Summary:
Asan stack-use-after-scope check should poison alloca even if there is
no access between start and end.
This is possible for code like this:
for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
int x;
p = &x;
}
"Loop Invariant Code Motion" will move "p = &x;" out of the loop, making
start/end range empty.
PR27453
Reviewers: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22842
llvm-svn: 277072
Summary:
Asan stack-use-after-scope check should poison alloca even if there is
no access between start and end.
This is possible for code like this:
for (int i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
int x;
p = &x;
}
"Loop Invariant Code Motion" will move "p = &x;" out of the loop, making
start/end range empty.
PR27453
Reviewers: eugenis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22842
llvm-svn: 277068
We were able to fold masked loads with an all-ones mask to a normal
load. However, we couldn't turn a masked load with a mask with mixed
ones and undefs into a normal load.
llvm-svn: 275380
This actually uncovered a surprisingly large chain of ultimately unused
TLI args.
From what I can gather, this argument is a remnant of when
isKnownNonNull would look at the TLI directly.
The current approach seems to be that InferFunctionAttrs runs early in
the pipeline and uses TLI to annotate the TLI-dependent non-null
information as return attributes.
This also removes the dependence of functionattrs on TLI altogether.
llvm-svn: 274455
As suggested by clang-tidy's performance-unnecessary-copy-initialization.
This can easily hit lifetime issues, so I audited every change and ran the
tests under asan, which came back clean.
llvm-svn: 272126
Unlike native shifts, the AVX2 per-element shift instructions VPSRAV/VPSRLV/VPSLLV handle out of range shift values (logical shifts set the result to zero, arithmetic shifts splat the sign bit).
If the shift amount is constant we can sometimes convert these instructions to native shifts:
1 - if all shift amounts are in range then the conversion is trivial.
2 - out of range arithmetic shifts can be clamped to the (bitwidth - 1) (a legal shift amount) before conversion.
3 - logical shifts just return zero if all elements have out of range shift amounts.
In addition, UNDEF shift amounts are handled - either as an UNDEF shift amount in a native shift or as an UNDEF in the logical 'all out of range' zero constant special case for logical shifts.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19675
llvm-svn: 271996
This patch adds support for folding undef/zero/constant inputs to MOVMSK instructions.
The SSE/AVX versions can be fully folded, but the MMX version can only handle undef inputs.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20998
llvm-svn: 271990
This patch removes the llvm intrinsics VPMOVSX and (V)PMOVZX sign/zero extension intrinsics and auto-upgrades to SEXT/ZEXT calls instead. We already did this for SSE41 PMOVSX sometime ago so much of that implementation can be reused.
Reapplied now that the the companion patch (D20684) removes/auto-upgrade the clang intrinsics has been committed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20686
llvm-svn: 271131
This patch removes the llvm intrinsics VPMOVSX and (V)PMOVZX sign/zero extension intrinsics and auto-upgrades to SEXT/ZEXT calls instead. We already did this for SSE41 PMOVSX sometime ago so much of that implementation can be reused.
A companion patch (D20684) removes/auto-upgrade the clang intrinsics.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20686
llvm-svn: 270973
When a va_start or va_copy is immediately followed by a va_end (ignoring
debug information or other start/end in between), then it is safe to
remove the pair. As this code shares some commonalities with the lifetime
markers, this has been factored to helper functions.
This InstCombine pattern kicks-in 3 times when running the LLVM test
suite.
llvm-svn: 269033
Make use of Constant::getAggregateElement instead of checking constant types - first step towards adding support for UNDEF mask elements.
llvm-svn: 268158
Make use of Constant::getAggregateElement instead of checking constant types - first step towards adding support for UNDEF mask elements.
llvm-svn: 268115
We neglected to transfer operand bundles for some transforms. These
were found via inspection, I'll try to come up with some test cases.
llvm-svn: 268010
This patch improves support for determining the demanded vector elements through SSE scalar intrinsics:
1 - recognise that we only need the lowest element of the second input for binary scalar operations (and all the elements of the first input)
2 - recognise that the roundss/roundsd intrinsics use the lowest element of the second input and the remaining elements from the first input
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17490
llvm-svn: 267356
This bug was introduced with:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL262269
AVX masked loads are specified to set vector lanes to zero when the high bit of the mask
element for that lane is zero:
"If the mask is 0, the corresponding data element is set to zero in the load form of these
instructions, and unmodified in the store form." --Intel manual
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19017
llvm-svn: 266148
`allocsize` is a function attribute that allows users to request that
LLVM treat arbitrary functions as allocation functions.
This patch makes LLVM accept the `allocsize` attribute, and makes
`@llvm.objectsize` recognize said attribute.
The review for this was split into two patches for ease of reviewing:
D18974 and D14933. As promised on the revisions, I'm landing both
patches as a single commit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14933
llvm-svn: 266032
Two or more identical assumes are occasionally next to each other in a
basic block.
While our generic machinery will turn a redundant assume into a no-op,
it is not super cheap.
We can perform a simpler check to achieve the same result for this case.
llvm-svn: 265801
Summary:
Previously we had a notion of convergent functions but not of convergent
calls. This is insufficient to correctly analyze calls where the target
is unknown, e.g. indirect calls.
Now a call is convergent if it targets a known-convergent function, or
if it's explicitly marked as convergent. As usual, we can remove
convergent where we can prove that no convergent operations are
performed in the call.
Originally landed as r261544, then reverted in r261544 for (incidental)
build breakage. Re-landed here with no changes.
Reviewers: chandlerc, jingyue
Subscribers: llvm-commits, tra, jhen, hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17739
llvm-svn: 263481
This follows up on the related AVX instruction transforms, but this
one is too strange to do anything more with. Intel's behavioral
description of this instruction in its Software Developer's Manual
is tragi-comic.
llvm-svn: 263340
The intended effect of this patch in conjunction with:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL259392http://reviews.llvm.org/rL260145
is that customers using the AVX intrinsics in C will benefit from combines when
the load mask is constant:
__m128 mload_zeros(float *f) {
return _mm_maskload_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(0));
}
__m128 mload_fakeones(float *f) {
return _mm_maskload_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(1));
}
__m128 mload_ones(float *f) {
return _mm_maskload_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(0x80000000));
}
__m128 mload_oneset(float *f) {
return _mm_maskload_ps(f, _mm_set_epi32(0x80000000, 0, 0, 0));
}
...so none of the above will actually generate a masked load for optimized code.
This is the masked load counterpart to:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL262064
llvm-svn: 262269
The intended effect of this patch in conjunction with:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL259392http://reviews.llvm.org/rL260145
is that customers using the AVX intrinsics in C will benefit from combines when
the store mask is constant:
void mstore_zero_mask(float *f, __m128 v) {
_mm_maskstore_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(0), v);
}
void mstore_fake_ones_mask(float *f, __m128 v) {
_mm_maskstore_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(1), v);
}
void mstore_ones_mask(float *f, __m128 v) {
_mm_maskstore_ps(f, _mm_set1_epi32(0x80000000), v);
}
void mstore_one_set_elt_mask(float *f, __m128 v) {
_mm_maskstore_ps(f, _mm_set_epi32(0x80000000, 0, 0, 0), v);
}
...so none of the above will actually generate a masked store for optimized code.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17485
llvm-svn: 262064
This is a part of the refactoring to unify isSafeToLoadUnconditionally and isDereferenceablePointer functions. In subsequent change I'm going to eliminate isDerferenceableAndAlignedPointer from Loads API, leaving isSafeToLoadSpecualtively the only function to check is load instruction can be speculated.
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16180
llvm-svn: 261736
Summary:
Previously we had a notion of convergent functions but not of convergent
calls. This is insufficient to correctly analyze calls where the target
is unknown, e.g. indirect calls.
Now a call is convergent if it targets a known-convergent function, or
if it's explicitly marked as convergent. As usual, we can remove
convergent where we can prove that no convergent operations are
performed in the call.
Reviewers: chandlerc, jingyue
Subscribers: hfinkel, jhen, tra, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17317
llvm-svn: 261544
Justin Bogner