Commit Graph

30 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith 4434d361d0 CodeGen: Don't set hidden visibility on symbols with local linkage
llvm-svn: 208258
2014-05-07 22:36:11 +00:00
John McCall e54d92b0f1 RTTI symbols for visible local types may need weak linkage.
Previously, we would always emit them with internal linkage,
but with hidden visibility when the function was hidden, which
is an illegal combination, which could lead LLVM to actually
emit them as strong hidden symbols with hilarious results.

rdar://16265084

llvm-svn: 203503
2014-03-10 22:27:33 +00:00
John McCall 57420b320c type_info objects are not unnamed_addr: the ABI requires us to
unique them and permits the implementation of dynamic_cast (and
anything else which knows it's working with a complete class
type) to compare their addresses directly.

rdar://16005328

llvm-svn: 201020
2014-02-08 03:26:05 +00:00
John McCall 8f80a61914 Remove the -fhidden-weak-vtables -cc1 option. It was dead,
gross, and increasingly replaced through other mechanisms.

llvm-svn: 201011
2014-02-08 00:41:16 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 49f17537ee When emitting RTTI for a non-class type, compute the visibility of the RTTI data based on the explicit visibility of the type.
llvm-svn: 124553
2011-01-29 22:10:32 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 46fcf9f0b7 Update tests.
I'm still not sure if having the typenames be visible with -hidden-weak-vtables, but I think it makes sense.

llvm-svn: 124549
2011-01-29 20:57:16 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 571e2ad042 Mark VTables and RTTI data linkonce_odr instead of weak_odr, with the exception of explicit template instantiations, which have to be weak_odr.
This fixes PR6996.

llvm-svn: 124089
2011-01-24 00:46:19 +00:00
Rafael Espindola 25f4620c67 Set unnamed_addr in every type info.
llvm-svn: 123293
2011-01-11 23:55:05 +00:00
Rafael Espindola b1e879c80f Set unnamed_addr for type infos that we are confortable marking as hidden. I
think it is safe to mark all type infos with unnamed_addr, but I am not sure.

llvm-svn: 123275
2011-01-11 21:44:37 +00:00
John McCall 09982c0a49 Give hidden visibility to RTTI for derived types. This is kindof a hacky
way to do this, but it fixes rdar://problem/8778973

llvm-svn: 122033
2010-12-17 02:58:03 +00:00
NAKAMURA Takumi 2fbf57a949 test/CodeGenCXX/rtti-linkage.cpp: Get rid of sort(1) to remove XFAIL: win32.
On the certain system, bogus SORT.EXE is picked up. Its sort-order is incompatible to POSIX.

llvm-svn: 118391
2010-11-08 01:05:10 +00:00
Argyrios Kyrtzidis f0e31c8b9c Don't let typeinfo name symbols be 'internal hidden', it can lead to linker conflicts
with similarly named classes in anonymous namespaces.

llvm-svn: 116185
2010-10-11 03:25:53 +00:00
John McCall b3732bb3b7 Just disable the hidden-visibility optimization for now by hiding it behind
a -cc1 option.  The Darwin linker complains about mixed visibility when linking
gcc-built objects with clang-built objects, and the optimization isn't really
that valuable.  Platforms with less ornery linkers can feel free to enable this.

llvm-svn: 110979
2010-08-12 23:36:15 +00:00
John McCall 5513fce96b It turns out that linkers (at least, the Darwin linker) don't necessarily
do the right thing with mixed-visibility symbols, so disable the visibility
optimization where that's possible, i.e. with template classes (since it's
possible that an arbitrary template might be subject to an explicit
instantiation elsewhere).  447.dealII actually does this.

I've put the code under an option that's currently not hooked up to anything.

llvm-svn: 110374
2010-08-05 20:39:18 +00:00
John McCall e16adc2b1e Emit standard-library RTTI with external linkage, not weak_odr.
Apply hidden visibility to most RTTI;  libstdc++ does not rely on exact
pointer equality for the type info (just the type info names).  Apply
the same optimization to RTTI that we do to vtables.

Fixes PR5962.

llvm-svn: 110192
2010-08-04 08:34:44 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 876cec2898 typeid() produces type information for the cv-unqualified version of
the type. Thanks to Anders for the bug report!

llvm-svn: 105314
2010-06-02 06:16:02 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar 64585cdb66 XFAIL a test on Win32.
llvm-svn: 103762
2010-05-14 03:54:53 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 88d292ccb8 Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are
"used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and
when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function
definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential
definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting
vtables for classes without key functions. 

The new scheme:
  - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate
  the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member
  function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type,
  dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting
  to/through a virtual base class, etc.
  - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to
  indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation
  unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can
  delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also
  occur with explicit template instantiation definitions.
 - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member
 functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key
 function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual
 member functions when needed.
  - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the
  ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define
  them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the
  vtables lazily). 

From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are
permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions
whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers
were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance
issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke
Boost test cases, which now pass).

Notes:
  (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which
  vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of
  the larger tests from these issues.
  (2) Some diagnostics related to
  implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions
  have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this
  way.
  (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to
  see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a
  vtable.

Fixes PR7114 and PR6564.

llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-13 16:44:06 +00:00
Douglas Gregor d7f18dd750 Drastically simplify the computation of linkage for typeinfo by using
the existing (and already well-tested) linkage computation for types,
with minor tweaks for dynamic classes and (pointers to) incomplete
types. Fixes PR6597.

llvm-svn: 99968
2010-03-31 00:15:35 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 2d21394190 If the key function of a record is inline, then the RTTI data should have weak_odr linkage.
llvm-svn: 92371
2009-12-31 19:36:25 +00:00
Anders Carlsson ac2f681777 More RTTI cleanup, test that RTTI classes have the correct vtables.
llvm-svn: 92284
2009-12-30 01:00:12 +00:00
Anders Carlsson ef88695860 Handle enum types as well.
llvm-svn: 92276
2009-12-29 22:13:01 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 26cf4ab8e2 Fix function type RTTI linkage and add tests.
llvm-svn: 92266
2009-12-29 20:20:19 +00:00
Douglas Gregor f45f6828c6 Remove cv-qualifiers from the argument to typeid
llvm-svn: 92041
2009-12-23 20:51:04 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 9a98ac993f Add tests for structs inside anonymous namespaces.
llvm-svn: 91806
2009-12-21 00:57:38 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 2b7f444366 Incomplete structs should also have internal linkage.
llvm-svn: 91805
2009-12-21 00:41:42 +00:00
Anders Carlsson 18e6ee1b20 Correcly handle pointers to member pointer types where the class or the pointee is incomplete.
llvm-svn: 91804
2009-12-20 23:37:55 +00:00
Anders Carlsson d008129f34 Rework the way pointer types are handled by the RTTI builder. We now get the right linkage for indirect pointers to incomplete structs.
llvm-svn: 91799
2009-12-20 22:30:54 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar 8fbe78f6fc Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'.
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
   which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
   can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
   a default target).

llvm-svn: 91446
2009-12-15 20:14:24 +00:00
Anders Carlsson a0b98f083a Use GetAddrOfRTTI when getting the RTTI pointer for a base class.
llvm-svn: 91127
2009-12-11 16:37:06 +00:00