This patch sinks add/mul(shufflevector(insertelement())) into the basic block in which they are used so that they can then be selected together.
This is useful for various MVE instructions, such as vmla and others that take R registers.
Loop tests have been added to the vmla test file to make sure vmlas are generated in loops.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66295
llvm-svn: 371218
If OptimizeExtractBits() encountered a shift instruction with no operands at all,
it would erase the instruction, but still return false.
This previously didn’t matter because its caller would always return after
processing the instruction, but https://reviews.llvm.org/D63233 changed the
function’s caller to fall through if it returned false, which would then cause
a use-after-free detectable by ASAN.
This change makes OptimizeExtractBits return true if it removes a shift
instruction with no users, terminating processing of the instruction.
Patch by: @brentdax (Brent Royal-Gordon)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66330
llvm-svn: 369168
This is based on the example/discussion in PR37428:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37428
Proper vector shift instructions don't appear until AVX2, so we may generate several
extra instructions within a loop trying to compensate for that. It's difficult to
recover from that shift expansion later than this, so use the existing TLI hook and
splat analysis to enable better codegen.
This extends CGP functionality introduced with:
rL201655
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63233
llvm-svn: 363511
This is a subset of the original commit from rL359879
which was reverted because it could crash when using the 'RemovedInstructions'
structure that enables delayed deletion of dead instructions. The motivating
compile-time win does not require that change though. We should get most of
that win from this change alone.
Using/updating a dominator tree to match math overflow patterns may be very
expensive in compile-time (because of the way CGP uses a DT), so just handle
the single-block case.
See post-commit thread for rL354298 for more details:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190422/646276.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61075
llvm-svn: 359969
Using/updating a dominator tree to match math overflow patterns may be very
expensive in compile-time (because of the way CGP uses a DT), so just handle
the single-block case.
Also, we were restarting the iterator loops when doing the overflow intrinsic
transforms by marking the dominator tree for update. That was done to prevent
iterating over a removed instruction. But we can postpone the deletion using
the existing "RemovedInsts" structure, and that means we don't need to update
the DT.
See post-commit thread for rL354298 for more details:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190422/646276.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61075
llvm-svn: 359879
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
This is probably a bigger limitation than necessary, but since we don't have any evidence yet
that this transform led to real-world perf improvements rather than regressions, I'm making a
quick, blunt fix.
In the motivating x86 example from:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41129
...and shown in the regression test, we want to avoid an extra instruction in the dominating
block because that could be costly.
The x86 LSR test diff is reversing the changes from D57789. There's no evidence that 1 version
is any better than the other yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59602
llvm-svn: 356665
This is almost the same as:
rL355345
...and should prevent any potential crashing from examples like:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41064
...although the bug was masked by:
rL355823
...and I'm not sure how to repro the problem after that change.
llvm-svn: 356218
Targets can potentially emit more efficient code if they know address
computations never overflow. For example ILP32 code on AArch64 (which only has
64-bit address computation) can ignore the possibility of overflow with this
extra information.
llvm-svn: 355926
Inserting an overflowing arithmetic intrinsic can increase register
pressure by producing two values at a point where only one is needed,
while the second use maybe several blocks away. This increase in
pressure is likely to be more detrimental on performance than
rematerialising one of the original instructions.
So, check that the arithmetic and compare instructions are no further
apart than their immediate successor/predecessor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59024
llvm-svn: 355823
r44412 fixed a huge compile time regression but it needed ModifiedDT flag to be
maintained correctly in optimizations in optimizeBlock() and optimizeInst().
Function optimizeSelectInst() does not update the flag.
This patch propagates the flag in optimizeSelectInst() back to
optimizeBlock().
This patch also removes ModifiedDT in CodeGenPrepare class (which is not used).
The property of ModifiedDT is now recorded in a ref parameter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59139
llvm-svn: 355751
This uses the infrastructure added in rL353152 to sink zext and sexts to
sub/add users, to enable vsubl/vaddl generation when NEON is available.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40025.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover, samparker, efriedma
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58063
llvm-svn: 355460
The test is reduced from an example in the post-commit thread for:
rL354746
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190304/632396.html
While we must avoid dying here, the real question should be:
Why is non-canonical and/or degenerate code making it to CGP when
using the new pass manager?
llvm-svn: 355345
There's likely a missed IR canonicalization for at least 1 of these
patterns. Otherwise, we wouldn't have needed the pattern-matching
enhancement in D57516.
Note that -- unlike usubo added with D57789 -- the TLI hook for
this transform defaults to 'on'. So if there's any perf fallout
from this, targets should look at how they're lowering the uaddo
node in SDAG and/or override that hook.
The x86 diffs suggest that there's some missing pattern-matching
for forming inc/dec.
This should fix the remaining known problems in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40486https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31754
llvm-svn: 354746
The motivating x86 cases for forming the intrinsic are shown in PR31754 and PR40487:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31754https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40487
..and those are shown in the IR test file and x86 codegen file.
Matching the usubo pattern is harder than uaddo because we have 2 independent values rather than a def-use.
This adds a TLI hook that should preserve the existing behavior for uaddo formation, but disables usubo
formation by default. Only x86 overrides that setting for now although other targets will likely benefit
by forming usbuo too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57789
llvm-svn: 354298
This patch improves code generation for some AArch64 ACLE intrinsics. It adds
support to CGP to duplicate and sink operands to their user, if they can be
folded into a target instruction, like zexts and sub into usubl. It adds a
TargetLowering hook shouldSinkOperands, which looks at the operands of
instructions to see if sinking is profitable.
I decided to add a new target hook, as for the sinking to be profitable,
at least on AArch64, we have to look at multiple operands of an
instruction, instead of looking at the users of a zext for example.
The sinking is done in CGP, because it works around an instruction
selection limitation. If instruction selection is not limited to a
single basic block, this patch should not be needed any longer.
Alternatively this could be done in the LoopSink pass, which tries to
undo LICM for instructions in blocks that are not executed frequently.
Note that we do not force the operands to sink to have a single user,
because we duplicate them before sinking. Therefore this is only
desirable if they really can be done for free. Additionally we could
consider the impact on live ranges later on.
This should fix https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40025.
As for performance, we have internal code that uses intrinsics and can
be speed up by 10% by this change.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, t.p.northover, samparker, efriedma, RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: samparker
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57377
llvm-svn: 353152
This is no-functional-change-intended although there could
be intermediate variations caused by a difference in the
debug info produced by setting that from the builder's
insertion point.
I'm updating the IR test file associated with this code just
to show that the naming differences from using the builder
are visible.
The motivation for adding a helper function is that we are
likely to extend this code to deal with other overflow ops.
llvm-svn: 353056
There are 2 changes visible here:
1. There's no reason to limit this transform based on number
of condition registers. That diff allows PPC to produce
slightly better (dot-instructions should be generally good)
code.
Note: someone that cares about PPC codegen might want to
look closer at that output because it seems like we could
still improve this.
2. We (probably?) should not bother trying to form uaddo (or
other overflow ops) when there's no target support for such
an op. This goes beyond checking whether the op is expanded
because both PPC and AArch64 show better codegen for standard
types regardless of whether the op is legal/custom.
llvm-svn: 353001
This is the most important uaddo problem mentioned in PR31754:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31754
...but that was overcome in x86 codegen with D57637.
That patch also corrects the inc vs. add regressions seen with the previous attempt at this.
Still, we want to make this matcher complete, so we can potentially canonicalize the pattern
even if it's an 'add 1' operation.
Pattern matching, however, shouldn't assume that we have canonicalized IR, so we match 4
commuted variants of uaddo.
There's also a test with a crazy type to show that the existing CGP transform based on this
matcher is not limited by target legality checks.
I'm not sure if the Hexagon diff means the test is no longer testing what it intended to
test, but that should be solvable in a follow-up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57516
llvm-svn: 352998
This ensures that if we make it to the backend w/o lowering widenable_conditions first, that we generate correct code. Doing it in CGP - instead of isel - let's us fold control flow before hitting block local instruction selection.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57473
llvm-svn: 352779
This is the most important uaddo problem mentioned in PR31754:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31754
We were failing to match the canonicalized pattern when it's an 'add 1' operation.
Pattern matching, however, shouldn't assume that we have canonicalized IR, so we
match 4 commuted variants of uaddo.
There's also a test with a crazy type to show that the existing CGP transform
based on this matcher is not limited by target legality checks, but that's a
different problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57516
llvm-svn: 352766
This change reverts r351626.
The changes in r351626 cause quadratic work in several cases. (See r351626 thread on llvm-commits for details.)
llvm-svn: 352722
This is meant to be used with clang's __builtin_dynamic_object_size.
When 'true' is passed to this parameter, the intrinsic has the
potential to be folded into instructions that will be evaluated
at run time. When 'false', the objectsize intrinsic behaviour is
unchanged.
rdar://32212419
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56761
llvm-svn: 352664
This reverts commit r351618.
Compiler RT + ASAN tests are failing for PowerPC. Not sure
how would I reproduce these on macOS, so reverting (again)
until I do.
llvm-svn: 351619
Make sure CodeGenPrepare doesn't emit multiple inttoptr instructions of
the same integer value while sinking address computations, but rather
CSEs them on the fly: excessive inttoptr's confuse SCEV into thinking
that related pointers have nothing to do with each other.
This problem blocks LoadStoreVectorizer from vectorizing some of the
loads / stores in a downstream target.
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56838
llvm-svn: 351582
compiler identification lines in test-cases.
(Doing so only because it's then easier to search for references which
are actually important and need fixing.)
llvm-svn: 351200
Creating the IR builder, then modifying the CFG, leads to an IRBuilder
where the BB and insertion point are inconsistent, so new instructions
have the wrong parent.
Modified an existing test because the test wasn't covering anything
useful (the "invoke" was not actually an invoke by the time we hit the
code in question).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55729
llvm-svn: 349693
ProfileSampleAccurate is used to indicate the profile has exact match to the
code to be optimized.
Previously ProfileSampleAccurate is handled in ProfileSummaryInfo::isColdCallSite
and ProfileSummaryInfo::isColdBlock. A better solution is to initialize function
entry count to 0 when ProfileSampleAccurate is true, so we don't have to handle
ProfileSampleAccurate in multiple places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55660
llvm-svn: 349088
For SampleFDO, when a callsite doesn't appear in the profile, it will not be marked as cold callsite unless the option -profile-sample-accurate is specified.
But profile-sample-accurate doesn't cover function isFunctionColdInCallGraph which is used to decide whether a function should be put into text.unlikely section, so even if the user knows the profile is accurate and specifies profile-sample-accurate, those functions not appearing in the sample profile are still not be put into text.unlikely section right now.
The patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55567
llvm-svn: 348940
Summary:
Large GEP splitting, introduced in rL332015, uses a `DenseMap<AssertingVH<Value>, ...>`. This causes an assertion to fail (in debug builds) or undefined behaviour to occur (in release builds) when a value is RAUWed.
This manifested itself in the 7zip benchmark from the llvm test suite built on ARM with `-fstrict-vtable-pointers` enabled while RAUWing invariant group launders and splits in CodeGenPrepare.
This patch merges the large offsets of the argument and the result of an invariant.group strip/launder intrinsic before RAUWing.
Reviewers: Prazek, javed.absar, haicheng, efriedma
Reviewed By: Prazek, efriedma
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51936
llvm-svn: 344802
Adding NonNull as attributes to returned pointers has the unfortunate side
effect of disabling tail calls. This patch ignores the NonNull attribute when
we decide whether to tail merge, in the same way that we ignore the NoAlias
attribute, as it has no affect on the call sequence.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52238
llvm-svn: 343091
CodeGenPrepare has a transform that sinks {lshr, trunc} pairs to make it
easier for the backend to emit fancy extract-bits instructions (e.g UBFX).
Teach it to preserve debug locations and salvage debug values.
llvm-svn: 342319
The output of splitLargeGEPOffsets does not appear to be deterministic because
of the way that we iterate over a DenseMap. I've changed it to a MapVector for
consistent output.
The test here isn't particularly great, only showing a consmetic difference in
output. The original reproducer is much larger but show a diffierence in
instruction ordering, leading to different codegen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51851
llvm-svn: 342043
It has essentially the same benefit it has on 64-bit ARM: it
substantially reduces the number of constants used by large GEP
operations. Seems to be generally helpful across a few different
codebases I've tried.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51462
llvm-svn: 341136
CodeGenPrepare has a strategy for moving dbg.values so that a value's
definition always dominates its debug users. This cleanup was happening
too early (before certain CGP transforms were run), resulting in some
dbg.value use-before-def errors.
Perform this cleanup as late as possible to avoid use-before-def.
llvm-svn: 340370
This test shows that optimizeSelectInst splits a select and sinks a
`fdiv` operation to one side of the diamond. However, the dbg.value for
the operation isn't moved.
llvm-svn: 340369
This patch fixes PR38125.
Instruction extension types are recorded in PromotedInsts, it can be used later in function canGetThrough. If an instruction has two users with different extension types, it will be inserted into PromotedInsts two times in function promoteOperandForOther. The second one overwrites the first one, and the final extension type is wrong, later causes problem in canGetThrough.
This patch changes the simple bool extension type to 2-bit enum type, add a BothExtension type in addition to zero/sign extension. When an user sees BothExtension for an instruction, it actually knows nothing about how that instruction is extended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49512
llvm-svn: 339822
In non-zero address spaces, we were reporting that an object at `null`
always occupies zero bytes. This is incorrect in many cases, so just
return `unknown` in those cases for now.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48860
llvm-svn: 336611
Summary:
This patch introduce new intrinsic -
strip.invariant.group that was described in the
RFC: Devirtualization v2
Reviewers: rsmith, hfinkel, nlopes, sanjoy, amharc, kuhar
Subscribers: arsenm, nhaehnle, JDevlieghere, hiraditya, xbolva00, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47103
Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Pszeniczny <krzysztof.pszeniczny@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 336073
Summary:
Two utils methods have essentially the same functionality. This is an attempt to merge them into one.
1. lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp : MergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred
2. lib/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.cpp : MergeBlockIntoPredecessor
Prior to the patch:
1. MergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred
Updates either DomTree or DeferredDominance
Moves all instructions from Pred to BB, deletes Pred
Asserts BB has single predecessor
If address was taken, replace the block address with constant 1 (?)
2. MergeBlockIntoPredecessor
Updates DomTree, LoopInfo and MemoryDependenceResults
Moves all instruction from BB to Pred, deletes BB
Returns if doesn't have a single predecessor
Returns if BB's address was taken
After the patch:
Method 2. MergeBlockIntoPredecessor is attempting to become the new default:
Updates DomTree or DeferredDominance, and LoopInfo and MemoryDependenceResults
Moves all instruction from BB to Pred, deletes BB
Returns if doesn't have a single predecessor
Returns if BB's address was taken
Uses of MergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred that need to be replaced:
1. lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopSimplifyCFG.cpp
Updated in this patch. No challenges.
2. lib/CodeGen/CodeGenPrepare.cpp
Updated in this patch.
i. eliminateFallThrough is straightforward, but I added using a temporary array to avoid the iterator invalidation.
ii. eliminateMostlyEmptyBlock(s) methods also now use a temporary array for blocks
Some interesting aspects:
- Since Pred is not deleted (BB is), the entry block does not need updating.
- The entry block was being updated with the deleted block in eliminateMostlyEmptyBlock. Added assert to make obvious that BB=SinglePred.
- isMergingEmptyBlockProfitable assumes BB is the one to be deleted.
- eliminateMostlyEmptyBlock(BB) does not delete BB on one path, it deletes its unique predecessor instead.
- adding some test owner as subscribers for the interesting tests modified:
test/CodeGen/X86/avx-cmp.ll
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/nested-loop-conditions.ll
test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/si-annotate-cf.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/hoist-spill.ll
test/CodeGen/X86/2006-11-17-IllegalMove.ll
3. lib/Transforms/Scalar/JumpThreading.cpp
Not covered in this patch. It is the only use case using the DeferredDominance.
I would defer to Brian Rzycki to make this replacement.
Reviewers: chandlerc, spatel, davide, brzycki, bkramer, javed.absar
Subscribers: qcolombet, sanjoy, nemanjai, nhaehnle, jlebar, tpr, kbarton, RKSimon, wmi, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48202
llvm-svn: 335183
CodeGenPrepare pass move extension instructions close to load instructions in different BB, so they can be combined later. But the extension instructions can't move through logical and shift instructions in current implementation. This patch enables this enhancement, so we can eliminate more extension instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45537
This is re-commit of r331783, which was reverted by r333305. The performance regression was caused by some unlucky alignment, not a code generation problem.
llvm-svn: 334049
Summary:
This feature is not needed, but it might be usefull in the future
to use metadata to mark what which function should support it
(and strip it when not).
Reviewers: rsmith, sanjoy, amharc, kuhar
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45419
llvm-svn: 332787
Accessing the members of a large data structures needs a lot of GEPs which
usually have large offsets due to the size of the underlying data structure. If
the offsets are too large to fit into the r+i addressing mode, these GEPs cannot
be sunk to their users' blocks and many extra registers are needed then to carry
the values of these GEPs.
This patch tries to split a large data struct starting from %base like the
following.
Before:
BB0:
%base =
BB1:
%gep0 = gep %base, off0
%gep1 = gep %base, off1
%gep2 = gep %base, off2
BB2:
%load1 = load %gep0
%load2 = load %gep1
%load3 = load %gep2
After:
BB0:
%base =
%new_base = gep %base, off0
BB1:
%new_gep0 = %new_base
%new_gep1 = gep %new_base, off1 - off0
%new_gep2 = gep %new_base, off2 - off0
BB2:
%load1 = load i32, i32* %new_gep0
%load2 = load i32, i32* %new_gep1
%load3 = load i32, i32* %new_gep2
In the above example, the struct is split into two parts. The first part still
starts from %base and the second part starts from %new_base. After the
splitting, %new_gep1 and %new_gep2 have smaller offsets and then can be sunk to
BB2 and folded into their users.
The algorithm to split data structure is simple and very similar to the work of
merging SExts. First, it collects GEPs that have large offsets when iterating
the blocks. Second, it splits the underlying data structures and updates the
collected GEPs to use smaller offsets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42759
llvm-svn: 332015
In order to set breakpoints on labels and list source code around
labels, we need collect debug information for labels, i.e., label
name, the function label belong, line number in the file, and the
address label located. In order to keep these information in LLVM
IR and to allow backend to generate debug information correctly.
We create a new kind of metadata for labels, DILabel. The format
of DILabel is
!DILabel(scope: !1, name: "foo", file: !2, line: 3)
We hope to keep debug information as much as possible even the
code is optimized. So, we create a new kind of intrinsic for label
metadata to avoid the metadata is eliminated with basic block.
The intrinsic will keep existing if we keep it from optimized out.
The format of the intrinsic is
llvm.dbg.label(metadata !1)
It has only one argument, that is the DILabel metadata. The
intrinsic will follow the label immediately. Backend could get the
label metadata through the intrinsic's parameter.
We also create DIBuilder API for labels to be used by Frontend.
Frontend could use createLabel() to allocate DILabel objects, and use
insertLabel() to insert llvm.dbg.label intrinsic in LLVM IR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45024
Patch by Hsiangkai Wang.
llvm-svn: 331841
CodeGenPrepare pass move extension instructions close to load instructions in different BB, so they can be combined later. But the extension instructions can't move through logical and shift instructions in current implementation. This patch enables this enhancement, so we can eliminate more extension instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45537
llvm-svn: 331783
When we replace the Phi we created with matched ones it is possible that
there are two identical phi nodes in IR. And matcher is smart enough to find that
new created phi matches both of them. So we try to replace our phi node with
matched ones twice and what is bad we delete our phi node twice causing a crash.
As soon as we found that we have two identical Phi nodes it makes sense to do
a clean-up and replace one phi node by other one.
The patch implements it.
Reviewers: john.brawn, reames
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43758
llvm-svn: 327250
Summary:
This change is part of step five in the series of changes to remove alignment argument from
memcpy/memmove/memset in favour of alignment attributes. In particular, this changes the
CodeGenPrepare pass to be more aggressive in improving the source and destination alignments
of memcpy/memmove/memset by exploiting our new ability to record independent alignments
for each argument.
Steps:
Step 1) Remove alignment parameter and create alignment parameter attributes for
memcpy/memmove/memset. ( rL322965, rC322964, rL322963 )
Step 2) Expand the IRBuilder API to allow creation of memcpy/memmove with differing
source and dest alignments. ( rL323597 )
Step 3) Update Clang to use the new IRBuilder API. ( rC323617 )
Step 4) Update Polly to use the new IRBuilder API. ( rL323618 )
Step 5) Update LLVM passes that create memcpy/memmove calls to use the new IRBuilder API,
and those that use use MemIntrinsicInst::[get|set]Alignment() to use [get|set]DestAlignment()
and [get|set]SourceAlignment() instead. ( rL323886 )
Step 6) Remove the single-alignment IRBuilder API for memcpy/memmove, and the
MemIntrinsicInst::[get|set]Alignment() methods.
Reference
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-August/089384.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
llvm-svn: 323891
Similar to D42437, XOP supports variable shift for v16i8/v8i16/v4i32/v2i64 types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42526
llvm-svn: 323797
If in complex addressing mode the difference is in GV then
base reg should not be installed because we plan to use
base reg as a merge point of different GVs.
This is a fix for PR35980.
Reviewers: reames, john.brawn, santosh
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42230
llvm-svn: 323192
If the offset is differ in two addressing mode we can continue only if
ScaleReg is not set due to we will use it as merge of different offsets.
It should fix PR35799 and PR35805.
Reviewers: john.brawn, reames
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41227
llvm-svn: 322056
Summary:
The function section prefix for PGO based layout (e.g. hot/unlikely)
should look at the hotness of all blocks not just the entry BB.
A function with a cold entry but a very hot loop should be placed in the
hot section, for example, so that it is located close to other hot
functions it may call. For SamplePGO it was already looking at the
branch weights on calls, and I made that code conditional on whether
this is SamplePGO since it was essentially a noop for instrumentation
PGO anyway.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41395
llvm-svn: 321197
When we put the value in select placeholder we must pass
the value through simplification tracker due to the value might
be already simplified and erased.
This is a fix for PR35658.
Reviewers: john.brawn, uabelho
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41251
llvm-svn: 320956
(This reapplies r314253. r314253 was reverted on r314482 because of a
correctness regression on P100, but that regression was identified to be
something else.)
Summary:
Don't bail out on constant divisors for divisions that can be narrowed without
introducing control flow . This gives us a 32 bit multiply instead of an
emulated 64 bit multiply in the generated PTX assembly.
Reviewers: jlebar
Subscribers: jholewinski, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38265
llvm-svn: 319677
If common type is different we should bail out due to we will not be
able to create a select or Phi of these values.
Basically it is done in ExtAddrMode::compare however it does not work
if we handle the null first and then two values of different types.
so add a check in initializeMap as well. The check in ExtAddrMode::compare
is used as earlier bail out.
Reviewers: reames, john.brawn
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40479
llvm-svn: 319292
The current way that trivial addressing modes are detected incorrectly thinks
that null pointers are non-trivial, leading to an infinite loop where we keep
duplicating the same select. Fix this by aware of null when deciding if an
addressing mode is trivial.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40447
llvm-svn: 319019
CodeGenPrepare sinks address computations from one basic block to another
and attempts to reuse address computations that have already been sunk. If
the same address computation appears twice with the first instance as an
operand of a load whose result is an operand to a simplifable select,
CodeGenPrepare simplifies the select and recursively erases the now dead
instructions. CodeGenPrepare then attempts to use the erased address
computation for the second load.
Fix this by erasing the cached address value if it has zero uses before
looking for the address value in the sunken address map.
This partially resolves PR35209.
Thanks to Alexander Richardson for reporting the issue!
This fixed version relands r318032 which was reverted in r318049 due to
sanitizer buildbot failures.
Reviewers: john.brawn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39841
llvm-svn: 318956
This patch extends the recent work in optimizeMemoryInst to make it able to
combine more ExtAddrMode fields than just the BaseReg.
This fixes some benchmark regressions introduced by r309397, where GVN PRE is
hoisting a getelementptr such that it can no longer be combined into the
addressing mode of the load or store that uses it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38133
llvm-svn: 318949
We must collect all AddModes even if they are the same.
This is due to Original value is different but we need all original
values collected as they are used as anchors in common phi finding.
Reviewers: john.brawn, reames
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40166
llvm-svn: 318638
llvm.invariant.group.barrier may accept pointers to arbitrary address space.
This patch let it accept pointers to i8 in any address space and returns
pointer to i8 in the same address space.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39973
llvm-svn: 318413
CodeGenPrepare sinks address computations from one basic block to another
and attempts to reuse address computations that have already been sunk. If
the same address computation appears twice with the first instance as an
operand of a load whose result is an operand to a simplifable select,
CodeGenPrepare simplifies the select and recursively erases the now dead
instructions. CodeGenPrepare then attempts to use the erased address
computation for the second load.
Fix this by erasing the cached address value if it has zero uses before
looking for the address value in the sunken address map.
This partially resolves PR35209.
Thanks to Alexander Richardson for reporting the issue!
Reviewers: john.brawn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39841
llvm-svn: 318032
This patch disables the handling of selects in optimization
extensing scope of optimizeMemoryInst.
The optimization itself is disable by default.
The idea here is just to switch optimiztion level step by step.
Specifically, first optimization will be enabled only for Phi nodes,
then select instructions will be added.
In case someone will complain about perfromance it will be easier to
detect what part of optimizations is responsible for that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36073
llvm-svn: 317555
Sam Tebbs