This was increasing the number of instructions when fsub was legalized
on AMDGPU with no signed zeros enabled. This fold should be guarded by
hasOneUse, and I don't think getNode should be doing that. The same
fold is already done as a regular combine through isNegatibleForFree.
This does require duplicating, even though isNegatibleForFree does
this combine already (and properly checks hasOneUse) to avoid one PPC
regression. In the regression, the outer fneg has nsz but the fsub
operand does not. isNegatibleForFree only sees the operand, and
doesn't see it's used from a nsz context. A nsz parameter needs to be
added and threaded through isNegatibleForFree to avoid this.
These operations are needed as building blocks for promoting so they
can't be promoted themselves.
This appeared to work because the fp_extend query type for operation
actions is the result type, not the input type so it never triggered
in the legalizer.
For fp_round, the vector op legalizer just ended up creating a
nop fp_extend that was elided by getNode, followed by a nop
fp_round that was also elided by getNode. This was followed by
a final fp_round from v4f32 back to vf416 which was CSEd to the
original node. Then legalize vector ops just believed that node
legalized to itself. LegalizeDAG took another crack at promoting
it, but didn't have a handler so just skipped it with a debug
message saying it wasn't promoted.
This patch just removes the operation actions to avoid this
non-sense. Found while trying to refactor LegalizeVectorOps to
handle multiple result nodes better.
This allows us to clean up some places that were peeking through
the MERGE_VALUES node after the call. By returning the SDValues
directly, we can clean that up.
Unfortunately, there are several call sites in AMDGPU that wanted
the MERGE_VALUES and now need to create their own.
This allows us to delete InlineAsm::Constraint_i workarounds in
SelectionDAGISel::SelectInlineAsmMemoryOperand overrides and
TargetLowering::getInlineAsmMemConstraint overrides.
They were introduced to X86 in r237517 to prevent crashes for
constraints like "=*imr". They were later copied to other targets.
SelectionDAG::transferDbgValues() can 'reattach' SDDbgValue from one to
another node, but doesn't change its source order. If the destination node has
the order greater than the SDDbgValue, there are two possible issues
revealed later:
* If debug info is attached to an instruction that is the first definition
of a register, this ends up with a def-after-use and the debug info
gets 'undef' later.
* If MIR has another definition of a register above the debug info,
the debug info may represent a source variable incorrectly because
it appears (significantly) before an instruction corresponded
to this debug info.
So, the patch changes the order of an SDDbgValue when it is moved
to a node with greater order.
Reviewers: dblaikie, jmorse, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: aprantl, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71175
Fix several several additional problems with the int <-> FP conversion
logic both in common code and in the X86 target. In particular:
- The STRICT_FP_TO_UINT expansion emits a floating-point compare. This
compare can raise exceptions and therefore needs to be a strict compare.
I've made it signaling (even though quiet would also be correct) as
signaling is the more usual default for an LT. This code exists both
in common code and in the X86 target.
- The STRICT_UINT_TO_FP expansion algorithm was incorrect for strict mode:
it emitted two STRICT_SINT_TO_FP nodes and then used a select to choose one
of the results. This can cause spurious exceptions by the STRICT_SINT_TO_FP
that ends up not chosen. I've fixed the algorithm to use only a single
STRICT_SINT_TO_FP instead.
- The !isStrictFPEnabled logic in DoInstructionSelection would sometimes do
the wrong thing because it calls getOperationAction using the result VT.
But for some opcodes, incuding [SU]INT_TO_FP, getOperationAction needs to
be called using the operand VT.
- Remove some (obsolete) code in X86DAGToDAGISel::Select that would mutate
STRICT_FP_TO_[SU]INT to non-strict versions unnecessarily.
Reviewed by: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71840
This moves the X86 specific transform from rL364407
into DAGCombiner to generically handle 'little to big' cases
(for example: extract_subvector(v2i64 bitcast(v16i8))). This
allows us to remove both the x86 implementation and the aarch64
bitcast(extract_subvector(bitcast())) combine.
Earlier patches that dealt with regressions initially exposed
by this patch:
rG5e5e99c041e4
rG0b38af89e2c0
Patch by: @RKSimon (Simon Pilgrim)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63815
Summary:
Without this check unnecessary FMA instructions are generated when the FSUB terms are reused.
This also has the side-effect that the same value is computed to different levels of precision, which can create undesirable effects if the results are used together in subsequent computation.
Reviewers: arsenm, nhaehnle, foad, tpr, dstuttard, spatel
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71656
Summary:
We noticed in Julia that the sequence below no longer turned into
a sequence of FMA instructions in LLVM 7+, but it did in LLVM 6.
```
%29 = fmul contract <4 x double> %wide.load, %wide.load16
%30 = fmul contract <4 x double> %wide.load13, %wide.load17
%31 = fmul contract <4 x double> %wide.load14, %wide.load18
%32 = fmul contract <4 x double> %wide.load15, %wide.load19
%33 = fadd fast <4 x double> %vec.phi, %29
%34 = fadd fast <4 x double> %vec.phi10, %30
%35 = fadd fast <4 x double> %vec.phi11, %31
%36 = fadd fast <4 x double> %vec.phi12, %32
```
Unlike Clang, Julia doesn't set the `unsafe-fp-math=true` function
attribute, but rather emits more local instruction flags.
This partially undoes https://reviews.llvm.org/D46854 and if required I can try to minimize the test further.
Reviewers: spatel, mcberg2017
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: chriselrod, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71495
Add new intrinsics
llvm.experimental.constrained.minimum
llvm.experimental.constrained.maximum
as strict versions of llvm.minimum and llvm.maximum.
Includes SystemZ back-end support.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71624
getTargetConstant prevents any optimizations from operating on the
value and basically says its already been iseled. But since we
want the index to be in a register, this isn't true.
Prior to this we were generating a vbroadcast with an immediate
argument which is illegal and was flagged by the expensive checks
bot.
This reverts commit 1f3dd83cc1, reapplying
commit bb1b0bc4e5.
The original commit failed on some builds seemingly due to the use of a
bracketed constructor with an std::array, i.e. `std::array<> arr({...})`.
Previously, LLVM had no functional way of performing casts inside of a
DIExpression(), which made salvaging cast instructions other than Noop
casts impossible. This patch enables the salvaging of casts by using the
DW_OP_LLVM_convert operator for SExt and Trunc instructions.
There is another issue which is exposed by this fix, in which fragment
DIExpressions (which are preserved more readily by this patch) for
values that must be split across registers in ISel trigger an assertion,
as the 'split' fragments extend beyond the bounds of the fragment
DIExpression causing an error. This patch also fixes this issue by
checking the fragment status of DIExpressions which are to be split, and
dropping fragments that are invalid.
Summary: Add calculation for elements in structures in getting uniform
base for the Gather/Scatter intrinsic.
Reviewers: craig.topper, c-rhodes, RKSimon
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, annita.zhang, LuoYuanke
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71442
The caller will assert for nodes with more than 2 results unless
we return a null SDValue.
I tried to test this by copying an AArch64 test for ScalarizeVecOp_FP_ROUND.
While it did hit the assert and this commited fixed that. It also
hit a later problem that couldn't be fixed without adding strict
FP support to AArch64.
This started with adding a test to support get code coverage on
ScalarizeVecOp_UnaryOp_StrictFP by copying an existing AArch64 test
and using constrained sitofp/uitofp intrinsics.
This found 3 separate issues:
-ScalarizeVecOp_UnaryOp_StrictFP needs to do its own replacement
because the caller can't handle replacing multiple results.
-Missing integer promotion support for sitofp/uitofp
-Chain result not always assigned in ExpandLegalINT_TO_FP.
Committing them together so I can add the test case.
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets to show the problem more
generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some value is free to negate,
but that use count can change as we rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression().
So something that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation phase becomes
not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or the inverse - something that was not
free becomes free). This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that everything
in an expression that is negatible to be handled in the corresponding code within
getNegatedExpression().
This patch adds a hack to work-around the case where we probably no longer detect
that either multiply operand of an FMA isNegatibleForFree which is assumed to be
true when we started rewriting the expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
This is an alternate fix for the bug discussed in D70595.
This also includes minimal tests for other in-tree targets to show the problem more
generally.
We check the number of uses as a predicate for whether some value is free to negate,
but that use count can change as we rewrite the expression in getNegatedExpression().
So something that was marked free to negate during the cost evaluation phase becomes
not free to negate during the rewrite phase (or the inverse - something that was not
free becomes free). This can lead to a crash/assert because we expect that everything
in an expression that is negatible to be handled in the corresponding code within
getNegatedExpression().
This patch adds a hack to work-around the case where we probably no longer detect
that either multiply operand of an FMA isNegatibleForFree which is assumed to be
true when we started rewriting the expression.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70975
Summary:
Right now, DAGCombiner process the nodes in an iplementation defined order. This tends to be fragile as optimisation may or may not kick in depending on the traversal order.
This is part of a larger effort to get the DAGCombiner to process its node in topological order.
Reviewers: craig.topper, efriedma, RKSimon, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70921
of integers to floating point.
This includes some of Craig Topper's changes for promotion support from
D71130.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69275
It doesn't seem to do anything that SplitVecRes_StrictFPOp can't
do. SplitVecRes_StrictFPOp already handles nodes with a variable
number of arguments and a mix of scalar and vector arguments.
Summary:
To find potential opportunities to use getMemBasePlusOffset() I looked at
all ISD::ADD uses found with the regex getNode\(ISD::ADD,.+,.+Ptr
in lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG. If this patch is accepted I will convert
the files in the individual backends too.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71207
Summary:
This change is preparatory work to use this helper functions in more places.
In order to make this change, getMemBasePlusOffset() has been extended to
also take a SDNodeFlags parameter.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71206
Summary:
This change is preparatory work to use this helper functions in more places.
Currently the function only allows integer constants offsets, but there
are cases where we can use an existing SDValue parameter.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel, craig.topper
Subscribers: craig.topper, merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71205
Summary:
This change is preparatory work to use this helper functions in more places.
Currently the function only allows positive offsets, but there are cases
where we want to subtract an offset from an existing pointer.
The motivation for this change is our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project). We use a separate register
type to store pointers (128-bit capabilities, which are effectively
unforgeable and monotonic fat pointers). These capabilities permit a
reduced set of operations and therefore use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR).
to represent pointers implemented as capabilities.
Therefore, we need to avoid using ISD::ADD for our patterns that operate
on pointers and need to use a function that chooses ISD::ADD or a new
ISD::PTRADD opcode depending on the value type.
We originally added a new DAG.getPointerAdd() function, but after this
patch series we can modify the implementation of getMemBasePlusOffset()
instead. Avoiding direct uses of ISD::ADD for pointer types will
significantly reduce the amount of assertion/instruction selection
failures for us in future upstream merges.
Reviewers: spatel
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: merge_guards_bot, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71204
The initial attempt (rG89633320) botched the logic by reversing
the source/dest types. Added x86 tests for additional coverage.
The vector tests show a potential improvement (fold vector load
instead of broadcasting), but that's a known/existing problem.
This fold is done in IR by instcombine, and we have a special
form of it already here in DAGCombiner, but we want the more
general transform too:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/3jZm
Name: general
Pre: (C1 + zext(C2) < 64)
%s = lshr i64 %x, C1
%t = trunc i64 %s to i16
%r = lshr i16 %t, C2
=>
%s2 = lshr i64 %x, C1 + zext(C2)
%a = and i64 %s2, zext((1 << (16 - C2)) - 1)
%r = trunc %a to i16
Name: special
Pre: C1 == 48
%s = lshr i64 %x, C1
%t = trunc i64 %s to i16
%r = lshr i16 %t, C2
=>
%s2 = lshr i64 %x, C1 + zext(C2)
%r = trunc %s2 to i16
...because D58017 exposes a regression without this fold.
GEP index size can be specified in the DataLayout, introduced in D42123. However, there were still places
in which getIndexSizeInBits was used interchangeably with getPointerSizeInBits. This notably caused issues
with Instcombine's visitPtrToInt; but the unit tests was incorrect, so this remained undiscovered.
This fixes the buildbot failures.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68328
Patch by Joseph Faulls!
Summary:
The use of a boolean isInteger flag (generally initialized using
VT.isInteger()) caused errors in our out-of-tree CHERI backend
(https://github.com/CTSRD-CHERI/llvm-project).
In our backend, pointers use a separate ValueType (iFATPTR) and therefore
.isInteger() returns false. This meant that getSetCCInverse() was using the
floating-point variant and generated incorrect code for us:
`(void *)0x12033091e < (void *)0xffffffffffffffff` would return false.
Committing this change will significantly reduce our merge conflicts
for each upstream merge.
Reviewers: spatel, bogner
Reviewed By: bogner
Subscribers: wuzish, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70917
Updated pred_load patterns added to AArch64SVEInstrInfo.td by this patch
to use reg + imm non-temporal loads to fix previous test failures.
Original commit message:
Adds the following intrinsics:
- llvm.aarch64.sve.ldnt1
- llvm.aarch64.sve.stnt1
This patch creates masked loads and stores with the
MONonTemporal flag set when used with the intrinsics above.
I believe this is a leftover from when fp128 was softened to fp128
on X86-64. In that case type legalization must have been able to
create a load that was the same as N which would make this
replacement fail or assert. Since we no longer do that, this
check should be unneeded.
Mark de Wever