The SchedModel allows the addition of ReadAdvances to express that certain
operands of the instructions are needed at a later point than the others.
RegAlloc may add pseudo operands that are not part of the instruction
descriptor, and therefore cannot have any read advance entries. This meant
that in some cases the desired read advance was nullified by such a pseudo
operand, which still had the original latency.
This patch fixes this by making sure that such pseudo operands get a zero
latency during DAG construction.
Review: Matthias Braun, Ulrich Weigand.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49671
llvm-svn: 345606
Summary:
Also explicitly port over some tests in llvm.amdgcn.image.* that were
missing. Some tests are removed because they no longer apply (i.e.
explicitly testing building an address vector via insertelement).
This is in preparation for the eventual removal of the old-style
intrinsics.
Some additional notes:
- constant-address-space-32bit.ll: change some GCN-NEXT to GCN because
the instruction schedule was subtly altered
- insert_vector_elt.ll: the old test didn't actually test anything,
because %tmp1 was not used; remove the load, because it doesn't work
(Because of the amdgpu_ps calling convention? In any case, it's
orthogonal to what the test claims to be testing.)
Change-Id: Idfa99b6512ad139e755e82b8b89548ab08f0afcf
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48018
llvm-svn: 335229
Currently the default C calling convention functions are treated
the same as compute kernels. Make this explicit so the default
calling convention can be changed to a non-kernel.
Converted with perl -pi -e 's/define void/define amdgpu_kernel void/'
on the relevant test directories (and undoing in one place that actually
wanted a non-kernel).
llvm-svn: 298444
In this situation:
%VGPR2<def> = BUFFER_LOAD_DWORD_OFFSET %SGPR8_SGPR9_SGPR10_SGPR11,
%VGPR7<def,tied3> = V_MAC_F32_e32 %VGPR0<undef>, %VGPR1<kill>, %VGPR7<kill,tied0>, %EXEC<imp-use>
%VGPR3_VGPR4_VGPR5_VGPR6<def> = COPY %VGPR0_VGPR1_VGPR2_VGPR3
%VGPR4<def> = COPY %VGPR2
The copy for VGPR1 -> VGPR4 was an error from reading undefined VGPR1,
but VGPR4 is defined immediately after this copy.
llvm-svn: 275635
It is fine for subregister ranges to be undefined on some CFG paths as
we may have a "vregX:other_subreg<read-undef> =" def on that path. We
do not (and should not) have live segments for the subregister ranges.
The MachineVerifier should not complain about this.
This is a slight variant of http://llvm.org/PR27705
llvm-svn: 270290
Simon Pilgrim