Summary:
Coverage is using large arrays which requires large allocations.
These allocations are flaky and often failing on win64.
We are using the 32-bits size until this gets a better fix.
Reviewers: rnk
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kubamracek, chrisha, dberris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29945
llvm-svn: 295086
The profile name variables passed to counter increment intrinsics are
dead after we emit the finalized name data in __llvm_prf_nm. However, we
neglect to erase these name variables. This causes huge size increases
in the __TEXT,__const section as well as slowdowns when linker dead
stripping is disabled. Some affected projects are so massive that they
fail to link on Darwin, because only the small code model is supported.
Fix the issue by throwing away the name constants as soon as we're done
with them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29921
llvm-svn: 295084
To help assist in debugging ISEL or to prioritize GlobalISel backend
work, this patch adds two more tables to <Target>GenISelDAGISel.inc -
one which contains the patterns that are used during selection and the
other containing include source location of the patterns
Enabled through CMake varialbe LLVM_ENABLE_DAGISEL_COV
llvm-svn: 295081
This allows for nicer backtrace and debugging when -j1 is passed:
$ opt-viewer.py CMakeFiles/LLVMScalarOpts.dir/LoopVersioningLICM.cpp.opt.yaml html
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/org/llvm/utils/opt-viewer/opt-viewer.py", line 405, in <module>
generate_report(pmap, all_remarks, file_remarks, args.source_dir, args.output_dir)
File "/org/llvm/utils/opt-viewer/opt-viewer.py", line 362, in generate_report
pmap(_render_file_bound, file_remarks.items())
File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 251, in map
return self.map_async(func, iterable, chunksize).get()
File "/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 567, in get
raise self._value
Exception: blah
$ opt-viewer.py -j 1 CMakeFiles/LLVMScalarOpts.dir/LoopVersioningLICM.cpp.opt.yaml html
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/org/llvm/utils/opt-viewer/opt-viewer.py", line 405, in <module>
generate_report(pmap, all_remarks, file_remarks, args.source_dir, args.output_dir)
File "/org/llvm/utils/opt-viewer/opt-viewer.py", line 362, in generate_report
pmap(_render_file_bound, file_remarks.items())
File "/org/llvm/utils/opt-viewer/opt-viewer.py", line 317, in _render_file
SourceFileRenderer(source_dir, output_dir, filename).render(remarks)
File "/org/llvm/utils/opt-viewer/opt-viewer.py", line 168, in __init__
raise Exception("blah")
Exception: blah
llvm-svn: 295080
Summary:
As written in the comments above, LastCallToStaticBonus is already applied to
the cost if Caller has only one user, so it is redundant to reapply the bonus
here.
If the only user is not a caller, TotalSecondaryCost will not be adjusted
anyway because callerWillBeRemoved is false. If there's no caller at all, we
don't need to care about TotalSecondaryCost because
inliningPreventsSomeOuterInline is false.
Reviewers: chandlerc, eraman
Reviewed By: eraman
Subscribers: haicheng, davidxl, davide, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29169
llvm-svn: 295075
And use it in MachineOptimizationRemarkEmitter. A test will follow on top of
Justin's changes to enable MachineORE in AsmPrinter.
The approach is similar to the IR-level pass. It's a bit simpler because BPI
is immutable at the Machine level so we don't need to make that lazy.
Because of this, a new function mapping is introduced (BPIPassTrait::getBPI).
This function extracts BPI from the pass. In case of the lazy pass, this is
when the calculation of the BFI occurs. For Machine-level, this is the
identity function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29836
llvm-svn: 295072
If we had SHT_GROUP sections, then when -r was used we might crash.
This is PR31952.
Issue happened because we emited relocation section though its target was discared
because was a member of duplicated group. When we tried to get VA of target,
segfault happened.
Core cause is the bug that GNU as 2.27 (and probably later versions) has.
In compare with llvm-mc, it does not include relocation sections into the group,
like shown in testcase. This patch covers that case.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29929
llvm-svn: 295067
Summary:
This is achieved by generalizing the expression selecting the StringRef
format_provider. Now, anything that can be converted to a StringRef will
use it's formatter.
Reviewers: zturner
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29898
llvm-svn: 295064
This reapplies commit r294967 with a fix for the execution time regressions
caught by the clang-cmake-aarch64-quick bot. We now extend the truncate
optimization to non-primary induction variables only if the truncate isn't
already free.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29847
llvm-svn: 295063
Summary:
There is no guarantee that the tls_init is executed on the static runtime
(/MT).
On windows 7, this unittest is failing.
On windows 10, I believe it's working because of the new CRT.
On ASAN side, it doesn't matter that the hook point is run or not.
It must be run only if there is other tls_initializer that are registered.
Reviewers: rnk, chrisha
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29838
llvm-svn: 295057
back into a vector
Previously the cost of the existing ExtractElement/ExtractValue
instructions was considered as a dead cost only if it was detected that
they have only one use. But these instructions may be considered
dead also if users of the instructions are also going to be vectorized,
like:
```
%x0 = extractelement <2 x float> %x, i32 0
%x1 = extractelement <2 x float> %x, i32 1
%x0x0 = fmul float %x0, %x0
%x1x1 = fmul float %x1, %x1
%add = fadd float %x0x0, %x1x1
```
This can be transformed to
```
%1 = fmul <2 x float> %x, %x
%2 = extractelement <2 x float> %1, i32 0
%3 = extractelement <2 x float> %1, i32 1
%add = fadd float %2, %3
```
because though `%x0` and `%x1` have 2 users each other, these users are
part of the vectorized tree and we can consider these `extractelement`
instructions as dead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29900
llvm-svn: 295056
Patch makes addends for addends of R_386_8, R_386_16 relocations
be sign extended.
The same we did earlier for PC ones,
currenly LLD fails to link linux kernel,
reporting relocation out of range because of this.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29714
llvm-svn: 295052
Summary:
Users might get confused easily when they see the check's message on
full template function speciliations.
Add a note to the output message, which mentions these kind of function
specializations are treated as regular functions.
Reviewers: alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29928
llvm-svn: 295048
Prevent memory objects of different address spaces to be part of
the same load/store groups when analysing interleaved accesses.
This is fixing pr31900.
Reviewers: HaoLiu, mssimpso, mkuper
Reviewed By: mssimpso, mkuper
Subscribers: llvm-commits, efriedma, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29717
llvm-svn: 295038
block or lambda.
This is a follow-up to r281682, which fixed a bug in computeBlockInfo
where the captured VarDecl's type, rather than the captured field type
of the enclosing lambda or block, was used to compute the layout of a
block.
This commit makes similar changes to enterBlockScope. This is necessary
to correctly determine whether a block capture requires cleanup.
rdar://problem/30388124
llvm-svn: 295034
Summary:
Function isCompatibleIVType is already used as a guard before the call to
SE.getMinusSCEV(OperExpr, PrevExpr);
in LSRInstance::ChainInstruction. getMinusSCEV requires the expressions
to be of the same type, so we now consider two pointers with different
address spaces to be incompatible, since it is possible that the pointers
in fact have different sizes.
Reviewers: qcolombet, eli.friedman
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: nhaehnle, Ka-Ka, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29885
llvm-svn: 295033
Etienne Bergeron