Commit Graph

95 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Philip Reames 32c09d527c [Tests] Migrate a number of tests to gc-live bundle representation 2020-06-05 16:44:04 -07:00
Eli Friedman f26bdb539e Make Value::getPointerAlignment() return an Align, not a MaybeAlign.
If we don't know anything about the alignment of a pointer, Align(1) is
still correct: all pointers are at least 1-byte aligned.

Included in this patch is a bugfix for an issue discovered during this
cleanup: pointers with "dereferenceable" attributes/metadata were
assumed to be aligned according to the type of the pointer.  This
wasn't intentional, as far as I can tell, so Loads.cpp was fixed to
stop making this assumption. Frontends may need to be updated.  I
updated clang's handling of C++ references, and added a release note for
this.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80072
2020-05-20 16:37:20 -07:00
Nikita Popov f89f7da999 [IR] Convert null-pointer-is-valid into an enum attribute
The "null-pointer-is-valid" attribute needs to be checked by many
pointer-related combines. To make the check more efficient, convert
it from a string into an enum attribute.

In the future, this attribute may be replaced with data layout
properties.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78862
2020-05-15 19:41:07 +02:00
Eli Friedman 4532a50899 Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing.
For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the
datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR
later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the
datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default
datalayout.

The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow
overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this,
some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target.
Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new
machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the
datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information
from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools
to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time.

Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback.
(clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at
least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a
datalayout is not something frontends should generate.

This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen
regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with
a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the
overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the
default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one
AMDGPU test.

Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just
fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-14 13:03:50 -07:00
Nikita Popov 5a2265647e Reapply [InstSimplify] Remove known bits constant folding
No changes relative to last time, but after a mitigation for
an AMDGPU regression landed.

---

If SimplifyInstruction() does not succeed in simplifying the
instruction, it will compute the known bits of the instruction
in the hope that all bits are known and the instruction can be
folded to a constant. I have removed a similar optimization
from InstCombine in D75801, and would like to drop this one as well.

On average, we spend ~1% of total compile-time performing this
known bits calculation. However, if we introduce some additional
statistics for known bits computations and how many of them succeed
in simplifying the instruction we get (on test-suite):

    instsimplify.NumKnownBits: 216
    instsimplify.NumKnownBitsComputed: 13828375
    valuetracking.NumKnownBitsComputed: 45860806

Out of ~14M known bits calculations (accounting for approximately
one third of all known bits calculations), only 0.0015% succeed in
producing a constant. Those cases where we do succeed to compute
all known bits will get folded by other passes like InstCombine
later. On test-suite, only lencod.test and GCC-C-execute-pr44858.test
show a hash difference after this change. On lencod we see an
improvement (a loop phi is optimized away), on the GCC torture
test a regression (a function return value is determined only
after IPSCCP, preventing propagation from a noinline function.)

There are various regressions in InstSimplify tests. However, all
of these cases are already handled by InstCombine, and corresponding
tests have already been added there.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79294
2020-05-08 10:24:53 +02:00
Nikita Popov 46ee652c70 Revert "[InstSimplify] Remove known bits constant folding"
This reverts commit 08556afc54.

This breaks some AMDGPU tests.
2020-05-03 20:45:10 +02:00
Nikita Popov 08556afc54 [InstSimplify] Remove known bits constant folding
If SimplifyInstruction() does not succeed in simplifying the
instruction, it will compute the known bits of the instruction
in the hope that all bits are known and the instruction can be
folded to a constant. I have removed a similar optimization
from InstCombine in D75801, and would like to drop this one as well.

On average, we spend ~1% of total compile-time performing this
known bits calculation. However, if we introduce some additional
statistics for known bits computations and how many of them succeed
in simplifying the instruction we get (on test-suite):

    instsimplify.NumKnownBits: 216
    instsimplify.NumKnownBitsComputed: 13828375
    valuetracking.NumKnownBitsComputed: 45860806

Out of ~14M known bits calculations (accounting for approximately
one third of all known bits calculations), only 0.0015% succeed in
producing a constant. Those cases where we do succeed to compute
all known bits will get folded by other passes like InstCombine
later. On test-suite, only lencod.test and GCC-C-execute-pr44858.test
show a hash difference after this change. On lencod we see an
improvement (a loop phi is optimized away), on the GCC torture
test a regression (a function return value is determined only
after IPSCCP, preventing propagation from a noinline function.)

There are various regressions in InstSimplify tests. However, all
of these cases are already handled by InstCombine, and corresponding
tests have already been added there.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79294
2020-05-03 20:26:58 +02:00
Nikita Popov 7cf0f8568c [ValueTracking] Convert test to unit test (NFC)
Test this directly, rather than going through InstSimplify.
2020-05-03 12:23:57 +02:00
Tyker 42431da895 [AssumeBundles] Use assume bundles in isKnownNonZero
Summary: Use nonnull and dereferenceable from an assume bundle in isKnownNonZero

Reviewers: jdoerfert, nikic, lebedev.ri, reames, fhahn, sstefan1

Reviewed By: jdoerfert

Subscribers: fhahn, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76149
2020-04-24 20:41:51 +02:00
Jonathan Roelofs 7c5d2bec76 [llvm] Fix missing FileCheck directive colons
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77352
2020-04-06 09:59:08 -06:00
Bjorn Pettersson d077d678d3 [ValueTracking] Avoid blind cast from Operator to Instruction
Summary:
Avoid blind cast from Operator to ExtractElementInst in
computeKnownBitsFromOperator. This resulted in some crashes
in downstream fuzzy testing. Instead we use getOperand directly
on the Operator when accessing the vector/index operands.

Haven't seen any problems with InsertElement and ShuffleVector,
but I believe those could be used in constant expressions as well.
So the same kind of fix as for ExtractElement was also applied for
InsertElement.

When it comes to ShuffleVector we now simply bail out if a dynamic
cast of the Operator to ShuffleVectorInst fails. I've got no
reproducer indicating problems for ShuffleVector, and a fix would be
slightly more complicated as getShuffleDemandedElts is involved.

Reviewers: RKSimon, nikic, spatel, efriedma

Reviewed By: RKSimon

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76564
2020-03-22 14:45:31 +01:00
Nikita Popov ce6c95aaca [InstCombine] Move test to instcombine; NFC
This test uses -instcombine, so move it into the appropriate
directory. Also fork it for expensive checks enabled/disabled.
2020-03-20 12:41:19 +01:00
Nikita Popov a09ff56b5b [Tests] Regenerate some test checks; NFC 2020-03-20 12:06:53 +01:00
Nico Weber 623cb95eb3 Revert "[InstSimplify] Simplify calls with "returned" attribute"
This reverts commit 45555c3819.
Causes clang crashes in some causes, see comments on
https://reviews.llvm.org/D75815 for details (including
repro steps).
2020-03-16 15:21:30 -04:00
Nikita Popov 45555c3819 [InstSimplify] Simplify calls with "returned" attribute
If a call argument has the "returned" attribute, we can simplify
the call to the value of that argument. The "-inst-simplify" pass
already handled this for the constant integer argument case via
known bits, which is invoked in SimplifyInstruction. However,
non-constant (or non-int) arguments are not handled at all right now.

This addresses one of the regressions from D75801.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75815
2020-03-09 18:53:47 +01:00
Danila Kutenin 19e83a9b4c [ValueTracking] Pointer is known nonnull after load/store
If the pointer was loaded/stored before the null check, the check
is redundant and can be removed. For now the optimizers do not
remove the nullptr check, see https://gcc.godbolt.org/z/H2r5GG.
The patch allows to use more nonnull constraints. Also, it found
one more optimization in some PowerPC test. This is my first llvm
review, I am free to any comments.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71177
2019-12-11 20:32:29 +01:00
Danila Kutenin fc765698e0 [ValueTracking] Add tests for non-null check after load/store; NFC
Tests for D71177.
2019-12-11 20:26:31 +01:00
Roman Lebedev ec7436f299
Autogenerate test/Analysis/ValueTracking/non-negative-phi-bits.ll test
Forgot to stage this change into 0f22e783a0 commit.
2019-12-02 18:28:41 +03:00
Ryan Taylor 6f13637a3e [IR][Verifier] Allow IntToPtrInst to be !dereferenceable
Summary:
Allow IntToPtrInst to carry !dereferenceable metadata tag.
This is valid since !dereferenceable can be only be applied to
pointer type values.

Change-Id: If8a6e3c616f073d51eaff52ab74535c29ed497b4

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64954

llvm-svn: 366826
2019-07-23 17:19:56 +00:00
Evgeniy Stepanov d752f5e953 Basic codegen for MTE stack tagging.
Implement IR intrinsics for stack tagging. Generated code is very
unoptimized for now.

Two special intrinsics, llvm.aarch64.irg.sp and llvm.aarch64.tagp are
used to implement a tagged stack frame pointer in a virtual register.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64172

llvm-svn: 366360
2019-07-17 19:24:02 +00:00
Evgeniy Stepanov 50dc28b556 Teach ValueTracking that aarch64.irg result aliases its input.
Reviewers: javed.absar, olista01

Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64103

llvm-svn: 365079
2019-07-03 20:19:14 +00:00
David Bolvansky 0290a77aa8 [SimplifyCFG] Added condition assumption for unreachable blocks
Summary: PR41688

Reviewers: spatel, efriedma, craig.topper, hfinkel, reames

Reviewed By: hfinkel

Subscribers: javed.absar, dmgreen, fhahn, hfinkel, reames, nikic, lebedev.ri, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61409

llvm-svn: 361707
2019-05-25 22:34:27 +00:00
David Bolvansky bb76cf0f96 [NFC] Update test checks
llvm-svn: 361695
2019-05-25 13:11:22 +00:00
Michael Ferguson e39b614d1d [ValueTracking] Adjust comment in test
Adjusts a comment in this test to verify commit access.

llvm-svn: 350569
2019-01-07 21:02:22 +00:00
Florian Hahn 7902405c42 [ValueTracking] Fix a misuse of APInt in GetPointerBaseWithConstantOffset
GetPointerBaseWithConstantOffset include this code, where ByteOffset
and GEPOffset are both of type llvm::APInt :

  ByteOffset += GEPOffset.getSExtValue();

The problem with this line is that getSExtValue() returns an int64_t, but
the += matches an overload for uint64_t. The problem is that the resulting
APInt is no longer considered to be signed. That in turn causes assertion
failures later on if the relevant pointer type is > 64 bits in width and
the GEPOffset was negative.

Changing it to

  ByteOffset += GEPOffset.sextOrTrunc(ByteOffset.getBitWidth());

resolves the issue and explicitly performs the sign-extending
or truncation. Additionally, instead of asserting later if the result
is > 64 bits, it breaks out of the loop in that case.

See also
 https://reviews.llvm.org/D24729
 https://reviews.llvm.org/D24772

This commit must be merged after D38662 in order for the test to pass.

Patch by Michael Ferguson <mpfergu@gmail.com>.

Reviewers: reames, sanjoy, hfinkel

Reviewed By: hfinkel

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38501

llvm-svn: 350395
2019-01-04 14:53:22 +00:00
Tim Northover 12c1f7675f InstCombine: move hasOneUse check to the top of foldICmpAddConstant
There were two combines not covered by the check before now, neither of which
actually differed from normal in the benefit analysis.

The most recent seems to be because it was just added at the top of the
function (naturally). The older is from way back in 2008 (r46687) when we just
didn't put those checks in so routinely, and has been diligently maintained
since.

llvm-svn: 341831
2018-09-10 14:26:44 +00:00
Nicola Zaghen 9588ad9611 [InstCombine] Fold icmp ugt/ult (add nuw X, C2), C --> icmp ugt/ult X, (C - C2)
Support for sgt/slt was added in rL294898, this adds the same cases also for unsigned compares.

This is the Alive proof: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/nyY

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50972

llvm-svn: 341353
2018-09-04 10:29:48 +00:00
Stanislav Mekhanoshin b8269a9589 Fix llvm::ComputeNumSignBits with some operations and llvm.assume
Currently ComputeNumSignBits does early exit while processing some
of the operations (add, sub, mul, and select). This prevents the
function from using AssumptionCacheTracker if passed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49759

llvm-svn: 337936
2018-07-25 16:39:24 +00:00
Piotr Padlewski c63b492bcd Simplify recursive launder.invariant.group and strip
Summary:
This patch is crucial for proving equality laundered/stripped
pointers. eg:

  bool foo(A *a) {
    return a == std::launder(a);
  }

Clang with -fstrict-vtable-pointers will emit something like:

    define dso_local zeroext i1 @_Z3fooP1A(%struct.A* %a) {
    entry:
      %c = bitcast %struct.A* %a to i8*
      %call = tail call i8* @llvm.launder.invariant.group.p0i8(i8* %c)
      %0 = bitcast %struct.A* %a to i8*
      %1 = tail call i8* @llvm.strip.invariant.group.p0i8(i8* %0)
      %2 = tail call i8* @llvm.strip.invariant.group.p0i8(i8* %call)
      %cmp = icmp eq i8* %1, %2
      ret i1 %cmp
    }

and because %2 can be replaced with @llvm.strip.invariant.group(%0)
and that %2 and %1 will produce the same value (because strip is readnone)
we can replace compare with true.

Reviewers: rsmith, hfinkel, majnemer, amharc, kuhar

Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47423

llvm-svn: 336963
2018-07-12 23:55:20 +00:00
Max Kazantsev 20da7e467a Revert "[InstCombine] Delay foldICmpUsingKnownBits until simple transforms are done"
llvm-svn: 336410
2018-07-06 04:04:13 +00:00
Max Kazantsev 3097b76e8c [InstCombine] Delay foldICmpUsingKnownBits until simple transforms are done
This patch changes order of transform in InstCombineCompares to avoid
performing transforms based on ranges which produce complex bit arithmetics
before more simple things (like folding with constants) are done. See PR37636
for the motivating example.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48584
Reviewed By: spatel, lebedev.ri

llvm-svn: 336172
2018-07-03 06:23:57 +00:00
Piotr Padlewski 5b3db45e8f Implement strip.invariant.group
Summary:
This patch introduce new intrinsic -
strip.invariant.group that was described in the
RFC: Devirtualization v2

Reviewers: rsmith, hfinkel, nlopes, sanjoy, amharc, kuhar

Subscribers: arsenm, nhaehnle, JDevlieghere, hiraditya, xbolva00, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47103

Co-authored-by: Krzysztof Pszeniczny <krzysztof.pszeniczny@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 336073
2018-07-02 04:49:30 +00:00
Piotr Padlewski d6f7346a4b Fix aliasing of launder.invariant.group
Summary:
Patch for capture tracking broke
bootstrap of clang with -fstict-vtable-pointers
which resulted in debbugging nightmare. It was fixed
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46900 but as it turned
out, there were other parts like inliner (computing of
noalias metadata) that I found after bootstraping with enabled
assertions.

Reviewers: hfinkel, rsmith, chandlerc, amharc, kuhar

Subscribers: JDevlieghere, eraman, llvm-commits, hiraditya

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47088

llvm-svn: 333070
2018-05-23 09:16:44 +00:00
Piotr Padlewski 5642a42442 Propagate nonnull and dereferenceable throught launder
Summary:
invariant.group.launder should not stop propagation
of nonnull and dereferenceable, because e.g. we would not be
able to hoist loads speculatively.

Reviewers: rsmith, amharc, kuhar, xbolva00, hfinkel

Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46972

llvm-svn: 332788
2018-05-18 23:54:33 +00:00
Mikhail Maltsev ffaa8a8781 [IR] Do not assume that function pointers are aligned
Summary:
The value tracking analysis uses function alignment to infer that the
least significant bits of function pointers are known to be zero.
Unfortunately, this is not correct for ARM targets: the least
significant bit of a function pointer stores the ARM/Thumb state
information (i.e., the LSB is set for Thumb functions and cleared for
ARM functions).

The original approach (https://reviews.llvm.org/D44781) introduced a
new field for function pointer alignment in the DataLayout structure
to address this. But it seems unlikely that optimizations based on
function pointer alignment would bring much benefit in practice to
justify the additional maintenance burden, so this patch simply
assumes that function pointer alignment is always unknown.

Reviewers: javed.absar, efriedma

Reviewed By: efriedma

Subscribers: kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, hfinkel, rogfer01

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46110

llvm-svn: 331025
2018-04-27 09:12:12 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 1d91ec34b2 [ValueTracking] add recursion depth param to matchSelectPattern
We're getting bug reports:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35807
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35840
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36045
...where we blow up the stack in value tracking because other passes are sending 
in selects that have an operand that is itself the select.

We don't currently have a reliable way to avoid analyzing dead code that may take 
non-standard forms, so bail out when things go too far.

This mimics the recursion depth limitations in other parts of value tracking.

Unfortunately, this pushes the underlying problems for other passes (jump-threading,
simplifycfg, correlated-propagation) into hiding. If someone wants to uncover those
again, the first draft of this patch on Phab would do that (it would assert rather
than bail out).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42442

llvm-svn: 323331
2018-01-24 15:20:37 +00:00
Nikolai Bozhenov 4d5e34b221 [ValueTracking] Adding missed lit-test for commit r316208
Reviewers: reames, hfinkel

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34101

Patch by: Olga Chupina <olga.chupina@intel.com>

llvm-svn: 321792
2018-01-04 10:02:50 +00:00
Bjorn Steinbrink 030123e8e8 Give up on array allocas in getPointerDereferenceableBytes
Summary:
As suggested by Eli Friedman, don't try to handle array allocas here,
because of possible overflows, instead rely on instcombine converting
them to allocations of array types.

Reviewers: efriedma

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41398

llvm-svn: 321159
2017-12-20 10:01:30 +00:00
Bjorn Steinbrink 2da4d9d86d Treat sret arguments as being dereferenceable in getPointerDereferenceableBytes()
Reviewers: rnk, hfinkel, efriedma

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41355

llvm-svn: 321061
2017-12-19 08:46:46 +00:00
Bjorn Steinbrink 3603de2fa2 Re-commit "Properly handle multi-element and dynamically sized allocas in getPointerDereferenceableBytes()""
llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win is still broken, so the failure
seems unrelated.

llvm-svn: 320953
2017-12-17 21:20:16 +00:00
Bjorn Steinbrink 6f7bbf349f Revert "Properly handle multi-element and dynamically sized allocas in getPointerDereferenceableBytes()"
This reverts commit 217067d5179882de9deb60d2e866befea4c126e7.

Fails on llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win

llvm-svn: 320945
2017-12-17 15:16:58 +00:00
Bjorn Steinbrink c27f81b92b Properly handle byval arguments in getPointerDereferenceableBytes()
Summary:
For byval arguments, the number of dereferenceable bytes is equal to
the size of the pointee, not the pointer.

Reviewers: hfinkel, rnk

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41305

llvm-svn: 320939
2017-12-17 02:37:42 +00:00
Bjorn Steinbrink 5d86532467 Properly handle multi-element and dynamically sized allocas in getPointerDereferenceableBytes()
Reviewers: hfinkel, rnk

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41288

llvm-svn: 320938
2017-12-17 01:54:25 +00:00
Sanjay Patel e272be7c9a [ValueTracking] return zero when there's conflict in known bits of a shift (PR34838)
Poison allows us to return a better result than undef.

llvm-svn: 315595
2017-10-12 17:31:46 +00:00
Hal Finkel b03dd4be70 [ValueTracking] Don't delete assumes of side-effectful instructions
ValueTracking has to strike a balance when attempting to propagate information
backwards from assumes, because if the information is trivially propagated
backwards, it can appear to LLVM that the assumption is known to be true, and
therefore can be removed.

This is sound (because an assumption has no semantic effect except for causing
UB), but prevents the assume from allowing further optimizations.

The isEphemeralValueOf check exists to try and prevent this issue by not
removing the source of an assumption. This tries to make it a little bit more
general to handle the case of side-effectful instructions, such as in

  %0 = call i1 @get_val()
  %1 = xor i1 %0, true
  call void @llvm.assume(i1 %1)

Patch by Ariel Ben-Yehuda, thanks!

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36590

llvm-svn: 310859
2017-08-14 17:11:43 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 37c7b08710 [ValueTracking] Revert r310583 which enabled functionality that still is
causing compile time issues.

Moreover, the patch *deleted* the flag in addition to changing the
default, and links to a code review that doesn't even discuss the flag
and just has an update to a Clang test case.

I've followed up on the commit thread to ask for numbers on compile time
at this point, leaving the flag in place until things stabilize, and
pointing at specific code that seems to exhibit excessive compile time
with this patch.

Original commit message for r310583:
"""
[ValueTracking] Enabling ValueTracking patch by default (recommit). Part 2.

The original patch was an improvement to IR ValueTracking on
non-negative integers. It has been checked in to trunk (D18777,
r284022). But was disabled by default due to performance regressions.
Perf impact has improved. The patch would be enabled by default.
""""

llvm-svn: 310816
2017-08-14 07:03:24 +00:00
Nikolai Bozhenov d97136c182 [ValueTracking] Enabling ValueTracking patch by default (recommit). Part 2.
The original patch was an improvement to IR ValueTracking on non-negative
integers. It has been checked in to trunk (D18777, r284022). But was disabled by
default due to performance regressions.
Perf impact has improved. The patch would be enabled by default.
 
Reviewers: reames, hfinkel
 
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34101
 
Patch by: Olga Chupina <olga.chupina@intel.com>

llvm-svn: 310583
2017-08-10 11:24:57 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 97e4b98749 [ValueTracking] use nonnull argument attribute to eliminate null checks
Enhancing value tracking's analysis of null-ness was suggested in D27855, so here's a first attempt at that.

This is part of solving:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28430

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28204

llvm-svn: 294897
2017-02-12 15:35:34 +00:00
Sanjay Patel baac743254 [ValueTracking] regenerate checks; NFC
llvm-svn: 291468
2017-01-09 19:31:20 +00:00
Sanjay Patel 5865d12e9f [ValueTracking] add tests for known-nonnull-at; NFC
llvm-svn: 290790
2016-12-31 19:23:26 +00:00