This fixes a couple of asserts when analyzing comparisons involving
C11 atomics that were uncovered by r205608 when we extended the
applicability of -Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare.
llvm-svn: 213573
C99 array parameters can have index-type CVR qualifiers, and the TypePrinter
should print them when present (and we were not for constant-sized arrays).
Otherwise, we'd drop the restrict in:
int foo(int a[restrict static 3]) { ... }
llvm-svn: 213445
ExtWarn/Warnings. Mostly the name of the warning was changed to match the
semantics, but in the PR20356 cases, the warning was about valid code, so the
diagnostic was changed from ExtWarn to Warning instead.
llvm-svn: 213443
In C99, an array parameter declarator might have the form: direct-declarator
'[' 'static' type-qual-list[opt] assign-expr ']'
and when the size of the array is a constant, don't omit the static keyword
when printing the type. Also, in the VLA case, put a space after the static
keyword (some assignment expression must follow it).
llvm-svn: 213424
Add an additional test to ensure that someone doesn't accidentally
change the definitions such that they can take a non-constant value.
llvm-svn: 213364
We were crashing on the relevant test case inputs. Also, refactor this
code a bit so we can report failure and slurp the pragma tokens without
returning a diagnostic id. This is more consistent with the rest of the
parser and sema code.
llvm-svn: 213337
This is a follow-up to an IRC conversation with Richard last night; __assume
does not evaluate its argument, and so the argument should not contribute to
whether (__assume(e), constant) can be used where a constant is required.
llvm-svn: 213267
In MS-compatibility mode, we support the __assume builtin. The __assume builtin
does not evaluate its arguments, and we should issue a warning if __assume is
provided with an argument with side effects (because these effects will be
discarded).
This is similar in spirit to the warnings issued by other compilers (Intel
Diagnostic 2261, MS Compiler Warning C4557).
llvm-svn: 213266
Memory barrier __builtin_arm_[dmb, dsb, isb] intrinsics are required to
implement their corresponding ACLE and MSVC intrinsics.
This patch ports ARM dmb, dsb, isb intrinsic to AArch64.
Requires LLVM r213247.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4521
llvm-svn: 213250
We've decided to make the core rewriter class and PP rewriters mandatory.
They're only a few hundred lines of code in total and not worth supporting as a
distinct build configuration, especially since doing so disables key compiler
features.
This reverts commit r213150.
Revert "clang/test: Introduce the feature "rewriter" for --enable-clang-rewriter."
This reverts commit r213148.
Revert "Move clang/test/Frontend/rewrite-*.c to clang/test/Frontend/Rewriter/"
This reverts commit r213146.
llvm-svn: 213159
gcc supports this behavior and it is pervasively used inside the Linux
kernel.
Note that both gcc and clang will reject code that attempts to do this
in a C++ language mode.
This fixes PR17998.
llvm-svn: 212631
Give scope a SEHTryScope bit, set that in ParseSEHTry(), and let Sema
walk the scope chain to find the SEHTry parent on __leave statements.
(They are rare enough that it seems better to do the walk instead of
giving Scope a SEHTryParent pointer -- this is similar to AtCatchScope.)
llvm-svn: 212422
ARMv8 adds (to both AArch32 and AArch64) acquiring and releasing
variants of the exclusive operations, in line with the C++11 memory
model.
This adds support for two new intrinsics to expose them to C & C++
developers directly: __builtin_arm_ldaex and __builtin_arm_stlex, in
direct analogy with the versions with no implicit barrier.
rdar://problem/15885451
llvm-svn: 212175
C++ [basic.start.main]p1: "It shall have a return type of type int"
ISO C is also clear about this, so only accept 'int' with qualifiers in GNUMode
C.
llvm-svn: 212171
Summary: This patch introduces ACLE header file, implementing extensions that can be directly mapped to existing Clang intrinsics. It implements for both AArch32 and AArch64.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, compnerd, rengolin
Reviewed By: compnerd, rengolin
Subscribers: rnk, echristo, compnerd, aemerson, mroth, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4296
llvm-svn: 211962
Types defined in function prototype are diagnosed earlier in C++ compilation.
They are put into declaration context where the prototype is introduced. Later on,
when FunctionDecl object is created, these types are moved into the function context.
This patch fixes PR19018 and PR18963.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4145
llvm-svn: 211718
The C++ language requires that the address of a function be the same
across all translation units. To make __declspec(dllimport) useful,
this means that a dllimported function must also obey this rule. MSVC
implements this by dynamically querying the import address table located
in the linked executable. This means that the address of such a
function in C++ is not constant (which violates other rules).
However, the C language has no notion of ODR nor does it permit dynamic
initialization whatsoever. This requires implementations to _not_
dynamically query the import address table and instead utilize a wrapper
function that will be synthesized by the linker which will eventually
query the import address table. The effect this has is, to say the
least, perplexing.
Consider the following C program:
__declspec(dllimport) void f(void);
typedef void (*fp)(void);
static const fp var = &f;
const fp fun() { return &f; }
int main() { return fun() == var; }
MSVC will statically initialize "var" with the address of the wrapper
function and "fun" returns the address of the actual imported function.
This means that "main" will return false!
Note that LLVM's optimizers are strong enough to figure out that "main"
should return true. However, this result is dependent on having
optimizations enabled!
N.B. This change also permits the usage of dllimport declarators inside
of template arguments; they are sufficiently constant for such a
purpose. Add tests to make sure we don't regress here.
llvm-svn: 211677
and is unrelated to the NEON intrinsics in arm_neon.h. On little
endian machines it works fine, however on big endian machines it
exhibits surprising behaviour:
uint32x2_t x = {42, 64};
return vget_lane_u32(x, 0); // Will return 64.
Because of this, explicitly call out that it is unsupported on big
endian machines.
This patch will emit the following warning in big-endian mode:
test.c:3:15: warning: vector initializers are a GNU extension and are not compatible with NEON intrinsics [-Wgnu]
int32x4_t x = {0, 1, 2, 3};
^
test.c:3:15: note: consider using vld1q_s32() to initialize a vector from memory, or vcombine_s32(vcreate_s32(), vcreate_s32()) to initialize from integer constants
1 warning generated.
llvm-svn: 211362
CL permits static redeclarations to follow extern declarations. The
storage specifier on the latter declaration has no effect.
This fixes PR20034.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4149
llvm-svn: 211238
There comes a time in the life of any amateur code generator when dumb string
concatenation just won't cut it any more. For NeonEmitter.cpp, that time has
come.
There were a bunch of magic type codes which meant different things depending on
the context. There were a bunch of special cases that really had no reason to be
there but the whole thing was so creaky that removing them would cause something
weird to fall over. There was a 1000 line switch statement for code generation
involving string concatenation, which actually did lexical scoping to an extent
(!!) with a bunch of semi-repeated cases.
I tried to refactor this three times in three different ways without
success. The only way forward was to rewrite the entire thing. Luckily the
testing coverage on this stuff is absolutely massive, both with regression tests
and the "emperor" random test case generator.
The main change is that previously, in arm_neon.td a bunch of "Operation"s were
defined with special names. NeonEmitter.cpp knew about these Operations and
would emit code based on a huge switch. Actually this doesn't make much sense -
the type information was held as strings, so type checking was impossible. Also
TableGen's DAG type actually suits this sort of code generation very well
(surprising that...)
So now every operation is defined in terms of TableGen DAGs. There are a bunch
of operators to use, including "op" (a generic unary or binary operator), "call"
(to call other intrinsics) and "shuffle" (take a guess...). One of the main
advantages of this apart from making it more obvious what is going on, is that
we have proper type inference. This has two obvious advantages:
1) TableGen can error on bad intrinsic definitions easier, instead of just
generating wrong code.
2) Calls to other intrinsics are typechecked too. So
we no longer need to work out whether the thing we call needs to be the Q-lane
version or the D-lane version - TableGen knows that itself!
Here's an example: before:
case OpAbdl: {
std::string abd = MangleName("vabd", typestr, ClassS) + "(__a, __b)";
if (typestr[0] != 'U') {
// vabd results are always unsigned and must be zero-extended.
std::string utype = "U" + typestr.str();
s += "(" + TypeString(proto[0], typestr) + ")";
abd = "(" + TypeString('d', utype) + ")" + abd;
s += Extend(utype, abd) + ";";
} else {
s += Extend(typestr, abd) + ";";
}
break;
}
after:
def OP_ABDL : Op<(cast "R", (call "vmovl", (cast $p0, "U",
(call "vabd", $p0, $p1))))>;
As an example of what happens if you do something wrong now, here's what happens
if you make $p0 unsigned before the call to "vabd" - that is, $p0 -> (cast "U",
$p0):
arm_neon.td:574:1: error: No compatible intrinsic found - looking up intrinsic 'vabd(uint8x8_t, int8x8_t)'
Available overloads:
- float64x2_t vabdq_v(float64x2_t, float64x2_t)
- float64x1_t vabd_v(float64x1_t, float64x1_t)
- float64_t vabdd_f64(float64_t, float64_t)
- float32_t vabds_f32(float32_t, float32_t)
... snip ...
This makes it seriously easy to work out what you've done wrong in fairly nasty
intrinsics.
As part of this I've massively beefed up the documentation in arm_neon.td too.
Things still to do / on the radar:
- Testcase generation. This was implemented in the previous version and not in
the new one, because
- Autogenerated tests are not being run. The testcase in test/ differs from
the autogenerated version.
- There were a whole slew of special cases in the testcase generation that just
felt (and looked) like hacks.
If someone really feels strongly about this, I can try and reimplement it too.
- Big endian. That's coming soon and should be a very small diff on top of this one.
llvm-svn: 211101
This patch adds support for pointer types in global named registers variables.
It'll be lowered as a pair of read/write_register and inttoptr/ptrtoint calls.
Also adds some early checks on types on SemaDecl to avoid the assert.
Tests changed accordingly. (PR19837)
llvm-svn: 210274
to the normal non-placement ::operator new and ::operator delete, but allow
optimizations like new-expressions and delete-expressions do.
llvm-svn: 210137
This allows us to be more careful when dealing with enums whose fixed
underlying type requires special handling in a format string, like
NSInteger.
A refinement of r163266 from a year and a half ago, which added the
special handling for NSInteger and friends in the first place.
<rdar://problem/16616623>
llvm-svn: 209966
A few (mostly CodeGen) parts of Clang were tightly coupled to the
AArch64 backend. Now that it's gone, they will not even compile.
I've also deduplicated RUN lines in many of the AArch64 tests. This
might improve "make check-all" time noticably: some of those NEON
tests were monsters.
llvm-svn: 209578
This patch implements global named registers in Clang, lowering to the just
created intrinsics in LLVM (@llvm.read/write_register). A new type of LValue
had to be created (Register), which just adds support to carry the metadata
node containing the name of the register. Two new methods to emit loads and
stores interoperate with another to emit the named metadata node.
No guarantees are being made and only non-allocatable global variable named
registers are being supported. Local named register support is unchanged.
llvm-svn: 209149
Now that llvm cannot represent alias cycles, we have to diagnose erros just
before trying to close the cycle. This degrades the errors a bit. The real
solution is what it was before: if we want to provide good errors for these
cases, we have to be able to find a clang level decl given a mangled name
and produce the error from Sema.
llvm-svn: 209008
We were emitting dynamic initializers for __thread variables if there
was no explicit initializer, as in this test case:
struct S { S(); };
__thread S s;
llvm-svn: 207675
glibc expects that stddef.h only defines a single thing if either of these
defines is set. For example, before this change, a C file containing
#include <stdlib.h>
int ptrdiff_t = 0;
would compile with gcc but not with clang. Now it compiles with clang too.
This also fixes PR12997, where older versions of the Linux headers would define
NULL incorrectly, and glibc would define __need_NULL and expect stddef.h to
redefine NULL with the correct definition.
llvm-svn: 207606
We never aka vector types because our attributed syntax for it is less
comprehensible than the typedefs. This leaves the user in the dark when
the typedef isn't named that well.
Example:
v2s v; v4f w;
w = v;
The naming in this cases isn't even that bad, but the error we give is
useless without looking up the actual typedefs.
t.c:6:5: error: assigning to 'v4f' from incompatible type 'v2s'
Now:
t.c:6:5: error: assigning to 'v4f' (vector of 4 'float' values) from
incompatible type 'v2s' (vector of 2 'int' values)
We do this for all diagnostics that print a vector type.
llvm-svn: 207267
through to the output even if the input comment comes from an untrusted source
Attribute filtering is currently based on a blacklist, which right now includes
all event handler attributes (they contain JavaScipt code). It should be
switched to a whitelist, but going over all of the HTML5 spec requires a
significant amount of time.
llvm-svn: 206882
This is a partial revert of 183015.
By not recognizing things like _setjmp we lose (returns_twice) attribute on
them, which leads to incorrect code generation.
Fixes PR16138.
llvm-svn: 206362
When instantiating an array that has an alignment attribute on it, we
were looking through the array type and only considering the element
type for the resulting alignment. We need to make sure we take the
array's requirements into account too.
llvm-svn: 206317
This patch adds support for the msvc pragmas section, bss_seg, code_seg,
const_seg and data_seg as well as support for __declspec(allocate()).
Additionally it corrects semantics and adds diagnostics for
__attribute__((section())) and the interaction between the attribute
and the msvc pragmas and declspec. In general conflicts should now be
well diganosed within and among these features.
In supporting the pragmas new machinery for uniform lexing for
msvc pragmas was introduced. The new machinery always lexes the
entire pragma and stores it on an annotation token. The parser
is responsible for parsing the pragma when the handling the
annotation token.
There is a known outstanding bug in this implementation in C mode.
Because these attributes and pragmas apply _only_ to definitions, we
process them at the time we detect a definition. Due to tentative
definitions in C, we end up processing the definition late. This means
that in C mode, everything that ends up in a BSS section will end up in
the _last_ BSS section rather than the one that was live at the time of
tentative definition, even if that turns out to be the point of actual
definition. This issue is not known to impact anything as of yet
because we are not aware of a clear use or use case for #pragma bss_seg
but should be fixed at some point.
Differential Revision=http://reviews.llvm.org/D3065#inline-16241
llvm-svn: 205810
which warns on compound conditionals that always evaluate to the same value.
For instance, (x > 5 && x < 3) will always be false since no value for x can
satisfy both conditions.
This patch also changes the CFG to use these tautological values for better
branch analysis. The test for -Wunreachable-code shows how this change catches
additional dead code.
Patch by Anders Rönnholm.
llvm-svn: 205665
better. This warning will now trigger on the following conditionals:
bool b;
int i;
if (b > 1) {} // always false
if (0 <= (i > 5)) {} // always true
if (-1 > b) {} // always false
Patch by Per Viberg.
llvm-svn: 205608
For namespaces, this is consistent with mangling and GCC's debug info
behavior. For structs, GCC uses <anonymous struct> but we prefer
consistency between all anonymous entities but don't want to confuse
them with template arguments, etc, so we'll just go with parens in all
cases.
llvm-svn: 205398
While investigating some debug info issues, Eric and I came across a
particular template case where the location of a decl was quite
different from the range of the same decl. It might've been rather
helpful if the dumper had actually showed us this.
llvm-svn: 205396
This removes a diagnostic that is no longer required (the semantic engine now properly handles attribute syntax so __declspec and __attribute__ spellings no longer get mismatched). This caused several testcases to need updating for a slightly different wording.
llvm-svn: 205234
A redeclaration may not add dllimport or dllexport attributes. dllexport is
sticky and can be omitted on redeclarations while dllimport cannot.
llvm-svn: 205197
This adds Clang support for the ARM64 backend. There are definitely
still some rough edges, so please bring up any issues you see with
this patch.
As with the LLVM commit though, we think it'll be more useful for
merging with AArch64 from within the tree.
llvm-svn: 205100
Taking a hint from -Wparentheses, use an extra '()' as a sigil that
a dead condition is intentionally dead. For example:
if ((0)) { dead }
When this sigil is found, do not emit a dead code warning. When the
analysis sees:
if (0)
it suggests inserting '()' as a Fix-It.
llvm-svn: 205069
This produces valid IR now that llvm rejects aliases to weak aliases and warns
the user that the resolution is not changed if the weak alias is overridden.
llvm-svn: 204935
The main difference between __va_start and __builtin_va_start is that
the address of the va_list has already been taken, and the va_list is
always a char*.
__va_end and __va_arg are not needed.
llvm-svn: 204821
Amends r204300 to not try to test fixing a wchar_t* to "%ls", which we don't
do correctly anyway. In C mode, wchar_t is just a typedef for a normal
primitive integer type, not a distinct type like it is in C++. To make this
work correctly, we'll need to look for the wchar_t typedef, not just the
builtin type.
Should fix the buildbots.
llvm-svn: 204349
Since "half" is an OpenCL keyword and clang accepts __fp16 as an extension for
other languages, error messages and metadata (and hence debug info) should refer
to the half-precision floating point as "__fp16" instead of "half" when
compiling for non-OpenCL languages. This patch creates a new printing policy for
half in a similar manner to what is done for bool and wchar_t.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2952
llvm-svn: 204164
Also relax unreachable 'break' and 'return' to not check for being
preceded by a call to 'noreturn'. That turns out to not be so
interesting in practice.
llvm-svn: 204000
Recent work on -Wunreachable-code has focused on suppressing uninteresting
unreachable code that center around "configuration values", but
there are still some set of cases that are sometimes interesting
or uninteresting depending on the codebase. For example, a dead
"break" statement may not be interesting for a particular codebase,
potentially because it is auto-generated or simply because code
is written defensively.
To address these workflow differences, -Wunreachable-code is now
broken into several diagnostic groups:
-Wunreachable-code: intended to be a reasonable "default" for
most users.
and then other groups that turn on more aggressive checking:
-Wunreachable-code-break: warn about dead break statements
-Wunreachable-code-trivial-return: warn about dead return statements
that return "trivial" values (e.g., return 0). Other return
statements that return non-trivial values are still reported
under -Wunreachable-code (this is an area subject to more refinement).
-Wunreachable-code-aggressive: supergroup that enables all these
groups.
The goal is to eventually make -Wunreachable-code good enough to
either be in -Wall or on-by-default, thus finessing these warnings
into different groups helps achieve maximum signal for more users.
TODO: the tests need to be updated to reflect this extra control
via diagnostic flags.
llvm-svn: 203994
Someone could write:
if (0) {
__c11_atomic_load(ptr, memory_order_release);
}
or the equivalent, which is perfectly valid, so we shouldn't outright reject
invalid orderings on purely static grounds.
rdar://problem/16242991
llvm-svn: 203564
This is a conservative check, because it's valid for the expression to be
non-constant, and in cases like that we just don't know whether it's valid.
rdar://problem/16242991
llvm-svn: 203561
I had forgotten that the same reachability code is used by both -Wreturn-type
and -Wunreachable-code, so the heuristics applied to the latter were indirectly
impacting the former.
To address this, the reachability code is more refactored so that whiled
the logic at its core is shared, the intention of the clients are better
captured and segregated in helper APIs.
Fixes PR19074, and also some false positives reported offline to me
by Nick Lewycky.
llvm-svn: 203209
getTypeSize (which rounds up sizes) in order to issue diagnostics
when casting to mismatched vector sizes; instead of crashing in IRGen.
// rdar:// 16196902. Reviewed offline by John McCall.
llvm-svn: 203175
Sometimes do..while() is used to create a scope that can be left early.
In such cases, the unreachable 'while()' test is not usually interesting
unless it actually does something that is observable.
llvm-svn: 203051
Sometimes do..while() is used to create a scope that can be left early.
In such cases, the unreachable 'while()' test is not usually interesting
unless it actually does something that is observable.
llvm-svn: 203036
Previously we only pruned dead returns preceded by a call to a
'noreturn' function. After looking at the results of the LLVM codebase,
there are many others that should be pruned as well.
llvm-svn: 203029
Note that for backwards compatibility, an unnamed capability will default to being a "mutex." This allows the deprecated lockable attribute to continue to function.
llvm-svn: 203012
Some unreachable code is only "sometimes unreachable" because it
is guarded by a configuration value that is determined at compile
time and is always constant. Sometimes those represent real bugs,
but often they do not. This patch causes the reachability analysis
to cover such branches even if they are technically unreachable
in the CFG itself. There are some conservative heuristics at
play here to determine a "configuration value"; these are intended
to be refined over time.
llvm-svn: 202912
This is a heuristic. Many switch statements, although they look covered
over an enum, may actually handle at runtime more values than in the enum.
This is overly conservative, as there are some cases that clearly
can be ruled as being clearly unreachable, e.g. 'switch (42) { case 1: ... }'.
We can refine this later.
llvm-svn: 202436
For example:
unreachable();
break;
This code is idiomatic and defensive. The fact that 'break' is
unreachable here is not interesting. This occurs frequently
in LLVM/Clang itself.
llvm-svn: 202328
null comparison when the pointer is known to be non-null.
This catches the array to pointer decay, function to pointer decay and
address of variables. This does not catch address of function since this
has been previously used to silence a warning.
Pointer to bool conversion is under -Wbool-conversion.
Pointer to null comparison is under -Wtautological-pointer-compare, a sub-group
of -Wtautological-compare.
void foo() {
int arr[5];
int x;
// warn on these conditionals
if (foo);
if (arr);
if (&x);
if (foo == null);
if (arr == null);
if (&x == null);
if (&foo); // no warning
}
llvm-svn: 202216
The warnings fall into three groups.
1) Using an absolute value function of the wrong type, for instance, using the
int absolute value function when the argument is a floating point type.
2) Using the improper sized absolute value function, for instance, using abs
when the argument is a long long. llabs should be used instead.
From these two cases, an implicit conversion will occur which may cause
unexpected behavior. Where possible, suggest the proper absolute value
function to use, and which header to include if the function is not available.
3) Taking the absolute value of an unsigned value. In addition to this warning,
suggest to remove the function call. This usually indicates a logic error
since the programmer assumed negative values would have been possible.
llvm-svn: 202211
When calculating the preferred alignment of a type, consider if a alignment
attribute came from a typedef declaration. If one did, do not naturally align
the type.
Patch by Stephan Tolksdorf, with a little tweaking and an additional testcase by me.
llvm-svn: 202088
The language forbids defining enums in prototypes, so this check is normally
redundant, but if an enum is defined during template instantiation it should
not be added to the prototype scope.
While at it, clean up the code that deals with tag definitions in prototype
scope and expand the visibility warning to cover the case where an anonymous
enum is defined.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2742
llvm-svn: 201927
CGRecordLayoutBuilder was aging, complex, multi-pass, and shows signs of
existing before ASTRecordLayoutBuilder. It redundantly performed many
layout operations that are now performed by ASTRecordLayoutBuilder and
asserted that the results were the same. With the addition of support
for the MS-ABI, such as placement of vbptrs, vtordisps, different
bitfield layout and a variety of other features, CGRecordLayoutBuilder
was growing unwieldy in its redundancy.
This patch re-architects CGRecordLayoutBuilder to not perform any
redundant layout but rather, as directly as possible, lower an
ASTRecordLayout to an llvm::type. The new architecture is significantly
smaller and simpler than the CGRecordLayoutBuilder and contains fewer
ABI-specific code paths. It's also one pass.
The architecture of the new system is described in the comments. For the
most part, the new system simply takes all of the fields and bases from
an ASTRecordLayout, sorts them, inserts padding and dumps a record.
Bitfields, unions and primary virtual bases make this process a bit more
complicated. See the inline comments.
In addition, this patch updates a few lit tests due to the fact that the
new system computes more accurate llvm types than CGRecordLayoutBuilder.
Each change is commented individually in the review.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2795
llvm-svn: 201907
The following attributes have been (silently) deprecated, with their replacements listed:
lockable => capability
exclusive_locks_required => requires_capability
shared_locks_required => requires_shared_capability
locks_excluded => requires_capability
There are no functional changes intended.
llvm-svn: 201585
According to the GNU docs, zero-sized bitfields should not be affected by the
packed attribute.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2693
llvm-svn: 201288
It is actually useful to warn in such cases, thanks to Dmitri for pushing on this and making us see the light!
Related to rdar://15925483 and rdar://15922612. The latter radar is where the usefulness of the warning is most clear.
llvm-svn: 201165
Thanks to r199467, __attribute__((nonnull)) (without arguments) can apply
directly to parameters, instead of being applied to the whole function.
However, the old form of nonnull (with an argument index) could also apply
to the arguments of function and block pointers, and both of these can be
passed as parameters.
Now, if 'nonnull' with an argument is found on a parameter, /and/ the
parameter is a function or block pointer, it is handled the old way.
PR18795
llvm-svn: 201162
When a lax conversion featured a vector and a non-vector, we were
only requiring the non-vector to be a scalar type, but really it
needs to be a real type (i.e. integral or real floating); it is
not reasonable to allow a pointer, member pointer, or complex
type here.
r198474 required lax conversions to match in "data size", i.e.
element size * element count, forbidding matches that happen
only because a vector is rounded up to the nearest power of two
in size. Unfortunately, the erroneous logic was repeated in
several different places; unify them to use the new condition,
so that it triggers for arbitrary conversions and not just
those performed as part of binary operator checking.
rdar://15931426
llvm-svn: 200810
Due to statement expressions supported as GCC extension, it is possible
to put 'break' or 'continue' into a loop/switch statement but outside
its body, for example:
for ( ; ({ if (first) { first = 0; continue; } 0; }); )
This code is rejected by GCC if compiled in C mode but is accepted in C++
code. GCC bug 44715 tracks this discrepancy. Clang used code generation
that differs from GCC in both modes: only statement of the third
expression of 'for' behaves as if it was inside loop body.
This change makes code generation more close to GCC, considering 'break'
or 'continue' statement in condition and increment expressions of a
loop as it was inside the loop body. It also adds error for the cases
when 'break'/'continue' appear outside loop due to this syntax. If
code generation differ from GCC, warning is issued.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2518
llvm-svn: 199897
Aaron Ballman