Teach the retain-count checker that CoreMedia reference types use
CoreFoundation-style reference counting. This enables the checker
to catch leaks and over releases of those types.
rdar://problem/33599757
llvm-svn: 318979
overridden methods when compiling for non-ARC.
Previously, clang would error out when compiling for ARC, but didn't
print any diagnostics when compiling for non-ARC.
This was pointed out in the patch review for attribute noescape:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32210
llvm-svn: 313717
Add a 'Generalized' object kind to the retain-count checker and suitable
generic diagnostic text for retain-count diagnostics involving those objects.
For now the object kind is introduced in summaries by 'annotate' attributes.
Once we have more experience with these annotations we will propose explicit
attributes.
Patch by Malhar Thakkar!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35613
llvm-svn: 308990
be shared without warnings. Build AttributedTypes to leave breadcrumbs
for tools like the static analyzer. Warn about attempting to use the
attribute with incompatible return types.
llvm-svn: 308092
The context argument passed to VideoToolbox's
VTCompressionSessionEncodeFrame() function is ultimately passed to a callback
supplied when creating the compression session and so may be freed by that
callback. To suppress false positives in this case, teach the retain count
checker to stop tracking that argument.
This isn't suppressed by the usual callback context mechanism because the call
to VTCompressionSessionEncodeFrame() doesn't include the callback itself.
rdar://problem/27685213
llvm-svn: 286633
Change the retain count checker to treat CoreFoundation-style "CV"-prefixed
reference types from CoreVideo similarly to CoreGraphics types. With this
change, we treat CVFooRetain() on a CVFooRef type as a retain. CVFooRelease()
APIs are annotated as consuming their parameter, so this change prevents false
positives about incorrect decrements of reference counts.
<rdar://problem/27116090>
llvm-svn: 278382
Addresses a conflict with glibc's __nonnull macro by renaming the type
nullability qualifiers as follows:
__nonnull -> _Nonnull
__nullable -> _Nullable
__null_unspecified -> _Null_unspecified
This is the major part of rdar://problem/21530726, but does not yet
provide the Darwin-specific behavior for the old names.
llvm-svn: 240596
That is,
void cf2(CFTypeRef * __nullable p CF_RETURNS_NOT_RETAINED);
is equivalent to
void cf2(CFTypeRef __nullable * __nullable p CF_RETURNS_NOT_RETAINED);
More rdar://problem/18742441
llvm-svn: 240186
Includes a simple static analyzer check and not much else, but we'll also
be able to take advantage of this in Swift.
This feature can be tested for using __has_feature(cf_returns_on_parameters).
This commit also contains two fixes:
- Look through non-typedef sugar when deciding whether something is a CF type.
- When (cf|ns)_returns(_not)?_retained is applied to invalid properties,
refer to "property" instead of "method" in the error message.
rdar://problem/18742441
llvm-svn: 240185
Fixes <rdar://problem/15584219> and <rdar://problem/12241361>.
This change looks large, but all it does is reuse and consolidate
the delayed diagnostic logic for deprecation warnings with unavailability
warnings. By doing so, it showed various inconsistencies between the
diagnostics, which were close, but not consistent. It also revealed
some missing "note:"'s in the deprecated diagnostics that were showing
up in the unavailable diagnostics, etc.
This change also changes the wording of the core deprecation diagnostics.
Instead of saying "function has been explicitly marked deprecated"
we now saw "'X' has been been explicitly marked deprecated". It
turns out providing a bit more context is useful, and often we
got the actual term wrong or it was not very precise
(e.g., "function" instead of "destructor"). By just saying the name
of the thing that is deprecated/deleted/unavailable we define
this issue away. This diagnostic can likely be further wordsmithed
to be shorter.
llvm-svn: 197627
It is unfortunate that we have to mark these exceptions in multiple places.
This was already in CallEvent. I suppose it does let us be more precise
about saying /which/ arguments have their retain counts invalidated -- the
connection's is still valid even though the context object's isn't -- but
we're not tracking the retain count of XPC objects anyway.
<rdar://problem/13783514>
llvm-svn: 180904
...and add a new test case.
I thought this was broken, but it isn't; refactoring and reformatting anyway
so that I don't make the same mistake again. No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 178799
This matches our behavior for autorelease pools created by +alloc. Some
people like to create autorelease pools in one method and release them
somewhere else.
If you want safe autorelease pool semantics, use the new ARC-compatible
syntax: @autoreleasepool { ... }
<rdar://problem/13121353>
llvm-svn: 174096
This was previously added to support -[NSAutoreleasePool drain], which
behaves like -release under non-GC and "please collect" under GC. We're
not currently modeling the autorelease pool stack, though, so we can
just take this out entirely.
Fixes PR14927.
llvm-svn: 172444
This fixes a few cases where we'd emit path notes like this:
+---+
1| v
p = malloc(len);
^ |2
+---+
In general this should make path notes more consistent and more correct,
especially in cases where the leak happens on the false branch of an if
that jumps directly to the end of the function. There are a couple places
where the leak is reported farther away from the cause; these are usually
cases where there are several levels of nested braces before the end of
the function. This still matches our current behavior for when there /is/
a statement after all the braces, though.
llvm-svn: 168070
I need to see how this breaks on other platforms when I fix the issue
that Benjamin Kramer pointed out.
This includes r163489 and r163490, plus a two line change.
llvm-svn: 163512
r163489, "Take another crack at stabilizing the emission order of analyzer"
r163490, "Use isBeforeInTranslationUnitThan() instead of operator<."
llvm-svn: 163497
diagnostics without using FoldingSetNodeIDs. This is done
by doing a complete recursive comparison of the PathDiagnostics.
Note that the previous method of comparing FoldingSetNodeIDs did
not end up relying on unstable things such as pointer addresses, so
I suspect this may still have some issues on various buildbots because
I'm not sure if the true source of non-determinism has been eliminated.
The tests pass for me, so the only way to know is to commit this change
and see what happens.
llvm-svn: 163489
Devin Coughlin