destination type for initialization, assignment, parameter-passing,
etc. The main issue fixed here is that we used rather confusing
wording for diagnostics such as
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char const [2]' discards qualifiers,
expected 'char *' [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
We're not initializing a 'char const [2]', we're initializing a 'char
*' with an expression of type 'char const [2]'. Similar problems
existed for other diagnostics in this area, so I've normalized them all
with more precise descriptive text to say what we're
initializing/converting/assigning/etc. from and to. The warning for
the code above is now:
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char *' from an expression of type
'char const [2]' discards qualifiers [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
Fixes <rdar://problem/7447179>.
llvm-svn: 100832
that was present in a prior declaration, emit a warning rather than a
hard error (which we did before, and still do with mismatched
exception specifications). Moreover, provide a fix-it hint with the
throw() clause that should be added, e.g.,
t.C:10:7: warning: 'operator new' is missing exception specification
'throw(std::bad_alloc)'
void *operator new(unsigned long sz)
^
throw(std::bad_alloc)
As part of this, disable the warning when we're missing an exception
specification on operator new, operator new[], operator delete, or
operator delete[] when exceptions are turned off (-fno-exceptions).
Fixes PR5957.
llvm-svn: 99388
therefore not creating ElaboratedTypes, which are still pretty-printed
with the written tag).
Most of these testcase changes were done by script, so don't feel too
sorry for my fingers.
llvm-svn: 98149
we look into a Scope that corresponds to a compound statement whose
scope was combined with the scope of the function that owns it. This
improves typo correction in many common cases.
llvm-svn: 92879
constructs:
- Instance variable lookup ("foo->ivar" and, in instance methods, "ivar")
- Property name lookup ("foo.prop")
- Superclasses
- Various places where a class name is required
- Protocol names (e.g., id<proto>)
This seems to cover many of the common places where typos could occur.
llvm-svn: 92449
class), provide a suggestion for the type or class found. However,
since we can't recover properly in this case, don't provide a fix-it
hint. Example:
test/FixIt/typo.m:8:3: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NSstring';
did you
mean 'NSString'?
NSstring *str = @"A string";
...
^
1 diagnostic generated.
llvm-svn: 92379
test/FixIt/typo.c:19:4: error: field designator 'bunds' does not refer to any
field in type 'struct Window'; did you mean 'bounds'?
.bunds.
^~~~~
bounds
llvm-svn: 92376
test/FixIt/typo.cpp:41:15: error: initializer 'base' does not name a non-static
data member or base class; did you mean the base class 'Base'?
Derived() : base(),
^~~~
Base
test/FixIt/typo.cpp:42:15: error: initializer 'ember' does not name a non-static
data member or base class; did you mean the member 'member'?
ember() { }
^~~~~
member
llvm-svn: 92355
typo.cpp:27:8: error: no template named 'basic_sting' in namespace 'std';
did you mean 'basic_string'?
std::basic_sting<char> b2;
~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
basic_string
llvm-svn: 92348
typo.cpp:22:10: error: use of undeclared identifier 'radious'; did
you mean 'radius'?
return radious * pi;
^~~~~~~
radius
This was super-easy, since we already had decent recovery by looking
for names in dependent base classes.
llvm-svn: 92341
tring str2;
we produce the following diagnostic + fix-it:
typo.cpp:15:1: error: unknown type name 'tring'; did you mean 'string'?
tring str2;
^~~~~
string
To make this really useful, we'll need to introduce typo correction in
many more places (wherever we do name lookup), and implement
declaration-vs-expression heuristics that cope with typos
better. However, for now this will handle the simple cases where we
already get good "unknown type name" diagnostics.
The LookupVisibleDecls functions are intended to be used by code
completion as well as typo correction; that refactoring will happen
later.
llvm-svn: 92308
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
get_origin->x
where get_origin is actually a function and the user has forgotten the
parentheses. Instead of giving a lame note for the fix-it, give a
full-fledge error, early, then build the call expression to try to
recover.
llvm-svn: 86238
Douglas Gregor