Remove all ilist_iterator to pointer casts. There were two reasons for
casts:
- Checking for an uninitialized (i.e., null) iterator. I added
MachineInstrBundleIterator::isValid() to check for that case.
- Comparing an iterator against the underlying pointer value while
avoiding converting the pointer value to an iterator. This is
occasionally necessary in MachineInstrBundleIterator, since there is
an assertion in the constructors that the underlying MachineInstr is
not bundled (but we don't care about that if we're just checking for
pointer equality).
To support the latter case, I rewrote the == and != operators for
ilist_iterator and MachineInstrBundleIterator.
- The implicit constructors now use enable_if to exclude
const-iterator => non-const-iterator conversions from overload
resolution (previously it was a compiler error on instantiation, now
it's SFINAE).
- The == and != operators are now global (friends), and are not
templated.
- MachineInstrBundleIterator has overloads to compare against both
const_pointer and const_reference. This avoids the implicit
conversions to MachineInstrBundleIterator that assert, instead just
checking the address (and I added unit tests to confirm this).
Notably, the only remaining uses of ilist_iterator::getNodePtrUnchecked
are in ilist.h, and no code outside of ilist*.h directly relies on this
UB end-iterator-to-pointer conversion anymore. It's still needed for
ilist_*sentinel_traits, but I'll clean that up soon.
llvm-svn: 278478
Remove remaining implicit conversions from MachineInstrBundleIterator to
MachineInstr* from the AMDGPU backend. In most cases, I made them less
attractive by preferring MachineInstr& or using a ranged-based for loop.
Once all the backends are fixed I'll make the operator explicit so that
this doesn't bitrot back.
llvm-svn: 274906
Change a while loop that was checking for nullptr on an
iterator-to-pointer conversion to an infinite for loop. Now it's clear
that the condition doesn't terminate.
The only change in behaviour is if an invalid iterator (holding nullptr)
was passed into AMDGPUCFGStructurizer::reversePredicateSetter. There
are only two callers, and they both dereference the iterator before
sending it in, so rather than adding an early return to avoid the loop
I've just asserted (using a static_cast, to avoid an implicit conversion
to pointer).
llvm-svn: 274902
Split AMDGPUSubtarget into amdgcn/r600 specific subclasses.
This removes most of the static_casting of the basic codegen
classes everywhere, and tries to restrict the features
visible on the wrong target.
llvm-svn: 273652
This used to be free, copying and moving DebugLocs became expensive
after the metadata rewrite. Passing by reference eliminates a ton of
track/untrack operations. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 272512
This patch adds some missing calls to MBB::normalizeSuccProbs() in several
locations where it should be called. Those places are found by checking if the
sum of successors' probabilities is approximate one in MachineBlockPlacement
pass with some instrumented code (not in this patch).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15259
llvm-svn: 255455
(This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first caused two assertion
failures and was reverted. See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25687)
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254377
and the follow-up r254356: "Fix a bug in MachineBlockPlacement that may cause assertion failure during BranchProbability construction."
Asserts were firing in Chromium builds. See PR25687.
llvm-svn: 254366
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254348
One of the changes in lib/Target/AMDGPU/AMDGPUMCInstLower.cpp was a new
one. Previously, bundle iterators and single-instruction iterators
could be compared to each other (comparing on underlying pointers).
I changed a comparison from using `MBB->end()` to using
`MBB->instr_end()`, since both end iterators should point at the some
place anyway.
I don't think the implicit conversion between the two iterator types is
a good idea since it's fairly easy to accidentally compare to the wrong
thing (they aren't always end iterators). Otherwise I would have just
added the conversion.
Even with that, no there should be functionality change here.
llvm-svn: 250218
Summary:
This fixes an issue on MIPS where the infinite-loop-evergreen.ll test
was failing to terminate.
Fixes PR24147.
Reviewers: arsenm, dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11260
llvm-svn: 242410
Hans Wennborg