cursors. Sadly, this visitation is a hack, because we don't have
proper source-location information for nested-name-specifiers in the
AST. It does improve on the status quo, however.
llvm-svn: 112837
three different kinds of AST nodes to represent using declarations:
UsingDecl, UnresolvedUsingValueDecl, and
UnresolvedUsingTypenameDecl. These three are collapsed into a single
cursor kind for using declarations, since libclang clients don't need
the distinction.
Several related changes here:
- Cursor visitation of the three AST nodes for using declarations
- Proper source-range computation for these AST nodes
- Using declarations have no USRs, since they don't actually declare
any entities.
llvm-svn: 112730
in a few related ways:
- Don't recurse into instantiations of templates.
- Recurse into explicit specializations.
- Visit the template arguments of an explicit specialization or
explicit instantiation.
- Include template specialization arguments in the USRs for class
template specializations.
llvm-svn: 112720
suppressing USRs). Also, fix up the source location information for
using directives so that the declaration location refers to the
namespace name.
llvm-svn: 112693
with a new cursor kind for a reference to a namespace.
There's still some oddities in the source location information for
NamespaceAliasDecl that I'll address with a separate commit, so the
source locations displayed in the load-namespaces.cpp test will
change.
llvm-svn: 112676
determines the kind of declaration that would be generated if the
given template were instantiated. This allows a client to distinguish
among class/struct/union templates and function/member function/static
member function templates.
Also, teach clang_CXXMethod_isStatic() about function templates.
llvm-svn: 112655
template. Such cursors occur, for example, in template specialization
types such as vector<int>. Note that we do not handle the
super-interesting case where the template name is unresolved, e.g.,
within a template.
llvm-svn: 112636
libclang. This includes:
- Cursor kind for function templates, with visitation logic
- Cursor kinds for template parameters, with visitation logic
- Visitation logic for template specialization types, qualified type
locations
- USR generation for function templates, template specialization
types, template parameter types.
Also happens to fix PR7804, which I tripped across while testing.
llvm-svn: 112604
conversion functions. This introduces new cursor kinds for these three
C++ entities, and reworks visitation of function declarations so that
we get type-source information for the names.
llvm-svn: 112600
Now all classes derived from Attr are generated from TableGen.
Additionally, Attr* is no longer its own linked list; SmallVectors or
Attr* are used. The accompanying LLVM commit contains the updates to
TableGen necessary for this.
Some other notes about newly-generated attribute classes:
- The constructor arguments are a SourceLocation and a Context&,
followed by the attributes arguments in the order that they were
defined in Attr.td
- Every argument in Attr.td has an appropriate accessor named getFoo,
and there are sometimes a few extra ones (such as to get the length
of a variadic argument).
Additionally, specific_attr_iterator has been introduced, which will
iterate over an AttrVec, but only over attributes of a certain type. It
can be accessed through either Decl::specific_attr_begin/end or
the global functions of the same name.
llvm-svn: 111455
when the CXTranslationUnit_CacheCompletionResults option is given to
clang_parseTranslationUnit(). Essentially, we compute code-completion
results for macro definitions after we have parsed the file, then
store an ASTContext-agnostic version of those results (completion
string, cursor kind, priority, and active contexts) in the
ASTUnit. When performing code completion in that ASTUnit, we splice
the macro definition results into the results provided by the actual
code-completion (which has had macros turned off) before libclang gets
those results. We use completion context information to only splice in
those results that make sense for that context.
With a completion involving all of the macros from Cocoa.h and a few other
system libraries (totally ~8500 macro definitions) living in a
precompiled header, we get about a 9% performance improvement from
code completion, since we no longer have to deserialize all of the
macro definitions from the precompiled header.
Note that macro definitions are merely the canary; the cache is
designed to also support other top-level declarations, which should be
a bigger performance win. That optimization will be next.
Note also that there is no mechanism for determining when to throw
away the cache and recompute its contents.
llvm-svn: 111051
clang_reparseTranslationUnit(), along with a function to retrieve the
default recommended reparsing options for a translation unit.
Also, add the CXTranslationUnit_CacheCompletionResults flag, which is
also currently unused.
llvm-svn: 110811
provided by __builtin_types_compatible_p and __builtin_va_arg
expressions, now that Abramo has added proper type-source information
to those expressions.
llvm-svn: 110681
"editing" mode, introduce a separate function
clang_defaultEditingTranslationUnitOptions() that retrieves the set of
options. No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 110613
completion within the translation unit using the same command-line
arguments for parsing the translation unit. Eventually, we'll reuse
the precompiled preamble to improve code-completion performance, and
this also gives us a place to cache results.
Expose this function via the new libclang function
clang_codeCompleteAt(), which performs the code completion within a
CXTranslationUnit. The completion occurs in-process
(clang_codeCompletion() runs code completion out-of-process).
llvm-svn: 110210
declarations that we saw when creating the precompiled preamble, and
provide those declarations in addition to the declarations parsed in
the main source file when traversing top-level declarations. This
makes the use of precompiled preambles a pure optimization, rather
than changing the semantics of the parsed translation unit.
llvm-svn: 110131
is present.
Rather than using clang_getCursorExtent(), which requires
us to lex the token at the ending position to determine its
length. Then, we'd be comparing [a, b) source ranges that cover the
characters in the range rather than the normal behavior for Clang's
source ranges, which covers the tokens in the range. However, relexing
causes us to read the source file (which may come from a precompiled
header), which is rather unfortunate and affects performance.
In the new scheme, we only use Clang-style source ranges that cover
the tokens in the range. At the entry points where this matters
(clang_annotateTokens, clang_getCursor), we make sure to move source
locations to the start of the token.
Addresses most of <rdar://problem/8049381>.
llvm-svn: 109134
will eventually replace
clang_createTranslationUnitFromSourceFile(). The only addition in
clang_parseTranslationUnit() is a set of flags that can control how
the translation unit is loaded. More interesting flags will be coming.
llvm-svn: 109027
reparses an already-parsed translation unit. At the moment it's just a
convenience function, but we hope to use it for performance
optimizations.
llvm-svn: 108756
to use them instead of SourceRange. CharSourceRange is just a SourceRange
plus a bool that indicates whether the range has the end character resolved
or whether the end location is the start of the end token. While most of
the compiler wants to think of ranges that have ends that are the start of
the end token, the printf diagnostic stuff wants to highlight ranges within
tokens.
This is transparent to the diagnostic stuff. To start taking advantage of
the new capabilities, you can do something like this:
Diag(..) << CharSourceRange::getCharRange(Begin,End)
llvm-svn: 106338
design limitation in how we handle Objective-C class extensions. This was causing the CursorVisitor
to essentially visit an @property twice (once in the @interface, the other in the class extension).
Fixes <rdar://problem/7410145>.
llvm-svn: 104055
ObjCObjectType, which is basically just a pair of
one of {primitive-id, primitive-Class, user-defined @class}
with
a list of protocols.
An ObjCObjectPointerType is therefore just a pointer which always points to
one of these types (possibly sugared). ObjCInterfaceType is now just a kind
of ObjCObjectType which happens to not carry any protocols.
Alter a rather large number of use sites to use ObjCObjectType instead of
ObjCInterfaceType. Store an ObjCInterfaceType as a pointer on the decl rather
than hashing them in a FoldingSet. Remove some number of methods that are no
longer used, at least after this patch.
By simplifying ObjCObjectPointerType, we are now able to easily remove and apply
pointers to Objective-C types, which is crucial for a certain kind of ObjC++
metaprogramming common in WebKit.
llvm-svn: 103870
<rdar://problem/7961995> and <rdar://problem/7967123> where declarations with attributes
would get grossly annotated with the wrong tokens because the attribute would be interpreted
as if it was a Decl*.
llvm-svn: 103581
Douglas Gregor