Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
the tail padding is not reused.
We track on the AggValueSlot (and through a couple of other
initialization actions) whether we're dealing with an object that might
share its tail padding with some other object, so that we can avoid
emitting stores into the tail padding if that's the case. We still
widen stores into tail padding when we can do so.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45306
llvm-svn: 329342
Summary:
"-fmerge-all-constants" is a non-conforming optimization and should not
be the default. It is also causing miscompiles when building Linux
Kernel (https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/20/872).
Fixes PR18538.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, chandlerc
Reviewed By: rsmith, chandlerc
Subscribers: srhines, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45289
llvm-svn: 329300
Microsoft has reserved 'U' for the PreserveMostCC which is used in the
swift runtime. Add support for this. This allows the swift runtime to
be built for Windows again.
llvm-svn: 329025
Summary:
The following class hierarchy requires that we be able to emit a
this-adjusting thunk for B::foo in C's vftable:
struct Incomplete;
struct A {
virtual A* foo(Incomplete p) = 0;
};
struct B : virtual A {
void foo(Incomplete p) override;
};
struct C : B { int c; };
This TU is valid, but lacks a definition of 'Incomplete', which makes it
hard to build a thunk for the final overrider, B::foo.
Before this change, Clang gives up attempting to emit the thunk, because
it assumes that if the parameter types are incomplete, it must be
emitting the thunk for optimization purposes. This is untrue for the MS
ABI, where the implementation of B::foo has no idea what thunks C's
vftable may require. Clang needs to emit the thunk without necessarily
having access to the complete prototype of foo.
This change makes Clang emit a musttail variadic call when it needs such
a thunk. I call these "unprototyped" thunks, because they only prototype
the "this" parameter, which must always come first in the MS C++ ABI.
These thunks work, but they create ugly LLVM IR. If the call to the
thunk is devirtualized, it will be a call to a bitcast of a function
pointer. Today, LLVM cannot inline through such a call, but I want to
address that soon, because we also use this pattern for virtual member
pointer thunks.
This change also implements an old FIXME in the code about reusing the
thunk's computed CGFunctionInfo as much as possible. Now we don't end up
computing the thunk's mangled name and arranging it's prototype up to
around three times.
Fixes PR25641
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, hans
Subscribers: Prazek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45112
llvm-svn: 329009
The problem with the previous logic was that there might not be any
explicit copy/move constructor declarations, e.g. if the type is
trivial and we've never type-checked a copy of it. Relying on Sema's
computation seems much more reliable.
Also, I believe Richard's recommendation is exactly the rule we use
now on the Itanium ABI, modulo the trivial_abi attribute (which this
change of course fixes our handling of in Swift).
This does mean that we have a less portable rule for deciding
indirectness for swiftcall. I would prefer it if we just applied the
Itanium rule universally under swiftcall, but in the meantime, I need
to fix this bug.
This only arises when defining functions with class-type arguments
in C++, as we do in the Swift runtime. It doesn't affect normal Swift
operation because we don't import code as C++.
llvm-svn: 328942
ObjC and ObjC++ pass non-trivial structs in a way that is incompatible
with each other. For example:
typedef struct {
id f0;
__weak id f1;
} S;
// this code is compiled in c++.
extern "C" {
void foo(S s);
}
void caller() {
// the caller passes the parameter indirectly and destructs it.
foo(S());
}
// this function is compiled in c.
// 'a' is passed directly and is destructed in the callee.
void foo(S a) {
}
This patch fixes the incompatibility by passing and returning structs
with __strong or weak fields using the C ABI in C++ mode. __strong and
__weak fields in a struct do not cause the struct to be destructed in
the caller and __strong fields do not cause the struct to be passed
indirectly.
Also, this patch fixes the microsoft ABI bug mentioned here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41039?id=128767#inline-364710
rdar://problem/38887866
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44908
llvm-svn: 328731
We were assuming that vbtable indices were assigned in layout order in
our comparison, which is not the case. When a virtual method, such as
the destructor, appears in multiple vftables, the vftable that appears
first in object layout order is the one that points to the main
implementation of that method. The later vftables use thunks.
In this layout, we adjusted "this" in the main implementation by the
amount that is appropriate for 'B' instead of 'A', even though the main
implementation is found in D's vftable for A:
struct A {
virtual ~A() {}
};
struct B {
virtual ~B() {}
};
struct C : virtual B {};
struct D : virtual A, C {};
D's layout looks like:
0 D subobject (empty)
0 C base suboject
8 A base subobject
16 B base subobject
With this fix, we correctly adjust by -8 in D's deleting destructor
instead of -16.
Fixes PR36921.
llvm-svn: 328723
Declaring "_Pragma("clang optimize off")" before the body of a
function with a lambda leads to the lambda functions in the body
not being affected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43821
llvm-svn: 328494
The issues was that we were setting hidden visibility if, when
processing a hidden class, we found out that we needed to emit a
reference to a vtable provided by the standard library.
Original message:
Set dso_local on vtables.
llvm-svn: 328288
Summary:
Libc++'s default allocator uses `__builtin_operator_new` and `__builtin_operator_delete` in order to allow the calls to new/delete to be ellided. However, libc++ now needs to support over-aligned types in the default allocator. In order to support this without disabling the existing optimization Clang needs to support calling the aligned new overloads from the builtins.
See llvm.org/PR22634 for more information about the libc++ bug.
This patch changes `__builtin_operator_new`/`__builtin_operator_delete` to call any usual `operator new`/`operator delete` function. It does this by performing overload resolution with the arguments passed to the builtin to determine which allocation function to call. If the selected function is not a usual allocation function a diagnostic is issued.
One open issue is if the `align_val_t` overloads should be considered "usual" when `LangOpts::AlignedAllocation` is disabled.
In order to allow libc++ to detect this new behavior the value for `__has_builtin(__builtin_operator_new)` has been updated to `201802`.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer, aaron.ballman, erik.pilkington, bogner, ahatanak
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43047
llvm-svn: 328134
Digging through commit logs, it appears the checks in this block predate
`inline` class variables. With them, we fail to emit dynamic
initializers for members that don't have an explicit initializer, and we
won't go out of our way to instantiate the class denoted by
`Var->getType()`.
Fixes PR35599.
llvm-svn: 327945
source expressions when iterating over a PseudoObjectExpr's semantic
subexpression list.
Previously the loop in emitPseudoObjectExpr would emit the IR for each
OpaqueValueExpr that was in a PseudoObjectExpr's semantic-form
expression list and use the result when the OpaqueValueExpr later
appeared in other expressions. This caused an assertion failure when
AggExprEmitter tried to copy the result of an OpaqueValueExpr and the
copied type didn't have trivial copy/move constructors or assignment
operators.
This patch adds flag IsUnique to OpaqueValueExpr which indicates it is a
unique reference to its source expression (it is not used in multiple
places). The loop in emitPseudoObjectExpr ignores OpaqueValueExprs that
are unique and CodeGen visitors simply traverse the source expressions
of such OpaqueValueExprs.
rdar://problem/34363596
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39562
llvm-svn: 327939
Summary:
Previously we tried too hard to uphold the fiction that destructor
variants work like they do on Itanium throughout the ABI-neutral parts
of clang. This lead to MS C++ ABI incompatiblities and other bugs. Now,
-mconstructor-aliases will no longer control this ABI detail, and clang
-cc1's LLVM IR output will be this much closer to the clang driver's.
Based on a patch by Zahira Ammarguellat:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39063
I've tried to move the logic that Zahira added into MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp.
There is only one ABI-specific detail sticking out, and that is in
CodeGenModule::getAddrOfCXXStructor, where we collapse complete dtors to
base dtors in the MS ABI.
This fixes PR32990.
Reviewers: erichkeane, zahiraam, majnemer, rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44505
llvm-svn: 327732
Since there is no reliable way to change the AST depth of this test by supported stack size
of the test environment, remove this test for now.
llvm-svn: 327578
In this particular case it would be possible to just add an else with
CGM.setDSOLocal(GV), but it seems better to have as many callers as
possible just call setGVProperties so that we can centralize the logic
there.
This patch then makes setGVProperties able to handle null Decls.
llvm-svn: 327543
Simplify the dispatching for the personality routines. This really had
no test coverage previously, so add test coverage for the various cases.
This turns out to be pretty complicated as the various languages and
models interact to change personalities around.
You really should feel bad for the compiler if you are using exceptions.
There is no reason for this type of cruelty.
llvm-svn: 327105
...that have already been constructed (e.g., in inner classes) while parsing the
class definition. They would otherwise lack any DLLAttr inherited from the
class, which are only set here (called from Sema::CheckCompletedClass) after the
class definition has been parsed completely.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D16632
llvm-svn: 326990
Before this, we'd only emit lifetime.ends for these temps in
non-exceptional paths. This potentially made our stack larger than it
needed to be for any code that follows an EH cleanup. e.g. in
```
struct Foo { char cs[32]; };
void escape(void *);
struct Bar { ~Bar() { char cs[64]; escape(cs); } };
Foo getFoo();
void baz() {
Bar b;
getFoo();
}
```
baz() would require 96 bytes of stack, since the temporary from getFoo()
only had a lifetime.end on the non-exceptional path.
This also makes us keep hold of the Value* returned by
EmitLifetimeStart, so we don't have to remake it later.
llvm-svn: 326988
We already have a mangling for the __unaligned qualifier, we just have
to call Qualifiers::getFromCVRUMask instead of getFromCVRMask.
PR36638
llvm-svn: 326971
The indirect function argument is in alloca address space in LLVM IR. However,
during Clang codegen for C++, the address space of indirect function argument
should match its address space in the source code, i.e., default addr space, even
for indirect argument. This is because destructor of the indirect argument may
be called in the caller function, and address of the indirect argument may be
taken, in either case the indirect function argument is expected to be in default
addr space, not the alloca address space.
Therefore, the indirect function argument should be mapped to the temp var
casted to default address space. The caller will cast it to alloca addr space
when passing it to the callee. In the callee, the argument is also casted to the
default address space and used.
CallArg is refactored to facilitate this fix.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34367
llvm-svn: 326946
The original revert was done in r326869, since reverting r326602 broke
the test added by this.
The new test should be less dependent on r326602.
llvm-svn: 326872
Richard Smith