Reverting to investigate layering effects of MCJIT not linking
libCodeGen but using TargetMachine::getNameWithPrefix() breaking the
lldb bots.
This reverts commit r315633.
llvm-svn: 315637
The clang frontend already creates a DIExpression that replicates the
logic in addBlockByrefAddress() exactly, thus making this function
effectively unreachable. To guard against human error I'm hereby
marking the function with an assertion and let it hit the bots before
eventually removing it.
rdar://problem/31629055
llvm-svn: 315636
Merge LLVMTargetMachine into TargetMachine.
- There is no in-tree target anymore that just implements TargetMachine
but not LLVMTargetMachine.
- It should still be possible to stub out all the various functions in
case a target does not want to use lib/CodeGen
- This simplifies the code and avoids methods ending up in the wrong
interface.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489
llvm-svn: 315633
The comparator passed to std::sort must provide a strict weak ordering;
otherwise, the behavior is undefined.
Fixes an assertion failure generating debug info for globals
split by GlobalOpt. I have a testcase, but not sure how to reduce it,
so not included here. (Someone else came up with a testcase, but I
can't reproduce the crash with it, presumably because my version of LLVM
ends up sorting the array differently.)
This isn't really a complete fix (see the FIXME in the patch), but at
least it doesn't have undefined behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38830
llvm-svn: 315619
Summary:
Add LLVM_FORCE_ENABLE_DUMP cmake option, and use it along with
LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS to set LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP.
Remove NDEBUG and only use LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP to enable dump methods.
Move definition of LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP from config.h to llvm-config.h so
it'll be picked up by public headers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38406
llvm-svn: 315590
MachineInstr::isIdenticalTo has a lot of logic for dealing with register
Defs (i.e. deciding whether to take them into account or ignore them).
This logic gets things wrong in some obscure cases, for instance if an
operand is not a Def for both the current MI and the one we are
comparing to.
I'm not sure if it's possible for this to happen for regular register
operands, but it may happen in the ARM backend for special operands
which use sentinel values for the register (i.e. 0, which is neither a
physical register nor a virtual one).
This causes MachineInstrExpressionTrait::isEqual (which uses
MachineInstr::isIdenticalTo) to return true for the following
instructions, which are the same except for the fact that one sets the
flags and the other one doesn't:
%1114 = ADDrsi %1113, %216, 17, 14, _, def _
%1115 = ADDrsi %1113, %216, 17, 14, _, _
OTOH, MachineInstrExpressionTrait::getHashValue returns different values
for the 2 instructions due to the different isDef on the last operand.
In practice this means that when trying to add those instructions to a
DenseMap, they will be considered different because of their different
hash values, but when growing the map we might get an assertion while
copying from the old buckets to the new buckets because isEqual
misleadingly returns true.
This patch makes sure that isEqual and getHashValue agree, by improving
the checks in MachineInstr::isIdenticalTo when we are ignoring virtual
register definitions (which is what the Trait uses). Firstly, instead of
checking isPhysicalRegister, we use !isVirtualRegister, so that we cover
both physical registers and sentinel values. Secondly, instead of
checking MachineOperand::isReg, we use MachineOperand::isIdenticalTo,
which checks isReg, isSubReg and isDef, which are the same values that
the hash function uses to compute the hash.
Note that the function is symmetric with this change, since if the
current operand is not a Def, we check MachineOperand::isIdenticalTo,
which returns false if the operands have different isDef's.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38789
llvm-svn: 315579
While this shouldn't be necessary anymore, we have cases where we run
into the assertion below, i.e. cases with two non-fragment entries for the
same variable at different frame indices.
This should be fixed, but for now, we should revert to a version that
does not trigger asserts.
llvm-svn: 315576
This patch fixes the bug introduced in https://reviews.llvm.org/D35907; the bug is reported by http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20171002/491452.html.
Before D35907, when GetUnderlyingObjects fails to find an identifiable object, allMMOsOkay lambda in getUnderlyingObjectsForInstr returns false and Objects vector is cleared. This behavior is unintentionally changed by D35907.
This patch makes the behavior for such case same as the previous behavior.
Since D35907 introduced a wrapper function getUnderlyingObjectsForCodeGen around GetUnderlyingObjects, getUnderlyingObjectsForCodeGen is modified to return a boolean value to ask the caller to clear the Objects vector.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38735
llvm-svn: 315565
Summary:
The comments in the code said
// Remove <def,read-undef> flags. This def is now a partial redef.
but the code didn't just remove read-undef, it could introduce new ones which
could cause errors.
E.g. if we have something like
%vreg1<def> = IMPLICIT_DEF
%vreg2:subreg1<def, read-undef> = op %vreg3, %vreg4
%vreg2:subreg2<def> = op %vreg6, %vreg7
and we merge %vreg1 and %vreg2 then we should not set undef on the second subreg
def, which the old code did.
Now we solve this by actually do what the code comment says. We remove
read-undef flags rather than remove or introduce them.
Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38616
llvm-svn: 315564
MCObjectStreamer owns its MCCodeEmitter -- this fixes the types to reflect that,
and allows us to remove the last instance of MCObjectStreamer's weird "holding
ownership via someone else's reference" trick.
llvm-svn: 315531
Summary:
This adds a set of new directives that describe 32-bit x86 prologues.
The directives are limited and do not expose the full complexity of
codeview FPO data. They are merely a convenience for the compiler to
generate more readable assembly so we don't need to generate tons of
labels in CodeGen. If our prologue emission changes in the future, we
can change the set of available directives to suit our needs. These are
modelled after the .seh_ directives, which use a different format that
interacts with exception handling.
The directives are:
.cv_fpo_proc _foo
.cv_fpo_pushreg ebp/ebx/etc
.cv_fpo_setframe ebp/esi/etc
.cv_fpo_stackalloc 200
.cv_fpo_endprologue
.cv_fpo_endproc
.cv_fpo_data _foo
I tried to follow the implementation of ARM EHABI CFI directives by
sinking most directives out of MCStreamer and into X86TargetStreamer.
This helps avoid polluting non-X86 code with WinCOFF specific logic.
I used cdb to confirm that this can show locals in parent CSRs in a few
cases, most importantly the one where we use ESI as a frame pointer,
i.e. the one in http://crbug.com/756153#c28
Once we have cdb integration in debuginfo-tests, we can add integration
tests there.
Reviewers: majnemer, hans
Subscribers: aemerson, mgorny, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38776
llvm-svn: 315513
Summary:
Fixes a bogus iterator resulting from the removal of a block's first instruction at the point that incremental update is enabled.
Patch by Paul Walker.
Reviewers: fhahn, Gerolf, efriedma, MatzeB
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: aemerson, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38734
llvm-svn: 315502
parameterized emit() calls
Summary: This is not functional change to adopt new emit() API added in r313691.
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38285
llvm-svn: 315476
The software pipeliner and the packetizer try to break dependence
between the post-increment instruction and the dependent memory
instructions by changing the base register and the offset value.
However, in some cases, the existing logic didn't work properly
and created incorrect offset value.
Patch by Jyotsna Verma.
llvm-svn: 315468
The pipeliner is generating a serial sequence that causes poor
register allocation when a post-increment instruction appears
prior to the use of the post-increment register. This occurs when
there is a circular set of dependences involved with a sequence
of instructions in the same cycle. In this case, there is no
serialization of the parallel semantics that will not cause an
additional register to be allocated.
This patch fixes the problem by changing the instructions so that
the post-increment instruction is used by the subsequent
instruction, which enables the register allocator to make a
better decision and not require another register.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 315466
Eg:
insert v4i32 V, (v2i16 X), 2 --> shuffle v8i16 V', X', {0,1,2,3,8,9,6,7}
This is a generalization of the IR fold in D38316 to handle insertion into a non-undef vector.
We may want to abandon that one if we can't find value in squashing the more specific pattern sooner.
We're using the existing legal shuffle target hook to avoid AVX512 horror with vXi1 shuffles.
There may be room for improvement in the shuffle lowering here, but that would be follow-up work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38388
llvm-svn: 315460
The NumFixedArgs field of CallLoweringInfo is used by
TargetLowering::LowerCallTo to determine whether a given argument is passed
using the vararg calling convention or not (specifically, to set IsFixed for
each ISD::OutputArg).
Firstly, CallLoweringInfo::setLibCallee and CallLoweringInfo::setCallee both
incorrectly set NumFixedArgs based on the _previous_ args list. Secondly,
TargetLowering::LowerCallTo failed to increment NumFixedArgs when modifying
the argument list so a pointer is passed for the return value.
If your backend uses the IsFixed property or directly accesses NumFixedArgs,
it is _possible_ this change could result in codegen changes (although the
previous behaviour would have been incorrect). No such cases have been
identified during code review for any in-tree architecture.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37898
llvm-svn: 315457
MCObjectStreamer owns its MCAsmBackend -- this fixes the types to reflect that,
and allows us to remove another instance of MCObjectStreamer's weird "holding
ownership via someone else's reference" trick.
llvm-svn: 315410
Similarly to how Instruction has getFunction, this adds a less verbose
way to write MI->getParent()->getParent(). I'll follow up shortly with
a change that changes a bunch of the uses.
llvm-svn: 315388
Summary:
See https://llvm.org/PR33743 for more details
It seems that for non-power of 2 vector sizes, the algorithm can produce
non-matching sizes for input and result causing an assert.
This usually isn't a problem as the isAnyExtend check will weed these out, but
in some cases (most often with lots of undefined values for the mask indices) it
can pass this check for non power of 2 vectors.
Adding in an extra check that ensures that bit size will match for the result
and input (as required)
Subscribers: nhaehnle
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35241
llvm-svn: 315307
Some passes might duplicate calls to llvm.dbg.declare creating
duplicate frame index expression which currently trigger an assertion
which is meant to catch erroneous, overlapping fragment declarations.
But identical frame index expressions are just redundant and don't
actually conflict with each other, so we can be more lenient and just
ignore the duplicates.
Reviewers: aprantl, rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38540
llvm-svn: 315279
We end up creating COPY's that are either truncating/extending and this
should be illegal.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D37640
Patch for X86 and ARM by igorb, rovka
llvm-svn: 315240
Say you have two identical linkonceodr functions, one in M1 and one in M2.
Say that the outliner outlines A,B,C from one function, and D,E,F from another
function (where letters are instructions). Now those functions are not
identical, and cannot be deduped. Locally to M1 and M2, these outlining
choices would be good-- to the whole program, however, this might not be true!
To mitigate this, this commit makes it so that the outliner sees linkonceodr
functions as unsafe to outline from. It also adds a flag,
-enable-linkonceodr-outlining, which allows the user to specify that they
want to outline from such functions when they know what they're doing.
Changing this handles most code size regressions in the test suite caused by
competing with linker dedupe. It also doesn't have a huge impact on the code
size improvements from the outliner. There are 6 tests that regress > 5% from
outlining WITH linkonceodrs to outlining WITHOUT linkonceodrs. Overall, most
tests either improve or are not impacted.
Not outlined vs outlined without linkonceodrs:
https://hastebin.com/raw/qeguxavuda
Not outlined vs outlined with linkonceodrs:
https://hastebin.com/raw/edepoqoqic
Outlined with linkonceodrs vs outlined without linkonceodrs:
https://hastebin.com/raw/awiqifiheb
Numbers generated using compare.py with -m size.__text. Tests run for AArch64
with -Oz -mllvm -enable-machine-outliner -mno-red-zone.
llvm-svn: 315136
Summary:
After r303360, we initialize UsesCalleeSaves in runOnMachineFunction,
which runs after getRequiredProperties. UsesCalleeSaves was initialized
to 'false', so getRequiredProperties would always return an empty set.
We don't have a TargetMachine available early anymore after r303360.
Just removing the requirement of NoVRegs seems to make things work, so
let's do that.
Reviewers: thegameg, dschuff, MatzeB
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38597
llvm-svn: 315089
The patch that this assert comes with is fixing a bug in MBP. The assert is
invalid however.
Thanks to @sergey.k.okunev for finding this
Currently this fails SPECCPU2006 LTO. I will add a test case when I do more
investigation and have one.
llvm-svn: 315032
Summary:
When reinserting debug values after register allocation, make sure to
insert debug values after each redefinition of debug value register in
the slot index range. The reason for this is that DwarfDebug will end
the range of a debug variable when the physical reg is defined. For
instructions with e.g. tied operands this result in prematurely ended
debug range.
This resolves pr34545
Patch by Karl-Johan Karlsson and Bjorn Pettersson
Reviewers: rnk, aprantl
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: bjope, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38229
llvm-svn: 314974
Summary:
FastISel::hasTrivialKill() was the only user of the "IntPtrTy" version of
Cast::isNoopCast(). According to review comments in D37894 we could instead
use the "DataLayout" version of the method, and thus get rid of the
"IntPtrTy" versions of isNoopCast() completely.
With the above done, the remaining isNoopCast() could then be simplified
a bit more.
Reviewers: arsenm
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38497
llvm-svn: 314969
This is a follow-up to https://reviews.llvm.org/D38138.
I fixed the capitalization of some functions because we're changing those
lines anyway and that helped verify that we weren't accidentally dropping
any options by using default param values.
llvm-svn: 314930
It broke the Chromium / SQLite build; see PR34830.
> Summary:
> 1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
> extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
> appearing in the DAG.
> e.g.
> T1 = A + B
> T2 = T1 + 10
> T3 = T2 + A
> For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
> Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
>
> 2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
> so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
> could be factored out.
> e.g.
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
> will be factored as following
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
>
> 3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
> thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
>
> Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy
>
> Reviewed By: lsaba
>
> Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 314919
Before the patch this was in Analysis. Moving it to IR and making it implicit
part of LLVMContext::diagnose allows the full opt-remark facility to be used
outside passes e.g. the pass manager. Jessica is planning to use this to
report function size after each pass. The same could be used for time
reports.
Tested with BUILD_SHARED_LIBS=On.
llvm-svn: 314909
Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
appearing in the DAG.
e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
could be factored out.
e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy
Reviewed By: lsaba
Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 314886
This time invoking llc with "-march=x86-64" in the testcase, so we don't assume
the default target is x86.
Summary:
If we have
%vreg0<def> = PHI %vreg2<undef>, <BB#0>, %vreg3, <BB#2>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg2,%vreg3
%vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32ri8 %vreg0<kill,tied0>, 1, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg0
then we can't just change %vreg0 into %vreg3, since %vreg2 is actually
undef. We would have to also copy the undef flag to be able to change the
register.
Instead we deal with this case like other cases where we can't just
replace the register: we insert a COPY. The code creating the COPY already
copied all flags from the PHI input, so the undef flag will be transferred
as it should.
Reviewers: kparzysz
Reviewed By: kparzysz
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38235
llvm-svn: 314882
Summary:
If we have
%vreg0<def> = PHI %vreg2<undef>, <BB#0>, %vreg3, <BB#2>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg2,%vreg3
%vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32ri8 %vreg0<kill,tied0>, 1, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg0
then we can't just change %vreg0 into %vreg3, since %vreg2 is actually
undef. We would have to also copy the undef flag to be able to change the
register.
Instead we deal with this case like other cases where we can't just
replace the register: we insert a COPY. The code creating the COPY already
copied all flags from the PHI input, so the undef flag will be transferred
as it should.
Reviewers: kparzysz
Reviewed By: kparzysz
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38235
llvm-svn: 314879
This commit does two things. Firstly, it cleans up some of the benefit
calculation wrt outlined functions and candidates. Secondly, it fixes an
off-by-one bug in the cost model which was caused by the benefit value of
an OutlinedFunction and Candidate differing by 1. It updates the remarks test
to reflect this change.
llvm-svn: 314836
Summary:
This should fix a regression introduced by r313786, which switched from
MachineInstr::isIndirectDebugValue() to checking if operand 1 is an
immediate. I didn't have a test case for it until now.
A single UserValue, which approximates a user variable, may have many
DBG_VALUE instructions that disagree about whether the variable is in
memory or in a virtual register. This will become much more common once
we have llvm.dbg.addr, but you can construct such a test case manually
today with llvm.dbg.value.
Before this change, we would get two UserValues: one for direct and one
for indirect DBG_VALUE instructions describing the same variable. If we
build separate interval maps for direct and indirect locations, we will
end up accidentally coalescing identical DBG_VALUE intervals that need
to remain separate because they are broken up by intervals of the
opposite direct-ness.
Reviewers: aprantl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37932
llvm-svn: 314819
Craig Topper