Summary:
`of` is only a keyword when after an identifier, but not when after
an actual keyword.
Before:
return of (a, b, c);
After:
return of(a, b, c);
Reviewers: djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43440
llvm-svn: 325489
With this patch in place, when a new-format TBAA tag is available
for a memory-transfer intrinsic call, we prefer propagating that
new-format tag. Otherwise, we fallback to the old approach where
we try to construct a proper TBAA access tag from 'tbaa.struct'
metadata.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41543
llvm-svn: 325488
Summary:
Before the name of the function sounded like it was just a getter for the
private class member Addend. However, it actually calculates the final
value for the r_addend field in Elf_Rela that is used when writing the
.rela.dyn section. I also added a comment to the UseSymVA member to
explain how it interacts with computeAddend().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43161
llvm-svn: 325485
This adds the program memory address space setting to the AVR data
layout.
This setting was very recently added under r325479.
At the moment, there are no uses of this setting. In the future, things
such as switch lookup tables should reside there.
llvm-svn: 325481
Summary:
This has a bit of a blast radius, but I think there's enough value in "forcing"
us to give names to these async tasks for debugging. Guessing about what
multithreaded code is doing is so unfun...
The "file" param attached to the tasks may seem to be redundant with the thread
names, but note that thread names are truncated to 15 chars on linux!
We'll be lucky to get the whole basename...
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, jkorous-apple, ioeric, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43388
llvm-svn: 325480
Summary:
This adds initial support for letting targets specify which address
spaces their functions should reside in by default.
If a function is created by a frontend, it will get the default address space specified in the DataLayout, unless the frontend explicitly uses a more general `llvm::Function` constructor. Function address spaces will become a part of the bitcode and textual IR forms, as we do not have access to a data layout whilst parsing LL.
It will be possible to write IR that explicitly has `addrspace(n)` on a function. In this case, the function will reside in the specified space, ignoring the default in the DL.
This is the first step towards placing functions into the correct
address space for Harvard architectures.
Full patchset
* Add program address space to data layout D37052
* Require address space to be specified when creating functions D37054
* [clang] Require address space to be specified when creating functions D37057
Reviewers: pcc, arsenm, kparzysz, hfinkel, theraven
Reviewed By: theraven
Subscribers: arichardson, simoncook, rengolin, wdng, uabelho, bjope, asb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37052
llvm-svn: 325479
Currently, clang compiles explicit initializers for array
elements into series of store instructions. For large arrays of
built-in types this results in bloated output code and
significant amount of time spent on the instruction selection
phase. This patch fixes the issue by initializing such arrays
with global constants that store the binary image of the
initializer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43181
llvm-svn: 325478
Summary:
There are a few implementation options here - alternatives are either both
awkward and inefficient, or really inefficient.
This is at least potentially a hot path when used as a reducer for common
symbols.
(Also fix an unused-var that sneaked in)
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: klimek, ilya-biryukov, jkorous-apple, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43381
llvm-svn: 325476
The parseFunctionArgs() method was directly reading the
arguments from a Function object, but is should have used the
arguments supplied by the SelectionDAGBuilder.
This was causing
the lowering code to only lower one argument, not two in some cases.
Thanks to @brainlag on GitHub for coming up with the working fix!
Patch-by: @brainlag on GitHub
llvm-svn: 325474
We're accidentally checking that the same node is a constant twice instead of checking the other node.
This isn't a functional problem since we didn't do anything below that explicitly requires constants. It just means we may have introduced a sign_extend or zero_extend that won't fold out.
llvm-svn: 325469
Loosening the matcher definition reveals a subtle bug in InstSimplify (we should not
assume that because an operand constant matches that it's safe to return it as a result).
So I'm making that change here too (that diff could be independent, but I'm not sure how
to reveal it before the matcher change).
This also seems like a good reason to *not* include matchers that capture the value.
We don't want to encourage the potential misstep of propagating undef values when it's
not allowed/intended.
I didn't include the capture variant option here or in the related rL325437 (m_One),
but it already exists for other constant matchers.
llvm-svn: 325466
Summary:
D42640 adds calls to `Preprocessor::addCommentHandler` in
`unittests/clangd/SymbolCollectorTests.cpp` and
`clangd/global-symbol-builder/GlobalSymbolBuilderMain.cpp` but does not
link `clangLex` library. This causes undefined reference errors when
built with `-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON`.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ilya-biryukov, jkorous-apple, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43437
llvm-svn: 325458
Enable multiple COPY hints to eliminate more COPYs during register allocation.
Note that this is something all targets should do, see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38128.
Review: Yonghong Song
llvm-svn: 325457
Previously we used the immediate encoding if the load was in operand 0 and the short encoding if the load was in operand 1.
This added an insane number of bytes to the size of the isel table. I'm wondering if we should always use the immediate form during isel and change to the short form during emission. This would remove the need to pattern match every combination for both the immediate form and the short form during isel. We could do the same with vpcmpgt
llvm-svn: 325456
Add GraphTraits definitions to the FunctionSummary and ModuleSummaryIndex classes. These GraphTraits will be used to construct find SCC's in ThinLTO analysis passes.
Second attempt, since last patch caused stage2 build to fail (now using function_ref rather than std::function).
Reverted due to buildbot failures
llvm-svn: 325454
If we have a clamp pattern, SMIN(SMAX(X, LO),HI) or SMAX(SMIN(X, HI),LO) then we can deduce that the number of signbits will be at least the minimum of the LO and HI constants.
I haven't bothered with the UMIN/UMAX equivalent as (1) we don't have any current use cases and (2) I wonder if we'd be better off immediately falling back for ComputeKnownBits for UMIN/UMAX which already has optimization patterns useful for unsigned cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43338
llvm-svn: 325450
Add GraphTraits definitions to the FunctionSummary and ModuleSummaryIndex classes. These GraphTraits will be used to construct find SCC's in ThinLTO analysis passes.
Second attempt, since last patch caused stage2 build to fail (now using function_ref rather than std::function).
llvm-svn: 325448
Summary:
Make clang accept `-msahf` (and `-mno-sahf`) flags to activate the
`+sahf` feature for the backend, for bug 36028 (Incorrect use of
pushf/popf enables/disables interrupts on amd64 kernels). This was
originally submitted in bug 36037 by Jonathan Looney
<jonlooney@gmail.com>.
As described there, GCC also uses `-msahf` for this feature, and the
backend already recognizes the `+sahf` feature. All that is needed is to
teach clang to pass this on to the backend.
The mapping of feature support onto CPUs may not be complete; rather, it
was chosen to match LLVM's idea of which CPUs support this feature (see
lib/Target/X86/X86.td).
I also updated the affected test case (CodeGen/attr-target-x86.c) to
match the emitted output.
Reviewers: craig.topper, coby, efriedma, rsmith
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: emaste, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43394
llvm-svn: 325446
Follow up of Clang commit r325351; this adds the LLVM tests, which
were also missing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43395
llvm-svn: 325443
Summary:
Consolidate LLDB_CODESIGN_IDENTITY logic in one place and use
SKIP_DEBUGSERVER, which can be set independently, to control
codesigning targets.
Currently, running cmake the first time in a clean directory, without
passing -DLLDB_CODESIGN_IDENTITY='', fails. However, subsequent runs
succeed. That's because LLDB_CODESIGN_IDENTITY gets added to the
CACHE after the initial test. To fix that, the default value must be
set before it's tested.
Here's the error produced on the first run:
CMake Error at tools/lldb/tools/debugserver/source/CMakeLists.txt:215 (add_custom_command):
No TARGET 'debugserver' has been created in this directory.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43432
llvm-svn: 325442
Some buildbots failed on this test (rL325438) because they don't
build all targets. I set the triple to aarch64 and moved the test
to test/CodeGen/AArch64/fast-isel-dbg-value.ll.
llvm-svn: 325440
Summary: We probably mostly get this right due to family/model/stepping mapping to CPU names. But we should detect it explicitly.
Reviewers: RKSimon, echristo, dim, spatel
Reviewed By: dim
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43418
llvm-svn: 325439
Summary:
https://llvm.org/PR36263 shows that when compiling at -O0 a dbg.value()
instruction (that remains from an original dbg.declare()) is dropped
by FastISel. Since FastISel selects instructions by iterating a basic
block backwards, it drops the dbg.value if one of its operands is not
yet instantiated by a previously selected instruction.
Instead of calling 'lookUpRegForValue()' we can call 'getRegForValue()'
instead that will insert a placeholder for the operand to be filled in
when continuing the instruction selection.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, probinson
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, dstenb, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43386
llvm-svn: 325438
Martin Probst