r304285 - [sanitizer] Avoid possible deadlock in child process after fork
r304297 - [sanitizer] Trying to fix MAC buildbots after r304285
These changes create deadlock when Tcl calls pthread_create from a
pthread_atfork child handler. More info in the original review at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33325
llvm-svn: 304735
Revert "Mark sancov test as unsupported on Darwin"
Revert "[LSan] Detect dynamic loader by its base address."
This reverts commit r304633.
This reverts commit r304673.
This reverts commit r304632.
Those commit have broken LOTS of ARM/AArch64 bots for two days.
llvm-svn: 304699
This test has been failing on all Darwin bots since it was introduced:
http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage1-configure-RA_check/32111
fatal error: error in backend: Global variable '__sancov_gen_' has an invalid section specifier '__DATA,__sancov_counters': mach-o section specifier requires a section whose length is between 1 and 16 characters.
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0
llvm-svn: 304673
This patch addresses https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/774. When we
fork a multi-threaded process it's possible to deadlock if some thread acquired
StackDepot or allocator internal lock just before fork. In this case the lock
will never be released in child process causing deadlock on following memory alloc/dealloc
routine. While calling alloc/dealloc routines after multi-threaded fork is not allowed,
most of modern allocators (Glibc, tcmalloc, jemalloc) are actually fork safe. Let's do the same
for sanitizers except TSan that has complex locking rules.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33325
llvm-svn: 304285
Summary:
allow_user_segv_handler had confusing name did not allow to control behavior for
signals separately.
Reviewers: eugenis, alekseyshl, kcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, dberris, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33371
llvm-svn: 303941
Summary:
sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE) is called very early during sanitizer init and
any instrumented code (sysconf() wrapper/interceptor will likely be
instrumented) calling back to sanitizer before init is done will
most surely crash.
2nd attempt, now with glibc version checks (D31092 was reverted).
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31221
llvm-svn: 298613
Summary:
sysconf(_SC_PAGESIZE) is called very early, during sanitizer init and
any instrumented code (a wrapper/interceptor will likely be instrumented)
calling back to sanitizer before init is done will most surely crash.
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31092
llvm-svn: 298305
People keep hitting on spurious failures in malloc/free routines when using sanitizers
with shared libraries dlopened with RTLD_DEEPBIND (see https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/611 for details).
Let's check for this flag and bail out with warning message instead of failing in random places.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30504
llvm-svn: 297370
This test has been reverted in r279918 due to flaky atos support in the OS
some machines in the buildbot fleet were running. This should not be a
problem anymore.
llvm-svn: 295766
This test relies on sanitizer common interceptor to pick the oldest version of
sem_init function from Glibc. But LSan actually doesn't intercept sem_init, thus
the new implementation is called that causes test failure. Disable it for LSan x86,
the proper fix would require to check Glibc version at runtime and adjust
GET_SEM_VALUE(V) accordingly.
llvm-svn: 294001
Breaks tests on i686/Linux due to missing clang driver support:
error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=leak' for target 'i386-unknown-linux-gnu'
llvm-svn: 292844
People keep asking LSan to be available on 32 bit targets (e.g. https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/403)
despite the fact that false negative ratio might be huge (up to 85%). This happens for big real world applications
that may contain random binary data (e.g. browser), but for smaller apps situation is not so terrible and LSan still might be useful.
This patch adds initial support for x86 Linux (disabled by default), ARM32 is in TODO list.
We used this patch (well, ported to GCC) on our 32 bit mobile emulators and it worked pretty fine
thus I'm posting it here to initiate further discussion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28609
llvm-svn: 292775
The reason they should have failed: absent sancov.
In this test (vs the trace_pc_guard test) sancov is not
yet called (not implemented).
llvm-svn: 291080
Summary:
At this point SANCOV_OPTIONS are not functional but it is our intent
to move here sanitizer coverage flags from various sanitizers _OPTIONS.
Reviewers: kcc
Subscribers: kubabrecka, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28311
llvm-svn: 291068
This doesn't work at all on big-endian systems, even just reading in the
magic bytes in the binary .sancov file header gets byte order wrong.
llvm-svn: 289539
fatal error: error in backend: Global variable '__sancov_gen_' has an
invalid section specifier '__sancov_guards': mach-o section specifier
requires a segment and section separated by a comma.
llvm-svn: 289507
Vedant Kumar