This was checking for a variety of situations that should
never happen. This saves a tiny bit of compile time.
We should not be selecting instructions with invalid operands in the
first place. Most of the time for registers copys are inserted
to the correct operand register class.
For VOP3, since all operand types are supported and literal
constants never are, we just need to verify the constant bus
requirements (all immediates should be legal inline ones).
The only possibly tricky case to maybe worry about is if when
legalizing operands in moveToVALU with s_add_i32 and similar
instructions. If the original s_add_i32 had a literal constant
and we need to replace it with v_add_i32_e64 we would have an
unsupported literal operand. However, I don't think we should worry
about that because SIFoldOperands should handle folding literal
constant operands into the SALU instructions based on the uses.
At SIFoldOperands time, the legality and profitability of
operand types is a bit different.
llvm-svn: 250951
Summary:
We currently ignore the calling convention, so there is no real reason to
assert on the calling convention of functions.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13367
llvm-svn: 249468
to prevent setting a huge stride, because DATA_FORMAT has a different
meaning if ADD_TID_ENABLE is set.
This is a candidate for stable llvm 3.7.
Tested-and-Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
llvm-svn: 248858
When buffer resource descriptors were built, the upper two components
of the descriptor were first composed into a 64-bit register because
legalizeOperands assumed all operands had the same register class.
Fix that problem, but keep the workaround. I'm not sure anything
actually is actually emitting such a REG_SEQUENCE now.
If multiple resource descriptors are set up with different base
pointers, this is copied with a single s_mov_b64. We probably
should fix this better by recognizing a pair of s_mov_b32 later,
but for now delete the dead code.
llvm-svn: 248585
After D10403, we had FMF in the DAG but disabled by default. Nick reported no crashing errors after some stress testing,
so I enabled them at r243687. However, Escha soon notified us of a bug not covered by any in-tree regression tests:
if we don't propagate the flags, we may fail to CSE DAG nodes because differing FMF causes them to not match. There is
one test case in this patch to prove that point.
This patch hopes to fix or leave a 'TODO' for all of the in-tree places where we create nodes that are FMF-capable. I
did this by putting an assert in SelectionDAG.getNode() to find any FMF-capable node that was being created without FMF
( D11807 ). I then ran all regression tests and test-suite and confirmed that everything passes.
This patch exposes remaining work to get DAG FMF to be fully functional: (1) add the flags to non-binary nodes such as
FCMP, FMA and FNEG; (2) add the flags to intrinsics; (3) use the flags as conditions for transforms rather than the
current global settings.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12095
llvm-svn: 247815
Currently this hits an assert that extload should
always be supported, which assumes integer extloads.
This moves a hack out of SI's argument lowering and
is covered by existing tests.
llvm-svn: 247113
Use and check the 'IsFast' optional parameter to TLI.allowsMemoryAccess() any time
we have a merged access candidate. Without this patch, we were generating unaligned
16-byte (SSE) memops for x86 targets where those accesses are slow.
This change was mentioned in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10662 and
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10905
and will help solve PR21711.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12573
llvm-svn: 246771
Summary:
The MUBUF addr64 bit has been removed on VI, so we must use FLAT
instructions when the pointer is stored in VGPRs.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11067
llvm-svn: 242673
Summary:
We can safely assume that the high bit of scratch offsets will never
be set, because this would require at least 128 GB of GPU memory.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11225
llvm-svn: 242433
Most loads and stores are derived from pointers derived from
a kernel argument load inserted during argument lowering.
This was just using the EntryToken chain for the argument loads,
and any users of these loads were also on the EntryToken chain.
Return the chain of the lowered argument load so that dependent loads
end up on the correct chain.
No test since I'm not aware of any case where this actually
broke.
llvm-svn: 241960
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11042
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241779
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11040
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241778
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11037
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241776
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: jholewinski, ted, yaron.keren, rafael, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11028
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 241775
There is some functional change here because it changes target code from
atoi(3) to StringRef::getAsInteger which has error checking. For valid
constraints there should be no difference.
llvm-svn: 241411
Marek Olsak