Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Majnemer ba6665d88a [Verifier] Resume instructions can only be in functions w/ a personality
This fixes PR28799.

llvm-svn: 277360
2016-08-01 18:06:34 +00:00
David Majnemer 7fddeccb8b Move the personality function from LandingPadInst to Function
The personality routine currently lives in the LandingPadInst.

This isn't desirable because:
- All LandingPadInsts in the same function must have the same
  personality routine.  This means that each LandingPadInst beyond the
  first has an operand which produces no additional information.

- There is ongoing work to introduce EH IR constructs other than
  LandingPadInst.  Moving the personality routine off of any one
  particular Instruction and onto the parent function seems a lot better
  than have N different places a personality function can sneak onto an
  exceptional function.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10429

llvm-svn: 239940
2015-06-17 20:52:32 +00:00
David Blaikie 445e3fbc54 [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to the invoke instruction
Same as r235145 for the call instruction - the justification, tradeoffs,
etc are all the same. The conversion script worked the same without any
false negatives (after replacing 'call' with 'invoke').

llvm-svn: 235755
2015-04-24 19:32:54 +00:00
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith be7ea19b58 IR: Make metadata typeless in assembly
Now that `Metadata` is typeless, reflect that in the assembly.  These
are the matching assembly changes for the metadata/value split in
r223802.

  - Only use the `metadata` type when referencing metadata from a call
    intrinsic -- i.e., only when it's used as a `Value`.

  - Stop pretending that `ValueAsMetadata` is wrapped in an `MDNode`
    when referencing it from call intrinsics.

So, assembly like this:

    define @foo(i32 %v) {
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 %v}, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{i32 7}, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !1, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{metadata !3}, metadata !0)
      ret void, !bar !2
    }
    !0 = metadata !{metadata !2}
    !1 = metadata !{i32* @global}
    !2 = metadata !{metadata !3}
    !3 = metadata !{}

turns into this:

    define @foo(i32 %v) {
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 %v, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32 7, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata i32* @global, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !3, metadata !0)
      call void @llvm.foo(metadata !{!3}, metadata !0)
      ret void, !bar !2
    }
    !0 = !{!2}
    !1 = !{i32* @global}
    !2 = !{!3}
    !3 = !{}

I wrote an upgrade script that handled almost all of the tests in llvm
and many of the tests in cfe (even handling many `CHECK` lines).  I've
attached it (or will attach it in a moment if you're speedy) to PR21532
to help everyone update their out-of-tree testcases.

This is part of PR21532.

llvm-svn: 224257
2014-12-15 19:07:53 +00:00
Michael Gottesman 24b2f6fdda [objc-arc] Convert the one directional retain/release relation assert to a conditional check + fail.
Due to the previously added overflow checks, we can have a retain/release
relation that is one directional. This occurs specifically when we run into an
additive overflow causing us to drop state in only one direction. If that
occurs, we should bail and not optimize that retain/release instead of
asserting.

Apologies for the size of the testcase. It is necessary to cause the additive
cfg overflow to trigger.

rdar://15377890

llvm-svn: 194083
2013-11-05 16:02:40 +00:00
Michael Gottesman d6ce6cbdac [objc-arc] Track if we encountered an additive overflow while computing {TopDown,BottomUp}PathCounts and do nothing if it occurred.
I fixed the aforementioned problems that came up on some of the linux boxes.
Major thanks to Nick Lewycky for his help debugging!

rdar://14590914

llvm-svn: 188122
2013-08-09 23:22:27 +00:00
Michael Gottesman 6663c7d5fc Revert "[objc-arc] Track if we encountered an additive overflow while computing {TopDown,BottomUp}PathCounts and do nothing if it occured."
This reverts commit r187941.

The commit was passing on my os x box, but it is failing on some non-osx
platforms. I do not have time to look into it now, so I am reverting and will
recommit after I figure this out.

llvm-svn: 187946
2013-08-08 00:41:18 +00:00
Michael Gottesman ddc89fcccd [objc-arc] Track if we encountered an additive overflow while computing {TopDown,BottomUp}PathCounts and do nothing if it occured.
rdar://14590914

llvm-svn: 187941
2013-08-07 23:56:41 +00:00
Michael Gottesman 9e7261c874 [objc-arc] Ensure that the cfg path count does not overflow when we multiply TopDownPathCount/BottomUpPathCount.
rdar://12480535

llvm-svn: 183489
2013-06-07 06:16:49 +00:00
Dan Gohman 7c84dad80a Detect overflow in the path count computation. rdar://12277446.
llvm-svn: 163739
2012-09-12 20:45:17 +00:00