Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into
C++ last year as a DR against C++11.
Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited
base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to
constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for
using-declarations.
For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived
class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow
constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the
actual initialization, and have a new expression node,
CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such
a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect
forwarding of arguments.)
In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls,
variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting
constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code
into the caller of the inherited constructor.
Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some
corner cases. In particular:
* if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to
construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B
befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and
* if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default
constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from
a base class
llvm-svn: 274049
[OpenMP] Initial implementation of parse and sema for composite pragma 'distribute parallel for'
This patch is an initial implementation for #distribute parallel for.
The main differences that affect other pragmas are:
The implementation of 'distribute parallel for' requires blocking of the associated loop, where blocks are "distributed" to different teams and iterations within each block are scheduled to parallel threads within each team. To implement blocking, sema creates two additional worksharing directive fields that are used to pass the team assigned block lower and upper bounds through the outlined function resulting from 'parallel'. In this way, scheduling for 'for' to threads can use those bounds.
As a consequence of blocking, the stride of 'distribute' is not 1 but it is equal to the blocking size. This is returned by the runtime and sema prepares a DistIncrExpr variable to hold that value.
As a consequence of blocking, the global upper bound (EnsureUpperBound) expression of the 'for' is not the original loop upper bound (e.g. in for(i = 0 ; i < N; i++) this is 'N') but it is the team-assigned block upper bound. Sema creates a new expression holding the calculation of the actual upper bound for 'for' as UB = min(UB, PrevUB), where UB is the loop upper bound, and PrevUB is the team-assigned block upper bound.
llvm-svn: 273884
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21564
This patch is an initial implementation for #distribute parallel for.
The main differences that affect other pragmas are:
The implementation of 'distribute parallel for' requires blocking of the associated loop, where blocks are "distributed" to different teams and iterations within each block are scheduled to parallel threads within each team. To implement blocking, sema creates two additional worksharing directive fields that are used to pass the team assigned block lower and upper bounds through the outlined function resulting from 'parallel'. In this way, scheduling for 'for' to threads can use those bounds.
As a consequence of blocking, the stride of 'distribute' is not 1 but it is equal to the blocking size. This is returned by the runtime and sema prepares a DistIncrExpr variable to hold that value.
As a consequence of blocking, the global upper bound (EnsureUpperBound) expression of the 'for' is not the original loop upper bound (e.g. in for(i = 0 ; i < N; i++) this is 'N') but it is the team-assigned block upper bound. Sema creates a new expression holding the calculation of the actual upper bound for 'for' as UB = min(UB, PrevUB), where UB is the loop upper bound, and PrevUB is the team-assigned block upper bound.
llvm-svn: 273705
classes.
MSVC actively uses unqualified lookup in dependent bases, lookup at the
instantiation point (non-dependent names may be resolved on things
declared later) etc. and all this stuff is the main cause of
incompatibility between clang and MSVC.
Clang tries to emulate MSVC behavior but it may fail in many cases.
clang could store lexed tokens for member functions definitions within
ClassTemplateDecl for later parsing during template instantiation.
It will allow resolving many possible issues with lookup in dependent
base classes and removing many already existing MSVC-specific
hacks/workarounds from the clang code.
llvm-svn: 272774
Summary:
The patch contains the parsing and sema support for the `from` clause.
Patch based on the original post by Kelvin Li.
Reviewers: hfinkel, carlo.bertolli, kkwli0, arpith-jacob, ABataev
Subscribers: caomhin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18488
llvm-svn: 270882
Summary:
The patch contains the parsing and sema support for the `to` clause.
Patch based on the original post by Kelvin Li.
Reviewers: carlo.bertolli, hfinkel, kkwli0, arpith-jacob, ABataev
Subscribers: caomhin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18597
llvm-svn: 270880
Summary:
This patch is to add parsing and sema support for `target update` directive. Support for the `to` and `from` clauses will be added by a different patch. This patch also adds support for other clauses that are already implemented upstream and apply to `target update`, e.g. `device` and `if`.
This patch is based on the original post by Kelvin Li.
Reviewers: hfinkel, carlo.bertolli, kkwli0, arpith-jacob, ABataev
Subscribers: caomhin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15944
llvm-svn: 270878
an identifier table lookup, *and* copy the LangOptions (including various
std::vector<std::string>s). Twice. We call this function once each time we start
parsing a declaration specifier sequence, and once for each call to Sema::Diag.
This reduces the compile time for a sample .c file from the linux kernel by 20%.
llvm-svn: 270009
This patch corresponds to reviews:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15120http://reviews.llvm.org/D19125
It adds support for the __float128 keyword, literals and target feature to
enable it. Based on the latter of the two aforementioned reviews, this feature
is enabled on Linux on i386/X86 as well as SystemZ.
This is also the second attempt in commiting this feature. The first attempt
did not enable it on required platforms which caused failures when compiling
type_traits with -std=gnu++11.
If you see failures with compiling this header on your platform after this
commit, it is likely that your platform needs to have this feature enabled.
llvm-svn: 268898
Since this patch provided support for the __float128 type but disabled it
on all platforms by default, some platforms can't compile type_traits with
-std=gnu++11 since there is a specialization with __float128.
This reverts the patch until D19125 is approved (i.e. we know which platforms
need this support enabled).
llvm-svn: 266460
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D15120
It adds support for the __float128 keyword, literals and a target feature to
enable it. This support is disabled by default on all targets and any target
that has support for this type is free to add it.
Based on feedback that I've received from target maintainers, this appears to
be the right thing for most targets. I have not heard from the maintainers of
X86 which I believe supports this type. I will subsequently investigate the
impact of enabling this on X86.
llvm-svn: 266186
Implement lambda capture of *this by copy.
For e.g.:
struct A {
int d = 10;
auto foo() { return [*this] (auto a) mutable { d+=a; return d; }; }
};
auto L = A{}.foo(); // A{}'s lifetime is gone.
// Below is still ok, because *this was captured by value.
assert(L(10) == 20);
assert(L(100) == 120);
If the capture was implicit, or [this] (i.e. *this was captured by reference), this code would be otherwise undefined.
Implementation Strategy:
- amend the parser to accept *this in the lambda introducer
- add a new king of capture LCK_StarThis
- teach Sema::CheckCXXThisCapture to handle by copy captures of the
enclosing object (i.e. *this)
- when CheckCXXThisCapture does capture by copy, the corresponding
initializer expression for the closure's data member
direct-initializes it thus making a copy of '*this'.
- in codegen, when assigning to CXXThisValue, if *this was captured by
copy, make sure it points to the corresponding field member, and
not, unlike when captured by reference, what the field member points
to.
- mark feature as implemented in svn
Much gratitude to Richard Smith for his carefully illuminating reviews!
llvm-svn: 263921
OpenMP 4.5 allows to privatize non-static data members of current class
in non-static member functions. Patch adds initial parsing/semantic
analysis for data members support in 'reduction' clauses.
llvm-svn: 262199
Expressions inside 'schedule'|'dist_schedule' clause must be captured in
combined directives to avoid possible crash during codegen. Patch
improves handling of such constructs
llvm-svn: 260954
OMPCapturedExprDecl allows caopturing not only of fielddecls, but also
other expressions. It also allows to simplify codegen for several
clauses.
llvm-svn: 260492
OpenMP 4.5 introduces privatization of non-static data members of current class in non-static member functions.
To correctly handle such kind of privatization a new (pseudo)declaration VarDecl-based node is added. It allows to reuse an existing code for capturing variables in Lambdas/Block/Captured blocks of code for correct privatization and codegen.
llvm-svn: 260077
Summary:
This patch adds parsing + sema for the target parallel for directive along with testcases.
Reviewers: ABataev
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16759
llvm-svn: 259654
Summary:
This patch adds parsing + sema for the target parallel directive and its clauses along with testcases.
Reviewers: ABataev
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16553
Rebased to current trunk and updated test cases.
llvm-svn: 258832
Summary:
This patch adds parsing + sema for the defaultmap clause associated with the target directive (among others).
Reviewers: ABataev
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16527
llvm-svn: 258817
OpenMP 4.0-3.1 supports the next format of ‘schedule’ clause: schedule(kind[, chunk_size])
Where kind can be one of ‘static’, ‘dynamic’, ‘guided’, ‘auto’ or ‘runtime’.
OpenMP 4.5 defines the format: schedule([modifier [, modifier]:]kind[, chunk_size])
Modifier can be one of ‘monotonic’, ‘nonmonotonic’ or ‘simd’.
llvm-svn: 256487
OpenMP 4.5 adds 'depend(source)' clause for 'ordered' directive to support cross-iteration dependence. Patch adds parsing and semantic analysis for this construct.
llvm-svn: 255986
OpenMP 4.5 adds directives 'taskloop' and 'taskloop simd'. These directives support clause 'num_tasks'. Patch adds parsing/semantic analysis for this clause.
llvm-svn: 255008
OpenMP 4.5 adds 'taksloop' and 'taskloop simd' directives, which have 'grainsize' clause. Patch adds parsing/sema analysis of this clause.
llvm-svn: 254903
OpenMP 4.5 adds 'taskloop' and 'taskloop simd' directives. These directives have new 'nogroup' clause. Patch adds basic parsing/sema support for this clause.
llvm-svn: 254899
OpenMP 4.5 defines new clause 'priority' for 'task', 'taskloop' and 'taskloop simd' directives. Added parsing and sema analysis for 'priority' clause in 'task' and 'taskloop' directives.
llvm-svn: 254398
MSVC supports 'property' attribute and allows to apply it to the declaration of an empty array in a class or structure definition.
For example:
```
__declspec(property(get=GetX, put=PutX)) int x[];
```
The above statement indicates that x[] can be used with one or more array indices. In this case, i=p->x[a][b] will be turned into i=p->GetX(a, b), and p->x[a][b] = i will be turned into p->PutX(a, b, i);
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13336
llvm-svn: 254067
Summary: It breaks the build for the ASTMatchers
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13893
llvm-svn: 250827
the "" and the suffix; that breaks names such as 'operator""if'. For symmetry,
also remove the space between the 'operator' and the '""'.
llvm-svn: 249641
Parsing and sema analysis for 'simd' clause in 'ordered' directive.
Description
If the simd clause is specified, the ordered regions encountered by any thread will use only a single SIMD lane to execute the ordered
regions in the order of the loop iterations.
Restrictions
An ordered construct with the simd clause is the only OpenMP construct that can appear in the simd region
llvm-svn: 248696
OpenMP 4.1 extends format of '#pragma omp ordered'. It adds 3 additional clauses: 'threads', 'simd' and 'depend'.
If no clause is specified, the ordered construct behaves as if the threads clause had been specified. If the threads clause is specified, the threads in the team executing the loop region execute ordered regions sequentially in the order of the loop iterations.
The loop region to which an ordered region without any clause or with a threads clause binds must have an ordered clause without the parameter specified on the corresponding loop directive.
llvm-svn: 248569
OpenMP 4.1 added special 'directive-name-modifier' to the 'if' clause.
Format of 'if' clause is as follows:
```
if([ directive-name-modifier :] scalar-logical-expression)
```
The restriction rules are also changed.
1. If any 'if' clause on the directive includes a 'directive-name-modifier' then all 'if' clauses on the directive must include a 'directive-name-modifier'.
2. At most one 'if' clause without a 'directive-name-modifier' can appear on the directive.
3. At most one 'if' clause with some particular 'directive-name-modifier' can appear on the directive.
'directive-name-modifier' is important for combined directives and allows to separate conditions in 'if' clause for simple sub-directives in combined directive. This 'directive-name-modifier' identifies the sub-directive to which this 'if' clause must be applied.
llvm-svn: 246747
Adds parsing/sema analysis/serialization/deserialization for array sections in OpenMP constructs (introduced in OpenMP 4.0).
Currently it is allowed to use array sections only in OpenMP clauses that accepts list of expressions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10732
llvm-svn: 245937
Add parsing/sema analysis for 'simdlen' clause in simd directives. Also add check that if both 'safelen' and 'simdlen' clauses are specified, the value of 'simdlen' parameter is less than the value of 'safelen' parameter.
llvm-svn: 245692
OpenMP 4.1 adds 3 optional modifiers to 'linear' clause.
Format of 'linear' clause has changed to:
```
linear(linear-list[ : linear-step])
```
where linear-list is one of the following
```
list
modifier(list)
```
where modifier is one of the following:
```
ref (C++)
val (C/C++)
uval (C++)
```
Patch adds parsing and sema analysis for these modifiers.
llvm-svn: 245550
OpenMP 4.1 introduces optional argument '(n)' for 'ordered' clause, where 'n' is a number of loops that immediately follow the directive.
'n' must be constant positive integer expressions and it must be less or equal than the number of the loops in the resulting loop nest.
Patch adds parsing and semantic analysis for this optional argument.
llvm-svn: 243635
StmtRange was just a convenient wrapper for two StmtIterators before
we had real range support. This removes some of the implicit conversions
StmtRange had leading to slightly more verbose code but also should make
more obvious what's going on. No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 242615
- Make it a proper random access iterator with a little help from iterator_adaptor_base
- Clean up users of magic dereferencing. The iterator should behave like an Expr **.
- Make it an implementation detail of Stmt. This allows inlining of the assertions.
llvm-svn: 242608
Parsing and sema analysis (without support for array sections in arguments) for 'depend' clause (used in 'task' directive, OpenMP 4.0).
llvm-svn: 240409
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
Added parsing, sema analysis and codegen for '#pragma omp taskgroup' directive (OpenMP 4.0).
The code for directive is generated the following way:
#pragma omp taskgroup
<body>
void __kmpc_taskgroup(<loc>, thread_id);
<body>
void __kmpc_end_taskgroup(<loc>, thread_id);
llvm-svn: 240011
Based on previous discussion on the mailing list, clang currently lacks support
for C99 partial re-initialization behavior:
Reference: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2013-April/029188.html
Reference: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_253.htm
This patch attempts to fix this problem.
Given the following code snippet,
struct P1 { char x[6]; };
struct LP1 { struct P1 p1; };
struct LP1 l = { .p1 = { "foo" }, .p1.x[2] = 'x' };
// this example is adapted from the example for "struct fred x[]" in DR-253;
// currently clang produces in l: { "\0\0x" },
// whereas gcc 4.8 produces { "fox" };
// with this fix, clang will also produce: { "fox" };
Differential Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5789
llvm-svn: 239446
Allows StmtPrinter to print old style field designators in
initializers, fixing an issue where we would print the following
invalid code:
struct A a = {b: = 3, .c = 4};
Patch by Nick Sumner. Thanks!
llvm-svn: 238517
A LambdaCapture does not have sufficient information
to correctly determine whether it is an init-capture or not.
Doing so requires knowledge held in the LambdaExpr itself.
It the case of a nested capture of an init-capture it is not
sufficient to check (as LambdaCapture::isInitCapture did)
whether the associated VarDecl was from an init-capture.
This patch moves isInitCapture to LambdaExpr and updates
Capture->isInitCapture() to Lambda->isInitCapture(Capture).
llvm-svn: 236760
StmtPrinter assumed that the first template arg was the pack and
attempted to iterate it. However, the GNU extension (which is really
just N3599), has two template arguments. In this case, the second
argument is the pack containing the string contents.
Handle this by desugaring the call to the explicit operator.
For example:
"qux" _zombocom will be shown as
operator "" _zombocom<char, 'q', 'u', 'x'>() in diagnostics and AST
dumps.
N.B. It is actually impossible to render the arguments back to the
source form without storing more information in the AST. For example,
we cannot tell if the user wrote u8"qux" or "qux". We also lose
fidelity when it comes to non-char types for this exact reason (e.g. it
is hard to render a list of wchar_t back to something that can be
printed to the screen even if you don't have to consider surrogate
pairs).
This fixes PR23120.
llvm-svn: 234110
initializer of the form {x}, where x is of type C or a type derived from C,
perform *non-list* initialization of the entity from x, but create a
CXXConstructExpr that knows that we used list-initialization syntax.
Plus some fixes to ensure we mangle correctly in this and related cases.
llvm-svn: 228276
list-initialization that gets converted to some form other than an
InitListExpr. CXXTemporaryObjectExpr is a special case here, because it
represents a fused CXXFunctionalCastExpr + CXXConstructExpr. That, in
itself, is probably a design error...
llvm-svn: 227377
This is a new form of expression of the form:
(expr op ... op expr)
where one of the exprs is a parameter pack. It expands into
(expr1 op (expr2onwards op ... op expr))
(and likewise if the pack is on the right). The non-pack operand can be
omitted; in that case, an empty pack gives a fallback value or an error,
depending on the operator.
llvm-svn: 221573
Assertion failed: "Computed __func__ length differs from type!"
Reworked PredefinedExpr representation with internal StringLiteral field for function declaration.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5365
llvm-svn: 219393
Includes parsing and semantic analysis for 'omp teams' directive support from OpenMP 4.0. Adds additional analysis to 'omp target' directive with 'omp teams' directive.
llvm-svn: 219385
Includes parsing and semantic analysis for 'omp teams' directive support from OpenMP 4.0. Adds additional analysis to 'omp target' directive with 'omp teams' directive.
llvm-svn: 219197
Something went wrong with r211426, it is an older version of this code
and should not have been committed. It was reverted with r211434.
Original commit message:
We didn't properly implement support for the sized integer suffixes.
Suffixes like i16 were essentially ignored instead of mapping them to
the appropriately sized integer type.
This fixes PR20008.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4132
llvm-svn: 211441
This reverts commit r211426.
This broke the arm bots. The crash can be reproduced on X86 by running.
./bin/clang -cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -fms-extensions ~/llvm/clang/test/Lexer/ms-extensions.c -triple arm-linux
llvm-svn: 211434
We didn't properly implement support for the sized integer suffixes.
Suffixes like i16 were essentially ignored instead of mapping them to
the appropriately sized integer type.
This fixes PR20008.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4132
llvm-svn: 211426
This reverts commit r211096. Looks like it broke the msvc build:
SemaOpenMP.cpp(140) : error C4519: default template arguments are only allowed on a class template
llvm-svn: 211113
hint attributes. Includes tests for pragma printing and for attribute order
which is incorrectly reversed by ParsedAttributes.
Reviewed by Aaron Ballman
llvm-svn: 210925
will never be true in a well-defined context. The checking for null pointers
has been moved into the caller logic so it does not rely on undefined behavior.
llvm-svn: 210498
It is very similar to GCC's __PRETTY_FUNCTION__, except it prints the
calling convention.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3311
llvm-svn: 205780
- Don't emit anything when we encounter a call to a conversion operator.
"bar(a & b)" instead of "bar(a & b.operator int())"
This preserves the semantics and is still idempotent if we print the AST multiple times.
- Properly print declarations of conversion operators.
"explicit operator bool();" instead of "bool operator _Bool();"
PR18776.
llvm-svn: 202167
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
llvm-svn: 200082
Richard Smith