The hardware has created a real mess in the naming for add/sub, which
have been renamed basically every generation. Switch the carry out
pseudos to have the gfx9/gfx10 names. We were using the original SI/CI
v_add_i32/v_sub_i32 names. Later targets reintroduced these names as
carryless instructions with a saturating clamp bit, which we do not
define. Do this rename so we can unambiguously add these missing
instructions.
The carry-in versions should also be renamed, but at least those had a
consistent _u32 name to begin with. The 16-bit instructions were also
renamed, but aren't ambiguous.
This does regress assembler error message quality in some cases. In
mismatched wave32/wave64 situations, this will switch from
"unsupported instruction" to "invalid operand", with the error
pointing at the wrong position. I couldn't quite follow how the
assembler selects these, but the previous behavior seemed accidental
to me. It looked like there was a partial attempt to handle this which
was never completed (i.e. there is an AMDGPUOperand::isBoolReg but it
isn't used for anything).
SGPR_128 only includes the real allocatable SGPRs, and SReg_128 adds
the additional non-allocatable TTMP registers. There's no point in
allocating SReg_128 vregs. This shrinks the size of the classes
regalloc needs to consider, which is usually good.
llvm-svn: 374284
Allow the clamp modifier on vop3 int arithmetic instructions in assembly
and disassembly.
This involved adding a clamp operand to the affected instructions in MIR
and MC, and thus having to fix up several places in codegen and MIR
tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59267
Change-Id: Ic7775105f02a985b668fa658a0cd7837846a534e
llvm-svn: 356399
Summary: 32bit operand sizes are guaranteed by the opcode check AMDGPU::V_ADD_I32_e64 and
AMDGPU::V_ADDC_U32_e64. Therefore, we don't any additional operand size-check-assert.
Author: FarhanaAleen
llvm-svn: 349529
Matt Arsenault