TemplateTypeParmType with the substituted type directly; instead, replace it
with a SubstTemplateTypeParmType which will note that the type was originally
written as a template type parameter. This makes it reasonable to preserve
source information even through template substitution.
Also define the new SubstTemplateTypeParmType class, obviously.
For consistency with current behavior, we stringize these types as if they
were the underlying type. I'm not sure this is the right thing to do.
At any rate, I paled at adding yet another clause to the don't-desugar 'if'
statement, so I extracted a function to do it. The new function also does
The Right Thing more often, I think: e.g. if we have a chain of typedefs
leading to a vector type, we will now desugar all but the last one.
llvm-svn: 84412
TypeLoc class names to be $(Type classname)Loc. Rewrite the visitor.
Provide skeleton implementations for all the new TypeLocs.
Handle all cases in PCH. Handle a few more cases when inserting
location information in SemaType.
It should be extremely straightforward to add new location information
to existing TypeLoc objects now.
llvm-svn: 84386
TypeLoc records for declarations; it should not be necessary to represent it
directly in the type system.
Please complain if you were using these classes and feel you can't replicate
previous functionality using the TypeLoc API.
llvm-svn: 84222
instantiation redeclaration semantics for function template
specializations and member functions of class template
specializations. Also, record the point of instantiation for
explicit-instantiated functions and static data members.
llvm-svn: 84188
most of the unsafe boilerplate out of TypeLoc. Create a QualifiedLoc class
to represent the idea that we *might* start representing source locations
of qualifiers. Dealing with qualifiers explicitly like this also lets us
efficiently ignore them in all the concrete cases.
This should make it obvious and easy to add new TypeLoc subclasses.
llvm-svn: 84168
template as a specialization. For example, this occurs with:
template<typename T>
struct X {
template<typename U> struct Inner { /* ... */ };
};
template<> template<typename T>
struct X<int>::Inner {
T member;
};
We need to treat templates that are member specializations as special
in two contexts:
- When looking for a definition of a member template, we look
through the instantiation chain until we hit the primary template
*or a member specialization*. This allows us to distinguish
between the primary "Inner" definition and the X<int>::Inner
definition, above.
- When computing all of the levels of template arguments needed to
instantiate a member template, don't add template arguments
from contexts outside of the instantiation of a member
specialization, since the user has already manually substituted
those arguments.
Fix up the existing test for p18, which was actually wrong (but we
didn't diagnose it because of our poor handling of member
specializations of templates), and add a new test for member
specializations of templates.
llvm-svn: 83974
which is a common idiom to improve PIC'ness of code using the addr of
label extension. This implementation is a gross hack, but the only other
alternative would be to teach evalutate about this horrid combination.
While GCC allows things like "&&foo - &&bar + 1", people don't use this
in practice. This implements PR5131.
llvm-svn: 83957
templates, and keep track of how those member classes were
instantiated or specialized.
Make sure that we don't try to instantiate an explicitly-specialized
member class of a class template, when that explicit specialization
was a declaration rather than a definition.
llvm-svn: 83547
track of the kind of specialization or instantiation. Also, check the
scope of the specialization and ensure that a specialization
declaration without an initializer is not a definition.
llvm-svn: 83533
function of a class template was implicitly instantiated, explicitly
instantiated (declaration or definition), or explicitly
specialized. The same MemberSpecializationInfo structure will be used
for static data members and member classes as well.
llvm-svn: 83509
for bases, members, overridden virtual methods, etc. The operations
isDerivedFrom and lookupInBases are now provided by CXXRecordDecl,
rather than by Sema, so that CodeGen and other clients can use them
directly.
llvm-svn: 83396
extension class's protocol list so its AST is complete.
2) Because of this no need to issue warning on unimplemeted
methods coming from the extended class protocols
because warning is issued when class definition is seen.
llvm-svn: 83326
concrete types. Use unqualified desugaring for getAs<> and sundry.
Fix a few users to either not desugar or use qualified desugar, as seemed
appropriate. Removed Type's qualified desugar method, as it was easy
to accidentally use instead of QualType's.
llvm-svn: 83116
Mike Stump