The reasoning is that this construct is accepted by all compilers and valid in
C++11, so it doesn't seem like a useful warning to have enabled by default.
Building with -pedantic, -Wbind-to-temporary-copy, or -Wc++98-compat still
shows the warning.
The motivation is that I built re2, and this was the only warning that was
emitted during the build. Both changing re2 to fix the warning and detecting
clang and suppressing the warning in re2's build seem inferior than just giving
the compiler a good default for this warning.
Also move the cxx98compat version of this warning to CXX98CompatPedantic, and
update tests accordingly.
llvm-svn: 218008
Changes diagnostic options, language standard options, diagnostic identifiers, diagnostic wording to use c++14 instead of c++1y. It also modifies related test cases to use the updated diagnostic wording.
llvm-svn: 215982
Still to do here:
- we have a collection of syntactic accepts-invalids to diagnose
- support non-PODs in VLAs, including dynamic initialization /
destruction
- runtime checks (and throw std::bad_array_length) for bad bound
- support VLA capture by reference in lambdas
- properly support VLAs in range-based for (don't recompute bound)
llvm-svn: 179962
This also adds a -Wc++98-compat-pedantic for warning on constructs which would
be diagnosed by -std=c++98 -pedantic (that is, it warns even on C++11 features
which we enable by default, with no warning, in C++98 mode).
llvm-svn: 142034
Nico Weber