These tests use the statepoint-example builtin gc which expects address space #1 to the only non-integral address space. The fact the test used as=0 happened to work, but was caught by a downstream assert. (Literally years ago, I just happened to notice the XFAIL and fix it now.)
CodeGenPrepare keeps fairly close track of various instructions it's
seen, particularly GEPs, in maps and vectors. However, sometimes those
instructions become dead and get removed while it's still executing.
This triggers AssertingVH references to them in an asserts build and
could lead to miscompiles in a release build (I've only seen a later
segfault though).
So this patch adds a callback to
RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions which can make sure the
instruction about to be deleted is removed from CodeGenPrepare's data
structures.
I don't know anything about debug info, but this seems like more work
should be necessary. This constructs a new IRBuilder and reconstructs
the original divides rather than moving the original.
One problem this has is if a div/rem pair are handled, both end up
with the same debugloc. I'm not sure how to fix this, since this uses
a cache when it sees the same input operands again, which will have
the first instance's location attached.
This should probably be implied for all the speculatable ones. I think
the only ones where this plausibly doesn't apply is s_sendmsghalt and
maybe kill.
When the zext gets promoted, it used to retain the original location,
which pessimizes the debugging experience causing an unexpected
jump in stepping at -Og.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46120 (which also
contains a full C repro).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81437
The promotion machinery in CGP moves instructions retaining
debug locations. When the transformation is local, this is mostly
correct, but when instructions are moved cross-BBs, this is not
always true and causes jumpiness in line tables. This is the first
of a series of commits. sext(s) and zext(s) need to be treated
similarly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81879
This is basically the same patch as D63233, but converted to
funnel shifts rather than regular shifts. I did not see a
way to effectively share code for these 2 cases though.
This follows D79718 and D79827 to re-fix PR37426 because
that gets canonicalized to funnel shift intrinsics in IR.
I did draft an alternative patch as an enhancement to
"shouldSinkOperands()", but that was awkward because
we have to key the transform from the select, but then
look at both its users and its operands.
This is D77454, except for stores. All the infrastructure work was done
for loads, so the remaining changes necessary are relatively small.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79968
For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the
datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR
later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the
datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default
datalayout.
The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow
overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this,
some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target.
Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new
machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the
datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information
from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools
to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time.
Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback.
(clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at
least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a
datalayout is not something frontends should generate.
This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen
regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with
a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the
overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the
default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one
AMDGPU test.
Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just
fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
Expands on the enablement of the shouldSinkOperands() TLI hook in:
D79718
The last codegen/IR test diff shows what I suspected could happen - we were
sinking all splat shift operands into a loop. But that's not what we want in
general; we only want to sink the *shift amount* operand if it is a splat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79827
SDAG suffers when it can't see that a funnel operand is a splat value
(due to single-basic-block visibility), so invert the normal loop
hoisting rules to move a splat op closer to its use.
This would be part 1 of an enhancement similar to D63233.
This is needed to re-fix PR37426:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37426
...because we got better at canonicalizing IR to funnel shift intrinsics.
The existing CGP code for shift opcodes is likely overstepping what it was
intended to do, so that will be fixed in a follow-up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79718
GNU ld's internal linker script uses (https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=add44f8d5c5c05e08b11e033127a744d61c26aee)
.text :
{
*(.text.unlikely .text.*_unlikely .text.unlikely.*)
*(.text.exit .text.exit.*)
*(.text.startup .text.startup.*)
*(.text.hot .text.hot.*)
*(SORT(.text.sorted.*))
*(.text .stub .text.* .gnu.linkonce.t.*)
/* .gnu.warning sections are handled specially by elf.em. */
*(.gnu.warning)
}
Because `*(.text.exit .text.exit.*)` is ordered before `*(.text .text.*)`, in a -ffunction-sections build, the C library function `exit` will be placed before other functions.
gold's `-z keep-text-section-prefix` has the same problem.
In lld, `-z keep-text-section-prefix` recognizes `.text.{exit,hot,startup,unlikely,unknown}.*`, but not `.text.{exit,hot,startup,unlikely,unknown}`, to avoid the strange placement problem.
In -fno-function-sections or -fno-unique-section-names mode, a function whose `function_section_prefix` is set to `.exit"`
will go to the output section `.text` instead of `.text.exit` when linked by lld.
To address the problem, append a dot to become `.text.exit.`
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79600
XOP targets have fast per-element vector shifts and we're better off splitting to 128-bit shifts where necessary (which is what we already do in LowerShift).
Helps improve test coverage of the XOP modes in X86TargetLowering::isVectorShiftByScalarCheap (and where we always return false for vXi8 vector shifts).
I've always found the "findValue" a little odd and
inconsistent with other things in SDB.
This simplfifies the code in SDB to just handle a splat constant
address or a 2 operand GEP in the same BB. This removes the
need for "findValue" since the operands to the GEP are
guaranteed to be available. The splat constant handling is
new, but was needed to avoid regressions due to constant
folding combining GEPs created in CGP.
CGP is now responsible for canonicalizing gather/scatters into
this form. The pattern I'm using for scalarizing, a scalar GEP
followed by a GEP with an all zeroes index, seems to be subject
to constant folding that the insertelement+shufflevector was not.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76947
The attached test case is simplified from tcmalloc. Both function calls should be optimized as tailcall. But llvm can only optimize the first call. The second call can't be optimized because function dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts failed to duplicate ret into block case2.
There 2 problems blocked the duplication:
1 Intrinsic call llvm.assume is not handled by dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts.
2 The control flow is more complex than expected, dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts can only duplicate ret into its predecessor, but here we have an intermediate block between call and ret.
The solutions:
1 Since CodeGenPrepare is already at the end of LLVM IR phase, we can simply delete the intrinsic call to llvm.assume.
2 A general solution to the complex control flow is hard, but for this case, after exit2 is duplicated into case1, exit2 is the only successor of exit1 and exit1 is the only predecessor of exit2, so they can be combined through eliminateFallThrough. But this function is called too late, there is no more dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts after it. We can add an earlier call to eliminateFallThrough to solve it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76539
Summary:
This is a simple fix for CodeGenPrepare that freezes branch condition when transforming select to branch.
If it is not frozen, instsimplify or the later pipeline can potentially exploit undefined behavior.
The diff shows optimized form becase D75859 and D76048 already made a few changes to CodeGenPrepare for optimizing freeze(cmp).
Reviewers: jdoerfert, spatel, lebedev.ri, efriedma
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76179
Summary:
This is a simple fix for CodeGenPrepare that freezes branch condition when transforming select to branch.
If it is not freezed, instsimplify or the later pipeline can potentially exploit undefined behavior.
The diff shows optimized form becase D75859 and D76048 already made a few changes to CodeGenPrepare for optimizing freeze(cmp).
Reviewers: jdoerfert, spatel, lebedev.ri, efriedma
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76179
Summary:
This is a simple patch that expands https://reviews.llvm.org/D75859 to pointer comparison and fcmp
Checked with Alive2
Reviewers: reames, jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76048
Summary:
This patch helps CodeGenPrepare move freeze into the icmp when it is used by branch.
It reenables generation of efficient conditional jumps.
This is only done when at least one of icmp's operands is constant to prevent the transformation from increasing # of freeze instructions.
Performance degradation of MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/yacr2/yacr2.test is resolved with this patch.
Checked with Alive2
Reviewers: reames, fhahn, nlopes
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: jdoerfert, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75859
This version fixes a buildbot failure cause by picking the wrong insert
point for XORs. We cannot pick the XOR binary operator as insert point,
as it is not guaranteed that both input operands for the overflow
intrinsic are defined before it.
This reverts the revert commit
c7fc0e5da6.
Instcombine folds (a + b <u a) to (a ^ -1 <u b) and that does not match
the expected pattern in CodeGenPerpare via UAddWithOverflow.
This causes a regression over Clang 7 on both X86 and AArch64:
https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/juhXYV
This patch extends UAddWithOverflow to also catch the XOR case, if the
XOR is only used in the ICMP. This covers just a single case, but I'd
like to make sure I am not missing anything before tackling the other
cases.
Reviewers: nikic, RKSimon, lebedev.ri, spatel
Reviewed By: nikic, lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74228
On some targets, like SPARC, forming overflow ops is only profitable if
the math result is used: https://godbolt.org/z/DxSmdB
This patch adds a new MathUsed parameter to allow the targets
to make the decision and defaults to only allowing it
if the math result is used. That is the conservative choice.
This patch also updates AArch64ISelLowering, X86ISelLowering,
ARMISelLowering.h, SystemZISelLowering.h to allow forming overflow
ops if the math result is not used. On those targets using the
overflow intrinsic for the overflow check only generates better code.
Reviewers: nikic, RKSimon, lebedev.ri, spatel
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74722
Summary:
Right now the alignment of the lower half of a store is computed as
align/2, which fails for unaligned stores (align = 1), and is overly
pessimitic for, e.g. a 8 byte store aligned to 4 bytes.
Fixes PR44851
Fixes PR44877
Reviewers: gchatelet, spatel, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74311
The code paths in the absence of TargetMachine, TargetLowering or
TargetRegisterInfo are poorly tested. As rL285987 said, requiring
TargetPassConfig allows us to delete many (untested) checks littered
everywhere.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73754
Add a pass to lower is.constant and objectsize intrinsics
This pass lowers is.constant and objectsize intrinsics not simplified by
earlier constant folding, i.e. if the object given is not constant or if
not using the optimized pass chain. The result is recursively simplified
and constant conditionals are pruned, so that dead blocks are removed
even for -O0. This allows inline asm blocks with operand constraints to
work all the time.
The new pass replaces the existing lowering in the codegen-prepare pass
and fallbacks in SDAG/GlobalISEL and FastISel. The latter now assert
on the intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65280
llvm-svn: 374784
This pass lowers is.constant and objectsize intrinsics not simplified by
earlier constant folding, i.e. if the object given is not constant or if
not using the optimized pass chain. The result is recursively simplified
and constant conditionals are pruned, so that dead blocks are removed
even for -O0. This allows inline asm blocks with operand constraints to
work all the time.
The new pass replaces the existing lowering in the codegen-prepare pass
and fallbacks in SDAG/GlobalISEL and FastISel. The latter now assert
on the intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65280
llvm-svn: 374743
In MVE, as of rL371218, we are attempting to sink chains of instructions such as:
%l1 = insertelement <8 x i8> undef, i8 %l0, i32 0
%broadcast.splat26 = shufflevector <8 x i8> %l1, <8 x i8> undef, <8 x i32> zeroinitializer
In certain situations though, we can end up breaking the dominance relations of
instructions. This happens when we sink the instruction into a loop, but cannot
remove the originals. The Use is updated, which might in fact be a Use from the
second instruction to the first.
This attempts to fix that by reversing the order of instruction that are sunk,
and ensuring that we update the uses on new instructions if they have already
been sunk, not the old ones.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67366
llvm-svn: 371743
Philip Reames