Introduce a helper on Instruction which can be used to update the debug
location after hoisting.
Use this in GVN and LICM, where we were mistakenly introducing new line
0 locations after hoisting (the docs recommend dropping the location in
this case).
For more context, see the discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D60913.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85670
While this doesn't appear to help with the perf issue being exposed by
D84108, the function as-is is very weird, convoluted, and what's worse,
recursive.
There was no need for `SpeculativelyAvaliableAndUsedForSpeculation`,
tri-state choice is enough. We don't even ever check for that state.
The basic idea here is that we need to perform a depth-first traversal
of the predecessors of the basic block in question, either finding a
preexisting state for the block in a map, or inserting a "placeholder"
`SpeculativelyAvaliable`,
If we encounter an `Unavaliable` block, then we need to give up search,
and back-propagate the `Unavaliable` state to the each successor of
said block, more specifically to the each `SpeculativelyAvaliable`
we've just created.
However, if we have traversed entirety of the predecessors and have not
encountered an `Unavaliable` block, then it must mean the value is fully
available. We could update each inserted `SpeculativelyAvaliable` into
a `Avaliable`, but we don't need to, as assertion excersizes,
because we can assume that if we see an `SpeculativelyAvaliable` entry,
it is actually `Avaliable`, because during the time we've produced it,
if we would have found that it has an `Unavaliable` predecessor,
we would have updated it's successors, including this block,
into `Unavaliable`
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84181
Summary: To match NewPM name. Also the new name is clearer and more consistent.
Subscribers: jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, asbirlea, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84542
Make sure we do not call
constainsConstantExpression/containsUndefElement on ConstantExpression,
which is not supported.
In particular, containsUndefElement/constainsConstantExpression are only
supported on constants which are supported by getAggregateElement.
Unfortunately there's no convenient way to check if a constant supports
getAggregateElement, so just check for non-constantexpressions with
vector type. Other users of those functions do so too.
Reviewers: spatel, nikic, craig.topper, lebedev.ri, jdoerfert, aqjune
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84512
Here we teach the ConstantFolding analysis pass that it is not legal to
replace a load of a bitcast constant (having a non-integral addrspace)
with a bitcast of the value of that constant (with a different
non-integral addrspace).
But also teach it that certain bit patterns are always known and
convertable (a fact it already uses elsewhere). This required us to also
fix a globalopt test, since, after this change, LLVM is able to realize
that the test actually is a valid transform (NULL is always a known
bit-pattern) and so it doesn't need to emit the failure remarks for it.
Also simplify some of the negative tests for transforms by avoiding a
type change in their bitcast, and add positive versions of the same
tests, to show that they otherwise should work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59730
Currently load instructions are added to the cache for invariant pointer
group dependencies, but only pointer values are removed currently. That
leads to dangling AssertingVHs in the test case below, where we delete a
load from an invariant pointer group. We should also remove the entries
from the cache.
Fixes PR46054.
Reviewers: efriedma, hfinkel, asbirlea
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81726
This patch adds a new option to CriticalEdgeSplittingOptions to control
whether loop-simplify form must be preserved. It is them used by GVN to
indicate that loop-simplify form does not have to be preserved.
This fixes a crash exposed by 189efe295b.
If the critical edge we are splitting goes from a block inside a loop to
a block outside the loop, splitting the edge will create a new exit
block. As a result, the new block will branch to the original exit
block, which will add a non-loop predecessor, breaking loop-simplify
form. To preserve loop-simplify form, the predecessor blocks of the
original exit are split, but that does not work for blocks with
indirectbr terminators. If preserving loop-simplify form is requested,
bail out , before making any changes.
Reviewers: reames, hfinkel, davide, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81582
If we don't know anything about the alignment of a pointer, Align(1) is
still correct: all pointers are at least 1-byte aligned.
Included in this patch is a bugfix for an issue discovered during this
cleanup: pointers with "dereferenceable" attributes/metadata were
assumed to be aligned according to the type of the pointer. This
wasn't intentional, as far as I can tell, so Loads.cpp was fixed to
stop making this assumption. Frontends may need to be updated. I
updated clang's handling of C++ references, and added a release note for
this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80072
This is D77454, except for stores. All the infrastructure work was done
for loads, so the remaining changes necessary are relatively small.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79968
The "null-pointer-is-valid" attribute needs to be checked by many
pointer-related combines. To make the check more efficient, convert
it from a string into an enum attribute.
In the future, this attribute may be replaced with data layout
properties.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78862
For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the
datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR
later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the
datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default
datalayout.
The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow
overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this,
some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target.
Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new
machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the
datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information
from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools
to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time.
Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback.
(clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at
least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a
datalayout is not something frontends should generate.
This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen
regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with
a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the
overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the
default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one
AMDGPU test.
Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just
fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
No changes relative to last time, but after a mitigation for
an AMDGPU regression landed.
---
If SimplifyInstruction() does not succeed in simplifying the
instruction, it will compute the known bits of the instruction
in the hope that all bits are known and the instruction can be
folded to a constant. I have removed a similar optimization
from InstCombine in D75801, and would like to drop this one as well.
On average, we spend ~1% of total compile-time performing this
known bits calculation. However, if we introduce some additional
statistics for known bits computations and how many of them succeed
in simplifying the instruction we get (on test-suite):
instsimplify.NumKnownBits: 216
instsimplify.NumKnownBitsComputed: 13828375
valuetracking.NumKnownBitsComputed: 45860806
Out of ~14M known bits calculations (accounting for approximately
one third of all known bits calculations), only 0.0015% succeed in
producing a constant. Those cases where we do succeed to compute
all known bits will get folded by other passes like InstCombine
later. On test-suite, only lencod.test and GCC-C-execute-pr44858.test
show a hash difference after this change. On lencod we see an
improvement (a loop phi is optimized away), on the GCC torture
test a regression (a function return value is determined only
after IPSCCP, preventing propagation from a noinline function.)
There are various regressions in InstSimplify tests. However, all
of these cases are already handled by InstCombine, and corresponding
tests have already been added there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79294
If SimplifyInstruction() does not succeed in simplifying the
instruction, it will compute the known bits of the instruction
in the hope that all bits are known and the instruction can be
folded to a constant. I have removed a similar optimization
from InstCombine in D75801, and would like to drop this one as well.
On average, we spend ~1% of total compile-time performing this
known bits calculation. However, if we introduce some additional
statistics for known bits computations and how many of them succeed
in simplifying the instruction we get (on test-suite):
instsimplify.NumKnownBits: 216
instsimplify.NumKnownBitsComputed: 13828375
valuetracking.NumKnownBitsComputed: 45860806
Out of ~14M known bits calculations (accounting for approximately
one third of all known bits calculations), only 0.0015% succeed in
producing a constant. Those cases where we do succeed to compute
all known bits will get folded by other passes like InstCombine
later. On test-suite, only lencod.test and GCC-C-execute-pr44858.test
show a hash difference after this change. On lencod we see an
improvement (a loop phi is optimized away), on the GCC torture
test a regression (a function return value is determined only
after IPSCCP, preventing propagation from a noinline function.)
There are various regressions in InstSimplify tests. However, all
of these cases are already handled by InstCombine, and corresponding
tests have already been added there.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79294
Summary:
This patch defines two freeze instructions to have the same value number if they are equivalent.
This is allowed because GVN replaces all uses of a duplicated instruction with another.
If it partially rewrites use, it is not allowed. e.g)
```
a = freeze(x)
b = freeze(x)
use(a)
use(a)
use(b)
=>
use(a)
use(b) // This is not allowed!
use(b)
```
Reviewers: fhahn, reames, spatel, efriedma
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75398
Adds the global (cl::opt) GVNOption enable-load-in-loop-pre in order
to control whether the optimization will be performed if the load
is part of a loop.
Patch by Hendrik Greving!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73804
Introduce parsing, add a few instances of parameter use into GVN-PRE tests.
Reviewers: skatkov, asbirlea
Reviewed By: skatkov
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72752
Factor out common logic into some reasonable commented helper functions. In the process, ensure that the in-block vs cross-block cases are handled the same. They previously weren't.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67126
This extends the existing logic for propagating constant expressions in an analogous manner for what we do across basic blocks. The core point is that we chose some order of operands, and canonicalize uses towards that one.
The heuristic used is inspired by the one used across blocks; in a follow up change, I'd plan to common them so that the cross block version uses the slightly stronger ordering herein.
As noted by the TODOs in the code, there's a good amount of room for improving the existing code and making it more powerful. Some follow up work planned.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66977
llvm-svn: 370791
This is an updated version of https://reviews.llvm.org/D66909 to fix PR42605.
Basically, current phi translatation translates an old value number to an new
value number for a call instruction based on the literal equality of call
expression, without verifying there is no clobber in between. This is incorrect.
To get a finegrain check, use MachineDependence analysis to do the job. However,
this is still not ideal. Although given a call instruction,
`MemoryDependenceResults::getCallDependencyFrom` returns identical call
instructions without clobber in between using MemDepResult with its DepType to
be `Def`. However, identical is too strict here and we want it to be relaxed a
little to consider phi-translation -- callee is the same, param operands can be
different. That means changing the semantic of `MemDepResult::Def` and I don't
know the potential impact.
So currently the patch is still conservative to only handle
MemDepResult::NonFuncLocal, which means the current call has no function local
clobber. If there is clobber, even if the clobber doesn't stand in between the
current call and the call with the new value, we won't do phi-translate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67013
llvm-svn: 370547
Currently we do not properly translate addresses with PHIs if LoadBB !=
LI->getParent(), because PHITranslateAddr expects a direct predecessor as argument,
because it considers all instructions outside of the current block to
not requiring translation.
The amount of cases that trigger this should be very low, as most single
predecessor blocks should be folded into their predecessor by GVN before
we actually start with value numbering. It is still not guaranteed to
happen, so we should do PHI translation along all edges between the
loads' block and the predecessor where we have to place a load.
There are a few test cases showing current limits of the PHI translation, which
could be improved later.
Reviewers: spatel, reames, efriedma, john.brawn
Reviewed By: efriedma
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65020
llvm-svn: 369570
LoopInfo can be easily preserved by passing it to the functions that
modify the CFG (SplitCriticalEdge and MergeBlockIntoPredecessor.
SplitCriticalEdge also preserves LoopSimplify and LCSSA form when when passing in
LoopInfo. The test case shows that we preserve LoopSimplify and
LoopInfo. Adding addPreservedID(LCSSAID) did not preserve LCSSA for some
reason.
Also I am not sure if it is possible to preserve those in the new pass
manager, as they aren't analysis passes.
Reviewers: reames, hfinkel, davide, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65137
llvm-svn: 367332
This is a follow-up to r291037+r291258, which used null debug locations
to prevent jumpy line tables.
Using line 0 locations achieves the same effect, but works better for
crash attribution because it preserves the right inline scope.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60913
llvm-svn: 358791
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
Noticed these while doing a final sweep of the code to make sure I hadn't missed anything in my last couple of patches. The (minor) missed optimization was noticed because of the stylistic fix to avoid an overly specific cast.
llvm-svn: 354412
Same case as for memset and memcpy, but this time for clobbering stores and loads. We still can't allow coercion to or from non-integrals, regardless of the transform.
Now that I'm done the whole little sequence, it seems apparent that we'd entirely missed reasoning about clobbers in the original GVN support for non-integral pointers.
My appologies, I thought we'd upstreamed all of this, but it turns out we were still carrying a downstream hack which hid all of these issues. My chanks to Cherry Zhang for helping debug.
llvm-svn: 354407
Problem is very similiar to the one fixed for memsets in r354399, we try to coerce a value to non-integral type, and then crash while try to do so. Since we shouldn't be doing such coercions to start with, easy fix. From inspection, I see two other cases which look to be similiar and will follow up with most test cases and fixes if confirmed.
llvm-svn: 354403
GVN generally doesn't forward structs or array types, but it *will* forward vector types to non-vectors and vice versa. As demonstrated in tests, we need to inhibit the same set of transforms for vector of non-integral pointers as for non-integral pointers themselves.
llvm-svn: 354401
If we encountered a location where we tried to forward the value of a memset to a load of a non-integral pointer, we crashed. Such a forward is not legal in general, but we can forward null pointers. Test for both cases are included.
llvm-svn: 354399
Salvaging a redundant load instruction into a debug expression hides a
memory read from optimisation passes. Passes that alter memory behaviour
(such as LICM promoting memory to a register) aren't aware of these debug
memory reads and leave them unaltered, making the debug variable location
point somewhere unsafe.
Teaching passes to know about these debug memory reads would be challenging
and probably incomplete. Finding dbg.value instructions that need to be fixed
would likely be computationally expensive too, as more analysis would be
required. It's better to not generate debug-memory-reads instead, alas.
Changed tests:
* DeadStoreElim: test for salvaging of intermediate operations contributing
to the dead store, instead of salvaging of the redundant load,
* GVN: remove debuginfo behaviour checks completely, this behaviour is still
covered by other tests,
* InstCombine: don't test for salvaged loads, we're removing that behaviour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57962
llvm-svn: 353824
Vedant Kumar