Add check for, and parsing of, .dwo files to Statistics.cpp; create a new getNon
SkeletonUnitDie function for DWARFUnit.h
Reviewers: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://review.llvm.org/D61755
llvm-svn: 360380
Add statistics for abstract origins, function, variable and parameter
locations; break the 'variable' counts down into variables and
parameters. Also update call site counting to check for
DW_AT_call_{file,line} in addition to DW_TAG_call_site.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58849
llvm-svn: 355243
DW_TAG_subprogram DIEs should not be counted in the inlined function statistic. This also addresses the source variables count, as that uses the inlined function count in its calculations.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57849
llvm-svn: 353491
DWARF v5 introduces DW_AT_call_all_calls, a subprogram attribute which
indicates that all calls (both regular and tail) within the subprogram
have call site entries. The information within these call site entries
can be used by a debugger to populate backtraces with synthetic tail
call frames.
Tail calling frames go missing in backtraces because the frame of the
caller is reused by the callee. Call site entries allow a debugger to
reconstruct a sequence of (tail) calls which led from one function to
another. This improves backtrace quality. There are limitations: tail
recursion isn't handled, variables within synthetic frames may not
survive to be inspected, etc. This approach is not novel, see:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/summit2010?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=jelinek.pdf
This patch adds an IR-level flag (DIFlagAllCallsDescribed) which lowers
to DW_AT_call_all_calls. It adds the minimal amount of DWARF generation
support needed to emit standards-compliant call site entries. For easier
deployment, when the debugger tuning is LLDB, the DWARF requirement is
adjusted to v4.
Testing: Apart from check-{llvm, clang}, I built a stage2 RelWithDebInfo
clang binary. Its dSYM passed verification and grew by 1.4% compared to
the baseline. 151,879 call site entries were added.
rdar://42001377
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49887
llvm-svn: 343883
Instead of indexing local variables by DIE offset, use the variable
name + the path through the lexical block tree. This makes the lookup
key consistent across duplicate abstract origins in different CUs.
llvm-svn: 342776
Errors found processing the DW_AT_ranges attribute are propagated by lower level
routines and reported by their callers.
Reviewer: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48344
llvm-svn: 335188
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
- Manual change to APInt
- Manually chage DOCS as regex doesn't match it.
In the transition period the DEBUG() macro is still present and aliased
to the LLVM_DEBUG() one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43624
llvm-svn: 332240
At the last LLVM dev meeting we had a debug info for optimized code
BoF session. In that session I presented some graphs that showed how
the quality of the debug info produced by LLVM changed over the last
couple of years. This is a cleaned up version of the patch I used to
collect the this data. It is implemented as an extension of
llvm-dwarfdump, adding a new --statistics option. The intended
use-case is to automatically run this on the debug info produced by,
e.g., our bots, to identify eyebrow-raising changes or regressions
introduced by new transformations that we could act on.
In the current form, two kinds of data are being collected:
- The number of variables that have a debug location versus the number
of variables in total (this takes into account inlined instances of
the same function, so if a variable is completely missing form only
one instance it will be found).
- The PC range covered by variable location descriptions versus the PC
range of all variables' containing lexical scopes.
The output format is versioned and extensible, so I'm looking forward
to both bug fixes and ideas for other data that would be interesting
to track.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36627
llvm-svn: 315101
Caroline Tice