-Allow Sema to do more processing on the initial Expr before checking it.
-Remove the special conditions in HandleExpr()
-Move the code so that only one call site is needed.
-Removed the function from Sema and only call it locally.
-Warn on potentially evaluated reference variables, not just casts to r-values.
-Update tests.
llvm-svn: 164951
actually perform value initialization rather than trying to fake it with a call
to the default constructor. Fixes various bugs related to the previously-missing
zero-initialization in this case.
I've also moved this and the other list initialization 'special case' from
TryConstructorInitialization into TryListInitialization where they belong.
llvm-svn: 159733
* Escape #, < and @ symbols where Doxygen would try to interpret them;
* Fix several function param documentation where names had got out of sync;
* Delete param documentation referring to parameters that no longer exist.
llvm-svn: 158472
In addition, I've made the pointer and reference typedef 'void' rather than T*
just so they can't get misused. I would've omitted them entirely but
std::distance likes them to be there even if it doesn't use them.
This rolls back r155808 and r155869.
Review by Doug Gregor incorporating feedback from Chandler Carruth.
llvm-svn: 158104
temporary or an array subobject of a class temporary, and the resulting value
is used to initialize a pointer which outlives the temporary. Such a pointer
is always left dangling after the initialization completes and the array's
lifetime ends.
In order to detect this situation, this change also adds an
LValueClassification of LV_ArrayTemporary for temporaries of array type which
aren't subobjects of class temporaries. These occur in C++11 T{...} and GNU C++
(T){...} expressions, when T is an array type. Previously we treated the former
as a generic prvalue and the latter as a class temporary.
llvm-svn: 157955
in-class initializer for one of its fields. Value-initialization of such
a type should use the in-class initializer!
The former was just a bug, the latter is a (reported) standard defect.
llvm-svn: 156274
off PartialDiagnostic. PartialDiagnostic is rather heavyweight for
something that is in the critical path and is rarely used. So, switch
over to an abstract-class-based callback mechanism that delays most of
the work until a diagnostic is actually produced. Good for ~11k code
size reduction in the compiler and 1% speedup in -fsyntax-only on the
code in <rdar://problem/11004361>.
llvm-svn: 156176
filter_decl_iterator had a weird mismatch where both op* and op-> returned T*
making it difficult to generalize this filtering behavior into a reusable
library of any kind.
This change errs on the side of value, making op-> return T* and op* return
T&.
(reviewed by Richard Smith)
llvm-svn: 155808
- The [class.protected] restriction is non-trivial for any instance
member, even if the access lacks an object (for example, if it's
a pointer-to-member constant). In this case, it is equivalent to
requiring the naming class to equal the context class.
- The [class.protected] restriction applies to accesses to constructors
and destructors. A protected constructor or destructor can only be
used to create or destroy a base subobject, as a direct result.
- Several places were dropping or misapplying object information.
The standard could really be much clearer about what the object type is
supposed to be in some of these accesses. Usually it's easy enough to
find a reasonable answer, but still, the standard makes a very confident
statement about accesses to instance members only being possible in
either pointer-to-member literals or member access expressions, which
just completely ignores concepts like constructor and destructor
calls, using declarations, unevaluated field references, etc.
llvm-svn: 154248
track whether the referenced declaration comes from an enclosing
local context. I'm amenable to suggestions about the exact meaning
of this bit.
llvm-svn: 152491
- getSourceRange().getBegin() is about as awesome a pattern as .copy().size().
I already killed the hot paths so this doesn't seem to impact performance on my
tests-of-the-day, but it is a much more sensible (and shorter) pattern.
llvm-svn: 152419
explicit conversion functions to initialize the argument to a
copy/move constructor that itself is the subject of direct
initialization. Since we don't have that much context in overload
resolution, we end up threading more flags :(.
Fixes <rdar://problem/10903741> / PR10456.
llvm-svn: 151409
We now generate temporary arrays to back std::initializer_list objects
initialized with braces. The initializer_list is then made to point at
the array. We support both ptr+size and start+end forms, although
the latter is untested.
Array lifetime is correct for temporary std::initializer_lists (e.g.
call arguments) and local variables. It is untested for new expressions
and member initializers.
Things left to do:
Massively increase the amount of testing. I need to write tests for
start+end init lists, temporary objects created as a side effect of
initializing init list objects, new expressions, member initialization,
creation of temporary objects (e.g. std::vector) for initializer lists,
and probably more.
Get lifetime "right" for member initializers and new expressions. Not
that either are very useful.
Implement list-initialization of array new expressions.
llvm-svn: 150803
function, provide a specialized diagnostic that indicates the kind of
special member function (default constructor, copy assignment
operator, etc.) and that it was implicitly deleted. Add a hook where
we can provide more detailed information later.
llvm-svn: 150611
used to construct an object of union type with a deleted default constructor
(plus fixes for some related value-initialization corner cases).
llvm-svn: 150502
instead of having a special-purpose function.
- ActOnCXXDirectInitializer, which was mostly duplication of
AddInitializerToDecl (leading e.g. to PR10620, which Eli fixed a few days
ago), is dropped completely.
- MultiInitializer, which was an ugly hack I added, is dropped again.
- We now have the infrastructure in place to distinguish between
int x = {1};
int x({1});
int x{1};
-- VarDecl now has getInitStyle(), which indicates which of the above was used.
-- CXXConstructExpr now has a flag to indicate that it represents list-
initialization, although this is not yet used.
- InstantiateInitializer was renamed to SubstInitializer and simplified.
- ActOnParenOrParenListExpr has been replaced by ActOnParenListExpr, which
always produces a ParenListExpr. Placed that so far failed to convert that
back to a ParenExpr containing comma operators have been fixed. I'm pretty
sure I could have made a crashing test case before this.
The end result is a (I hope) considerably cleaner design of initializers.
More importantly, the fact that I can now distinguish between the various
initialization kinds means that I can get the tricky generalized initializer
test cases Johannes Schaub supplied to work. (This is not yet done.)
This commit passed self-host, with the resulting compiler passing the tests. I
hope it doesn't break more complicated code. It's a pretty big change, but one
that I feel is necessary.
llvm-svn: 150318
Richard Trieu