specially handle
completing the type of an expression where the type alone is
insufficient. It also requires *updating* the expression with the newly
completed type. Fortunately, all the other infrastructure is already in
Clang to do the instantiation, do the completion, and prune out the
unused bits of code that result from this instantiation.
This addresses the initial bug in PR10001, and will be a step to
fleshing out other cases where we need to work harder to complete an
expression's type. Who knew we still had missing C++03 "features"?
llvm-svn: 132172
e.g. for:
template <int i> class A {
class B *g;
};
'class B' has the template as lexical context but semantically it is
introduced in namespace scope.
Fixes rdar://8611125 & http://llvm.org/PR8505
llvm-svn: 118235
by marking the decl invalid isn't. Make some steps towards supporting these
and then hastily shut them down at the last second by marking them as
unsupported.
llvm-svn: 116661
at -O0. The only change from the previous patch is that we don't try
to generate virtual method thunks for an available_externally
function.
llvm-svn: 108230
-O0, since we won't be using the definitions for anything anyway. For
lib/System/Path.o when built in Debug+Asserts mode, this leads to a 4%
improvement in compile time (and suppresses 440 function bodies).
<rdar://problem/7987644>
llvm-svn: 108156
Remove -faccess-control from -cc1; add -fno-access-control.
Make the driver pass -fno-access-control by default.
Update a bunch of tests to be correct under access control.
llvm-svn: 100880
implicit methods on explicit template instantiation definitions. As a
consequence, we should emit them at every use, even if we see a explicit
template instantiation declaration.
This is already the current behaviour, but it is good to test for that :-)
llvm-svn: 99443
Charles Li