Commit Graph

24 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Pavel Iliin 4d7df43ffd [AArch64] Out-of-line atomics (-moutline-atomics) implementation.
This patch implements out of line atomics for LSE deployment
mechanism. Details how it works can be found in llvm/docs/Atomics.rst
Options -moutline-atomics and -mno-outline-atomics to enable and disable it
were added to clang driver. This is clang and llvm part of out-of-line atomics
interface, library part is already supported by libgcc. Compiler-rt
support is provided in separate patch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91157
2020-11-20 13:30:12 +00:00
Kazuaki Ishizaki f65d4aa960 [llvm] NFC: fix trivial typos in documents
Reviewers: hans, Jim

Reviewed By: Jim

Subscribers: jvesely, nhaehnle, mgorny, arphaman, bmahjour, kerbowa, llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73017
2020-01-22 11:32:51 +08:00
Hans Wennborg e334a3a60f [docs] NFC: Fix typos in documents
"the the" -> "the"
"an" -> "a"

Patch by Kazuaki Ishizaki <ishizaki@jp.ibm.com>!

Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72091
2020-01-07 16:06:14 +01:00
David Tellenbach 0ecf34dde3 [NFC] Test commit, deleting some whitespace
llvm-svn: 372379
2019-09-20 09:43:31 +00:00
Eli Friedman c69273fa10 [docs] Clarify where the indirect UB due to write-write races comes from
This is based on https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42435#c3.

Patch by Ralf Jung.

llvm-svn: 366855
2019-07-23 21:51:26 +00:00
Alex Bradbury f612fadc51 [docs][AtomicExpandPass] Document the alternate lowering strategy for part-word atomicrmw/cmpxchg
D47882, D48130 and D48131 introduce a new lowering strategy for part-word 
atomicrmw/cmpxchg and uses it to lower these operations for the RISC-V target. 
Rather than having AtomicExpandPass produce the LL/SC loop in the IR level, it 
instead calculates the necessary mask values and inserts a target-specific 
intrinsic, which is lowered at a much later stage (after register allocation). 
This ensures that architecture-specific restrictions for forward-progress in 
LL/SC loops can be guaranteed.

This patch documents this new AtomicExpandPass functionality. See the previous 
llvm-dev RFC for more info 
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-June/123993.html>.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52234

llvm-svn: 347971
2018-11-30 09:23:24 +00:00
Sylvestre Ledru 7d5405069d fix some various typos in the doc
llvm-svn: 274449
2016-07-02 19:28:40 +00:00
David Majnemer cbf614a93b Remove the ScalarReplAggregates pass
Nearly all the changes to this pass have been done while maintaining and
updating other parts of LLVM.  LLVM has had another pass, SROA, which
has superseded ScalarReplAggregates for quite some time.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21316

llvm-svn: 272737
2016-06-15 00:19:09 +00:00
James Y Knight 19f6cce4e3 Add __atomic_* lowering to AtomicExpandPass.
(Recommit of r266002, with r266011, r266016, and not accidentally
including an extra unused/uninitialized element in LibcallRoutineNames)

AtomicExpandPass can now lower atomic load, atomic store, atomicrmw, and
cmpxchg instructions to __atomic_* library calls, when the target
doesn't support atomics of a given size.

This is the first step towards moving all atomic lowering from clang
into llvm. When all is done, the behavior of __sync_* builtins,
__atomic_* builtins, and C11 atomics will be unified.

Previously LLVM would pass everything through to the ISelLowering
code. There, unsupported atomic instructions would turn into __sync_*
library calls. Because of that behavior, Clang currently avoids emitting
llvm IR atomic instructions when this would happen, and emits __atomic_*
library functions itself, in the frontend.

This change makes LLVM able to emit __atomic_* libcalls, and thus will
eventually allow clang to depend on LLVM to do the right thing.

It is advantageous to do the new lowering to atomic libcalls in
AtomicExpandPass, before ISel time, because it's important that all
atomic operations for a given size either lower to __atomic_*
libcalls (which may use locks), or native instructions which won't. No
mixing and matching.

At the moment, this code is enabled only for SPARC, as a
demonstration. The next commit will expand support to all of the other
targets.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18200

llvm-svn: 266115
2016-04-12 20:18:48 +00:00
Rafael Espindola d41b54be11 This reverts commit r266002, r266011 and r266016.
They broke the msan bot.

Original message:

Add __atomic_* lowering to AtomicExpandPass.

AtomicExpandPass can now lower atomic load, atomic store, atomicrmw,and
cmpxchg instructions to __atomic_* library calls, when the target
doesn't support atomics of a given size.

This is the first step towards moving all atomic lowering from clang
into llvm. When all is done, the behavior of __sync_* builtins,
__atomic_* builtins, and C11 atomics will be unified.

Previously LLVM would pass everything through to the ISelLowering
code. There, unsupported atomic instructions would turn into __sync_*
library calls. Because of that behavior, Clang currently avoids emitting
llvm IR atomic instructions when this would happen, and emits __atomic_*
library functions itself, in the frontend.

This change makes LLVM able to emit __atomic_* libcalls, and thus will
eventually allow clang to depend on LLVM to do the right thing.

It is advantageous to do the new lowering to atomic libcalls in
AtomicExpandPass, before ISel time, because it's important that all
atomic operations for a given size either lower to __atomic_*
libcalls (which may use locks), or native instructions which won't. No
mixing and matching.

At the moment, this code is enabled only for SPARC, as a
demonstration. The next commit will expand support to all of the other
targets.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18200

llvm-svn: 266062
2016-04-12 12:30:25 +00:00
James Y Knight b91d38c5fe Add __atomic_* lowering to AtomicExpandPass.
AtomicExpandPass can now lower atomic load, atomic store, atomicrmw, and
cmpxchg instructions to __atomic_* library calls, when the target
doesn't support atomics of a given size.

This is the first step towards moving all atomic lowering from clang
into llvm. When all is done, the behavior of __sync_* builtins,
__atomic_* builtins, and C11 atomics will be unified.

Previously LLVM would pass everything through to the ISelLowering
code. There, unsupported atomic instructions would turn into __sync_*
library calls. Because of that behavior, Clang currently avoids emitting
llvm IR atomic instructions when this would happen, and emits __atomic_*
library functions itself, in the frontend.

This change makes LLVM able to emit __atomic_* libcalls, and thus will
eventually allow clang to depend on LLVM to do the right thing.

It is advantageous to do the new lowering to atomic libcalls in
AtomicExpandPass, before ISel time, because it's important that all
atomic operations for a given size either lower to __atomic_*
libcalls (which may use locks), or native instructions which won't. No
mixing and matching.

At the moment, this code is enabled only for SPARC, as a
demonstration. The next commit will expand support to all of the other
targets.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18200

llvm-svn: 266002
2016-04-11 22:22:33 +00:00
JF Bastien 800f87a871 NFC: make AtomicOrdering an enum class
Summary:
In the context of http://wg21.link/lwg2445 C++ uses the concept of
'stronger' ordering but doesn't define it properly. This should be fixed
in C++17 barring a small question that's still open.

The code currently plays fast and loose with the AtomicOrdering
enum. Using an enum class is one step towards tightening things. I later
also want to tighten related enums, such as clang's
AtomicOrderingKind (which should be shared with LLVM as a 'C++ ABI'
enum).

This change touches a few lines of code which can be improved later, I'd
like to keep it as NFC for now as it's already quite complex. I have
related changes for clang.

As a follow-up I'll add:
  bool operator<(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
  bool operator>(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
  bool operator<=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
  bool operator>=(AtomicOrdering, AtomicOrdering) = delete;
This is separate so that clang and LLVM changes don't need to be in sync.

Reviewers: jyknight, reames

Subscribers: jyknight, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18775

llvm-svn: 265602
2016-04-06 21:19:33 +00:00
JF Bastien 86d8d87640 Docs: dampen story time for atomics
Story time was nice a few years ago, but by now it's nice to state how things are, rather than explain the diff from ye olden atomic history. These were dark times.

llvm-svn: 265369
2016-04-05 00:31:25 +00:00
Ahmed Bougacha 5246867384 [CodeGen] Refactor TLI/AtomicExpand interface to make LLSC explicit.
We used to have this magic "hasLoadLinkedStoreConditional()" callback,
which really meant two things:
- expand cmpxchg (to ll/sc).
- expand atomic loads using ll/sc (rather than cmpxchg).

Remove it, and, instead, introduce explicit callbacks:
- bool shouldExpandAtomicCmpXchgInIR(inst)
- AtomicExpansionKind shouldExpandAtomicLoadInIR(inst)

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12557

llvm-svn: 247429
2015-09-11 17:08:28 +00:00
Tanya Lattner 0d28f80bd1 Rename all references to old mailing lists to new lists.llvm.org address.
llvm-svn: 243999
2015-08-05 03:51:17 +00:00
Dan Liew 460e0f4dfe [sphinx cleanup] Fix unexpected indentation warning introduced by r218937
llvm-svn: 218982
2014-10-03 12:28:48 +00:00
Robin Morisset e83f59e658 Update Atomics.rst
Summary:
I changed various bits of the compilation of atomics recently, and forgot
updating the documentation. This patch just brings it up to date.

Test Plan: no change to the code

Reviewers: jfb

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5590

llvm-svn: 218937
2014-10-03 01:04:20 +00:00
Jingyue Wu c4725da382 [docs] Fixed a typo in Atomics.rst
llvm-svn: 218319
2014-09-23 17:35:28 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer 2abde4f9d7 Update links to the gcc and java documentation that 404'd.
llvm-svn: 214700
2014-08-04 09:26:40 +00:00
Tim Northover 420a216817 IR: add "cmpxchg weak" variant to support permitted failure.
This commit adds a weak variant of the cmpxchg operation, as described
in C++11. A cmpxchg instruction with this modifier is permitted to
fail to store, even if the comparison indicated it should.

As a result, cmpxchg instructions must return a flag indicating
success in addition to their original iN value loaded. Thus, for
uniformity *all* cmpxchg instructions now return "{ iN, i1 }". The
second flag is 1 when the store succeeded.

At the DAG level, a new ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP_WITH_SUCCESS node has been
added as the natural representation for the new cmpxchg instructions.
It is a strong cmpxchg.

By default this gets Expanded to the existing ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP during
Legalization, so existing backends should see no change in behaviour.
If they wish to deal with the enhanced node instead, they can call
setOperationAction on it. Beware: as a node with 2 results, it cannot
be selected from TableGen.

Currently, no use is made of the extra information provided in this
patch. Test updates are almost entirely adapting the input IR to the
new scheme.

Summary for out of tree users:
------------------------------

+ Legacy Bitcode files are upgraded during read.
+ Legacy assembly IR files will be invalid.
+ Front-ends must adapt to different type for "cmpxchg".
+ Backends should be unaffected by default.

llvm-svn: 210903
2014-06-13 14:24:07 +00:00
JF Bastien e84854a125 Small correction to unordered memory code generation of ARM LDRD
The information was correct pre-LPAE.

llvm-svn: 184253
2013-06-18 23:07:16 +00:00
Sean Silva 92a44897a2 docs: Fix long standing linking antipattern.
Before we learned about :doc:, we used :ref: and put a dummy link at the
top of each page. Don't do that anymore.

This fixes PR14891 as a special case.

llvm-svn: 172162
2013-01-11 02:28:08 +00:00
Sylvestre Ledru 35521e2310 Fix a typo (the the => the)
llvm-svn: 160621
2012-07-23 08:51:15 +00:00
Bill Wendling 2908947b97 Sphinxify the Atomics documentation.
llvm-svn: 159416
2012-06-29 09:00:01 +00:00