Summary:
The original patch addressed the use of BlockRPONumber by forcing a sequence point when accessing that map in a conditional. In short we found cases where that map was being accessed with blocks that had not yet been added to that structure. For context, I've kept the wall of text below, to what we are trying to fix, by always ensuring a updated BlockRPONumber.
== Backstory ==
I was investigating an ICE (segfault accessing a DenseMap item). This failure happened non-deterministically, with no apparent reason and only on a Windows build of LLVM (from October 2018).
After looking into the crashes (multiple core files) and running DynamoRio, the cores and DynamoRio (DR) log pointed to the same code in `GVN::performScalarPRE()`. The values in the map are unsigned integers, the keys are `llvm::BasicBlock*`. Our test case that triggered this warning and periodic crash is rather involved. But the problematic line looks to be:
GVN.cpp: Line 2197
```
if (BlockRPONumber[P] >= BlockRPONumber[CurrentBlock] &&
```
To test things out, I cooked up a patch that accessed the items in the map outside of the condition, by forcing a sequence point between accesses. DynamoRio stopped warning of the issue, and the test didn't seem to crash after 1000+ runs.
My investigation was on an older version of LLVM, (source from October this year). What it looks like was occurring is the following, and the assembly from the latest pull of llvm in December seems to confirm this might still be an issue; however, I have not witnessed the crash on more recent builds. Of course the asm in question is generated from the host compiler on that Windows box (not clang), but it hints that we might want to consider how we access the BlockRPONumber map in this conditional (line 2197, listed above). In any case, I don't think the host compiler is wrong, rather I think it is pointing out a possibly latent bug in llvm.
1) There is no sequence point for the `>=` operation.
2) A call to a `DenseMapBase::operator[]` can have the side effect of the map reallocating a larger store (more Buckets, via a call to `DenseMap::grow`).
3) It seems perfectly legal for a host compiler to generate assembly that stores the result of a call to `operator[]` on the stack (that's what my host compile of GVN.cpp is doing) . A second call to `operator[]` //might// encourage the map to 'grow' thus making any pointers to the map's store invalid. The `>=` compares the first and second values. If the first happens to be a pointer produced from operator[], it could be invalid when dereferenced at the time of comparison.
The assembly generated from the Window's host compiler does show the result of the first access to the map via `operator[]` produces a pointer to an unsigned int. And that pointer is being stored on the stack. If a second call to the map (which does occur) causes the map to grow, that address (on the stack) is now invalid.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55974
llvm-svn: 350880
Summary:
Step 2 in using MemorySSA in LICM:
Use MemorySSA in LICM to do sinking and hoisting, all under "EnableMSSALoopDependency" flag.
Promotion is disabled.
Enable flag in LICM sink/hoist tests to test correctness of this change. Moved one test which
relied on promotion, in order to test all sinking tests.
Reviewers: sanjoy, davide, gberry, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: llvm-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40375
llvm-svn: 350879
This extends to combineVSelectToShrunkBlend to be able to resimplify SHRUNKBLENDS that have already been created.
This should help some of the regressions from D56387
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56421
llvm-svn: 350875
Despite what the comment says, FCMP_UNE would be an OR not an AND. In the lowering code the first branch created still goes to the original destination. The second branch was exchanged to go to where the subsequent unconditional branch went. This is different than what we do for FCMP_OEQ where both branches that we create go to the original unconditional branch.
As far as I can tell, I think this means we don't need to exchange the branch target with the unconditional branch for FCMP_UNE at all.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56309
llvm-svn: 350873
`FILECHECK_OPTS` into environment for FileCheck tests.
Summary:
This fixes the following FileCheck tests:
* FileCheck/dump-input-enable.txt
* FileCheck/match-full-lines.txt
when `FILECHECK_DUMP_INPUT_ON_FAILURE` is set in the environment.
By default llvm-lit propagates `FILECHECK_DUMP_INPUT_ON_FAILURE` and
`FILECHECK_OPTS` from llvm-lit's environment into the test environment.
Unfortunately this can break FileCheck's tests because they expect that
these environment variables not to be set.
rdar://problem/47176262
Reviewers: jdenny, probinson, george.karpenkov
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56541
llvm-svn: 350850
In an assert build, the Error gets destroyed and we get "Program aborted
due to an unhandled Error:".
In release, we get an empty message.
llvm-svn: 350848
This is https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26892,
GNU objdump hides the special symbol entry:
SYMBOL TABLE:
000000000000a7e0 l F .text 00000000000003f9 bi_copymodules
while llvm-objdump does not:
SYMBOL TABLE:
0000000000000000 *UND* 00000000
000000000000a7e0 l F .text 000003f9 bi_copymodules
Patch makes the behavior of the llvm-objdump to be consistent with the GNU objdump.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56076
llvm-svn: 350840
This commit fixes the dwordx3/southern-islands failures that were found
in bugzilla https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40129, by not
generating the dwordx3 variants of load/store instructions that were
added to the ISA after southern islands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56434
llvm-svn: 350838
That is, remove many of the calls to Type::getNumContainedTypes(),
Type::subtypes(), and Type::getContainedType(N).
I'm not intending to remove these accessors -- they are
useful/necessary in some cases. However, removing the pointee type
from pointers would potentially break some uses, and reducing the
number of calls makes it easier to audit.
llvm-svn: 350835
This further improves compatibility with GNU as, allowing input such as the
following to be assembled:
.equ CONST, 0x123456
li a0, CONST
addi a0, a0, %lo(CONST)
.equ CONST, 1
slli a0, a0, CONST
Note that we don't have perfect compatibility with gas, as it will avoid
emitting a relocation in this case:
addi a0, a0, %lo(CONST2)
.equ CONST2, 0x123456
Thanks to Shiva Chen for suggesting a better way to approach this during review.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52298
llvm-svn: 350831
When we use the partial-matching function on a 128-bit chunk, we must
account for the possibility that we've matched undef halves of the
original source vectors, so the outputs may need to be reset.
This should allow closing PR40243:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40243
llvm-svn: 350830
This is a partial fix for:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40243
...as seen in the integer test, we still need to correct the result when using the
existing (old) horizontal op matching function because it does not model the way
x86 256-bit horizontal ops return results (each 128-bit half is its own horizontal-op).
A potential follow-up change for that is discussed in the bug report - see also D56490.
This generally duplicates a lot of the existing matching code, but we can't just remove
that without introducing regressions, so the existing code is renamed and used less often.
Follow-ups may try to reduce that overlap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56450
llvm-svn: 350826
Summary:
This patch changes the legalization action for some half-precision floating-
point vector intrinsics (FSIN, FLOG, etc.) from Promote to Expand. These ops
are not supported in hardware for half-precision vectors, but promotion is
not always possible (for v8f16 operands). Changing the action to Expand fixes
an assertion failure in the legalizer when the frontend produces such ops.
In addition, a quick microbenchmark shows that, in the v4f16 case,
expanding introduces fewer spills and is therefore slightly faster than
promoting.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, SjoerdMeijer
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56296
llvm-svn: 350825
This is https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37151,
GNU objdump spec says that "Normally the disassembly output will skip blocks of zeroes.",
but currently, llvm-objdump prints them.
The patch implements the -z/--disassemble-zeroes option and switches the default to always
skip blocks of zeroes.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56083
llvm-svn: 350823
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40070.
GNU addr2line accepts input addresses both on the command-line and via
stdin. llvm-symbolizer previously only supported the latter. This
change adds support for the former. As with addr2line, the new
behaviour is to only look for addresses on stdin if no positional
arguments were provided to llvm-symbolizer.
Reviewed by: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56272
llvm-svn: 350821
Field ResourceUnitMask was incorrectly defined as a 'const unsigned' mask. It
should have been a 64 bit quantity instead. That means, ResourceUnitMask was
always implicitly truncated to a 32 bit quantity.
This issue has been found by inspection. Surprisingly, that bug was latent, and
it never negatively affected any existing upstream targets.
This patch fixes the wrong definition of ResourceUnitMask, and adds a bunch of
extra debug prints to help debugging potential issues related to invalid
processor resource masks.
llvm-svn: 350820
Allow to specify loop-unrolling with optional parameters explicitly
spelled out in -passes pipeline specification.
Introducing somewhat generic way of specifying parameters parsing via
FUNCTION_PASS_PARAMETRIZED pass registration.
Syntax of parametrized unroll pass name is as follows:
'unroll<' parameter-list '>'
Where parameter-list is ';'-separate list of parameter names and optlevel
optlevel: 'O[0-3]'
parameter: { 'partial' | 'peeling' | 'runtime' | 'upperbound' }
negated: 'no-' parameter
Example:
-passes=loop(unroll<O3;runtime;no-upperbound>)
this invokes LoopUnrollPass configured with OptLevel=3,
Runtime, no UpperBound, everything else by default.
llvm-svn: 350808
Add t2TEQrr to the map of instructions with can be reduced down into
a T1 instruction. This is a special case because TEQ just sets the
CPSR and doesn't write to a GPR, which is not the case for EOR. So,
we need to ensure that the EOR can write to the first operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56255
llvm-svn: 350801
Summary:
This pass replaces GR8/GR16/GR32/GR64 with their equivalent sized mask register classes. But VK32/VK64 aren't legal without AVX512BW. Apparently this mostly appears to work if the register coalescer is able to remove the VK32/VK64 register class reference. Or if we don't ever spill it. But there's no guarantee of that.
Another Intel employee managed to trigger a crash due to this with ISPC. Unfortunately, I've lost the test case he sent me at the time. I'm trying to get him to reproduce it for me. I'd like to get this in before 8.0 branches since its a little scary.
The regressions here are unfortunate, but I think we can make some improvements to DAG combine, load folding, etc. to fix them. Just not sure if we can get that done for 8.0.
Fixes PR39741
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56460
llvm-svn: 350800
Summary:
D55896 and D56029 add support to emit fixups for :abs_g0: , :abs_g1_s: , etc.
This patch adds the necessary enums and MCExpr needed for lowering these.
Reviewers: rnk, mstorsjo, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56037
llvm-svn: 350798
This is a second attempt at r350778, which was reverted in
r350789. The only change is that the unimplemented-simd128 feature has
been renamed simd128-unimplemented, since naming it
unimplemented-simd128 somehow made the simd128 feature flag enable the
unimplemented-simd128 feature on Windows.
llvm-svn: 350791
Summary:
If we don't reset the optimized value O for access A, even though A is no longer optimized to O, A will still show up in that O's users list.
This fails verification when hoisting a Def outside a loop, even though the updates are correct.
The reason is that the phi in the loop header still find as user the hoisted def, because the Def has a pointer to the Phi in its optimized operand.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56467
llvm-svn: 350783
Found while trying to figure out why my second version of D56421 worked better than the first version. We weren't deleting the vselect in a timely fashion and that caused SimplfyDemandedBit to see an additional user.
The new version doesn't have this problem so this fix isn't needed there, but seemed like the right thing to do.
llvm-svn: 350781
Summary:
This replaces the old ad-hoc -wasm-enable-unimplemented-simd
flag. Also makes the new unimplemented-simd128 feature imply the
simd128 feature.
Reviewers: aheejin, dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, llvm-commits, alexcrichton
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56501
llvm-svn: 350778
The C standard says "The memchr function locates the first
occurrence of c (converted to an unsigned char)[...]". The expansion
was missing the conversion to unsigned char.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39041 .
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55947
llvm-svn: 350775
When a null terminator is required and the file size is a multiple of the system page size, MemoryBuffer will prefer pread() over mmap(), which can result in excessive memory usage.
Patch by Mike Hommey!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56475
llvm-svn: 350774
Summary:
Looks like many passes print its pass description as a debug message at
the start of each pass, so added that to (mostly newly added) other
passes as well.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: jgravelle-google, sbc100, sunfish, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56142
llvm-svn: 350771
Sanjoy Das