disabled for several months (since svn r88806) and no one noticed. My fix
for pr6543 yesterday reenabled it, but broke the ARM port's code for using
TBB/TBH. Rather than adding a target hook to disable merging for Thumb2 only,
I'm just taking this out. It is not common to have identical jump tables,
the code we used to merge them was O(N^2), and it only helps code size, not
performance.
llvm-svn: 98977
into TargetOpcodes.h. #include the new TargetOpcodes.h
into MachineInstr. Add new inline accessors (like isPHI())
to MachineInstr, and start using them throughout the
codebase.
llvm-svn: 95687
1. MachineJumpTableInfo is now created lazily for a function the first time
it actually makes a jump table instead of for every function.
2. The encoding of jump table entries is now described by the
MachineJumpTableInfo::JTEntryKind enum. This enum is determined by the
TLI::getJumpTableEncoding() hook, instead of by lots of code scattered
throughout the compiler that "knows" that jump table entries are always
32-bits in pic mode (for example).
3. The size and alignment of jump table entries is now calculated based on
their kind, instead of at machinefunction creation time.
Future work includes using the EntryKind in more places in the compiler,
eliminating other logic that "knows" the layout of jump tables in various
situations.
llvm-svn: 94470
branches only to a landing pad. Without this check, the compiler would go into
an infinite loop because the branch to a landing pad is an "abnormal" edge which
wasn't being taken into account.
This is the meat of that fix:
if (!PrevBB.canFallThrough() && !MBB->BranchesToLandingPad(MBB)) {
The other stuff is simplification of the "branches to a landing pad" code.
llvm-svn: 91161
running tail duplication when doing branch folding for if-conversion, and
we also want to be able to run tail duplication earlier to fix some
reg alloc problems. Move the CanFallThrough function from BranchFolding
to MachineBasicBlock so that it can be shared by TailDuplication.
llvm-svn: 89904
Make tail duplication of indirect branches much more aggressive (for targets
that indicate that it is profitable), based on further experience with
this transformation. I compiled 3 large applications with and without
this more aggressive tail duplication and measured minimal changes in code
size. ("size" on Darwin seems to round the text size up to the nearest
page boundary, so I can only say that any code size increase was less than
one 4k page.) Radar 7421267.
llvm-svn: 89814
contents of the block to be duplicated. Use this for ARM Cortex A8/9 to
be more aggressive tail duplicating indirect branches, since it makes it
much more likely that they will be predicted in the branch target buffer.
Testcase coming soon.
llvm-svn: 89187
unnecessary. It is broken because the "isIdenticalTo" check should be
negated. If that is fixed, this code causes the CodeGen/X86/tail-opts.ll
test to fail, in the dont_merge_oddly function. And, I confirmed that the
regression is real -- the generated code is worse. As far as I can tell,
that tail-opts.ll test is checking for what this code is supposed to handle
and we're doing the right thing anyway.
llvm-svn: 89121
code-size win, and not when it's only likely to be code-size neutral,
such as when only a single instruction would be eliminated and a new
branch would be required.
This fixes rdar://7392894.
llvm-svn: 88692
instead of typedefs for std::pair. This simplifies the type of
SameTails, which previously was std::vector<std::pair<std::vector<std::pair<unsigned, MachineBasicBlock *> >::iterator, MachineBasicBlock::iterator>
llvm-svn: 86885
tail merging support to handle more cases.
- Recognize several cases where tail merging is beneficial even when
the tail size is smaller than the generic threshold.
- Make use of MachineInstrDesc::isBarrier to help detect
non-fallthrough blocks.
- Check for and avoid disrupting fall-through edges in more cases.
llvm-svn: 86871
an unconditional branch (possibly from tail merging), this code is
trying to redirect all of its predecessors to go directly to the branch
target, but that isn't feasible for indirect branches. The other
predecessors (that don't end with indirect branches) could theoretically
still be handled, but that is not easily done right now.
The AnalyzeBranch interface doesn't currently let us distinguish jump table
branches from indirect branches, and this code is currently handling
jump tables. To avoid punting on address-taken blocks, we would have to give
up handling jump tables. That seems like a bad tradeoff.
llvm-svn: 85975
Bob Wilson