Commit Graph

10 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Pat Gavlin b399095c3f Add a target environment for CoreCLR.
Although targeting CoreCLR is similar to targeting MSVC, there are
certain important differences that the backend must be aware of
(e.g. differences in stack probes, EH, and library calls).

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11012

llvm-svn: 245115
2015-08-14 22:41:43 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 60381791b5 Rename llvm.frameescape and llvm.framerecover to localescape and localrecover
Summary:
Initially, these intrinsics seemed like part of a family of "frame"
related intrinsics, but now I think that's more confusing than helpful.
Initially, the LangRef specified that this would create a new kind of
allocation that would be allocated at a fixed offset from the frame
pointer (EBP/RBP). We ended up dropping that design, and leaving the
stack frame layout alone.

These intrinsics are really about sharing local stack allocations, not
frame pointers. I intend to go further and add an `llvm.localaddress()`
intrinsic that returns whatever register (EBP, ESI, ESP, RBX) is being
used to address locals, which should not be confused with the frame
pointer.

Naming suggestions at this point are welcome, I'm happy to re-run sed.

Reviewers: majnemer, nicholas

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11011

llvm-svn: 241633
2015-07-07 22:25:32 +00:00
David Majnemer 7fddeccb8b Move the personality function from LandingPadInst to Function
The personality routine currently lives in the LandingPadInst.

This isn't desirable because:
- All LandingPadInsts in the same function must have the same
  personality routine.  This means that each LandingPadInst beyond the
  first has an operand which produces no additional information.

- There is ongoing work to introduce EH IR constructs other than
  LandingPadInst.  Moving the personality routine off of any one
  particular Instruction and onto the parent function seems a lot better
  than have N different places a personality function can sneak onto an
  exceptional function.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10429

llvm-svn: 239940
2015-06-17 20:52:32 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 5c5facc2ce Re-commit "[SEH] Remove the old __C_specific_handler code now that WinEHPrepare works"
This reverts commit r235617.

r235649 should have addressed the problems.

llvm-svn: 235667
2015-04-23 23:22:33 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 909ea7e6b8 Revert "[SEH] Remove the old __C_specific_handler code now that WinEHPrepare works"
We still have some "uses remain after removal" issues in -O0 builds.

This reverts commit r235557.

llvm-svn: 235617
2015-04-23 18:34:01 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 64a2a6a473 [SEH] Remove the old __C_specific_handler code now that WinEHPrepare works
This removes the -sehprepare flag and makes __C_specific_handler
functions always to use WinEHPrepare.

This was tested by building all of chromium_builder_tests and running a
few tests that use SEH, but if something breaks, we can revert this.

llvm-svn: 235557
2015-04-22 22:13:09 +00:00
Reid Kleckner d2a1a51996 Re-land r235154-r235156 under the existing -sehprepare flag
Keep the old SEH fan-in lowering on by default for now, since projects
rely on it.  This will make it easy to test this change with a simple
flag flip.

llvm-svn: 235399
2015-04-21 18:23:57 +00:00
Nico Weber a762fa6c98 Revert r235154-r235156, they cause asserts when building win64 code (http://crbug.com/477988)
llvm-svn: 235170
2015-04-17 09:10:43 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 56cc879ac1 Fix test failure due to racing commits
It looks like r235145 changed the .ll syntax for variadic calls. Update
tests to use the new syntax.

llvm-svn: 235156
2015-04-17 01:09:53 +00:00
Reid Kleckner d4523e3c51 [SEH] Reimplement x64 SEH using WinEHPrepare
This now emits simple, unoptimized xdata tables for __C_specific_handler
based on the handlers listed in @llvm.eh.actions calls produced by
WinEHPrepare.

This adds support for running __finally blocks when exceptions are
thrown, and removes the old landingpad fan-in codepath.

I ran some manual execution tests on small basic test cases with and
without optimization, as well as on Chrome base_unittests, which uses a
small amount of SEH.  I'm sure there are bugs, and we may need to
revert.

llvm-svn: 235154
2015-04-17 01:01:27 +00:00