registers.
This patch fixes a bug in r328731 that caused structs transitively
containing __weak fields to be passed in registers. The patch replaces
the flag RecordDecl::CanPassInRegisters with a 2-bit enum that indicates
whether the struct or structs containing the struct are forced to be
passed indirectly.
This reapplies r329617. r329617 didn't specify the underlying type for
enum ArgPassingKind, which caused regression tests to fail on a windows
bot.
rdar://problem/39194693
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45384
llvm-svn: 329635
registers.
This patch fixes a bug in r328731 that caused structs transitively
containing __weak fields to be passed in registers. The patch replaces
the flag RecordDecl::CanPassInRegisters with a 2-bit enum that indicates
whether the struct or structs containing the struct are forced to be
passed indirectly.
rdar://problem/39194693
llvm-svn: 329617
ObjC and ObjC++ pass non-trivial structs in a way that is incompatible
with each other. For example:
typedef struct {
id f0;
__weak id f1;
} S;
// this code is compiled in c++.
extern "C" {
void foo(S s);
}
void caller() {
// the caller passes the parameter indirectly and destructs it.
foo(S());
}
// this function is compiled in c.
// 'a' is passed directly and is destructed in the callee.
void foo(S a) {
}
This patch fixes the incompatibility by passing and returning structs
with __strong or weak fields using the C ABI in C++ mode. __strong and
__weak fields in a struct do not cause the struct to be destructed in
the caller and __strong fields do not cause the struct to be passed
indirectly.
Also, this patch fixes the microsoft ABI bug mentioned here:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41039?id=128767#inline-364710
rdar://problem/38887866
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44908
llvm-svn: 328731
This patch uses the infrastructure added in r326307 for enabling
non-trivial fields to be declared in C structs to allow __weak fields in
C structs in ARC.
This recommits r327206, which was reverted because it caused
module-enabled builders to fail. I discovered that the
CXXRecordDecl::CanPassInRegisters flag wasn't being set correctly in
some cases after I moved it to RecordDecl.
Thanks to Eric Liu for helping me investigate the bug.
rdar://problem/33599681
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44095
llvm-svn: 327870
This patch uses the infrastructure added in r326307 for enabling
non-trivial fields to be declared in C structs to allow __weak fields in
C structs in ARC.
rdar://problem/33599681
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44095
llvm-svn: 327206
So I wrote a clang-tidy check to lint out redundant `isa`, `cast`, and
`dyn_cast`s for fun. This is a portion of what it found for clang; I
plan to do similar cleanups in LLVM and other subprojects when I find
time.
Because of the volume of changes, I explicitly avoided making any change
that wasn't highly local and obviously correct to me (e.g. we still have
a number of foo(cast<Bar>(baz)) that I didn't touch, since overloading
is a thing and the cast<Bar> did actually change the type -- just up the
class hierarchy).
I also tried to leave the types we were cast<>ing to somewhere nearby,
in cases where it wasn't locally obvious what we were dealing with
before.
llvm-svn: 326416
ARC mode.
Declaring __strong pointer fields in structs was not allowed in
Objective-C ARC until now because that would make the struct non-trivial
to default-initialize, copy/move, and destroy, which is not something C
was designed to do. This patch lifts that restriction.
Special functions for non-trivial C structs are synthesized that are
needed to default-initialize, copy/move, and destroy the structs and
manage the ownership of the objects the __strong pointer fields point
to. Non-trivial structs passed to functions are destructed in the callee
function.
rdar://problem/33599681
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41228
llvm-svn: 326307
We can stash the cached transparent tag bit in existing pointer padding.
Everything coming out of ASTContext is always aligned to a multiple of
8, so we have 8 spare bits.
llvm-svn: 323528
We should (almost) never consider a device-side declaration to match a
library builtin functio. Otherwise clang may ignore the implementation
provided by the CUDA headers and emit clang's idea of the builtin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42319
llvm-svn: 323239
Extend the hashing to functions, which allows detection of function definition
mismatches across modules. This is a re-commit of r320230.
llvm-svn: 321395
An unscoped enumeration used as template argument, should not have any
qualified information about its enclosing scope, as its visibility is
global.
In the case of scoped enumerations, they must include information
about their enclosing scope.
Patch by Carlos Alberto Enciso!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39239
llvm-svn: 321312
whether they have an initializer.
We cannot distinguish between a declaration of a variable template
specialization and a definition of one that lacks an initializer without this,
and would previously mistake the latter for the former.
llvm-svn: 319605
These functions were defined as static members of TemplateSpecializationType.
Now they are moved to namespace level. Previously there were different
implementations for lists containing TemplateArgument and TemplateArgumentLoc,
now these implementations share the same code.
This change is a result of refactoring patch D40508. NFC.
llvm-svn: 319178
When we merge together class definitions, we can end up with the canonical
declaration of a field not being the one that was lexically within the
canonical definition of the class. Additionally, when we merge class
definitions via update records (eg, for a template specialization whose
declaration is instantiated in one module and whose definition is instantiated
in multiple others), we can end up with the list of lexical contents for the
class not including a particular declaration of a field whose lexical parent is
that class definition. In the worst case, we have a field whose canonical
declaration's lexical parent has no fields, and in that case this attempt to
number the fields by walking the fields in the declaration of the class that
contained one of the canonical fields will fail.
Instead, when numbering fields in a class, do the obvious thing: walk the
fields in the definition.
I'm still trying to reduce a testcase; the setup that leads to the above
scenario seems to be quite fragile.
llvm-svn: 318245
They might have different visibility, and thus discarding all but one of them
can result in rejecting valid code. Also fix name lookup to cope with multiple
using-directives being found that denote the same namespace, where some are not
visible -- don't cache an "already visited" state for a using-directive that we
didn't visit because it was hidden.
llvm-svn: 316965
This feature is not (yet) approved by the C++ committee, so this is liable to
be reverted or significantly modified based on committee feedback.
No functionality change intended for existing code (a new type must be defined
in namespace std to take advantage of this feature).
llvm-svn: 315662
When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a
redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module
("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible
redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we
pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule.
This reinstates r315251 and r315256, reverted in r315309 and r315308
respectively, tweaked to avoid triggering a linkage calculation when declaring
implicit special members (this exposed our pre-existing issue with typedef
names for linkage changing the linkage of types whose linkage has already been
computed and cached in more cases). A testcase for that regression has been
added in r315366.
llvm-svn: 315379
This works around a language issue where adding a typedef name for linkage
purposes changes the linkage of an already-defined class after it becomes
complete.
llvm-svn: 315256
When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a
redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module
("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible
redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we
pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule.
llvm-svn: 315251
Summary:
This is the follow-up patch to D37924.
This change refactors clang to use the the newly added section headers
in SpecialCaseList to specify which sanitizers blacklists entries
should apply to, like so:
[cfi-vcall]
fun:*bad_vcall*
[cfi-derived-cast|cfi-unrelated-cast]
fun:*bad_cast*
The SanitizerSpecialCaseList class has been added to allow querying by
SanitizerMask, and SanitizerBlacklist and its downstream users have been
updated to provide that information. Old blacklists not using sections
will continue to function identically since the blacklist entries will
be placed into a '[*]' section by default matching against all
sanitizers.
Reviewers: pcc, kcc, eugenis, vsk
Reviewed By: eugenis
Subscribers: dberris, cfe-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37925
llvm-svn: 314171
This doesn't affect our code generation in any material way -- we already give
such declarations internal linkage from a codegen perspective -- but it has
some subtle effects on code validity.
We suppress the 'L' (internal linkage) marker for mangled names in anonymous
namespaces, because it is redundant (the information is already carried by the
namespace); this deviates from GCC's behavior if a variable or function in an
anonymous namespace is redundantly declared 'static' (where GCC does include
the 'L'), but GCC's behavior is incoherent because such a declaration can be
validly declared with or without the 'static'.
We still deviate from the standard in one regard here: extern "C" declarations
in anonymous namespaces are still granted external linkage. Changing those does
not appear to have been an intentional consequence of the standard change in
DR1113.
llvm-svn: 314037
This implements the proposed approach in https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/33
This reinstates r313827, reverted in r313856, with a fix for the 'out-of-bounds
enumeration value' ubsan error in that change.
llvm-svn: 313955
If a function or variable has a type with no linkage (and is not extern "C"),
any use of it requires a definition within the same translation unit; the idea
is that it is not possible to define the entity elsewhere, so any such use is
necessarily an error.
There is an exception, though: some types formally have no linkage but
nonetheless can be referenced from other translation units (for example, this
happens to anonymous structures defined within inline functions). For entities
with those types, we suppress the diagnostic except under -pedantic.
llvm-svn: 313729
This follows the scheme agreed with Nathan Sidwell, which can be found here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cxx-modules?action=AttachFile
This will be proposed to the itanium-cxx-abi list once we have some experience
with how well it works; the ABI for this TS should be considered unstable until
it is part of the Itanium C++ ABI.
llvm-svn: 312467
This is a follow-up to r310436 with actual functional changes. Please
see that commit message for a description of why a cache is appearing
here.
Suggestions for less-bad ways of testing this are appreciated. :)
This fixes PR29160.
llvm-svn: 310437
This is patch 1 in a 2 patch series that aims to fix PR29160. Its goal
is to cache decl visibility/linkage for the duration of each
visibility+linkage query.
The simplest way I can see to do this is to put the visibility
calculation code that needs to (transitively) access this cache into a
class, which is what this patch does. Actual caching will come in patch
2. (Another way would be to keep the cache in ASTContext + manually
invalidate it or something, but that felt way too subtle to me.)
Caching visibility results across multiple queries seems a bit tricky,
since the user can add visibility attributes ~whenever they want, and
these attributes can apparently have far-reaching effects (e.g. class
visibility extends to its members, ...). Because a cache that's dropped
at the end of each top-level query seems to work nearly as well and
doesn't require any eviction logic, I opted for that design.
llvm-svn: 310436
Akira Hatanaka