The hardware has created a real mess in the naming for add/sub, which
have been renamed basically every generation. Switch the carry out
pseudos to have the gfx9/gfx10 names. We were using the original SI/CI
v_add_i32/v_sub_i32 names. Later targets reintroduced these names as
carryless instructions with a saturating clamp bit, which we do not
define. Do this rename so we can unambiguously add these missing
instructions.
The carry-in versions should also be renamed, but at least those had a
consistent _u32 name to begin with. The 16-bit instructions were also
renamed, but aren't ambiguous.
This does regress assembler error message quality in some cases. In
mismatched wave32/wave64 situations, this will switch from
"unsupported instruction" to "invalid operand", with the error
pointing at the wrong position. I couldn't quite follow how the
assembler selects these, but the previous behavior seemed accidental
to me. It looked like there was a partial attempt to handle this which
was never completed (i.e. there is an AMDGPUOperand::isBoolReg but it
isn't used for anything).
This is the groundwork required to implement strictfp. For now, this
should be NFC for regular instructoins (many instructions just gain an
extra use of a reserved register). Regalloc won't rematerialize
instructions with reads of physical registers, but we were suffering
from that anyway with the exec reads.
Should add it for all the related FP uses (possibly with some
extras). I did not add it to either the gpr index mode instructions
(or every single VALU instruction) since it's a ridiculous feature
already modeled as an arbitrary side effect.
Also work towards marking instructions with FP exceptions. This
doesn't actually set the bit yet since this would start to change
codegen. It seems nofpexcept is currently not implied from the regular
IR FP operations. Add it to some MIR tests where I think it might
matter.
Summary:
The INLINEASM MIR instructions use immediate operands to encode the values of some operands.
The MachineInstr pretty printer function already handles those operands and prints human readable annotations instead of the immediates. This patch adds similar annotations to the output of the MIRPrinter, however uses the new MIROperandComment feature.
Reviewers: SjoerdMeijer, arsenm, efriedma
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: qcolombet, sdardis, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78088
The AMDGPU implementation of getReservedRegs depends on
MachineFunctionInfo fields that are parsed from the YAML section. This
was reserving the wrong register since it was setting the reserved
regs before parsing the correct one.
Some tests were relying on the default reserved set for the assumed
default calling convention.
llvm-svn: 357083
Allow the clamp modifier on vop3 int arithmetic instructions in assembly
and disassembly.
This involved adding a clamp operand to the affected instructions in MIR
and MC, and thus having to fix up several places in codegen and MIR
tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59267
Change-Id: Ic7775105f02a985b668fa658a0cd7837846a534e
llvm-svn: 356399
This can leave behind the uses with the defs removed.
Since this should only really happen in tests, it's not worth the
effort of trying to handle this.
llvm-svn: 340866
Discussed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120320.html
In preparation for adding support for named vregs we are changing the sigil for
physical registers in MIR to '$' from '%'. This will prevent name clashes of
named physical register with named vregs.
llvm-svn: 323922
This updates the MIRPrinter to include the regclass when printing
virtual register defs, which is already valid syntax for the
parser. That is, given 64 bit %0 and %1 in a "gpr" regbank,
%1(s64) = COPY %0(s64)
would now be written as
%1:gpr(s64) = COPY %0(s64)
While this change alone introduces a bit of redundancy with the
registers block, it allows us to update the tests to be more concise
and understandable and brings us closer to being able to remove the
registers block completely.
Note: We generally only print the class in defs, but there is one
exception. If there are uses without any defs whatsoever, we'll print
the class on all uses. I'm not completely convinced this comes up in
meaningful machine IR, but for now the MIRParser and MachineVerifier
both accept that kind of stuff, so we don't want to have a situation
where we can print something we can't parse.
llvm-svn: 316479
Matt Arsenault