latter may (eventually) perform multiple levels of desugaring (thus
breaking the newly-added tests) and the former is faster. Thanks, John!
llvm-svn: 93192
they redefine is a class-name but not a typedef-name, per C++0x
[dcl.typedef]p4. The code in the test was valid C++98 and is valid
C++0x, but an unintended consequence of DR56 made it ill-formed in
C++03 (which we were luck enough to implement). Fixes PR5455.
llvm-svn: 93188
result for a nested class whose first non-pure virtual member function
has an inline body. Previously, we were checking for the key function
before we had seen the (delayed) inline body.
llvm-svn: 92839
deterministic and work properly with templates. Once a class that
needs a vtable has been defined, we now do one if two things:
- If the class has no key function, we place the class on a list of
classes whose virtual functions will need to be "marked" at the
end of the translation unit. The delay until the end of the
translation unit is needed because we might see template
specializations of these virtual functions.
- If the class has a key function, we do nothing; when the key
function is defined, the class will be placed on the
aforementioned list.
At the end of the translation unit, we "mark" all of the virtual
functions of the classes on the list as used, possibly causing
template instantiation and other classes to be added to the
list. This gets LLVM's lib/Support/CommandLine.cpp compiling again.
llvm-svn: 92821
- All classes can have a key function; templates don't change that.
non-template classes when computing the key function.
- We always mark all of the virtual member functions of class
template instantiations.
- The vtable for an instantiation of a class template has weak
linkage.
We could probably use available_externally linkage for vtables of
classes instantiated by explicit instantiation declarations (extern
templates), but GCC doesn't do this and I'm not 100% that the ABI
permits it.
llvm-svn: 92753
assembly code. This avoids changing the bahvior when normal asm("")
statements are used.
The type of code affected would be:
void* t4(void) { __asm mov eax, fs:[0x10] }
I hope people like this version, if not, let me know.
llvm-svn: 92531
constructs:
- Instance variable lookup ("foo->ivar" and, in instance methods, "ivar")
- Property name lookup ("foo.prop")
- Superclasses
- Various places where a class name is required
- Protocol names (e.g., id<proto>)
This seems to cover many of the common places where typos could occur.
llvm-svn: 92449
attach the appropriate attributes to it. I don't think
this manifests as any real change though, we're still
not getting the right LLVM IR attributes out of codegen.
llvm-svn: 92316
tring str2;
we produce the following diagnostic + fix-it:
typo.cpp:15:1: error: unknown type name 'tring'; did you mean 'string'?
tring str2;
^~~~~
string
To make this really useful, we'll need to introduce typo correction in
many more places (wherever we do name lookup), and implement
declaration-vs-expression heuristics that cope with typos
better. However, for now this will handle the simple cases where we
already get good "unknown type name" diagnostics.
The LookupVisibleDecls functions are intended to be used by code
completion as well as typo correction; that refactoring will happen
later.
llvm-svn: 92308
Darwin's sekrit fourth argument. This should probably be factored to
let targets make target-specific decisions about what main() should look like.
Fixes rdar://problem/7414990
or if different platforms have radically different ideas of what they want in
llvm-svn: 92128
Sema::getTypeName.
"LookupNestedNameSpecifierName" isn't quite the right kind of lookup, though;
it doesn't ignore namespaces. Someone more familiar with the lookup code
should fix this properly.
llvm-svn: 91809
Because of the rules of base-class lookup* and the restrictions on typedefs, it
was actually impossible for this to cause any problems more serious than the
spurious acceptance of
template <class T> class A : B<A> { ... };
instead of
template <class T> class A : B<A<T> > { ... };
but I'm sure we can all agree that that is a very important restriction which
is well worth making another Parser->Sema call for.
(*) n.b. clang++ does not implement these rules correctly; we are not ignoring
non-type names
llvm-svn: 91792
the redeclaration problems in the [temp.explicit]p3 testcase worse, but I can
live with that; they'll need to be fixed more holistically anyhow.
llvm-svn: 91771
small bug fixes in SemaInit, switch over SemaDecl to use it more often, and
change a bunch of diagnostics which are different with the new initialization
code.
llvm-svn: 91767
different functions and pick the function at lookup initialization time.
In theory we could actually divide the criteria functions into N different
functions for the N cases, but it's so not worth it.
Among other things, lets us invoke LookupQualifiedName without recomputing
IDNS info every time.
Do some refactoring in SemaDecl to avoid an awkward special case in LQN
that was only necessary for redeclaration testing for anonymous structs/unions ---
which could be done more efficiently with a scoped lookup anyway.
llvm-svn: 91676
than using its own partial implementation of initialization.
Switched CheckInitializerTypes over to
InitializedEntity/InitializationKind, to help move us closer to
InitializationSequence.
Added InitializedEntity::getName() to retrieve the name of the entity,
for diagnostics that care about such things.
Implemented support for default initialization in
InitializationSequence.
Clean up the determination of the "source expressions" for an
initialization sequence in InitializationSequence::Perform.
Taught CXXConstructExpr to store more location information.
llvm-svn: 91492
attribute to function pointers. It also fixes Sema to check function
pointers for the noreturn attribute when checking for fallthrough.
Patch by Chip Davis, with a slight fix to pass the testsuite.
llvm-svn: 91408
declaration. Rename note_using_decl to note_using, which is possibly less confusing.
Add a test for non-class-scope using decl collisions and be sure to note the case
we can't diagnose yet.
llvm-svn: 91057
are a couple of O(n^2) operations in this, some analogous to the usual O(n^2)
redeclaration problem and some not. In particular, retroactively removing
shadow declarations when they're hidden by later decls is pretty unfortunate.
I'm not yet convinced it's worse than the alternative, though.
llvm-svn: 91045
new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the
computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic
information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an
expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit
callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow.
Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the
diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit
better than before. Some examples:
p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Derived'
cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base'
Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to
a value of
type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers
Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}}
^ ~~
p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class
'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base':
struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base
struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base
Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from
...
^~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long'
cannot bind to
a value of unrelated type 'int'
long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Base' cannot
bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base'
Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field
'i'
int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here
int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}}
^
llvm-svn: 90992
"integer promotion" type associated with an enum decl, and use this type to
determine which type to promote to. This type obeys C++ [conv.prom]p2 and
is therefore generally signed unless the range of the enumerators forces
it to be unsigned.
Kills off a lot of false positives from -Wsign-compare in C++, addressing
rdar://7455616
llvm-svn: 90965
using value decls; we optimistically assume they won't turn into conflicts.
Teach it to tell the caller *why* the function doesn't overload with the returned
decl; this will be useful for using hiding.
llvm-svn: 90939
DeclContext, so they don't completely disappear from the AST.
I don't particularly like this fix, but I don't see any obviously better way
to deal with it, and I think it's pretty clearly an improvement; comments
welcome.
llvm-svn: 90835
Mike Stump