for floating point registers was not recording them correctly. I needed to
change the EmulateInstructionARM64 unwind plans from using the DWARF
register numbering scheme to using the LLDB register numbering scheme
(because dwarf doesn't define register numbers for the 64-bit "d" registers).
Updated the EmulateInstructionARM64 unit tests to work with the LLDB
register numbering scheme and added a unit test to check the floating
point register spills & restores are correctly recorded.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D25864
<rdar://problem/28745483>
llvm-svn: 285662
prologue, then loads & stores x20 on the stack from a different
location in the middle of the function, and then restores the
reg in the epilogue. The saving/restoring of x20 in the middle
of the function should be ignored.
llvm-svn: 283969
MSVC does not like the declaration of a terminate() function (I guess it looks
too much like std::terminate()). While I'm there, move the setup/teardown code
into the functions gtest provides for that purpose.
llvm-svn: 283870
plan generator.
Fix a small bug in EmulateInstructionARM64::GetFramePointerRegister
which was returning the stack pointer reg instead of fp, prevented
the unwinder from recognizing the switch to using the fp in a
function. (<rdar://problem/28663117>)
Add a new eContextRestoreStackPointer context hint so that the arm64
emulator can flag when the frame pointer value is copied back in to
the stack pointer and that should be used to compute the canonical
frame address again in an epilogue sequence. (<rdar://problem/28704862>)
Small changes to UnwindAssemblyInstEmulation to have a method we can
call without a live process/thread/etc for unit tests.
<rdar://problem/28663117>
<rdar://problem/28704862>
<rdar://problem/28509178>
llvm-svn: 283847
insturction profiling. Add a test that verifies that we reject a
32-bit only instruction in 64-bit (long) mode.
This wraps up all the testing I want to add for
x86AssemblyInspectionEngine.
llvm-svn: 283404
unittests. If I have time, I'd like to see if I can write some
tests of the eh_frame augmentation which is a wholly separate code
path (it seems like maybe it should be rolled into the main instruction
scanning codepath, to be honest, and operate on the generated
UnwindPlan instead of bothering with raw instructions at all).
Outside the eh_frame augmentation, I'm comfortable that this unwind
generator is being tested well now.
llvm-svn: 283186
assembly inspection class is designed to detect. This is only about
half of the instructions that it needs to recognize - I'll complete
this in a separate checkin.
The larger full-function style test cases I'd checked in previously
covered nearly all of these already, but I wanted simpler test cases
too, so if they fail in the future, it will be easier to spot the
issue.
llvm-svn: 283010
'push 0x20(%esp)' which clang can generate when emitting
-fomit-frame-pointer code for 32-bit.
Add a unit test program which includes this instruction.
Also fix a bug in the refactoring/rewrite of the x86 assembly
instruction profiler where I'd hard coded it as a 64-bit disassembler
instead of using the ArchSpec to pick a 32-bit or 64-bit disassembler
from llvm. When the disassembler would hit an instruction
that is invalid in 64-bit mode, it would stop disassembling the function.
This likely led to the TestSBData testsuite failure on linux with 32-bit
i386 and gcc-4.9; I'll test that in a bit.
The newly added unit test program is 32-bit i386 code and it includes
an instruction which is invalid in 64-bit mode so it will catch this.
<rdar://problem/28557876>
llvm-svn: 282991
a large stack frame with lots of spilled registers.
While writing the i386 version of this test, it looks
like I found a bug in the 32-bit instruction profiler
code. I may ned to fix the assembly inspection engine
before I can finish writing that test, so I'm only
committing the 64-bit one tonight.
<rdar://problem/28509178>
llvm-svn: 282683
a linux bot test failure. That one is fixed; hopefully there won't
be any others turned up this time.
The eh_frame augmentation code wasn't working right after the
reorg/rewrite of the classes. It works correctly now for the one
test that was failing - but we'll see what the test bots come up
with.
<rdar://problem/28509178>
llvm-svn: 282659
A testbot found a regression introduced in the testsuite with
the changes in r282565 on Ubuntu (TestStepNoDebug.ReturnValueTestCase).
I'll get this set up on an ubuntu box and figure out what is happening
there -- likely a problem with the eh_frame augmentation, which isn't
used on macosx.
llvm-svn: 282566
x86AssemblyInspectionEngine and the current UnwindAssembly_x86 to
allow for the core engine to be exercised by unit tests.
The UnwindAssembly_x86 class will have access to Targets, Processes,
Threads, RegisterContexts -- it will be working in the full lldb
environment.
x86AssemblyInspectionEngine is layered away from all of that, it is
given some register definitions and a bag of bytes to profile.
I wrote an initial unittest for a do-nothing simple x86_64/i386
function to start with. I'll be adding more.
The x86 assembly unwinder was added to lldb early in its bringup;
I made some modernization changes as I was refactoring the code
to make it more consistent with how we write lldb today.
I also added RegisterContextMinidump_x86_64.cpp to the xcode project
file so I can run the unittests from that.
The testsuite passes with this change, but there was quite a bit of
code change by the refactoring and it's possible there are some
issues. I'll be testing this more in the coming days, but it looks
like it is behaving correctly as far as I can tell with automated
testing.
<rdar://problem/28509178>
llvm-svn: 282565
Chris Bieneman