from those that aren't.
This patch changes the way __block variables that aren't captured by
escaping blocks are handled:
- Since non-escaping blocks on the stack never get copied to the heap
(see https://reviews.llvm.org/D49303), Sema shouldn't error out when
the type of a non-escaping __block variable doesn't have an accessible
copy constructor.
- IRGen doesn't have to use the specialized byref structure (see
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/Block-ABI-Apple.html#id8) for a
non-escaping __block variable anymore. Instead IRGen can emit the
variable as a normal variable and copy the reference to the block
literal. Byref copy/dispose helpers aren't needed either.
rdar://problem/39352313
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51564
llvm-svn: 341754
destructors.
We previously tried to patch up the exception specification after
completing the class, which went wrong when the exception specification
was needed within the class body (in particular, by a friend
redeclaration of the destructor in a nested class). We now mark the
destructor as having a not-yet-computed exception specification
immediately after creating it.
This requires delaying various checks against the exception
specification (where we'd previously have just got the wrong exception
specification, and now find we have an exception specification that we
can't compute yet) when those checks fire while the class is being
defined.
This also exposed an issue that we were missing a CodeSynthesisContext
for computation of exception specifications (otherwise we'd fail to make
the module containing the definition of the class visible when computing
its members' exception specs). Adding that incidentally also gives us a
diagnostic quality improvement.
This has also exposed an pre-existing problem: making the exception
specification evaluation context a non-SFINAE context (as it should be)
results in a bootstrap failure; PR38850 filed for this.
llvm-svn: 341499
Summary:
Given the following kernel:
__kernel void foo() {
double d;
double4 dd;
}
and cl_khr_fp64 is disabled, the compilation would fail due to
the presence of 'double d', but when removed, it passes.
The expectation is that extended vector types of unsupported types
will also be unsupported.
The patch adds the check for this scenario.
Patch by: Ofir Cohen
Reviewers: bader, Anastasia, AlexeySotkin, yaxunl
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51296
llvm-svn: 341309
As documented here: https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/682969 and
https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/523346. cpu_dispatch multiversioning
is an ICC feature that provides for function multiversioning.
This feature is implemented with two attributes: First, cpu_specific,
which specifies the individual function versions. Second, cpu_dispatch,
which specifies the location of the resolver function and the list of
resolvable functions.
This is valuable since it provides a mechanism where the resolver's TU
can be specified in one location, and the individual implementions
each in their own translation units.
The goal of this patch is to be source-compatible with ICC, so this
implementation diverges from the ICC implementation in a few ways:
1- Linux x86/64 only: This implementation uses ifuncs in order to
properly dispatch functions. This is is a valuable performance benefit
over the ICC implementation. A future patch will be provided to enable
this feature on Windows, but it will obviously more closely fit ICC's
implementation.
2- CPU Identification functions: ICC uses a set of custom functions to identify
the feature list of the host processor. This patch uses the cpu_supports
functionality in order to better align with 'target' multiversioning.
1- cpu_dispatch function def/decl: ICC's cpu_dispatch requires that the function
marked cpu_dispatch be an empty definition. This patch supports that as well,
however declarations are also permitted, since the linker will solve the
issue of multiple emissions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47474
llvm-svn: 337552
Summary:
Using _Atomic to do implicit load / store is just a seq_cst atomic_load / atomic_store. Stores currently assert in Sema::ImpCastExprToType with 'can't implicitly cast lvalue to rvalue with this cast kind', but that's erroneous. The codegen is fine as the test shows.
While investigating I found that Richard had found the problem here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46112#1113557
<rdar://problem/40347123>
Reviewers: dexonsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, efriedma, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49458
llvm-svn: 337410
Summary:
Currently clang looks up the coroutine_traits ClassTemplateDecl
everytime it looks up the promise type. This is unnecessary
as coroutine_traits doesn't change between promise type lookups.
This diff caches the coroutine_traits lookup.
Patch by Tanoy Sinha!
Test Plan:
I added log statements in the new lookupCoroutineTraits function
to ensure that LookupQualifiedName was only called once even
when multiple coroutines existed in the source file.
Reviewers: modocache, GorNishanov
Reviewed By: modocache
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48981
llvm-svn: 337103
checks across module boundaries. This was causing us to load constructor
definitions for all consumers of a module with a pending check.
(In one case we saw ~7% of total frontend time spent loading
constructors for this check.)
llvm-svn: 335807
Summary:
Previously this triggered a -Wundefined-internal warning. But it's not
an undefined variable -- any variable of this form is a pointer to the
base of GPU core's shared memory.
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: sanjoy, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46782
llvm-svn: 332621
For example, given:
#define bool _Bool
_Bool i;
void fn() { 1; }
-ast-print produced:
tmp.c:3:13: warning: expression result unused
void fn() { 1; }
^
bool i;
void fn() {
1;
}
That fails to compile because bool is undefined.
Details:
Diagnostics print _Bool as bool when the latter is defined as the
former. However, diagnostics were altering the printing policy for
-ast-print as well. The printed source was then invalid because the
preprocessor eats the bool definition.
Problematic diagnostics included suppressed warnings (e.g., add
-Wno-unused-value to the above example), including those that are
suppressed by default.
This patch fixes this bug and cleans up some related comments.
Reviewed by: aaron.ballman, rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45093
llvm-svn: 332275
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
Summary:
This patch tackles long hanging fruit for the builtin operator<=> expressions. It is currently needs some cleanup before landing, but I want to get some initial feedback.
The main changes are:
* Lookup, build, and store the required standard library types and expressions in `ASTContext`. By storing them in ASTContext we don't need to store (and duplicate) the required expressions in the BinaryOperator AST nodes.
* Implement [expr.spaceship] checking, including diagnosing narrowing conversions.
* Implement `ExprConstant` for builtin spaceship operators.
* Implement builitin operator<=> support in `CodeGenAgg`. Initially I emitted the required comparisons using `ScalarExprEmitter::VisitBinaryOperator`, but this caused the operand expressions to be emitted once for every required cmp.
* Implement [builtin.over] with modifications to support the intent of P0946R0. See the note on `BuiltinOperatorOverloadBuilder::addThreeWayArithmeticOverloads` for more information about the workaround.
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, majnemer, rnk, compnerd, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman, junbuml, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45476
llvm-svn: 331677
The current support of the feature produces only 2 lines in report:
-Some general Code Generation Time;
-Total time of Backend Consumer actions.
This patch extends Clang time report with new lines related to Preprocessor, Include Filea Search, Parsing, etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43578
llvm-svn: 329684
Summary:
This fixes PR33561 and PR34185.
Don't store pending template instantiations for late-parsed templates in
the normal PendingInstantiations queue. Instead, use a separate list
that will only be parsed and instantiated at end of TU when late
template parsing actually works and doesn't infinite loop.
Reviewers: rsmith, thakis, hans
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44846
llvm-svn: 328567
This relands r326965.
There was a null dereference in typo correction that was triggered in
Sema/diagnose_if.c. We are not always in a function scope when doing
typo correction. The fix is to add a null check.
LLVM's optimizer made it hard to find this bug. I wrote it up in a
not-very-well-editted blog post here:
http://qinsb.blogspot.com/2018/03/ub-will-delete-your-null-checks.html
llvm-svn: 327334
This reverts r326965. It seems to have caused repeating test failures in
clang/test/Sema/diagnose_if.c on some buildbots.
I cannot reproduce the problem, and it's not immediately obvious what
the problem is, so let's revert to green.
llvm-svn: 326974
Summary:
Before this patch, Sema pre-allocated a FunctionScopeInfo and kept it in
the first, always present element of the FunctionScopes stack. This
meant that Sema::getCurFunction would return a pointer to this
pre-allocated object when parsing code outside a function body. This is
pretty much always a bug, so this patch moves the pre-allocated object
into a separate unique_ptr. This should make bugs like PR36536 a lot
more obvious.
As you can see from this patch, there were a number of places that
unconditionally assumed they were always called inside a function.
However, there are also many places that null checked the result of
getCurFunction(), so I think this is a reasonable direction.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44039
llvm-svn: 326965
Summary:
This provides no measurable build speedup, but it reinstates an
optimization from r112038 that was lost in r179618. It requires moving
CapturedScopeInfo::Capture out to clang::sema, which might be too
general since we have plenty of other Capture records in BlockDecl and
other AST nodes.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44221
llvm-svn: 326957
When parsing comments, for example, for -Wdocumentation, slightly different
behaviour occurs when -fparse-all-comments is specified. However, these
differences are subtle:
1. All comments are saved during parsing, regardless of whether they are doc
comments or not.
2. "Maybe-doc" comments, like <, !, etc, are saved as such, instead of marking
them as ordinary comments. The maybe-doc type of comment is never saved
otherwise. (Warning on these is the impetus of -Wdocumentation.)
3. All comments are treated as doc comments in ASTContext, even if they are ordinary.
This change moves the logic for checking CommentOptions.ParseAllComments closer
to where it has an effect. The overall logic is unchanged, but checks of the
ParseAllComments flag are now done where the effect will be clearer.
Subscribers: cfe-commits
llvm-svn: 326512
Original change:
[NFC] Move CommentOpts checks to the call sites that depend on it.
When parsing comments, for example, for -Wdocumentation, slightly different
behaviour occurs when -fparse-all-comments is specified. However, these
differences are subtle:
1. All comments are saved during parsing, regardless of whether they are doc comments or not.
2. "Maybe-doc" comments, like //<, //!, etc, are saved as such, instead of marking them as ordinary comments. The maybe-doc type of comment is never saved otherwise. (Warning on these is the impetus of -Wdocumentation.)
3. All comments are treated as doc comments in ASTContext, even if they are ordinary.
This change moves the logic for checking CommentOptions.ParseAllComments closer
to where it has an effect. The overall logic is unchanged, but checks of the
ParseAllComments flag are now done where the effect will be clearer.
llvm-svn: 326508
When parsing comments, for example, for -Wdocumentation, slightly different
behaviour occurs when -fparse-all-comments is specified. However, these
differences are subtle:
1. All comments are saved during parsing, regardless of whether they are doc
comments or not.
2. "Maybe-doc" comments, like //<, //!, etc, are saved as such, instead of
marking them as ordinary comments. The maybe-doc type of comment is never
saved otherwise. (Warning on these is the impetus of -Wdocumentation.)
3. All comments are treated as doc comments in ASTContext, even if they are
ordinary.
This change moves the logic for checking CommentOptions.ParseAllComments closer
to where it has an effect. The overall logic is unchanged, but checks of the
ParseAllComments flag are now done where the effect will be clearer.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43663
llvm-svn: 326501
This patch adds a base-class called TemplateInstantiationObserver which gets
notified whenever a template instantiation is entered or exited during
semantic analysis. This is a base class used to implement the template
profiling and debugging tool called
Templight (https://github.com/mikael-s-persson/templight).
The patch also makes a few more changes:
* ActiveTemplateInstantiation class is moved out of the Sema class (so it can be used with inclusion of Sema.h).
* CreateFrontendAction function in front-end utilities is given external linkage (not longer a hidden static function).
* TemplateInstObserverChain data member added to Sema class to hold the list of template-inst observers.
* Notifications to the template-inst observer are added at the key places where templates are instantiated.
Patch by: Abel Sinkovics!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D5767
llvm-svn: 324808
We could in principle support such pack expansion, using techniques similar to
what we do for pack expansion of lambdas, but it's not clear it's worthwhile.
For now at least, cleanly reject these cases rather than crashing.
llvm-svn: 324160
GCC's attribute 'target', in addition to being an optimization hint,
also allows function multiversioning. We currently have the former
implemented, this is the latter's implementation.
This works by enabling functions with the same name/signature to coexist,
so that they can all be emitted. Multiversion state is stored in the
FunctionDecl itself, and SemaDecl manages the definitions.
Note that it ends up having to permit redefinition of functions so
that they can all be emitted. Additionally, all versions of the function
must be emitted, so this also manages that.
Note that this includes some additional rules that GCC does not, since
defining something as a MultiVersion function after a usage has been made illegal.
The only 'history rewriting' that happens is if a function is emitted before
it has been converted to a multiversion'ed function, at which point its name
needs to be changed.
Function templates and virtual functions are NOT yet supported (not supported
in GCC either).
Additionally, constructors/destructors are disallowed, but the former is
planned.
llvm-svn: 322028
Summary:
The warning was initially introduced in D32914 by @thakis,
and the concerns were raised there, and later in rL302247
and PR33771.
I do believe that it makes sense to relax the diagnostic
e.g. in this case, when the expression originates from the
system header, which can not be modified. This prevents
adoption for the diagnostic for codebases which use pthreads
(`PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER`), gtest, etc.
As @malcolm.parsons suggests, it *may* make sense to also
not warn for the template types, but it is not obvious to
me how to do that in here.
Though, it still makes sense to complain about `NULL` macro.
While there, add more tests.
Reviewers: dblaikie, thakis, rsmith, rjmccall, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: thakis
Subscribers: Rakete1111, hans, cfe-commits, thakis, malcolm.parsons
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38954
llvm-svn: 316662
If a function or variable has a type with no linkage (and is not extern "C"),
any use of it requires a definition within the same translation unit; the idea
is that it is not possible to define the entity elsewhere, so any such use is
necessarily an error.
There is an exception, though: some types formally have no linkage but
nonetheless can be referenced from other translation units (for example, this
happens to anonymous structures defined within inline functions). For entities
with those types, we suppress the diagnostic except under -pedantic.
llvm-svn: 313729
This follows the scheme agreed with Nathan Sidwell, which can be found here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cxx-modules?action=AttachFile
This will be proposed to the itanium-cxx-abi list once we have some experience
with how well it works; the ABI for this TS should be considered unstable until
it is part of the Itanium C++ ABI.
llvm-svn: 312467
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308441
Summary: When in incremental processing mode, we should never set `TUScope` to a nullptr otherwise any future lookups fail. We already have similar checks in the rest of the code, but we never hit this one because so far we didn't try to generate a module from the AST that Cling generates.
Reviewers: rsmith, v.g.vassilev
Reviewed By: v.g.vassilev
Subscribers: cfe-commits, v.g.vassilev
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35536
llvm-svn: 308333
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308327
Richard Smith