There is no FSLI instruction, but we can emulate it using FSRI by swapping operands and subtracting the immediate from the bitwidth.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90826
The operations in these patterns shouldn't be effected by sign
bits. And the pattern is starting from a sign_extend_inreg so
we aren't expecting sign bits to be passed through either.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90739
fsl/fsr take their shift amount in $rs2 or an immediate. The
sources are $rs1 and $rs3.
fshl/fshr ISD opcodes both concatenate operand 0 in the high bits and
operand 1 in the lower bits. fshl returns the high bits after
shifting and fshr returns the low bits. So a shift amount of 0
returns operand 0 for fshl and operand 1 for fshr.
fsl/fsr concatenate their operands in different orders such that
$rs1 will be returned for a shift amount of 0. So $rs1 needs to
come from operand 0 of fshl and operand 1 of fshr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90735
riscv_sllw/srlw only reads the lower 32 bits of the first operand.
And the lower 5 bits of the second operands. Whether the upper
32 bits of the input are sign bits or not doesn't matter.
Also use ineg and not to shorten the patterns.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90668
We don't need custom matching, we just a need a predicate to check
the immediate is greater than 32. We can use the existing ImmSub32
to adjust the immediate.
I've also used the new predicate in the other location that used
ImmSub32. I tried to create a test case where we would break without
the greater than 32 check on that pattern, but DAG combine defeated me.
Still seemed safer to have it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90546
DAGCombine doesn't canonicalize rotl/rotr with immediate so we
need patterns for both.
Remove the custom matcher for rotl to RORI and just use a SDNodeXForm
to convert the immediate instead. Doing this gives priority to the
rev32/rev16 versions of grevi over rori since an explicit immediate
is more precise than any immediate. I also added rotr patterns for
rev32/rev16. And removed the (or (shl), (shr)) patterns that should be
combined to rotl by DAG combine.
There is at least one other grev pattern that probably needs a
another rotr pattern, but we need more test coverage first.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90575
In SelectionDAGBuilder always translate the fshl and fshr intrinsics to
FSHL and FSHR (or ROTL and ROTR) instead of lowering them to shifts and
ORs. Improve the legalization of FSHL and FSHR to avoid code quality
regressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77152
This patch provides optimization of bit manipulation operations by
enabling the +experimental-b target feature.
It adds matching of single block patterns of instructions to specific
bit-manip instructions from the ternary subset (zbt subextension) of the
experimental B extension of RISC-V.
It adds also the correspondent codegen tests.
This patch is based on Claire Wolf's proposal for the bit manipulation
extension of RISCV:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/master/bitmanip-0.92.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79875
This patch provides optimization of bit manipulation operations by
enabling the +experimental-b target feature.
It adds matching of single block patterns of instructions to specific
bit-manip instructions from the single-bit subset (zbs subextension) of
the experimental B extension of RISC-V.
It adds also the correspondent codegen tests.
This patch is based on Claire Wolf's proposal for the bit manipulation
extension of RISCV:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/master/bitmanip-0.92.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79874
This patch provides optimization of bit manipulation operations by
enabling the +experimental-b target feature.
It adds matching of single block patterns of instructions to specific
bit-manip instructions belonging to both the permutation and the base
subsets of the experimental B extension of RISC-V.
It adds also the correspondent codegen tests.
This patch is based on Claire Wolf's proposal for the bit manipulation
extension of RISCV:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/master/bitmanip-0.92.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79873
This patch provides optimization of bit manipulation operations by
enabling the +experimental-b target feature.
It adds matching of single block patterns of instructions to specific
bit-manip instructions from the permutation subset (zbp subextension) of
the experimental B extension of RISC-V.
It adds also the correspondent codegen tests.
This patch is based on Claire Wolf's proposal for the bit manipulation
extension of RISCV:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/master/bitmanip-0.92.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79871
This patch provides optimization of bit manipulation operations by
enabling the +experimental-b target feature.
It adds matching of single block patterns of instructions to specific
bit-manip instructions from the base subset (zbb subextension) of the
experimental B extension of RISC-V.
It adds also the correspondent codegen tests.
This patch is based on Claire Wolf's proposal for the bit manipulation
extension of RISCV:
https://github.com/riscv/riscv-bitmanip/blob/master/bitmanip-0.92.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79870
This adds the instruction encoding and mnenomics for the proposed
RISC-V Bit Manipulation extension (version 0.92). It is implemented with
each category of instruction as its own target feature, with the 'b'
extension feature enabling all options. Since this extension is not yet
ratified, all target features are prefixed with 'experimental-' to note
their status.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65649
Craig Topper