Summary:
This patch separates the peeling specific parameters from the UnrollingPreferences,
and creates a new struct called PeelingPreferences. Functions which used the
UnrollingPreferences struct for peeling have been updated to use the PeelingPreferences struct.
Author: sidbav (Sidharth Baveja)
Reviewers: Whitney (Whitney Tsang), Meinersbur (Michael Kruse), skatkov (Serguei Katkov), ashlykov (Arkady Shlykov), bogner (Justin Bogner), hfinkel (Hal Finkel), anhtuyen (Anh Tuyen Tran), nikic (Nikita Popov)
Reviewed By: Meinersbur (Michael Kruse)
Subscribers: fhahn (Florian Hahn), hiraditya (Aditya Kumar), llvm-commits, LLVM
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80580
There appears to be some kind of memory corruption/use-after-free/etc
going on here. In particular, in `OpenMPOpt::deleteParallelRegions()`,
in `DeleteCallCB()`, `CI` is garbage.
WIll post reproducer in the original review.
This reverts commit 6c4a5e9257.
This relands commit cd7f8051ac that was
reverted since lower threshold have successfully found an issue.
Now that the issue is fixed, let's wait until the next one is reported.
This reverts commit caa423eef0.
We can happen to have a situation with many stores eligible for transform,
but due to our visitation order (top to bottom), when we have processed
the first eligible instruction, we would not try to reprocess the previous
instructions that are now also eligible.
So after we've successfully merged a store that was second-to-last instruction
into successor, if the now-second-to-last instruction is also a such store
that is eligible, add it to worklist to be revisited.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46661
Currently the DomTree is not kept up to date for additional blocks
generated in the vector loop, for example when vectorizing with
predication. SCEVExpander relies on dominance checks when looking for
existing instructions to re-use and in some cases that can lead to the
expander picking instructions that do not actually dominate their insert
point (e.g. as in PR46525).
Unfortunately keeping the DT up-to-date is a bit tricky, because the CFG
is only patched up after generating code for a block. For now, we can
just use the vector loop header, as this ensures the inserted
instructions dominate all uses in the vector loop. There should be no
noticeable impact on the generated code, as other passes should sink
those instructions, if profitable.
Fixes PR46525.
Reviewers: Ayal, gilr, mkazantsev, dmgreen
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83288
Summary: This allows to convert any SExt to a ZExt when we know none of the extended bits are used, specially in cases where there are multiple uses of the value.
Reviewers: dmgreen, eli.friedman, spatel, lebedev.ri, nikic
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri, nikic
Subscribers: hiraditya, dmgreen, craig.topper, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60413
Summary: This patch moves OrderedInstructions to CodeMoverUtils as It was
the only place where OrderedInstructions is required.
Authored By: RithikSharma
Reviewer: Whitney, bmahjour, etiotto, fhahn, nikic
Reviewed By: Whitney, nikic
Subscribers: mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80643
The block front may be a PHI node, inserting a cast instructions like
BitCast, PtrToInt, IntToPtr among PHIs is not right.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80975
Summary:
The test case started to hoist bitcasts to upper BB after D81730.
Reverted unintentional logic change. Some instructions may have zero cost but
will not be hoisted by different limitation so should be counted for threshold.
Reviewers: aprantl, arsenm, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: wdng, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82761
Currently SCCP does not combine the information of conditions joined by
AND in the true branch or OR in the false branch.
For branches on AND, 2 copies will be inserted for the true branch, with
one being the operand of the other as in the code below. We can combine
the information using intersection. Note that for the OR case, the
copies are inserted in the false branch, where using intersection is
safe as well.
define void @foo(i32 %a) {
entry:
%lt = icmp ult i32 %a, 100
%gt = icmp ugt i32 %a, 20
%and = and i1 %lt, %gt
; Has predicate info
; branch predicate info { TrueEdge: 1 Comparison: %lt = icmp ult i32 %a, 100 Edge: [label %entry,label %true] }
%a.0 = call i32 @llvm.ssa.copy.140247425954880(i32 %a)
; Has predicate info
; branch predicate info { TrueEdge: 1 Comparison: %gt = icmp ugt i32 %a, 20 Edge: [label %entry,label %false] }
%a.1 = call i32 @llvm.ssa.copy.140247425954880(i32 %a.0)
br i1 %and, label %true, label %false
true: ; preds = %entry
call void @use(i32 %a.1)
%true.1 = icmp ne i32 %a.1, 20
call void @use.i1(i1 %true.1)
ret void
false: ; preds = %entry
call void @use(i32 %a.1)
ret void
}
Reviewers: efriedma, davide, mssimpso, nikic
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77808
OriginalOp of a predicate always refers to the original IR
value that was renamed. So for nested predicates of the same value, it
will always refer to the original IR value.
For the use in SCCP however, we need to find the renamed value that is
currently used in the condition associated with the predicate. This
patch adds a new RenamedOp field to do exactly that.
NewGVN currently relies on the existing behavior to merge instruction
metadata. A test case to check for exactly that has been added in
195fa4bfae.
Reviewers: efriedma, davide, nikic
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78133
The `noundef` attribute indicates an argument or return value which
may never have an undef value representation.
This patch allows LLVM to parse the attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83412
by default.
sample-profile-top-down-load is an internal option which can enable top-down
order of inlining and profile annotation in sample profile load pass. It was
found to be beneficial for better profile annotation.
Recently we found it could also solve some build time issue. Suppose function
A has many callsites in function B. In the last release binary where sample
profile was collected, the outline copy of A is large because there are many
other functions inlined into A. However although all the callsites calling A
in B are inlined, but every inlined body is small (A was inlined into B
before other functions are inlined into A), there is no build time issue in
last release.
In an optimized build using the sample profile collected from last release,
without top-down inlining, we saw a case that A got very large because of
inlining, and then multiple callsites of A got inlined into B, and that led
to a huge B which caused significant build time issue besides profile
annotation issue.
To solve that problem, the patch enables the flag
sample-profile-top-down-load by default. sample-profile-top-down-load can
have better performance when it is enabled together with
sample-profile-merge-inlinee so in this patch we also enable
sample-profile-merge-inlinee by default.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82919
Summary:
Almost all uses of these iterators, including implicit ones, really
only need the const variant (as it should be). The only exception is
in NewGVN, which changes the order of dominator tree child nodes.
Change-Id: I4b5bd71e32d71b0c67b03d4927d93fe9413726d4
Reviewers: arsenm, RKSimon, mehdi_amini, courbet, rriddle, aartbik
Subscribers: wdng, Prazek, hiraditya, kuhar, rogfer01, rriddle, jpienaar, shauheen, antiagainst, nicolasvasilache, arpith-jacob, mgester, lucyrfox, aartbik, liufengdb, stephenneuendorffer, Joonsoo, grosul1, vkmr, Kayjukh, jurahul, msifontes, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #mlir, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83087
Summary:
D82193 exposed a problem with global type definitions in
`OMPConstants.h`. This causes a race when running in thinLTO mode.
Types now live inside of OpenMPIRBuilder to prevent this from happening.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Subscribers: yaxunl, hiraditya, guansong, dexonsmith, aaron.ballman, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83176
At the moment this place does not check maximum size set
by TTI and just creates a maximum possible vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82227
This patch adds support for eliminating stores by free & lifetime.end
calls. We can remove stores that are not read before calling a memory
terminator and we can eliminate all stores after a memory terminator
until we see a new lifetime.start. The second case seems to not really
trigger much in practice though.
Reviewers: dmgreen, rnk, efriedma, bryant, asbirlea, Tyker
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72410
Previously the NPM inliner would skip all potential inlines in an
optnone function, but alwaysinline callees should be inlined regardless
of optnone.
Fixes inline-optnone.ll under NPM.
Reviewed By: kazu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83021
When all else fails, use range metadata to constrain the result
of loads and calls. It should also be possible to use !nonnull,
but that would require some general support for inequalities in
SCCP first.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83179
Take assume predicates into account when visiting ssa.copy. The
handling is the same as for branch predicates, with the difference
that we're always on the true edge.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83257
Summary: This patch makes code motion checks optional which are dependent on
specific analysis example, dominator tree, post dominator tree and dependence
info. The aim is to make the adoption of CodeMoverUtils easier for clients that
don't use analysis which were strictly required by CodeMoverUtils. This will
also help in diversifying code motion checks using other analysis example MSSA.
Authored By: RithikSharma
Reviewer: Whitney, bmahjour, etiotto
Reviewed By: Whitney
Subscribers: Prazek, hiraditya, george.burgess.iv, asbirlea, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82566
The (previously-crashing) test-case would cause us to seemingly-harmlessly
replace some use with something else, but we can't replace it with itself,
so we would crash.
If a loop is in a function marked OptSize, Loop Access Analysis should refrain
from generating runtime checks for unit strides that will version the loop.
If a loop is in a function marked OptSize and its vectorization is enabled, it
should be vectorized w/o any versioning.
Fixes PR46228.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81345
Summary:
It is reasonably common to want to clone some call with different bundles.
Let's actually provide an interface to do that.
Reviewers: chandlerc, jdoerfert, dblaikie, nickdesaulniers
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83248
As reported in https://reviews.llvm.org/D83101#2133062
the new visitInsertElementInst()/visitExtractElementInst() functionality
is causing miscompiles (previously-crashing test added)
It is due to the fact how the infra of Scalarizer is dealing with DCE,
it was not updated or was it ready for such scalar value forwarding.
It always assumed that the moment we "scalarized" something,
it can go away, and did so with prejudice.
But that is no longer safe/okay to do.
Instead, let's prevent it from ever shooting itself into foot,
and let's just accumulate the instructions-to-be-deleted
in a vector, and collectively cleanup (those that are *actually* dead)
them all at the end.
All existing tests are not reporting any new garbage leftovers,
but maybe it's test coverage issue.
Summary:
Avoid exposing details about how roots are stored. This enables subsequent
type-erasure changes.
v5:
- cleanup a unit test by using EXPECT_EQ instead of EXPECT_TRUE
Change-Id: I532b774cc71f2224e543bc7d79131d97f63f093d
Reviewers: arsenm, RKSimon, mehdi_amini, courbet
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, hiraditya, kuhar, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83085
Summary:
Avoid exposing details about how children are stored. This will enable
subsequent type-erasure changes.
New methods are introduced to cover common access patterns.
Change-Id: Idb5f4b1b9c84e4cc71ddb39bb52a388682f5674f
Reviewers: arsenm, RKSimon, mehdi_amini, courbet
Subscribers: qcolombet, sdardis, wdng, hiraditya, jrtc27, zzheng, atanasyan, asbirlea, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83083
Compilers may evaluate call arguments in different order,
which would result in different order of IR, which would break the tests.
Spotted thanks to Dmitri Gribenko!
Summary:
I'm interested in taking the original C++ input,
for which we currently are stuck with an alloca
and producing roughly the lower IR,
with neither an alloca nor a vector ops:
https://godbolt.org/z/cRRWaJ
For that, as intermediate step, i'd to somehow perform scalarization.
As per @arsenmn suggestion, i'm trying to see if scalarizer can help me
avoid writing a bicycle.
I'm not sure if it's really intentional that variable insert is not handled currently.
If it really is, and is supposed to stay that way (?), i guess i could guard it..
See [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46524 | PR46524 ]].
Reviewers: bjope, cameron.mcinally, arsenm, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: arphaman, uabelho, wdng, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82961
Summary:
It appears to be better IR-wise to aggressively scalarize it,
rather than relying on gathering it, and leaving it as-is.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, bjope, arsenm, cameron.mcinally
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: arphaman, wdng, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83101
Summary: As it can be clearly seen from the diff, this results in nicer IR.
Reviewers: jdoerfert, arsenm, bjope, cameron.mcinally
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: arphaman, wdng, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83102
Summary:
1000 iteratons is still kinda a lot.
Would it make sense to iteratively lower it, until it becomes `2`,
with some delay inbetween in order to let users actually potentially encounter it?
Reviewers: spatel, nikic, kuhar
Reviewed By: nikic
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83160
Sidharth Baveja