To determine the list of clobbered registers, the RegUsageInfoCollector pass
uses the list of callee saved registers provided by the target and then augments
it with the list of registers which have all their subregisters saved. It then
basically does the difference between all the registers and the saved registers
to come up with what is clobbered (plus it checks that the register is defined
within that functions).
The patch fixes a bug where when register does not have any subregister lane,
hence when checking if any of its subregister are not saved, we would find none
and think the register is saved as well.
That's obviously wrong.
The code was actually kind of checking for something like that with the
CoveredBySubRegs bit. What this bit says is that a register is completely
covered by its subregisters.
We required that this bit was set, to check that a register was saved by its
subregister lanes, since without this bit, we potentially would miss to check
some part of the register.
However, this bit is used de facto on registers that don't have any
subregisters (e.g., on ARM) and the code was not prepared for that.
This patch fixes this by checking that a register has subregisters before
declaring it saved when none of its lanes are modified.
llvm-svn: 361901
Add support for selecting FCMPSri and FCMPDri when comparing against 0.0, and
factor out opcode selection for G_FCMP into its own function.
Add a test to show that we don't do this with other immediates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62539
llvm-svn: 361888
Summary:
This adds support for translation of LLVM IR fence instruction. We
convert a singlethread fence to a pseudo compiler barrier which becomes
0 instructions in final binary, and a thread fence to an idempotent
atomicrmw instruction to a memory address.
Reviewers: dschuff, jfb, sunfish, tlively
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50277
llvm-svn: 361884
This patch optimizes ISD::LRINT and ISD::LLRINT to frintx plus
fcvtzs. It currently only handles the scalar version.
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer, mstorsjo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62018
llvm-svn: 361877
This patch add the ISD::LRINT and ISD::LLRINT along with new
intrinsics. The changes are straightforward as for other
floating-point rounding functions, with just some adjustments
required to handle the return value being an interger.
The idea is to optimize lrint/llrint generation for AArch64
in a subsequent patch. Current semantic is just route it to libm
symbol.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62017
llvm-svn: 361875
Summary:
Again only vectors affected. Frustrating. Let me take a look into that..
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/AAq
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361856, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62294
llvm-svn: 361874
Summary:
This prevents regressions in next patch,
and somewhat recovers from the regression to AMDGPU test in D62223.
It is indeed not great that we leave vector decrement,
don't transform it into vector add all-ones..
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ZRl
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361855, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: RKSimon, arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, javed.absar, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62263
llvm-svn: 361873
Summary:
Direct sibling of D62223 patch.
While i don't have a direct motivational pattern for this,
it would seem to make sense to handle both patterns (or none),
for symmetry?
The aarch64 changes look neutral;
sparc and systemz look like improvement (one less instruction each);
x86 changes - 32bit case improves, 64bit case shows that LEA no longer
gets constructed, which may be because that whole test is `-mattr=+slow-lea,+slow-3ops-lea`
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ffh
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361853, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs.
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Subscribers: t.p.northover, jyknight, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62252
llvm-svn: 361872
Summary:
The main motivation is shown by all these `neg` instructions that are now created.
In particular, the `@reg32_lshr_by_negated_unfolded_sub_b` test.
AArch64 test changes all look good (`neg` created), or neutral.
X86 changes look neutral (vectors), or good (`neg` / `xor eax, eax` created).
I'm not sure about `X86/ragreedy-hoist-spill.ll`, it looks like the spill
is now hoisted into preheader (which should still be good?),
2 4-byte reloads become 1 8-byte reload, and are elsewhere,
but i'm not sure how that affects that loop.
I'm unable to interpret AMDGPU change, looks neutral-ish?
This is hopefully a step towards solving [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41952 | PR41952 ]].
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/pkdq (we are missing more patterns, i'll submit them later)
This is a recommit, originally committed in rL361852, but reverted
to investigate test-suite compile-time hangs.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: bjope, qcolombet, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, javed.absar, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62223
llvm-svn: 361871
Summary:
- There's a regression due to the cross-block RC assignment. Use the
proper way to derive the output register RC in inline asm.
Reviewers: rampitec, alex-t
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits, yaxunl
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62537
llvm-svn: 361868
Summary:
Again only vectors affected. Frustrating. Let me take a look into that..
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/AAq
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, JDevlieghere, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62294
llvm-svn: 361856
Summary:
This prevents regressions in next patch,
and somewhat recovers from the regression to AMDGPU test in D62223.
It is indeed not great that we leave vector decrement,
don't transform it into vector add all-ones..
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ZRl
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: RKSimon, arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, javed.absar, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62263
llvm-svn: 361855
Summary:
Only vector tests are being affected here,
since subtraction by scalar constant is rewritten
as addition by negated constant.
No surprising test changes.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/pbT
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62257
llvm-svn: 361854
Summary:
Direct sibling of D62223 patch.
While i don't have a direct motivational pattern for this,
it would seem to make sense to handle both patterns (or none),
for symmetry?
The aarch64 changes look neutral;
sparc and systemz look like improvement (one less instruction each);
x86 changes - 32bit case improves, 64bit case shows that LEA no longer
gets constructed, which may be because that whole test is `-mattr=+slow-lea,+slow-3ops-lea`
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ffh
Reviewers: RKSimon, craig.topper, spatel, t.p.northover
Reviewed By: t.p.northover
Subscribers: t.p.northover, jyknight, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, fedor.sergeev, jrtc27, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62252
llvm-svn: 361853
Summary:
The main motivation is shown by all these `neg` instructions that are now created.
In particular, the `@reg32_lshr_by_negated_unfolded_sub_b` test.
AArch64 test changes all look good (`neg` created), or neutral.
X86 changes look neutral (vectors), or good (`neg` / `xor eax, eax` created).
I'm not sure about `X86/ragreedy-hoist-spill.ll`, it looks like the spill
is now hoisted into preheader (which should still be good?),
2 4-byte reloads become 1 8-byte reload, and are elsewhere,
but i'm not sure how that affects that loop.
I'm unable to interpret AMDGPU change, looks neutral-ish?
This is hopefully a step towards solving [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41952 | PR41952 ]].
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/pkdq (we are missing more patterns, i'll submit them later)
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: bjope, qcolombet, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, javed.absar, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62223
llvm-svn: 361852
If the only VGPRs used for SGPR spilling were not CSRs, this was
enabling all laness and immediately restoring exec. This is the usual
situation in leaf functions.
llvm-svn: 361848
Summary:
- Don't treat the use of a scalar register as `vreg_1` an VGPR usage.
Otherwise, that promotes that scalar register into vector one, which
breaks the assumption that scalar register holds the lane mask.
- The issue is triggered in a complicated case, where if the uses of
that (lane mask) scalar register is legalized firstly before its
definition, e.g., due to the mismatch block placement and its
topological order or loop. In that cases, the legalization of PHI
introduces the use of that scalar register as `vreg_1`.
Reviewers: rampitec, nhaehnle, arsenm, alex-t
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits, yaxunl
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62492
llvm-svn: 361847
Those two subtarget features were awkward because their semantics are
reversed: each one indicates the _lack_ of support for something in
the architecture, rather than the presence. As a consequence, you
don't get the behavior you want if you combine two sets of feature
bits.
Each SubtargetFeature for an FP architecture version now comes in four
versions, one for each combination of those options. So you can still
say (for example) '+vfp2' in a feature string and it will mean what
it's always meant, but there's a new string '+vfp2d16sp' meaning the
version without those extra options.
A lot of this change is just mechanically replacing positive checks
for the old features with negative checks for the new ones. But one
more interesting change is that I've rearranged getFPUFeatures() so
that the main FPU feature is appended to the output list *before*
rather than after the features derived from the Restriction field, so
that -fp64 and -d32 can override defaults added by the main feature.
Reviewers: dmgreen, samparker, SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: srhines, javed.absar, eraman, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, zzheng, Petar.Avramovic, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60691
llvm-svn: 361845
If we don't have VLX then 256-bit SET0 should be lowered
to VPXOR with ZMM registers. This restores functionality
accidentally removed by r309926.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62415
llvm-svn: 361843
This shows up as a side issue to the main problem for the AVX target example from PR37428:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37428 - https://godbolt.org/z/7tpRa3
But as we can see in the pile of existing test diffs, it's actually a widespread problem
that affects any AVX or later target. Apart from a couple of oddballs, I think these are
all improvements for the reasons stated in the code comment: we do not want to enable YMM
unnecessarily (avoid vzeroupper and frequency throttling) and some cores split 256-bit
stores anyway.
We could say that MergeConsecutiveStores() is going overboard on some of these examples,
but that won't solve the problem completely. But that is the reason I'm proposing this as
a lowering rather than a combine: we will infinite loop fighting the merge code if we try
this earlier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62498
llvm-svn: 361822
Forking this out of the discussion in D62498
(and assuming that will be committed later, so adding the helper function here).
The LangRef says:
"the backend should never split or merge target-legal volatile load/store instructions."
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62506
llvm-svn: 361815
This was reverted in r360086 as it was supected of causing mysterious test
failures internally. However, it was never concluded that this patch was the
root cause.
> The code was previously checking that candidates for sinking had exactly
> one use or were a store instruction (which can't have uses). This meant
> we could sink call instructions only if they had a use.
>
> That limitation seemed a bit arbitrary, so this patch changes it to
> "instruction has zero or one use" which seems more natural and removes
> the need to special-case stores.
>
> Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59936
llvm-svn: 361811
Setting mayLiveOut based only on use instructions after allocating the
def block did not work if the use block was allocated before the def
block, since the virtual register uses were already removed.
Fixes bug 41973.
llvm-svn: 361781
Summary:
- The current implementation simplifies the case where the source of
`copyto` is `implicit-def`ed. However, it only works when that
`implicit-def` is single-used since it detects that from
`implicit-def` and cannot determine which destination vreg should be
used if there are multiple uses.
- This patch changes that detection when `copyto` is being emitted. If
that `copyto`'s source is defined from `implicit-def`, it simplifies
it. Hence, it works even that `implicit-def` is multi-used.
- Except it simplifies the internal IR, it won't improve the quality of
code generation. However, it helps to detect 'implicit-def` in a
straight-forward manner in some passes, such as `si-i1-copies`. A test
case is added.
Reviewers: sunfish, nhaehnle
Subscribers: jvesely, hiraditya, asbirlea, llvm-commits, yaxunl
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62342
llvm-svn: 361777
This is problematic on buildbots, as discussed here: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL361356
It seems like the plan already was to revert, but that hasn't happened yet.
llvm-svn: 361746
The variables in BTF DataSec type encode in-section offset.
R_BPF_NONE should be generated instead of R_BPF_64_32.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62460
llvm-svn: 361742
Details: To make instruction selection really divergence driven it is necessary to assign
the correct register classes to the cross block values beforehand. For the divergent targets
same value type requires different register classes dependent on the value divergence.
Reviewers: rampitec, nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59990
This commit was reverted because of the build failure.
The reason was mlformed patch.
Build failure fixed.
llvm-svn: 361741
This add patterns for fp16 round and ceil etc. Same as the float and double
patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62326
llvm-svn: 361718
Promote a number of fp16 math intrinsics to float, so that the relevant float
math routines can be used. Copysign is expanded so as to be handled in-place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62325
llvm-svn: 361717
We were only testing for direct SETCC results - this allows us to peek through AND/OR/XOR combinations of the comparison results as well.
There's a missing SEXT(PACKSS) fold that I need to investigate for v8i1 cases before I can enable it there as well.
llvm-svn: 361716
Simon Atanasyan