With targeting i686-win32,
error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 521: implicit instantiation of undefined template 'dr547::X<void () __attribute__((thiscall)) const>'
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 518: implicit instantiation of undefined template 'dr547::X<void () __attribute__((thiscall)) const>'
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 518: implicit instantiation of undefined template 'dr547::X<void () __attribute__((thiscall)) const>'
error: 'note' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 516: template is declared here
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 521: in instantiation of function template specialization 'dr547::f<void () __attribute__((thiscall)) const, dr547::S>' requested here
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 516: template is declared here
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr5xx.cpp Line 516: template is declared here
7 errors generated.
llvm-svn: 216841
A couple of these arguments were passed by void* as a rather extreme
example of pimpling. Adjusting this to a more classic form of the idiom
(involving forward declarations) makes this more legible and allows
explicit passing of ownership via std::unique_ptr.
llvm-svn: 216785
This avoids encoding information about the function prototype into the
thunk at the cost of some function prototype bitcast gymnastics.
Fixes PR20653.
llvm-svn: 216782
in the super class, do not issue the warning about property
in current class's protocol will not be auto synthesized.
// rdar://18179833
llvm-svn: 216769
People have been incorrectly using "-analyzer-disable-checker" to
silence analyzer warnings on a file, when analyzing a project. Add
the "-analyzer-disable-all-checks" option, which would allow the
suppression and suggest it as part of the error message for
"-analyzer-disable-checker". The idea here is to compose this with
"--analyze" so that users can selectively opt out specific files from
static analysis.
llvm-svn: 216763
I suspect llvm::ilist should take elements by unique_ptr, since it does
take ownership of the element (by stitching it into the linked list) -
one day.
llvm-svn: 216761
Do not warn when property declared in class's protocol will be auto-synthesized
by its uper class implementation because super class has also declared this
property while this class has not. Continue to warn if current class
has declared the property also (because this declaration will not result
in a 2nd synthesis).
rdar://18152478
llvm-svn: 216753
Again, if shared ownership is the right model here (I assume it is,
given graph algorithms & such) this could be tidied up (the 'release'
call removed in favor of something safer) by having
IntrunsiveRefCntPointer constructible from a unique_ptr.
(& honestly I'd probably favor taking a page out of shared_ptr's book,
allowing implicit construction from a unique_ptr rvalue, and only allow
explicit from a raw pointer - currently IntrusiveRefCntPointer can
implicitly own from a raw pointer, which seems unsafe)
llvm-svn: 216752
In theory, it'd be nice if we could move to a case where all buried
pointers were buried via unique_ptr to demonstrate that the program had
finished with the value (that we could really have cleanly deallocated
it) but instead chose to bury it.
I think the main reason that's not possible right now is the various
IntrusiveRefCntPtrs in the Frontend, sharing ownership for a variety of
compiler bits (see the various similar
"CompilerInstance::releaseAndLeak*" functions). I have yet to figure out
their correct ownership semantics - but perhaps, even if the
intrusiveness can be removed, the shared ownership may yet remain and
that would lead to a non-unique burying as is there today. (though we
could model that a little better - by passing in a shared_ptr, etc -
rather than needing the two step that's currently used in those other
releaseAndLeak* functions)
This might be a bit more robust if BuryPointer took the boolean:
BuryPointer(bool, unique_ptr<T>)
and the choice to bury was made internally - that way, even when
DisableFree was not set, the unique_ptr would still be null in the
caller and there'd be no chance of accidentally having a different
codepath where the value is used after burial in !DisableFree, but it
becomes null only in DisableFree, etc...
llvm-svn: 216742
But don't move if all we do is clearing the thing. The move method is too large
to be inlined and performs a ton of unnecessary checking when the RHS is empty.
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 216723
Previously, EnterStructPointerForCoercedAccess used Alloc size when determining how to convert. This was problematic, because there were situations were the alloc size was larger than the store size. For example, if the first element of a structure were i24 and the destination type were i32, the old code would generate a GEP and a load i24. The code should compare store sizes to ensure the whole object is loaded. I have attached a test case.
This patch modifies the output of arm64-be-bitfield.c test case, but the new IR seems to be equivalent, and after -O3, the compiler generates identical ARM assembly. (asr x0, x0, #54)
Patch by Thomas Jablin!
llvm-svn: 216722
Summary:
We did a great job getting this wrong:
- We messed up which LLVM IR types to use for arguments and return values.
The optimized libcalls use integer types for values.
Clang attempted to use the IR type which corresponds to the value
passed in instead of using an appropriately sized integer type. This
would result in violations of the ABI for, as an example, floating
point types.
- We didn't bother recording the result of the atomic libcall in the
destination memory.
Instead, call the functions with arguments matching the type of the
libcall prototype's parameters.
This fixes PR20780.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5098
llvm-svn: 216714
It hits a limit when we reach ActionList, which is used for dynamic
conditional ownership, so we lose type safety there.
This did expose at least one caller "lying" about ownership (passing
ownership to an Action, then updating the Action to specify that it
doesn't actually own the thing that was passed) - changing this to
unique_ptr just makes that oddity more obvious.
llvm-svn: 216713
Rather than having a pair of pairs and a reference out parameter, build
a structure with everything together and named. A raw pointer and a
unique_ptr, rather than a raw pointer and a boolean, are used to
communicate ownership transfer.
It's possible one day we'll end up with a conditional pointer (probably
represented by a raw pointer and a boolean) abstraction to use in places
like this. Conditional ownership seems to be coming up more often than
I'd hoped...
llvm-svn: 216712
Summary:
The current implementation of asan cookie is incorrect:
we add nosanitize metadata to the cookie load, but the metadata may be lost
and we will instrument the load from poisoned memory.
This change replaces the load with a call to __asan_load_cxx_array_cookie (r216692)
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5111
llvm-svn: 216702
Rafael Espindola