Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Majnemer 791b88b6da [X86] Elide references to _chkstk for dynamic allocas
The _chkstk function is called by the compiler to probe the stack in an
order consistent with Windows' expectations.  However, it is possible to
elide the call to _chkstk and manually adjust the stack pointer if we
can prove that the allocation is fixed size and smaller than the probe
size.

This shrinks chrome.dll, chrome_child.dll and chrome.exe by a
cummulative ~133 KB.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17679

llvm-svn: 262370
2016-03-01 19:20:23 +00:00
David Majnemer c4ab61cb2f IR: Change inalloca's grammar a bit
The grammar for LLVM IR is not well specified in any document but seems
to obey the following rules:

 - Attributes which have parenthesized arguments are never preceded by
   commas.  This form of attribute is the only one which ever has
   optional arguments.  However, not all of these attributes support
   optional arguments: 'thread_local' supports an optional argument but
   'addrspace' does not.  Interestingly, 'addrspace' is documented as
   being a "qualifier".  What constitutes a qualifier?  I cannot find a
   definition.

 - Some attributes use a space between the keyword and the value.
   Examples of this form are 'align' and 'section'.  These are always
   preceded by a comma.

 - Otherwise, the attribute has no argument.  These attributes do not
   have a preceding comma.

Sometimes an attribute goes before the instruction, between the
instruction and it's type, or after it's type.  'atomicrmw' has
'volatile' between the instruction and the type while 'call' has 'tail'
preceding the instruction.

With all this in mind, it seems most consistent for 'inalloca' on an
'inalloca' instruction to occur before between the instruction and the
type.  Unlike the current formulation, there would be no preceding
comma.  The combination 'alloca inalloca' doesn't look particularly
appetizing, perhaps a better spelling of 'inalloca' is down the road.

llvm-svn: 203376
2014-03-09 06:41:58 +00:00
Reid Kleckner dfbed59cc2 Don't put non-static allocas in the static alloca map
Allocas marked inalloca are never static, but we were trying to put them
into the static alloca map if they were in the entry block.  Also add an
assertion in x86 fastisel.

llvm-svn: 200593
2014-01-31 23:45:12 +00:00