`pass_object_size` is our way of enabling `__builtin_object_size` to
produce high quality results without requiring inlining to happen
everywhere.
A link to the design doc for this attribute is available at the
Differential review link below.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13263
llvm-svn: 254554
std::initializer_list<T> type. Instead, the list must contain a single element
and the type is deduced from that.
In Clang 3.7, we warned by default on all the cases that would change meaning
due to this change. In Clang 3.8, we will support only the new rules -- per
the request in N3922, this change is applied as a Defect Report against earlier
versions of the C++ standard.
This change is not entirely trivial, because for lambda init-captures we
previously did not track the difference between direct-list-initialization and
copy-list-initialization. The difference was not previously observable, because
the two forms of initialization always did the same thing (the elements of the
initializer list were always copy-initialized regardless of the initialization
style used for the init-capture).
llvm-svn: 252688
Objective-C ARC lifetime qualifiers are dropped when canonicalizing
function types. Perform the same adjustment before comparing the
deduced result types of lambdas. Fixes rdar://problem/22344904.
llvm-svn: 249065
Previously we'd try to perform checks on the captures from the middle of
parsing the lambda's body, at the point where we detected that a variable
needed to be captured. This was wrong in a number of subtle ways. In
PR23334, we couldn't correctly handle the list of potential odr-uses
resulting from the capture, and our attempt to recover from that resulted
in a use-after-free.
We now defer building the initialization expression until we leave the lambda
body and return to the enclosing context, where the initialization does the
right thing. This patch only covers lambda-expressions, but we should apply
the same change to blocks and captured statements too.
llvm-svn: 235921
Update the test cases to pass when lambda call operators use thiscall.
Update the lambda-to-block conversion operator to use the default free
function calling convention instead of the call operator's convention.
This reverts commit r233082 and re-instates r233023.
llvm-svn: 233835
Changes diagnostic options, language standard options, diagnostic identifiers, diagnostic wording to use c++14 instead of c++1y. It also modifies related test cases to use the updated diagnostic wording.
llvm-svn: 215982
DR18 previously forebode typedefs to be used as parameter types if they
were of type 'void'. DR577 allows 'void' to be used as a function
parameter type regardless from where it came.
llvm-svn: 201631
A return type is the declared or deduced part of the function type specified in
the declaration.
A result type is the (potentially adjusted) type of the value of an expression
that calls the function.
Rule of thumb:
* Declarations have return types and parameters.
* Expressions have result types and arguments.
llvm-svn: 200082
Fix a perennial source of confusion in the clang type system: Declarations and
function prototypes have parameters to which arguments are supplied, so calling
these 'arguments' was a stretch even in C mode, let alone C++ where default
arguments, templates and overloading make the distinction important to get
right.
Readability win across the board, especially in the casting, ADL and
overloading implementations which make a lot more sense at a glance now.
Will keep an eye on the builders and update dependent projects shortly.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 199686
encodes the canonical rules for LLVM's style. I noticed this had drifted
quite a bit when cleaning up LLVM, so wanted to clean up Clang as well.
llvm-svn: 198686
Add back the test that was triggering the assertion (which I removed mistakenly thinking it was triggering just a warning and not an assertion). My error was brought to my attention by Rafael (Thanks!).
llvm-svn: 196721
Employed the following refactorings:
- Renamed some functions
- Introduced explaining variables
- Cleaned up & added comments
- Used Optional<unsigned> for return value instead of an out parameter
- Added assertions
- Constified a few member functions
No functionality change.
All regressions pass.
llvm-svn: 196662
For an init capture, process the initialization expression
right away. For lambda init-captures such as the following:
const int x = 10;
auto L = [i = x+1](int a) {
return [j = x+2,
&k = x](char b) { };
};
keep in mind that each lambda init-capture has to have:
- its initialization expression executed in the context
of the enclosing/parent decl-context.
- but the variable itself has to be 'injected' into the
decl-context of its lambda's call-operator (which has
not yet been created).
Each init-expression is a full-expression that has to get
Sema-analyzed (for capturing etc.) before its lambda's
call-operator's decl-context, scope & scopeinfo are pushed on their
respective stacks. Thus if any variable is odr-used in the init-capture
it will correctly get captured in the enclosing lambda, if one exists.
The init-variables above are created later once the lambdascope and
call-operators decl-context is pushed onto its respective stack.
Since the lambda init-capture's initializer expression occurs in the
context of the enclosing function or lambda, therefore we can not wait
till a lambda scope has been pushed on before deciding whether the
variable needs to be captured. We also need to process all
lvalue-to-rvalue conversions and discarded-value conversions,
so that we can avoid capturing certain constant variables.
For e.g.,
void test() {
const int x = 10;
auto L = [&z = x](char a) { <-- don't capture by the current lambda
return [y = x](int i) { <-- don't capture by enclosing lambda
return y;
}
};
If x was not const, the second use would require 'L' to capture, and
that would be an error.
Make sure TranformLambdaExpr is also aware of this.
Patch approved by Richard (Thanks!!)
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2092
llvm-svn: 196454
Both Richard and I felt that the current wording in the working paper needed some tweaking - Please see http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2035 for additional context and references to core-reflector messages that discuss wording tweaks.
What is implemented is what we had intended to specify in Bristol; but, recently felt that the specification might benefit from some tweaking and fleshing.
As a rough attempt to explain the semantics: If a nested lambda with a default-capture names a variable within its body, and if the enclosing full expression that contains the name of that variable is instantiation-dependent - then an enclosing lambda that is capture-ready (i.e. within a non-dependent context) must capture that variable, if all intervening nested lambdas can potentially capture that variable if they need to, and all intervening parent lambdas of the capture-ready lambda can and do capture the variable.
Of note, 'this' capturing is also currently underspecified in the working paper for generic lambdas. What is implemented here is if the set of candidate functions in a nested generic lambda includes both static and non-static member functions (regardless of viability checking - i.e. num and type of parameters/arguments) - and if all intervening nested-inner lambdas between the capture-ready lambda and the function-call containing nested lambda can capture 'this' and if all enclosing lambdas of the capture-ready lambda can capture 'this', then 'this' is speculatively captured by that capture-ready lambda.
Hopefully a paper for the C++ committee (that Richard and I had started some preliminary work on) is forthcoming.
This essentially makes generic lambdas feature complete, except for known bugs. The more prominent ones (and the ones I am currently aware of) being:
- generic lambdas and init-captures are broken - but a patch that fixes this is already in the works ...
- nested variadic expansions such as:
auto K = [](auto ... OuterArgs) {
vp([=](auto ... Is) {
decltype(OuterArgs) OA = OuterArgs;
return 0;
}(5)...);
return 0;
};
auto M = K('a', ' ', 1, " -- ", 3.14);
currently cause crashes. I think I know how to fix this (since I had done so in my initial implementation) - but it will probably take some work and back & forth with Doug and Richard.
A warm thanks to all who provided feedback - and especially to Doug Gregor and Richard Smith for their pivotal guidance: their insight and prestidigitation in such matters is boundless!
Now let's hope this commit doesn't upset the buildbot gods ;)
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 194188
This patch fixes the typelocs of the conversion-operator and the conversion-operator-name and adds the parameters of the call operator to the FunctionProtoTypeLoc of the respective entities. Thus, when the template declarations (conversion operators) undergo deduction and instantiation/transformation/substitution - they add themselves to the local instantiation scope if needed.
This patch supports the following:
auto L = [](auto b) {
return [](auto a) ->decltype(a) { return a; };
};
int (*fp)(int) = L(8);
Richard LGTM'd this patch: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1831
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 193294
A prior commit of this patch was reverted because it was within the blamelist's purview of a failing test. The failure of that test has been addressed here: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20131021/091546.html. Therefore I am recommitting this patch (all tests pass on windows, except for the usual modules & index suspects that never pass on my box).
Some background: Both Doug and Richard had asked me in Chicago to remove the circular reference in CXXRecordDecl to LambdaExpr by factoring out and storing the needed information from LambdaExpr directly into CXXRecordDecl.
In addition, I have added an IsGenericLambda flag - this makes life a little easier when we implement capturing, and are Sema-analyzing the body of a lambda (and the calloperator hasn't been wired to the closure class yet). Any inner lambdas can have potential captures that could require walking up the scope chain and checking if any generic lambdas are capture-ready. This 'bit' makes some of that checking easier.
No change in functionality.
This patch was approved by Doug with minor modifications (comments were cleaned up, and all data members were converted from bool/enum to unsigned, as requested):
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1856
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 193246
They were causing CodeGenCXX/mangle-exprs.cpp to fail.
Revert "Remove the circular reference to LambdaExpr in CXXRecordDecl."
Revert "Again: Teach TreeTransform and family how to transform generic lambdas nested within templates and themselves."
llvm-svn: 193226
Both Doug and Richard had asked me to remove the circular reference in CXXRecordDecl to LambdaExpr by factoring out and storing the needed information from LambdaExpr directly into CXXRecordDecl.
No change in functionality.
In addition, I have added an IsGenericLambda flag - this makes life a little easier when we implement capturing, and are Sema-analyzing the body of a lambda (and the calloperator hasn't been wired to the closure class yet). Any inner lambdas can have potential captures that could require walking up the scope chain and checking if any generic lambdas are capture-ready. This 'bit' makes some of that checking easier.
This patch was approved by Doug with minor modifications (comments were cleaned up, and all data members were converted from bool/enum to unsigned, as requested):
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1856
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 193223
The general strategy is to create template versions of the conversion function and static invoker and then during template argument deduction of the conversion function, create the corresponding call-operator and static invoker specializations, and when the conversion function is marked referenced generate the body of the conversion function using the corresponding static-invoker specialization. Similarly, Codegen does something similar - when asked to emit the IR for a specialized static invoker of a generic lambda, it forwards emission to the corresponding call operator.
This patch has been reviewed in person both by Doug and Richard. Richard gave me the LGTM.
A few minor changes:
- per Richard's request i added a simple check to gracefully inform that captures (init, explicit or default) have not been added to generic lambdas just yet (instead of the assertion violation).
- I removed a few lines of code that added the call operators instantiated parameters to the currentinstantiationscope. Not only did it not handle parameter packs, but it is more relevant in the patch for nested lambdas which will follow this one, and fix that problem more comprehensively.
- Doug had commented that the original implementation strategy of using the TypeSourceInfo of the call operator to create the static-invoker was flawed and allowed const as a member qualifier to creep into the type of the static-invoker. I currently kludge around it - but after my initial discussion with Doug, with a follow up session with Richard, I have added a FIXME so that a more elegant solution that involves the use of TrivialTypeSourceInfo call followed by the correct wiring of the template parameters to the functionprototypeloc is forthcoming.
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 191634
putting them in the call operator's DeclContext. This better matches the
language wording and avoids some cases where code gets confused by them for
namespace-scope lambdas and the like.
llvm-svn: 191606
David Majnemer