This reserves an MDKind for !llvm.loop, which allows callers to avoid a
string-based lookup. I'm not sure why it was missing.
There should be no functionality change here, just a small compile-time
speedup.
llvm-svn: 264371
We used to only allow SCEVAddRecExpr for pointer expressions in order to
be able to compute the bounds. However this is also trivially possible
for loop-invariant addresses (scUnknown) since then the bounds are the
address itself.
Interestingly, we used allow this for the special case when the
loop-invariant address happens to also be an SCEVAddRecExpr (in an outer
loop).
There are a couple more loops that are vectorized in SPEC after this.
My guess is that the main reason we don't see more because for example a
loop-invariant load is vectorized into a splat vector with several
vector-inserts. This is likely to make the vectorization unprofitable.
I.e. we don't notice that a later LICM will move all of this out of the
loop so the cost estimate should really be 0.
llvm-svn: 264243
Summary:
This changes the conversion functions from SCEV * to SCEVAddRecExpr from
ScalarEvolution and PredicatedScalarEvolution to return a SCEVAddRecExpr*
instead of a SCEV* (which removes the need of most clients to do a
dyn_cast right after calling these functions).
We also don't add new predicates if the transformation was not successful.
This is not entirely a NFC (as it can theoretically remove some predicates
from LAA when we have an unknown dependece), but I couldn't find an obvious
regression test for it.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: sanjoy, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18368
llvm-svn: 264161
Summary:
replaceCongruentIVs can break LCSSA when trying to replace IV increments
since it tries to replace all uses of a phi node with another phi node
while both of the phi nodes are not necessarily in the processed loop.
This will cause an assert in IndVars.
To fix this, we add a check to make sure that the replacement maintains
LCSSA.
Reviewers: sanjoy
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18266
llvm-svn: 263941
Summary:
It can hurt performance to prefetch ahead too much. Be conservative for
now and don't prefetch ahead more than 3 iterations on Cyclone.
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17949
llvm-svn: 263772
Summary:
And use this TTI for Cyclone. As it was explained in the original RFC
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel/92758), the HW
prefetcher work up to 2KB strides.
I am also adding tests for this and the previous change (D17943):
* Cyclone prefetching accesses with a large stride
* Cyclone not prefetching accesses with a small stride
* Generic Aarch64 subtarget not prefetching either
Reviewers: hfinkel
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17945
llvm-svn: 263771
Summary:
This form was replaced by a form taking an instruction instead of opcode and
return type in r258391. After committing this change (and some depending,
follow-up changes) it turned out in the review thread to be controversial. The
discussion didn't come to a conclusion yet. I'm re-adding the old form to fix
the API regression and to provide a better base for discussion, possibly on
llvm-dev.
A difference to the original function is that it can't be called with GEPs
(similarly to how it was already the case for compares). In order to support
opaque pointers in the future, folding GEPs needs to be passed the source
element type, which is not possible with the current API.
Reviewers: dberlin, reames
Subscribers: dblaikie, eddyb
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17901
llvm-svn: 263501
This doesn't change how many times we construct domtrees in the normal
pipeline, and it removes fragility and instability where basic-aa may
not be run in time to see domtrees because they happen to be constructed
afterward.
This isn't quite as clean as the change to memdep because there is
a mode where basic-aa specifically runs without domtrees -- in the
hacking version used by function-attrs with the legacy pass manager.
llvm-svn: 263234
This doesn't cause us to construct dominator trees any more often in the
normal pipeline, and removes an entire mode of memdep that needed to be
reasoned about and maintained. Perhaps more importantly, it removes the
ability for the results of memdep to be different because of accidental
pass scheduling goofs or the order of evaluation of 'getResult' calls.
Essentially, 'getCachedResult', unless across IR-unit boundaries, is
extremely dangerous. We need to work much harder to avoid it (or its
analog in the old pass manager).
llvm-svn: 263232
This was originally a pointer to support pass managers which didn't use
AnalysisManagers. However, that doesn't realistically come up much and
the complexity of supporting it doesn't really make sense.
In fact, *many* parts of the pass manager were just assuming the pointer
was never null already. This at least makes it much more explicit and
clear.
llvm-svn: 263219
work in the face of the limitations of DLLs and templated static
variables.
This requires passes that use the AnalysisBase mixin provide a static
variable themselves. So as to keep their APIs clean, I've made these
private and befriended the CRTP base class (which is the common
practice).
I've added documentation to AnalysisBase for why this is necessary and
at what point we can go back to the much simpler system.
This is clearly a better pattern than the extern template as it caught
*numerous* places where the template magic hadn't been applied and
things were "just working" but would eventually have broken
mysteriously.
llvm-svn: 263216
actually finish wiring up the old call graph.
There were bugs in the old call graph that hadn't been caught because it
wasn't being tested. It wasn't being tested because it wasn't in the
pipeline system and we didn't have a printing pass to run in tests. This
fixes all of that.
As for why I'm still keeping the old call graph alive its so that I can
port GlobalsAA to the new pass manager with out forking it to work with
the lazy call graph. That's clearly the right eventual design, but it
seems pragmatic to defer that until its necessary. The old call graph
works just fine for GlobalsAA.
llvm-svn: 263104
location in the opt tool to live along side the analysis in LLVM's
libraries.
No functionality changed here, but this will allow me to port the
printer to the new pass manager as well.
llvm-svn: 263101
There is another pass by the generic name 'CallGraphPrinter' which is
actually just a call graph printer tucked away inside the opt tool. I'd
like to bring it out and make it follow the same patterns as the rest of
the CallGraph code, but doing so would end up conflicting with the name
of the DOT printing pass. So this makes the DOT printing pass name be
more precise.
No functionality changed here.
llvm-svn: 263100
This is a fairly straightforward port to the new pass manager with one
exception. It removes a very questionable use of releaseMemory() in
the old pass to invalidate its caches between runs on a function.
I don't think this is really guaranteed to be safe. I've just used the
more direct port to the new PM to address this by nuking the results
object each time the pass runs. While this could cause some minor malloc
traffic increase, I don't expect the compile time performance hit to be
noticable, and it makes the correctness and other aspects of the pass
much easier to reason about. In some cases, it may make things faster by
making the sets and maps smaller with better locality. Indeed, the
measurements collected by Bruno (thanks!!!) show mostly compile time
improvements.
There is sadly very limited testing at this point as there are only two
tests of memdep, and both rely on GVN. I'll be porting GVN next and that
will exercise this heavily though.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17962
llvm-svn: 263082
MemoryDependenceAnalysis had a hard-coded exception to the general aliasing rules for malloc and calloc. The reasoning that applied there is equally valid in BasicAA and clarifies the remaining logic in MDA.
In principal, this can expose slightly more optimization opportunities, but since essentially all of our aliasing aware memory optimization passes go through MDA, this will likely be NFC in practice.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15912
llvm-svn: 263075
Building on the previous change, this generalizes
ScalarEvolution::getRangeViaFactoring to work with
{Ext(C?A:B)+k0,+,Ext(C?A:B)+k1} where Ext can be a zero extend, sign
extend or truncate operation, and k0 and k1 are constants.
llvm-svn: 262979
This change generalizes ScalarEvolution::getRangeViaFactoring to work
with {Ext(C?A:B),+,Ext(C?A:B)} where Ext can be a zero extend, sign
extend or truncate operation.
llvm-svn: 262978
This is much more clear and less surprising IMO. It also makes things
more consistent with the increasingly large chunk of LLVM code that
assumes true-on-success.
llvm-svn: 262826
duplicated comments.
In several cases these had diverged making them especially nice to
canonicalize. I checked to make sure we weren't losing important
information of course.
llvm-svn: 262825
the new pass manager.
The port will involve substantial edits here, and would likely introduce
bad formatting if formatted in isolation, so just get all the formatting
up to snuff. I'll also go through and try to freshen the doxygen here as
well as modernizing some of the code.
llvm-svn: 262821
The diff is relatively large since I took a chance to rearrange the code I had to touch in a more obvious way, but the key bit is merely using the !range metadata when we can't analyze the instruction further. The previous !range metadata code was essentially just dead since no binary operator or cast will have !range metadata (per Verifier) and it was otherwise dropped on the floor.
llvm-svn: 262751
This experiment was originally about trying to use facts implied dominating conditions to infer more precise known bits. While the compile time was found to be acceptable on several large code bases, we never found sufficiently profitable examples to justify turning on the code by default. Given this, it's time to abandon the experiment.
Several folks have commented that they've found this useful for experimentation, but nothing has come of those experiments. Given how easy the patch is to apply, there's no reason to leave the code in tree.
For anyone interested in further investigation in this area, I recommend finding the summary email I sent on one of the original review threads. In particular, I now believe the use-list based approach is strictly worse than the dom-tree-walking approach.
llvm-svn: 262646
After r262438 we can have provably positive NSW SCEV expressions whose
zero extensions cannot be simplified (since r262438 makes SCEV better at
computing constant ranges). This means demoting sexts of positive add
recurrences eagerly can result in an unsimplified zero extension where
we could have had a simplified sign extension. This change fixes the
issue by teaching SCEV to demote sext of a positive SCEV expression to a
zext only if the sext could not be simplified.
llvm-svn: 262638
This patch provides the following infrastructure for PGO enhancements in inliner:
Enable the use of block level profile information in inliner
Incremental update of block frequency information during inlining
Update the function entry counts of callees when they get inlined into callers.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16381
llvm-svn: 262636
parts of the AA interface out of the base class of every single AA
result object.
Because this logic reformulates the query in terms of some other aspect
of the API, it would easily cause O(n^2) query patterns in alias
analysis. These could in turn be magnified further based on the number
of call arguments, and then further based on the number of AA queries
made for a particular call. This ended up causing problems for Rust that
were actually noticable enough to get a bug (PR26564) and probably other
places as well.
When originally re-working the AA infrastructure, the desire was to
regularize the pattern of refinement without losing any generality.
While I think it was successful, that is clearly proving to be too
costly. And the cost is needless: we gain no actual improvement for this
generality of making a direct query to tbaa actually be able to
re-use some other alias analysis's refinement logic for one of the other
APIs, or some such. In short, this is entirely wasted work.
To the extent possible, delegation to other API surfaces should be done
at the aggregation layer so that we can avoid re-walking the
aggregation. In fact, this significantly simplifies the logic as we no
longer need to smuggle the aggregation layer into each alias analysis
(or the TargetLibraryInfo into each alias analysis just so we can form
argument memory locations!).
However, we also have some delegation logic inside of BasicAA and some
of it even makes sense. When the delegation logic is baking in specific
knowledge of aliasing properties of the LLVM IR, as opposed to simply
reformulating the query to utilize a different alias analysis interface
entry point, it makes a lot of sense to restrict that logic to
a different layer such as BasicAA. So one aspect of the delegation that
was in every AA base class is that when we don't have operand bundles,
we re-use function AA results as a fallback for callsite alias results.
This relies on the IR properties of calls and functions w.r.t. aliasing,
and so seems a better fit to BasicAA. I've lifted the logic up to that
point where it seems to be a natural fit. This still does a bit of
redundant work (we query function attributes twice, once via the
callsite and once via the function AA query) but it is *exactly* twice
here, no more.
The end result is that all of the delegation logic is hoisted out of the
base class and into either the aggregation layer when it is a pure
retargeting to a different API surface, or into BasicAA when it relies
on the IR's aliasing properties. This should fix the quadratic query
pattern reported in PR26564, although I don't have a stand-alone test
case to reproduce it.
It also seems general goodness. Now the numerous AAs that don't need
target library info don't carry it around and depend on it. I think
I can even rip out the general access to the aggregation layer and only
expose that in BasicAA as it is the only place where we re-query in that
manner.
However, this is a non-trivial change to the AA infrastructure so I want
to get some additional eyes on this before it lands. Sadly, it can't
wait long because we should really cherry pick this into 3.8 if we're
going to go this route.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17329
llvm-svn: 262490
For some reason MSVC seems to think I'm calling getConstant() from a
static context. Try to avoid this issue by explicitly specifying
'this->' (though I'm not confident that this will actually work).
llvm-svn: 262451
Have ScalarEvolution::getRange re-consider cases like "{C?A:B,+,C?P:Q}"
by factoring out "C" and computing RangeOf{A,+,P} union RangeOf({B,+,Q})
instead.
The latter can be easier to compute precisely in cases like
"{C?0:N,+,C?1:-1}" N is the backedge taken count of the loop; since in
such cases the latter form simplifies to [0,N+1) union [0,N+1).
llvm-svn: 262438
Duncan P. N. Exon Smith