- Output format and some of the code stolen from macho-dump.
- Somewhat incomplete and probably buggy.
- Comes with a very basic test.
llvm-svn: 113488
unrolling threshold to the optimize-for-size threshold. Basically, for loops containing calls, unrolling
can still be profitable as long as the loop is REALLY small.
llvm-svn: 113439
turning (fptrunc (sqrt (fpext x))) -> (sqrtf x) is great, but we have
to delete the original sqrt as well. Not doing so causes us to do
two sqrt's when building with -fmath-errno (the default on linux).
llvm-svn: 113260
always be disambiguated as sldtw. sldtw and sldtq with
a mem operands have the same effect, but sldtw is more
compact. Force it to sldtw, resolving rdar://8017530
llvm-svn: 113186
in the duplicated block instead of duplicating them.
Duplicating them into the end of the loop and the preheader
means that we got a phi node in the header of the loop,
which prevented LICM from hoisting them. GVN would
usually come around later and merge the duplicated
instructions so we'd get reasonable output... except that
anything dependent on the shoulda-been-hoisted value can't
be hoisted. In PR5319 (which this fixes), a memory value
didn't get promoted.
llvm-svn: 113134
Since mem2reg isn't run at -O0, we get a ton of reloads from the stack,
for example, before, this code:
int foo(int x, int y, int z) {
return x+y+z;
}
used to compile into:
_foo: ## @foo
subq $12, %rsp
movl %edi, 8(%rsp)
movl %esi, 4(%rsp)
movl %edx, (%rsp)
movl 8(%rsp), %edx
movl 4(%rsp), %esi
addl %edx, %esi
movl (%rsp), %edx
addl %esi, %edx
movl %edx, %eax
addq $12, %rsp
ret
Now we produce:
_foo: ## @foo
subq $12, %rsp
movl %edi, 8(%rsp)
movl %esi, 4(%rsp)
movl %edx, (%rsp)
movl 8(%rsp), %edx
addl 4(%rsp), %edx ## Folded load
addl (%rsp), %edx ## Folded load
movl %edx, %eax
addq $12, %rsp
ret
Fewer instructions and less register use = faster compiles.
llvm-svn: 113102
location is being re-stored to the memory location. We would get
a dangling pointer from the SSAUpdate data structure and miss a
use. This fixes PR8068
llvm-svn: 113042
"For ARM stack frames that utilize variable sized objects and have either
large local stack areas or require dynamic stack realignment, allocate a
base register via which to access the local frame. This allows efficient
access to frame indices not accessible via the FP (either due to being out
of range or due to dynamic realignment) or the SP (due to variable sized
object allocation). In particular, this greatly improves efficiency of access
to spill slots in Thumb functions which contain VLAs."
r112986 fixed a latent bug exposed by the above.
llvm-svn: 112989
vabd intrinsic and add and/or zext operations. In the case of vaba, this
also avoids the need for a DAG combine pattern to combine vabd with add.
Update tests. Auto-upgrade the old intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 112941
large local stack areas or require dynamic stack realignment, allocate a
base register via which to access the local frame. This allows efficient
access to frame indices not accessible via the FP (either due to being out
of range or due to dynamic realignment) or the SP (due to variable sized
object allocation). In particular, this greatly improves efficiency of access
to spill slots in Thumb functions which contain VLAs.
rdar://7352504
rdar://8374540
rdar://8355680
llvm-svn: 112883
there are clearly no stores between the load and the store. This fixes
this miscompile reported as PR7833.
This breaks the test/CodeGen/X86/narrow_op-2.ll optimization, which is
safe, but awkward to prove safe. Move it to X86's README.txt.
llvm-svn: 112861
add, and subtract operations with zero-extended or sign-extended vectors.
Update tests. Add auto-upgrade support for the old intrinsics.
llvm-svn: 112773
check more strict, breaking some cases not checked in the
testsuite, but also exposes some foldings not done before,
as this example:
movaps (%rdi), %xmm0
movaps (%rax), %xmm1
movaps %xmm0, %xmm2
movss %xmm1, %xmm2
shufps $36, %xmm2, %xmm0
now is generated as:
movaps (%rdi), %xmm0
movaps %xmm0, %xmm1
movlps (%rax), %xmm1
shufps $36, %xmm1, %xmm0
llvm-svn: 112753
on llvmdev: SRoA is introducing MMX datatypes like <1 x i64>,
which then cause random problems because the X86 backend is
producing mmx stuff without inserting proper emms calls.
In the short term, force off MMX datatypes. In the long term,
the X86 backend should not select generic vector types to MMX
registers. This is being worked on, but won't be done in time
for 2.8. rdar://8380055
llvm-svn: 112696
int x(int t) {
if (t & 256)
return -26;
return 0;
}
We generate this:
tst.w r0, #256
mvn r0, #25
it eq
moveq r0, #0
while gcc generates this:
ands r0, r0, #256
it ne
mvnne r0, #25
bx lr
Scandalous really!
During ISel time, we can look for this particular pattern. One where we have a
"MOVCC" that uses the flag off of a CMPZ that itself is comparing an AND
instruction to 0. Something like this (greatly simplified):
%r0 = ISD::AND ...
ARMISD::CMPZ %r0, 0 @ sets [CPSR]
%r0 = ARMISD::MOVCC 0, -26 @ reads [CPSR]
All we have to do is convert the "ISD::AND" into an "ARM::ANDS" that sets [CPSR]
when it's zero. The zero value will all ready be in the %r0 register and we only
need to change it if the AND wasn't zero. Easy!
llvm-svn: 112664
I have not been able to find a way to test each in isolation, for a few reasons:
1) The ability to look-through non-i1 BinaryOperator's requires the ability to look through non-constant
ICmps in order for it to ever trigger.
2) The ability to do LVI-powered PHI value determination only matters in cases that ProcessBranchOnPHI
can't handle. Since it already handles all the cases without other instructions in the def-use chain
between the PHI and the branch, it requires the ability to look through ICmps and/or BinaryOperators
as well.
llvm-svn: 112611
This actually exposed an infinite recursion bug in ComputeValueKnownInPredecessors which theoretically already existed (in JumpThreading's
handling of and/or of i1's), but never manifested before. This patch adds a tracking set to prevent this case.
llvm-svn: 112589
1) nuke ConstDataCoalSection, which is dead.
2) revise my previous patch for rdar://8018335,
which was completely wrong. Specifically, it doesn't
make sense to mark __TEXT,__const_coal as PURE_INSTRUCTIONS,
because it is for readonly data. templates (it turns out)
go to const_coal_nt. The real fix for rdar://8018335 was
to give ConstTextCoalSection a section kind of ReadOnly
instead of Text.
llvm-svn: 112496
when the top elements of a vector are undefined. This happens all
the time for X86-64 ABI stuff because only the low 2 elements of
a 4 element vector are defined. For example, on:
_Complex float f32(_Complex float A, _Complex float B) {
return A+B;
}
We used to produce (with SSE2, SSE4.1+ uses insertps):
_f32: ## @f32
movdqa %xmm0, %xmm2
addss %xmm1, %xmm2
pshufd $16, %xmm2, %xmm2
pshufd $1, %xmm1, %xmm1
pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm0
addss %xmm1, %xmm0
pshufd $16, %xmm0, %xmm1
movdqa %xmm2, %xmm0
unpcklps %xmm1, %xmm0
ret
We now produce:
_f32: ## @f32
movdqa %xmm0, %xmm2
addss %xmm1, %xmm2
pshufd $1, %xmm1, %xmm1
pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm3
addss %xmm1, %xmm3
movaps %xmm2, %xmm0
unpcklps %xmm3, %xmm0
ret
This implements rdar://8368414
llvm-svn: 112378
all the other LDM/STM instructions. This fixes asm printer crashes when
compiling with -O0. I've changed one of the NEON tests (vst3.ll) to run
with -O0 to check this in the future.
Prior to this change VLDM/VSTM used addressing mode #5, but not really.
The offset field was used to hold a count of the number of registers being
loaded or stored, and the AM5 opcode field was expanded to specify the IA
or DB mode, instead of the standard ADD/SUB specifier. Much of the backend
was not aware of these special cases. The crashes occured when rewriting
a frameindex caused the AM5 offset field to be changed so that it did not
have a valid submode. I don't know exactly what changed to expose this now.
Maybe we've never done much with -O0 and NEON. Regardless, there's no longer
any reason to keep a count of the VLDM/VSTM registers, so we can use
addressing mode #4 and clean things up in a lot of places.
llvm-svn: 112322
A = shl x, 42
...
B = lshr ..., 38
which can be transformed into:
A = shl x, 4
...
iff we can prove that the would-be-shifted-in bits
are already zero. This eliminates two shifts in the testcase
and allows eliminate of the whole i128 chain in the real example.
llvm-svn: 112314
framework, which is good at ripping through bitfield
operations. This generalize a bunch of the existing
xforms that instcombine does, such as
(x << c) >> c -> and
to handle intermediate logical nodes. This is useful for
ripping up the "promote to large integer" code produced by
SRoA.
llvm-svn: 112304
by the SRoA "promote to large integer" code, eliminating
some type conversions like this:
%94 = zext i16 %93 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=2]
%96 = lshr i32 %94, 8 ; <i32> [#uses=1]
%101 = trunc i32 %96 to i8 ; <i8> [#uses=1]
This also unblocks other xforms from happening, now clang is able to compile:
struct S { float A, B, C, D; };
float foo(struct S A) { return A.A + A.B+A.C+A.D; }
into:
_foo: ## @foo
## BB#0: ## %entry
pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm2
addss %xmm0, %xmm2
movdqa %xmm1, %xmm3
addss %xmm2, %xmm3
pshufd $1, %xmm1, %xmm0
addss %xmm3, %xmm0
ret
on x86-64, instead of:
_foo: ## @foo
## BB#0: ## %entry
movd %xmm0, %rax
shrq $32, %rax
movd %eax, %xmm2
addss %xmm0, %xmm2
movapd %xmm1, %xmm3
addss %xmm2, %xmm3
movd %xmm1, %rax
shrq $32, %rax
movd %eax, %xmm0
addss %xmm3, %xmm0
ret
This seems pretty close to optimal to me, at least without
using horizontal adds. This also triggers in lots of other
code, including SPEC.
llvm-svn: 112278
fix: add a flag to MapValue and friends which indicates whether
any module-level mappings are being made. In the common case of
inlining, no module-level mappings are needed, so MapValue doesn't
need to examine non-function-local metadata, which can be very
expensive in the case of a large module with really deep metadata
(e.g. a large C++ program compiled with -g).
This flag is a little awkward; perhaps eventually it can be moved
into the ClonedCodeInfo class.
llvm-svn: 112190
expanding: e.g. <2 x float> -> <4 x float> instead of -> 2 floats. This
affects two places in the code: handling cross block values and handling
function return and arguments. Since vectors are already widened by
legalizetypes, this gives us much better code and unblocks x86-64 abi
and SPU abi work.
For example, this (which is a silly example of a cross-block value):
define <4 x float> @test2(<4 x float> %A) nounwind {
%B = shufflevector <4 x float> %A, <4 x float> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1>
%C = fadd <2 x float> %B, %B
br label %BB
BB:
%D = fadd <2 x float> %C, %C
%E = shufflevector <2 x float> %D, <2 x float> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 undef, i32 undef>
ret <4 x float> %E
}
Now compiles into:
_test2: ## @test2
## BB#0:
addps %xmm0, %xmm0
addps %xmm0, %xmm0
ret
previously it compiled into:
_test2: ## @test2
## BB#0:
addps %xmm0, %xmm0
pshufd $1, %xmm0, %xmm1
## kill: XMM0<def> XMM0<kill> XMM0<def>
insertps $0, %xmm0, %xmm0
insertps $16, %xmm1, %xmm0
addps %xmm0, %xmm0
ret
This implements rdar://8230384
llvm-svn: 112101
comparison that would overflow.
- The other under/overflow cases can't actually happen because the immediates
which would trigger them are legal (so we don't enter this code), but
adjusted the style to make it clear the transform is always valid.
llvm-svn: 112053
- Implemented by manually splicing the tokens. If this turns out to be
problematically platform specific, a more elegant solution would be to
implement some context dependent lexing support.
llvm-svn: 111934
comparison is in a different basic block from the branch. In such
cases, the comparison's operands may not have initialized virtual
registers available.
llvm-svn: 111709
It's similar to "linker_private_weak", but it's known that the address of the
object is not taken. For instance, functions that had an inline definition, but
the compiler decided not to inline it. Note, unlike linker_private and
linker_private_weak, linker_private_weak_def_auto may have only default
visibility. The symbols are removed by the linker from the final linked image
(executable or dynamic library).
llvm-svn: 111684