This is necessary to use them as part of pointer traits and is generally
useful. I've added unit test coverage to isolate and ensure this works
correctly.
I'll watch the build bots to try to see if any compilers can't tolerate
this bit of magic (and much credit goes to Richard Smith for coming up
with this magical production!) but give a shout if you see issues.
llvm-svn: 256553
of casting the integer '4' to such a pointer. There is no reason to
expect '4' to be a portable or reliable pointer of this form. The only
reason this ever worked is because the PointerIntPair that this actually
gets used with has an artificially *low* presumed alignment that allowed
it to work. When the alignment of PointerIntPair is derived from the
actual type's alignment, the asserts start firing on this pointer. I'm
amazed we never managed to do anything that triggered the alignment
sanitizer with it, as this is just flat out UB.
If folks dislike this approach to providing a sentinel fragment address,
there are a myriad of other alternatives, suggestions welcome. But this
one has the distinct advantage of not requiring the friend dance of
ilist's sentinel (which I'll point out is *also* in play for
MCFragment!) and seems to be using a nicely provided facility in
MCFragment to establish just such dummy nodes.
This is part of a series of patches to allow LLVM to check for complete
pointee types when computing its pointer traits. This is absolutely
necessary to get correct (or reproducible) results for things like how
many low bits are guaranteed to be zero.
llvm-svn: 256552
inline definitions after the mutually recursive pair of types have been
defined. The two types mutually recurse specifically through
abstractions that require pointer traits which makes this kind of mutual
recursion especially tricky to get right in terms of ordering.
This is part of a series of patches to allow LLVM to check for complete
pointee types when computing its pointer traits. This is absolutely
necessary to get correct (or reproducible) results for things like how
many low bits are guaranteed to be zero.
llvm-svn: 256551
missing includes so that the pointee types for DenseMap pointer keys and
such are complete prior to us querying the pointer traits for them.
This is part of a series of patches to allow LLVM to check for complete
pointee types when computing its pointer traits. This is absolutely
necessary to get correct (or reproducible) results for things like how
many low bits are guaranteed to be zero.
llvm-svn: 256550
used in pointer dense map key types or in other ways that require
pointer traits.
This is part of a series of patches to allow LLVM to check for complete
pointee types when computing its pointer traits. This is absolutely
necessary to get correct (or reproducible) results for things like how
many low bits are guaranteed to be zero.
llvm-svn: 256549
header to its own header, allowing users of fragments to have a narrower
header file, and avoid circular header dependencies when getting the
definition of MCSection prior to inspecting traits on MCSection
pointers.
This is part of a series of patches to allow LLVM to check for complete
pointee types when computing its pointer traits. This is absolutely
necessary to get correct (or reproducible) results for things like how
many low bits are guaranteed to be zero.
Note that this doesn't in any way change the design of MC, it is just
moving code around to allow the *header files* to be more fine grained.
Without this, it is impossible to get a complete type for MCSection
where it is needed.
If anyone would prefer a different slicing of the header files, I'm
happy to oblige of course. =]
llvm-svn: 256548
copy/pasted.
Happy for anyone to suggest a more precise or refined set of boilerplate
here, but the comments on the actual code seem descriptive and accurate.
llvm-svn: 256547
In MS inline asm syntax a label with '$' char produces an error, while in AT&T it does not.
In AT&T inline asm syntax Clang escapes the '$' char and replaces it with "$$". Adopted same approach for MS syntax.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15795
llvm-svn: 256545
The profile reader no longer depends on this field to be updated and point
to owning func's vp data. The VP data also no longer needs to be allocated
in a contiguous memory space.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15258
llvm-svn: 256543
member function exists on a class.
The previous trick depended on inheriting from the class it was
checking, which will fail when I start marking things 'final'.
Hopefully this actually builds with all supported compilers...
llvm-svn: 256534
Previously, the code enforced non-decreasing alignment of each trailing
type. However, it's easy enough to allow for realignment as needed, and
thus avoid the developer having to think about the possiblilities for
alignment requirements on all architectures.
(E.g. on Linux/x86, a struct with an int64 member is 4-byte aligned,
while on other 32-bit archs -- and even with other OSes on x86 -- it has
8-byte alignment. This sort of thing is irritating to have to manually
deal with.)
llvm-svn: 256533
header.
This is part of a series of patches to allow LLVM to check for complete
pointee types when computing its pointer traits. This is absolutely
necessary to get correct (or reproducible) results for things like how
many low bits are guaranteed to be zero.
The MetadataTracking helpers aren't actually independent. They rely on
constructing a PointerUnion between Metadata and MetadataAsValue
pointers, which requires know the alignment of pointers to those types
which requires them to be complete.
The .cpp file even defined a method declared in Metadata.h! These really
don't seem like something that is separable, and there is no real
layering problem with just placing them together.
llvm-svn: 256531
We didn't actually statically check this, and so it worked 25% of the
time for me. =/ Really sorry it took so long to fix, I shouldn't leave
the commit log editor window open without saving and landing the commit.
=[
llvm-svn: 256528
This depends on having a recently built version of clang-format
installed, as the patch to support this behavior was only just
recently added to clang-format.
llvm-svn: 256526
Use getRedeclContext() instead of a manually-written loop and fix a comment.
A patch by Aleksei Sidorin!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15794
llvm-svn: 256524
Summary:
* avoid generating POP {LR} in Thumb1 epilogues
* combine MOV LR, Rx + BX LR -> BX Rx in a peephole optimization pass
* combine POP {LR} + B + BX LR -> POP {PC} on v5T+
Test cases by Ana Pazos
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15707
llvm-svn: 256523
InlineCostAnalysis is an analysis pass without any need for it to be one.
Once it stops being an analysis pass, it doesn't maintain any useful state
and the member functions inside can be made free functions. NFC.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15701
llvm-svn: 256521
Summary:
Previously, only the outer (last) bitcast was rematerialized, resulting in a
use of the unrelocated inner (first) bitcast after the statepoint. See the
test case for an example.
Reviewers: igor-laevsky, reames
Subscribers: reames, alex, llvm-commits, sanjoy
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15789
llvm-svn: 256520
The cost is calculated for all X86 targets. When gather/scatter instruction
is not supported we calculate the cost of scalar sequence.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15677
llvm-svn: 256519
the front end as well.
Note that DWARF5 isn't finalized and any feature support is subject to
change and accepting of the option doesn't mean we're supporting the
full range of the current standard.
llvm-svn: 256516
This patch fixes PR16677. The latter represents the case when due to
misprinted character class definition occurs in the scope of template
arguments. Base class of this class depends on the template parameter in the
same scope and cannot be resolved, it causes crash. Right behavior is to
make semantic processing even if the definition is wrong, as the code
that emits appropriate message is called after the processing.
llvm-svn: 256511
The check lines were added with:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL256458http://reviews.llvm.org/rL256460
but on a darwin target, the output looks like:
## InlineAsm Start
rorq %rdi
## InlineAsm End
## InlineAsm Start
rorq %rsi
## InlineAsm End
leaq (%rsi,%rdi), %rax
retq
llvm-svn: 256507
Alexander Kornienko