Add bindings for LLVMConstGEP2, LLVMAddAlias2, LLVMBuildLoad2,
LLVMBuildInvoke2, LLVMBuildGEP2, LLVMBuildInBoundsGEP2,
LLVMBuildStructGEP2, LLVMBuildPtrDiff2 and use these in tests.
Using the legacy PM for the optimization pipeline was deprecated in 13.0.0.
Following recent changes to remove non-core features of the legacy
PM/optimization pipeline, remove ThreadSanitizerLegacyPass.
Reviewed By: #sanitizers, vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124209
Using the legacy PM for the optimization pipeline was deprecated in 13.0.0.
Following recent changes to remove non-core features of the legacy
PM/optimization pipeline, remove AddressSanitizerLegacyPass,
ModuleAddressSanitizerLegacyPass, and ASanGlobalsMetadataWrapperPass.
MemorySanitizerLegacyPass was removed in D123894.
Reviewed By: #sanitizers, vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124216
Using the legacy PM for the optimization pipeline was deprecated in 13.0.0.
Following recent changes to remove non-core features of the legacy
PM/optimization pipeline, remove AddressSanitizerLegacyPass,
ModuleAddressSanitizerLegacyPass, and ASanGlobalsMetadataWrapperPass.
MemorySanitizerLegacyPass was removed in D123894.
Reviewed By: #sanitizers, vitalybuka
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124216
Using the legacy PM for the optimization pipeline was deprecated in 13.0.0.
Following recent changes to remove non-core features of the legacy
PM/optimization pipeline, remove MemorySanitizerLegacyPass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123894
The legacy passes are deprecated now and would be removed in near
future. This patch tries to remove legacy passes in coroutines.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123918
Currently adding attribute no_sanitize("bounds") isn't disabling
-fsanitize=local-bounds (also enabled in -fsanitize=bounds). The Clang
frontend handles fsanitize=array-bounds which can already be disabled by
no_sanitize("bounds"). However, instrumentation added by the
BoundsChecking pass in the middle-end cannot be disabled by the
attribute.
The fix is very similar to D102772 that added the ability to selectively
disable sanitizer pass on certain functions.
In this patch, if no_sanitize("bounds") is provided, an additional
function attribute (NoSanitizeBounds) is attached to IR to let the
BoundsChecking pass know we want to disable local-bounds checking. In
order to support this feature, the IR is extended (similar to D102772)
to make Clang able to preserve the information and let BoundsChecking
pass know bounds checking is disabled for certain function.
Reviewed By: melver
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119816
Remove the dependency on ounit2 and the relevant lit code. It seems
that ounit2 is not used at all and all OCaml binding tests pass without
it installed.
Thanks for Shiwei Weng and Josh Berdine for bringing this to
my attention.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119884
We have the `clang -cc1` command-line option `-funwind-tables=1|2` and
the codegen option `VALUE_CODEGENOPT(UnwindTables, 2, 0) ///< Unwind
tables (1) or asynchronous unwind tables (2)`. However, this is
encoded in LLVM IR by the presence or the absence of the `uwtable`
attribute, i.e. we lose the information whether to generate want just
some unwind tables or asynchronous unwind tables.
Asynchronous unwind tables take more space in the runtime image, I'd
estimate something like 80-90% more, as the difference is adding
roughly the same number of CFI directives as for prologues, only a bit
simpler (e.g. `.cfi_offset reg, off` vs. `.cfi_restore reg`). Or even
more, if you consider tail duplication of epilogue blocks.
Asynchronous unwind tables could also restrict code generation to
having only a finite number of frame pointer adjustments (an example
of *not* having a finite number of `SP` adjustments is on AArch64 when
untagging the stack (MTE) in some cases the compiler can modify `SP`
in a loop).
Having the CFI precise up to an instruction generally also means one
cannot bundle together CFI instructions once the prologue is done,
they need to be interspersed with ordinary instructions, which means
extra `DW_CFA_advance_loc` commands, further increasing the unwind
tables size.
That is to say, async unwind tables impose a non-negligible overhead,
yet for the most common use cases (like C++ exceptions), they are not
even needed.
This patch extends the `uwtable` attribute with an optional
value:
- `uwtable` (default to `async`)
- `uwtable(sync)`, synchronous unwind tables
- `uwtable(async)`, asynchronous (instruction precise) unwind tables
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114543
Fix forward for "signed version of createExpression" change in ec501f15a8
Reviewed By: bgraur, achieveartificialintelligence
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116301
In the textual format, `noduplicates` means no COMDAT/section group
deduplication is performed. Therefore, if both sets of sections are retained, and
they happen to define strong external symbols with the same names,
there will be a duplicate definition linker error.
In PE/COFF, the selection kind lowers to `IMAGE_COMDAT_SELECT_NODUPLICATES`.
The name describes the corollary instead of the immediate semantics. The name
can cause confusion to other binary formats (ELF, wasm) which have implemented/
want to implement the "no deduplication" selection kind. Rename it to be clearer.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106319
We really ought to support no_sanitize("coverage") in line with other
sanitizers. This came up again in discussions on the Linux-kernel
mailing lists, because we currently do workarounds using objtool to
remove coverage instrumentation. Since that support is only on x86, to
continue support coverage instrumentation on other architectures, we
must support selectively disabling coverage instrumentation via function
attributes.
Unfortunately, for SanitizeCoverage, it has not been implemented as a
sanitizer via fsanitize= and associated options in Sanitizers.def, but
rolls its own option fsanitize-coverage. This meant that we never got
"automatic" no_sanitize attribute support.
Implement no_sanitize attribute support by special-casing the string
"coverage" in the NoSanitizeAttr implementation. To keep the feature as
unintrusive to existing IR generation as possible, define a new negative
function attribute NoSanitizeCoverage to propagate the information
through to the instrumentation pass.
Fixes: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49035
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, morehouse
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102772
I've taken the following steps to add unwinding support from inline assembly:
1) Add a new `unwind` "attribute" (like `sideeffect`) to the asm syntax:
```
invoke void asm sideeffect unwind "call thrower", "~{dirflag},~{fpsr},~{flags}"()
to label %exit unwind label %uexit
```
2.) Add Bitcode writing/reading support + LLVM-IR parsing.
3.) Emit EHLabels around inline assembly lowering (SelectionDAGBuilder + GlobalISel) when `InlineAsm::canThrow` is enabled.
4.) Tweak InstCombineCalls/InlineFunction pass to not mark inline assembly "calls" as nounwind.
5.) Add clang support by introducing a new clobber: "unwind", which lower to the `canThrow` being enabled.
6.) Don't allow unwinding callbr.
Reviewed By: Amanieu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95745
The removal of CAMLprim left the code in need of an application of
clang-format. There are various other changes made by clang-format
which it seems ought to be rolled together into this diff.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99477
The CAMLprim macro has not been needed since OCaml 3.11, and is
defined to the empty string. This diff removes all instances of it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99476
The current code does not follow the simple interface to the OCaml GC,
where GC roots are registered conservatively, only initializing
allocations are performed, etc. This is intentional, as stated in the
opening file comments. On the other hand, the current code does
register GC roots in many situations where it is not strictly
necessary. This diff omits many of them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99475
Using the `cstr_to_string` function that allocates and initializes an
OCaml `string` value enables simplifications in several cases. This
change also has the effect of avoiding calling `memcpy` on NULL
pointers even if only 0 bytes are to be copied.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99474
Using the `caml_alloc_some` and `ptr_to_option` functions that
allocate OCaml `option` values enables simplifications in many
cases. These simplifications also result in avoiding unnecessary
double initialization in many cases, so yield a minor optimization as
well.
Also, change to avoid using the old unprefixed functions such as
`alloc_small` and instead use the current `caml_alloc_small`.
A few of the changed functions were slightly rewritten in the
early-return style.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99473
In several functions an OCaml block is allocated and no further OCaml
allocation functions (or other functions that might trigger allocation
or collection) are performed before the block is fully initialized. In
these cases, it is safe and slightly more efficient to allocate an
uninitialized block.
Also, the code does not become more complex after the non-initializing
allocation, since in the case that a non-small allocation is made, the
initial values stored are definitely not pointers to OCaml young
blocks, and so initializing via direct assignment is still safe. That
is, in general if `caml_alloc_small` is called, initializing it with
direct assignments is safe, but if `caml_alloc_shr` is
called (e.g. for a block larger than `Max_young_wosize`), then
`caml_initialize` should be called to inform the GC of a potential
major to minor pointer. But if the initial value is definitely not a
young OCaml block, direct assignment is safe.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99472
Using `Store_field` to initialize fields of blocks allocated with
`caml_alloc_small` is unsafe. The fields of blocks allocated by
`caml_alloc_small` are not initialized, and `Store_field` calls the
OCaml GC write barrier. If the uninitialized value of a field happens
to point into the OCaml heap, then it will e.g. be added to a conflict
set or followed and have what the GC thinks are color bits
changed. This leads to crashes or memory corruption.
This diff fixes a few (I think all) instances of this problem. Some of
these are creating option values. OCaml 4.12 has a dedicated
`caml_alloc_some` function for this, so this diff adds a compatible
function with a version check to avoid conflict. With that, macros for
accessing option values are also added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99471
`get_or_create_type_array` was used on a non-type MDNode.
Add interface for `get_or_create_array` and use that instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99450
In the process of adding the tests, several bugs were
found in the implementation and interface of the API
and they were fixed.
Some utilities from the core tests (core.ml) were moved
into a separate file for reuse.
The following new functions have been added:
`dibuild_create_global_variable_expression`,
`dibuild_create_constant_value_expression` and
`llmetadata_null`. The third one already existed but
is now exposed publicly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99403
The implementation of `llvm_struct_name` before this diff calls
`caml_copy_string`, which allocates, while the `result` local variable
points to a block allocated by `caml_alloc_small` that has not yet
been initialized. If the allocation in `caml_copy_string` triggers a
garbage collection, then the GC root `result` contains a pointer to
uninitialized data, which may crash the GC or lead to a memory
corruption.
This diff fixes this by allocating and initializing the string first
and then allocating and initializing the option, thereby leaving no
dangling pointers when allocations are made.
The conversion from a C string to an OCaml string option is refactored
into a function, `cstr_to_string_option`. This function is also used
to simplify the definitions of `llvm_get_mdstring` and
`llvm_string_of_const`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99393
There are a number of compilation warnings regarding disregarding
const qualifiers, and casting between pointers to integer types with
different sign.
The incompatible sign warnings are due to treating the result of
`LLVMGetModuleIdentifier` as `const unsigned char *`, but it is
declared as `const char *`.
The dropped const qualifiers are due to the code pattern
`memcpy(String_val(_),_,_)` which ought to be (following the
implementation of the OCaml runtime)
`memcpy((char *)String_val(_),_,_)`. The issue is that `String_val` is
usually used to get the value of an immutable string. But in the
context of the `memcpy` calls, the string is in the process of being
initialized, so is not yet constant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99392
This diff uses ptr_to_option to convert a nullable C pointer to an
OCaml option instead of the redundant implementation in
llvm_global_initializer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99391
Also:
- Fix a bug that crept in when fixing a buildbot failure in
f7be9db622
- Use mlsize_t for cstr_to_string as that is what
caml_alloc_string specifies.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98851
LLVMGetInitializer returns nullptr in case there is no initializer.
There is not much that can be done with nullptr in OCaml, not even
test if it is null. Also, there does not seem to be a C or OCaml API
to test if there is an initializer. So this diff changes
Llvm.global_initializer to return an option.
Reviewed By: whitequark
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65195
Documentation of verify_function is incorrect and that of
const_of_int64 is incomplete.
Reviewed By: whitequark
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77884
The commit 506df1bbfd introduced
a call to `caml_alloc_initialized_string` which seems to be
unavailable on older OCaml versions. So I'm now switching to
using `caml_alloc_string` and using a `memcpy` after that, as
is done in the rest of the file.
Buildbot failure:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/16/builds/7919
Many (but not all) DebugInfo functions are now added to the
OCaml bindings, and rest can be safely added incrementally.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90831
There are several enum values that have been added to LLVM-C that are
missing from the OCaml bindings. The types defined in
bindings/ocaml/llvm/llvm.ml should be in sync with the corresponding
enum definitions in include/llvm-c/Core.h. The enum values are passed
from C to OCaml unmodified, and clients of the OCaml bindings
interpret them as tags of the corresponding OCaml types. So the only
changes needed are to add the missing constructors to the type
definitions, and to change the name of the maximum opcode in an
assertion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98578
Define ConstantData::PoisonValue.
Add support for poison value to LLLexer/LLParser/BitcodeReader/BitcodeWriter.
Add support for poison value to llvm-c interface.
Add support for poison value to OCaml binding.
Add m_Poison in PatternMatch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71126
Use exact component name in add_ocaml_library.
Make expand_topologically compatible with new architecture.
Fix quoting in is_llvm_target_library.
Fix LLVMipo component name.
Write release note.
No longer rely on an external tool to build the llvm component layout.
Instead, leverage the existing `add_llvm_componentlibrary` cmake function and
introduce `add_llvm_component_group` to accurately describe component behavior.
These function store extra properties in the created targets. These properties
are processed once all components are defined to resolve library dependencies
and produce the header expected by llvm-config.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90848
It's currently ambiguous in IR whether the source language explicitly
did not want a stack a stack protector (in C, via function attribute
no_stack_protector) or doesn't care for any given function.
It's common for code that manipulates the stack via inline assembly or
that has to set up its own stack canary (such as the Linux kernel) would
like to avoid stack protectors in certain functions. In this case, we've
been bitten by numerous bugs where a callee with a stack protector is
inlined into an __attribute__((__no_stack_protector__)) caller, which
generally breaks the caller's assumptions about not having a stack
protector. LTO exacerbates the issue.
While developers can avoid this by putting all no_stack_protector
functions in one translation unit together and compiling those with
-fno-stack-protector, it's generally not very ergonomic or as
ergonomic as a function attribute, and still doesn't work for LTO. See also:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20200915172658.1432732-1-rkir@google.com/https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200918201436.2932360-30-samitolvanen@google.com/T/#u
Typically, when inlining a callee into a caller, the caller will be
upgraded in its level of stack protection (see adjustCallerSSPLevel()).
By adding an explicit attribute in the IR when the function attribute is
used in the source language, we can now identify such cases and prevent
inlining. Block inlining when the callee and caller differ in the case that one
contains `nossp` when the other has `ssp`, `sspstrong`, or `sspreq`.
Fixes pr/47479.
Reviewed By: void
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87956
Nikita Popov